scholarly journals FOREIGN EXPERIENCE OF CRIMINALIZATION OF ACTS, RELATED TO NON-EXECUTION OF COURT ORDERS

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-132
Author(s):  
A.V. Kachmazova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Full Understanding ◽  
Court Order ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
The Social ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Court Orders ◽  
Criminal Legislation

A comparative analysis of foreign criminal legislation in this area contributes to a full understanding of the social and legal nature of crimes that infringe on the mandatory execution of court decisions. A comparative study of these provisions makes it possible not only to objectively assess the existing legal regulation of criminal liability for failure to comply with a court order, but also to develop ways to optimize it. The article presents the results of a comparative legal study of the criminal legislation of foreign States on liability for non-execution of a court order. It is concluded that criminal legal counteraction to non-execution of a court order is carried out in the prevailing majority of foreign countries. At the same time, a number of States have criminalized a wider range of acts in the field of enforcement of court orders. The author focuses on the features of legal regulation in this area, which can be productively used in modern Russian criminal legislation

scholarly journals Protection of the labor rights, freedoms and social interests in the criminal law: experience of foreign countries

2020 ◽  
pp. 32-35
Author(s):  
Tetiana LYSKO
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Labor Rights ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Labour Rights ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Social Interests ◽  
Labour Legislation ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The analysis of certain points of the criminal legislation of the foreign countries, which provide protection of labour rights, freedoms and social interests, is made in the paper with the help of comparative legal analysis. Despite the quite wide legal regulation of labour relations in all countries in the world, the special criminal law protection of labour rights has remained a feature of "eastern" countries of the continental family of law mainly, the so-called post-socialist family of law. The analysis of criminal legislation of foreign countries regarding criminalization of the violation of labour rights of a person is conducted in the paper. Comparative-legal analysis allows defining general approaches to formation of labour rights of employees, including in the sphere of contractual relationship. The most similar and corresponding to the national criminal legislature are the Criminal codes of Spain an Polish Republic, which establish criminal liability for violation of not only labour legislation in force, but also conditions of individual labour acts (agreements, contracts etc.). It is stated in the text that the protection of labour rights in the modern legislation of foreign countries often has fragmentary, unsystematic nature. The violation of labour safety rules is most often regulated in the criminal legislation of foreign countries. Other types of violation of the labour legislation are regulated with arbitration under administrative or civil legislation. The drawbacks of the fatherland`s legislation are mentioned and the main positive improvements in this sphere after adoption of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in 2001 are emphasized. It was made the conclusion that the list of crimes against labour rights, which are provided by modern criminal legislations, is strong enough and has specific features. The list mentioned above could be the target for improving Ukrainian criminal legislation in certain cases. Therewith it is important to remember that formation of the legislation in the sphere of the protection of labour rights, freedoms and social interests directly depends on the development of the regulatory legislation. It is the clarity and certainty of blanket norms that will become the fundamental basis for the formation of effective criminal law protection of labour rights, freedoms and interests.

scholarly journals Criminal environmental protection: international practices and priorities for improving

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (33) ◽  
pp. 102-120
Author(s):  
Oleh Kyrychenko ◽  
Yuliia Khrystova ◽  
Oleksandra Skok ◽  
Taisiia Shevchenko ◽  
Oleh Litun
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Documentary Sources ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
The Eu

The purpose of the research is to reveal international practices, criminal law protection and the system of punishments for environmental crimes in the field of environmental protection. Main content. The paper uses a comparative method to study the criminal environmental protection international practices of some European Union countries, in particular Spain, Germany and Austria. In addition, the study of model criminal law standards of the EU made it possible to evaluate them as a factor that leads to the unification and universalization of the criminal legislation of the EU countries in the field of environmental protection, harmonization of criminal law and related sectors. Methodology: Research of materials and methods based on the analysis of documentary sources and regulatory legal acts of foreign countries. The dialectical method of cognizing the social reality facts is the basis on which the formal legal and rather-legal approaches are largely based. Conclusions. The absence of developed unified approaches to its unification and practical application in the countries of Europe and Asia has been established. Attention is focused on the attempt of individual countries (the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Lithuania) to determine the criteria for the correlation of main and additional punishments, to establish criteria for the equivalent application of sanctions related to isolation and without isolation, and also to expand the boundaries of judicial review in the field of setting the degree and type of measures of criminal liability, depending on the factual and legal circumstances of the criminal case.

scholarly journals Special Confiscation as a Measure of Criminal Law under Ukrainian Legislation

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Tetiana Nikolaienko ◽  
Viktoria Babanina ◽  
Tetiana Bohdanevych
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
Foreign Law ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
European Standards ◽  
The Right ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The article is devoted to the study of special confiscation as a measure of criminal law, other than punishment, which was introduced into the legislation of Ukraine on the way of transformation and reformation of the institution of confiscation of property. The study found that the emergence of special confiscation was dictated primarily by Ukraine's choice of European integration and the need to fulfil its obligations to bring domestic criminal law in line with European standards and international legal practice in combating crime. The article notes that today the confiscation of property remains one of the most controversial measures of criminal law in both domestic and foreign law. Traditionally, in the criminal law of Ukraine, this measure played the role of one of the types of punishment. However, at the present stage of development of criminal law, the legal regulation of forced confiscation of property has undergone significant changes. Currently, this is not only a form of criminal liability, but also different from the latter, another measure of criminal law, which manifests itself in three forms, namely as: 1) special confiscation of property of an individual; 2) confiscation of property of a legal entity; 3) special confiscation of property in respect of a legal entity. The article analyzes the provisions of the current criminal legislation of Ukraine on the regulation of special confiscation as another measure of criminal law and considers the main problematic aspects of this institution in the doctrine of criminal law of Ukraine. The correlation between general confiscation and special confiscation was revealed in the article. The conclusion was drawn that these two types of confiscations are different in legal nature. Confiscation of property is a type of additional punishment, and special confiscation of property is an independent type of other measures of a criminal law nature. The main difference between the investigated institutions is that their application seizes property of different nature, namely: the subject of confiscation of property is property that belongs to the convict on the right of ownership, and in the case of special confiscation, property related to the commission of a crime is subject to confiscation.

scholarly journals Criminal liability for land damage under the legislation of the cis countries

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (Extra-D) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
Sergej N. Bezugly ◽  
Galia G. Mikhaleva ◽  
Irina V. Savelieva ◽  
Oksana S. Shumilina ◽  
Natalia Yu. Zhilina
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Environmental Safety ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Land Protection ◽  
Rational Use ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
The Future ◽  
Special Rules ◽  
Cis Countries ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The article includes consideration of the norms on land damage under the criminal legislation of the CIS countries, analysis of approaches to the legal regulation of land protection in criminal legislation. It is determined that not all criminal laws have the special rules protecting the land only. We analyzed the signs of land damage, revealed the specifics of objective signs of land damage, as well as analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of legal regulation in comparison. It is concluded that relations on the protection and rational use of land, ensuring environmental safety are very important for the uninterrupted provision of the population with a sufficient number of safe and affordable products in the future.

scholarly journals ON THE ISSUE OF CRIMINALIZATION OF CRIMINAL ACTS RELATED TO THE SPREAD OF CORONAVIRUS INFECTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-250
Author(s):  
E.R. Gafurova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Sociological Study ◽  
False Information ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Coronavirus Infection ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The article deals with the issues of improving the Russian criminal legislation on toughening responsibility in the context of coronavirus infection. The author analyzes the effectiveness of measures to tighten criminal liability for violations of quarantine measures in order to counter the spread of coronavirus infection in foreign countries and presents proposals for improving Russian criminal legislation, taking into account the data of a sociological study conducted among citizens of the Russian Federation. In order to study the norms of criminal legislation introduced by Federal Law No. 100-FZ of 01.04.2020, on liability for the dissemination of deliberately false information about circumstances that pose a threat to the life and safety of citizens, examples of judicial practice are given. There is a promising tightening of legal liability in the context of the spread of coronavirus infection in Russia based on the experience of foreign countries.

Improvement of the Legislation of Ukraine as to the Provision of the Protection of Banking in the Conditions of European Integration

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 2165
Author(s):  
Alyona M. KLOCHKO ◽  
Nikolai P. KURILO ◽  
Svetlana I. ZAPARA ◽  
Irina V. ARISTOVA ◽  
Mykola I. LOGVINENKO
Keyword(s):  
Banking Sector ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
External Threats ◽  
Banking Activity ◽  
Banking Institutions ◽  
Criminal Legislation

Euro-integration course of Ukraine has caused an intensive development of its banking sphere. The inconsistency between the possible legislative consolidation of criminal responsibility for socially dangerous acts in the banking sector and the objective needs of society in such protection becomes more and more obviousis in Ukraine. The processes of ‘clearing’ the banking system from financial institutions that are insolvent along with the positive results have led to an increase in the level of criminalization of the banking sector. Abuses aimed at taking possession of money from creditors and borrowers of banking institutions have become widespread. External threats to the stable functioning of the banking sector are combined with internal misconduct of unscrupulous bank managers, officials and persons related to the banks. Approaches to legislative regulation of suspicious banking transactions and to identify their real volumes must be improved. The measures aimed at reducing of the level of criminalization of the banking sphere by establishing criminal liability of managers and persons connected with the bank for unlawful acts in the banking sector must be taken. The certain issues of legal regulation of banking activity in Ukraine on criminal legal level are considered. The provisions of international law on these matters are  analyzed and the main ways to optimize Ukranian criminal legislation to ensure the safety of banking activity are suggested. It turns out that the need for criminal legal protection of banking is conditoned by an increase in the public danger of these acts at the present stage of the functioning of society. This need is also confirmed by the crisis in the financial and banking spheres of the state, the need to eliminate the gaps in the current legislation on banking safety and the changes that took place in the banking sector of Ukraine in the context of increased integration with the EU.

scholarly journals Draft Law on Criminal Misconduct given the German Experience of Legal Regulation

Lex Russica ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 133-141
Author(s):  
Ya. M. Ploshkina ◽  
L. V. Mayorova
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
A Minor

The paper considers the second attempt made by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in terms of introducing the concept of criminal misconduct into the Russian criminal and criminal procedure legislation, examines the goals of its introduction. The authors conclude that the introduction of a criminal offense in the draft law No. 1112019-7 will entail the need to review some approaches in Russian law: the legal nature of the crime, the ratio of a criminal offense with a minor act and an administrative offense, the elements of a crime with administrative prejudice, the principle of justice. It seems possible to achieve procedural effectiveness, reduce the burden on judges and protect the rights of victims without introducing a criminal offense within the existing criminal and criminal procedural mechanisms related to exemption from criminal liability and expansion of non-rehabilitating grounds for termination of a criminal case or criminal prosecution. It seems possible to use the already established categorization of crimes in relation to crimes of small and medium gravity. In terms of expanding the grounds for terminating a criminal case or criminal prosecution, it is appropriate to use the experience of the German legislator, which provides for the possibility of terminating criminal prosecution on grounds of expediency when the accused fulfills various duties and regulations assigned to him. In German criminal procedure law, the termination of criminal prosecution on grounds of expediency when assigning duties or prescriptions to the accused is the right of the relevant officials and bodies, and not their obligation, since in fact it is an alternative to criminal prosecution. This will allow it to be terminated at a certain stage in the case when there are all legal grounds for criminal prosecution.

scholarly journals La pérdida del interés (superior del menor) cuando se nace por gestación subrogada = The loss of interest (of the child) when born by surrogate motherhood

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 326
Author(s):  
Lorena Sales Pallarés
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Forum Shopping ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Surrogate Motherhood ◽  
Assisted Reproduction Techniques ◽  
Course Of Action ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Supreme Court

Resumen: Las contradicciones que el desarrollo de las técnicas de reproducción asistida provocan sobre los ordenamientos jurídicos tienen en la gestación subrogada su máximo exponente. A la mater­nidad tecnológica no la ha acompañado una adecuada regulación jurídica, lo que ha provocado que los tribunales y la DGRN convivan en una dualidad que provoca irremediablemente la pérdida del interés superior del menor. Tras cerrar las puertas a la inscripción de la filiación de menores nacidos por ges­tación subrogada, el TS apuntó a la adopción como modo de proteger los intereses de los menores. Sin embargo, recientes decisiones judiciales no parecen indicar que ese sea el camino ni más rápido ni más adecuado. Por tanto, hemos revisado diferentes planteamientos que el TS ha aceptado en temas análogos buscando una justificación o salida a estas situaciones. El reconocimiento por complacencia o el orden público atenuado son algunas de las opciones que se exploran ante la negativa actual de afrontar la de­manda social de una regulación justa y adecuada para todos los afectados.Palabras clave: gestación subrogada, interés superior del menor, filiación intencional, forum shop­ping, orden público atenuado, dignidad humana.Abstract: The contradictions that the development of assisted reproduction techniques provoke in the legal systems have in the surrogacy its maximum exponent. Technological maternity has not been accompanied by adequate legal regulation, which has caused the Courts and the DGRN to coexist in a duality that irremediably causes the loss of the best interests of the child. After closing the doors to the registration of the filiation of minors born through surrogacy, the Supreme Court pointed to adoption as a way to protect the interests of minors. However, recent court decisions do not seem to indicate that this is the fastest or most appropriate course of action. Therefore, we have reviewed different approaches that the SC has accepted in analogous issues seeking a justification or a way out of these situations. Re­cognition out of complacency or attenuated public order are some of the options explored in view of the current refusal to face the social demand for a fair and adequate regulation for all those affected.Keywords: surrogacy, best interests of the child, intended parents, forum shopping, attenuated public order, human dignity.

scholarly journals Legal analysis of the content of the category «criminal law impact»

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-13
Author(s):  
Valery F. Lapshin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Behavior ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Final Conclusion ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
The Social ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Relationship

The category of criminal law impact is currently being actively studied in the domestic legal science for the relationship with the content of the categories of criminal punishment, other measures of a criminal law nature, criminal liability. In the presented study, the problem of determining the types of criminal law influence and the peculiarities of their implementation, depending on the presence or absence of certain legally significant features, is posed. Given the stated problems, the subject of the study is determined in the form of criminal law norms that enshrine deprivation and legal restrictions that apply to persons who have committed a socially dangerous act prohibited by criminal law. The application in the process of research of a combination of general scientific and private scientific methods allowed us to formulate the final conclusion that the criminal legal effect is realized as a result of the application of criminal liability measures and other measures of a criminal legal nature. Criminal liability is realized on general and preferential terms. The basis for the use of the latter is the fact of positive post-criminal behavior, which significantly reduces the social danger of the perpetrator.

scholarly journals The goals of criminal punishment as a reflection of modern criminal policy

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-330
Author(s):  
V.V. Popov ◽  
◽  
S.M. Smolev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Criminal Punishment ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The presented study is devoted to the issues of disclosing the content of the goals of criminal punishment, analyzing the possibilities of their actual achievement in the practical implementation of criminal punishment, determining the political and legal significance of the goals of criminal punishment indicated in the criminal legislation. The purpose of punishment as a definition of criminal legislation was formed relatively recently, despite the fact that theories of criminal punishment and the purposes of its application began to form long before our era. These doctrinal teachings, in essence, boil down to defining two diametrically opposed goals of criminal punishment: retribution and prevention. The state, on the other hand, determines the priority of one or another goal of the punishment assigned for the commission of a crime. The criminal policy of Russia as a whole is focused on mitigating the criminal law impact on the offender. One of the manifestations of this direction is the officially declared humanization of the current criminal legislation of the Russian Federation. However, over the course of several years, the announced “humanization of criminal legislation” has followed the path of amending and supplementing the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: introducing additional opportunities for exemption from criminal liability and punishment, reducing the limits of punishments specified in the sanctions of articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and including in the system of criminal punishments of types of measures that do not imply isolation from society. At the same time the goals of criminal punishment are not legally revised, although the need for such a decision has already matured. Based on consideration of the opinions expressed in the scientific literature regarding the essence of those listed in Part 2 of Art. 43 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the goals of punishment are determined that each of them is subject to reasonable criticism in view of the abstract description or the impossibility of achieving in the process of law enforcement (criminal and penal) activities. This circumstance gives rise to the need to revise the content of the goals of criminal punishment and to determine one priority goal that meets the needs of modern Russian criminal policy. According to the results of the study the conclusion is substantiated that the only purpose of criminal punishment can be considered to ensure proportionality between the severity of the punishment imposed and the social danger (harmfulness) of the crime committed. This approach to determining the purpose of criminal punishment is fully consistent with the trends of modern criminal policy in Russia, since it does not allow the use of measures, the severity of which, in terms of the amount of deprivation and legal restrictions, clearly exceeds the social danger of the committed act. In addition, it is proportionality, not prevention, that underlies justice – one of the fundamental principles of criminal law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document