scholarly journals PENGARUH PROBLEM POSING DAN PBL TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR, DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Risnawati Amiluddin ◽  
Sugiman Sugiman

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan pengaruh pendekatan problem posing dan pendekatan problem-based learning; dan untuk mengetahui mana yang lebih baik antara pendekatan problem posing dan pendekatan problem-based learning ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, dan motivasi belajar mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin Baubau. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison-group design. Populasi penelitian mencakup seluruh mahasiswa pendidikan matematika Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin Baubau yang mengambil mata kuliah Kalkulus II. Instrumen penelitian meliputi tes prestasi belajar, dan angket motivasi. Analisis yang digunakan, yaitu uji one sample t-test, T2 Hotteling’s, dan uji independent sample t-test dengan data gain ternormalisasi. Setiap analisis dilakukan pada taraf signifikansi 5%. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) pendekatan problem posing dan pendekatan PBL berpengaruh positif terhadap prestasi belajar mahasiswa; (2) pendekatan problem posing tidak berpengaruh terhadap motivasi belajar mahasiswa sedangkan pendekatan PBL berpengaruh terhadap motivasi belajar mahasiswa; (3) pendekatan problem posing sama baiknya dengan pendekatan PBL ditinjau dari prestasi belajar mahasiswa; dan (4) pendekatan PBL lebih baik dibandingkan dengan pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari motivasi belajar mahasiswa.Kata Kunci: pendekatan problem posing, problem-based learning, prestasi belajar, motivasi belajar mahasiswa. THE EFFECT PROBLEM POSING AND PBL ON LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT, AND LEARNING MOTIVATION STUDENTS MATHEMATICS EDUCATION AbstractThis study aims is to  describe the effect of problem posing and problem-based learning; and to knowing the better approach between problem posing approach and problem-based learning approach viewed from the learning achievement, and learning motivation of the students of mathematics Education Department of Dayanu Ikhsanuddin University of Baubau. This research was a quasi-experimental study with the pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison-group design. The population included all students of Mathematics Education Department who took Calculus II. The instrument used including an achievement test, and motivation questionnaire. The test was analyzed by One sample t-test, T2 Hottelling’s and independent sample t-test with gain data normalized each analysis was performed at the significance level of 0.05.The research found: (1) the problem posing approach and PBL approach positive effect the learning achievement; (2) PBL approach affect student’s learning motivation while the problem posing does not; (3) the problem posing approach is equal good to PBL approach in achieving the learning objective; and (4) the problem-based learning approach is better than the problem posing approach viewed from student’s learning motivation.Keywords: problem posing approach, problem-based learning, learning objective achievement, student’s learning motivation.

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 234
Author(s):  
Markus Palobo

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving serta membandingkan keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dengan problem solving ditinjau dari sikap mahasiswa terhadap Kalkulus dan prestasi belajar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non equivalent comparison group design. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa Universitas Musamus Merauke. Sampel penelitian adalah mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika semester II yang dibagi dalam dua kelompok. Pengujian keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving menggunakan uji one sample t-test dan untuk mengetahui pendekatan mana yang lebih efektif menggunakan uji independent sample t-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) pendekatan problem posing efektif ditinjau dari sikap terhadap Kalkulus dan prestasi belajar; (2) pendekatan problem solving efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar; dan (3) pendekatan problem posing lebih efektif dari pada pendekatan problem solving ditinjau dari sikap mahasiswa terhadap Kalkulus.Kata Kunci: pendekatan problem posing, pendekatan problem solving, sikap terhadap kalkulus, prestasi belajar The effectiveness of problem posing and problem solving approach in calculus II learning AbstractThis study aimed to describe the effectiveness of problem posing and problem solving approach, and to compare the effectiveness between problem posing and problem solving approach in terms of attitude toward Calculus and learning achievement. This study was a quasi-experimental study using the pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison group design. The population of this study were student of Musamus University. The sample in this study were 2nd semester students of mathematics educations departement who were divided into two groups. To assess the effectiveness of the problem posing and problem solving approach, the one sample t-test was carried out and to determine the more effective approach, independent sample t-test was used. The results of this study show that (1) the problem posing approach was effective in terms of attitude towards Calculus and learning achievement; (2) problem solving approach was effective in terms of learning achievement; and (3) problem posing approach was more effective than problem solving approach in terms of students attitude toward calculus.Keywords: problem posing approach, problem solving approach, attitude toward Calculus, leraning achievement


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahmi Hidayati

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan setting TPS dalam pendekatan discovery learning dan problem based learning terhadap prestasi belajar, kemampuan komunikasi matematis, dan kemampuan interpersonal siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi eksperiment dengan pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. Sampel penelitian dipilih secara acak dari delapan kelas yang ada, terpilih dua kelas. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes prestasi belajar, tes kemampuan komunikasi matematis, dan angket kemampuan interpersonal. Untuk menguji keefektifan setting TPS dalam pendekatan discovery learning dan problem-based learning data dianalisis menggunakan uji one sample t-test. Untuk menguji perbedaan keefektifan, data dianalisis menggunakan MANOVA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa setting TPS dalam pendekatan discovery learning dan problem-based learning efektif terhadap prestasi belajar, kemampuan komunikasi matematis, dan kemampuan interpersonal siswa. Tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan setting TPS dalam pendekatan discovery learning dengan problem based learning ditinjau dari aspek prestasi belajar, kemampuan komunikasi matematis, dan kemampuan interpersonal siswa.Kata Kunci: setting TPS, pendekatan discovery learning, pendekatan problem-based learning, prestasi belajar, kemampuan komunikasi matematis, kemampuan interpersonal The Effectiveness of Setting Think Pair Share in Discovery Learning Approach and Problem-Based Learning in Circle of Junior High School Students AbstractThe purpose of this study was to describe the effectiveness of setting Think Pair Share (TPS) in the approach to discovery learning and problem-based learning in terms of student achievement, mathematical communication skills, and interpersonal skills of the student.  This study was a quasi-experimental study using the pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. The research population comprised all Year VIII students of SMP Negeri 1 Yogyakarta. The research sample was randomly selected from eight classes, two classes were elected. The instrument used in this study is the learning achievement test, a test of mathematical communication skills, and interpersonal skills student questionnaires. To test the effectiveness of setting Think Pair Share (TPS) in the approach to discovery learning and problem-based learning, the one sample t-test was carried out. Then, to investigate the difference in effectiveness between the setting Think Pair Share (TPS) in the approach to discovery learning and problem-based learning, the Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) was carried out. The research findings indicate that the setting TPS discovery approach to learning and problem-based approach to learning (PBL) is effective in terms of learning achievement, mathematical communication skills, and interpersonal skills of the students. No difference in effectiveness between setting TPS discovery approach to learning and problem-based learning (PBL) in terms of learning achievement, mathematical communication skills, and interpersonal skills of the students.Keywords: TPS setting in discovery learning approach, in problem-based learning, academic achievement, mathematical communication skills, and interpersonal skills of the student


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Abdul Khamid ◽  
Rusgianto Heri Santosa

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji keefektifan pendekatan Problem-Based Learning (PBL) dan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) ditinjau  dari kemampuan komunikasi matematis dan motivasi belajar siswa dan manakah yang lebih efektif diantara keduanya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu. Populasinya adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Margasari Kabupaten Tegal. Sampel penelitian kelas VIII-A dan VIII-H. Untuk menguji keefektifan pendekatan pembelajaran data dianalisis dengan uji one sample    t- test pada taraf signifikansi 5%. Untuk mengetahui perbedaan keefektifan pembelajaran data diukur dengan  uji Hotelling’s Trace pada taraf signifikansi 5% dan selanjutnya digunakan uji independent sample t-testuntuk mengetahui pembelajaran mana yang lebih efektif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: pendekatan PBL dan CTL efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan komunikasi matematis dan motivasi belajar siswa dan pendekatan PBL lebih efektif dibandingkan dengan pendekatan CTL ditinjau dari motivasi belajar siswa, namun tidak lebih efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan komunikasi matematis.Kata Kunci:  pendekatan Problem-Based Learning, pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning,   kemampuan komunikasi matematis, dan motivasi belajar siswa. The Effectiveness of PBL Approach and CTL Viewed from Mathematical Communication and Learning Motivation of Students Junior High School  AbstractThis study aims to examine  the effectiveness of Problem Based-Learning (PBL) and Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) viewed from students’ mathematical communication ability and learning motivation and which more effective instruction between PBL approach and CTL approach. This study was quasi experiment research. The population covered all grade VIII students of SMP Negeri 1 Margasari in Tegal Regency.  The sample of class VIII-A and VIII-H. To test the effectiveness of the PBL and CTL approaches, the data were analyzed using the one-sample t-test at the significance level of 5%. To determine differences in the effectiveness of mathematics teaching data were analyzed using Hotteling Trace at the significance level of 5% and followed by independent sample t- test to determine which approach was more effective. The results of this study show that: the PBL approach and CTL is effective to increase students’ communication ability and learning motivation and the PB L approach is more effective than the CTL approach viewed from students’ learning motivation but not more effective viewed from mathematical communication ability .Keywords: Problem-Based Learning approach, Contextual Teaching and Learning approach, mathematical communication ability, student’s learning motivation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miftakhus Sholikhah ◽  
Hartono Hartono

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan: (1) keefektifan problem-based learning dengan setting model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Numbered Head Together (PBL-NHT) dan problem-based learning dengan setting model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw; dan (2) pembelajaran yang lebih efektif antara PBL-NHT dan PBL-Jigsaw ditinjau dari prestasi belajar matematika, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan disposisi matematis siswa kelas X SMA. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu (quasi eksperimen), yang menggunakan rancangan pretest-postest non-equivalen multiple-group design. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes prestasi belajar matematika, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan angket disposisi matematis. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji multivariat (MANOVA) dan independent sample t-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kedua model pembelajaran ini efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis dan disposisi matematis, tetapi tidak efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar matematika. PBL-Jigsaw lebih efektif dibandingkan PBL-NHT ditinjau dari disposisi matematis, tetapi tidak berbeda jika ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis dan prestasi belajar matematika. Kata Kunci: problem-based learning, numbered head together, jigsaw, prestasi belajar matematika, kemampuan berpikir kritis, disposisi matematis   THE COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING OF NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER AND THAT OF THE JIGSAW Abstract This study aims to describe: (1) the effectiveness of problem-based learning of the numbered head together (PBL-NHT) type and that of jigsaw (PBL-Jigsaw) type, and (2) the more effective teaching between PBL-NHT and PBL-Jigsaw in terms of learning achievement, critical thinking skills, and mathematics dispositions of class X students. This study was a quasi-experiment using a pretest-posttest with the non-equivalent multiple-group design. The instruments used were a math achievement test, critical thinking test, and mathematics disposition questionnaire. The data were analyzed using the multivariate (MANOVA) and independent sample t test. The results of this study show both the models are effective in terms of critical thinking skills and mathematics dispositions, but they are not effective in their learning achievement. The PBL-Jigsaw is more effective than PBL-NHT in mathematics dispositions, but does not differ in terms of the critical thinking skills and learning achievement. Keywords: problem-based learning, numbered head together, jigsaw, learning achievement, critical thinking skills, mathematics dispositions


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Andriani Suzana

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk: mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan TGT; membandingkan keefektifan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan pendekatan CTL setting TGT ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan komunikasi matematis, dan sikap matematika siswa SMP kelas VII dalam belajar bangun datar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison-group design. Untuk mengetahui keefektifan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan TGT pada masing-masing variabel, digunakan uji one sample t-test. Selanjutnya, untuk membandingkan keefektifan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan TGT, data dianalisis menggunakan uji T2 Hotteling’s. Jika terdapat perbedaan keefektifan, maka dilakukan uji lanjut t-univariat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: pembelajaran matematika menggunakan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan TGT efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan sikap matematika siswa, namun tidak efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan komunikasi matematis; tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan antara pembelajaran menggunakan pendekatan CTL setting NHT dan pembelajaran menggunakan pendekatan CTL setting TGT ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan komunikasi matematis, dan sikap matematika siswa.  Kata Kunci: pendekatan CTL setting NHT, pendekatan CTL setting TGT, prestasi belajar, kemampuan komunikasi matematis, sikap matematika siswa The Comparison of the Effectiveness of CTL Approach of NHT Type and CTL Approach of TGT Type in Learning Planes AbstractThis research aims to: describe the effectiveness of teaching mathematics by using the CTL approach of NHT type and the CTL approach of TGT type; compare the effectiveness of the CTL approach of NHT type and CTL approach of TGT type in terms of mathematics learning achievement, mathematical communication ability, and mathematics attitude of 7th grade junior high school students in learning planes. This research is a quasi-experimental research with the pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison-group design. To determine the effectiveness of the CTL approach of NHT type and CTL approach of TGT type on each variable, one sample t-test was used. Furthermore, to compare the effectiveness of the CTL approach of NHT type and CTL approach of TGT type, the data were analyzed using a multivariate test of T2 Hotteling’s. If there were differences in effectiveness, then further study of t-univariate was done to determine certain variables that contributed to the overall difference. The results showed that: the teaching of mathematics using the CTL approach of NHT type and using the CTL approach of TGT type are effective in terms of mathematics learning achievement and mathematics attitude, but is not effective in terms of mathematical communication ability; there is no difference between the effectiveness of teaching using the CTL approach of NHT type and teaching using the CTL approach of TGT type in terms of mathematics learning achievement, mathematical communication ability, and mathematics attitude. Keywords: CTL approach of NHT type, CTL approach of TGT type, mathematics learning achievement, mathematical communication ability, mathematics attitudes of students.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 244
Author(s):  
As’ad Furqon Syadzili ◽  
Sukainil Ahzan ◽  
Dwi Pangga

This research aimed to know there is or no effect of scientific approach toward student’s motivation and learning achievement. The kind of this research was experimental research. Design of this research used pretest and posttest one group design, with population was all students of XI IPA at SMAN 1 Kopang. Sample of this research consist of two classes that is class XI IPA 1 as experimental group and class XI IPA 2 as control group which used random sampling tachnique. Mean of pretest was 23,21 in experimental group and 30,15 in control group. Mean of posttest was 74,74 in experimental group and 57,68 in control group. Percentage of student’s learning motivation was increased 59,85% (low) in experimental group and 64,65% (quite) became 82,40% (high) in experimental  group and 76, 56% (quite) in control group. The data of homogenity and normality was homogen and normal distribution. The data analysis used t-test. The result of t-test was 3,89 for motivation and 5,47 for learning achievement and t-table was 1,99 in 5% level of significant with t-test > t-table. This research showed that there is effect of scientific approach toward student’s motivation and learnig achievement at eleventh year students of SMAN 1 Kopang. 


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Lella Tahlilla Yasna

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan cooperative learning tipe Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) dan cooperative  learning tipe Jigsaw serta membandingkan keefektifan kedua pendekatan tersebut ditinjau dari prestasi, motivasi belajar, dan akhlak mulia siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi experiment dengan pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X MA Ali Maksum, sedangkan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X-E dan X-G. Untuk menguji keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan cooperative learning tipe STAD dan cooperative learning tipe Jigsaw ditinjau dari masing-masing variabel, data dianalisis menggunakan uji t-test one sample, sedangkan untuk membandingkan keefektifan pembelajaran menggunakan kedua pendekatan tersebut, data dianalisis secara multivariat dengan statistik uji two-group MANOVA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan cooperative learning tipe STAD dan tipe Jigsaw efektif digunakan dalam pembelajaran matematika dan tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan penggunaan kedua pendekatan tersebut dalam pembelajaran matematika ditinjau dari prestasi, motivasi belajar, dan akhlak mulia siswa.Kata kunci: cooperative learning tipe STAD, cooperative learning tipe jigsaw, prestasi belajar, motivasi belajar, dan akhlak mulia Learning Mathematics with Cooperative Learning Approach in Terms of Students’ Achievement, Motivation, and Noble Character AbstractThis study aimed to describe the effectiveness of mathematics learning using cooperative learning approach type Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) and cooperative learning type Jigsaw and to compare the effectiveness of both approaches in terms of students’ achievement, learning motivation, and noble character. This study was a quasi experiment research with pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. The study population included all students of class X MA Ali Maksum and the sample was class X-E and X-G that were selected randomly. To determine the effectiveness of mathematics learning using cooperative learning approach type STAD and cooperative learning type Jigsaw in terms of each variables, the data were analyzed using one sample t-test. Then to compare the effectiveness of mathematics learning using both approaches, the data were analyzed using multivariate statistical with two-group MANOVA test. The results show that the mathematics learning with cooperative learning type STAD and jigsaw was effective and there is no difference in the effectiveness of mathematics learning using cooperative learning type STAD and jigsaw in terms of students’ achievement, learning motivation, and noble character.Keywords: cooperative learning type STAD, cooperative learning type jigsaw, learning achievement, learning motivation, and noble character.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trisnawati Trisnawati ◽  
Dhoriva Urwatul Wutsqa

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan model pembelajaran (Quantum Teaching dan TGT) dan membandingkan keefektifan model pembelajaran (Quantum Teaching dan TGT) pada pembelajaran matematika ditinjau dari aspek prestasi dan motivasi belajar siswa. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian quasi-experiment dengan desain pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Yogyakarta, sedangkan sampelnya adalah siswa kelas VIII-D dan VIII-E. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes prestasi belajar dan angket motivasi belajar siswa. Untuk menguji keefektifan model  pembelajaran (Quantum Teachingdan TGT), data dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji one sample t-test. Untuk membandingkan keefektifan model pembelajaran (Quantum Teaching dan TGT), data dianalisis dengan menggunakan MANOVA kemudian dilanjutkan dengan uji t-Bonferoni. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran (Quantum TeachingdanTGT) efektif dan model Quantum Teaching lebih efektif daripada model TGT ditinjau dari aspek prestasi dan motivasi belajar siswa. Kata Kunci: model quantum teaching, model TGT, prestasi belajar, motivasi belajar  COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF QUANTUM TEACHING AND TGT IN MATHEMATICS’ INSTRUCTION VIEWED FROM ACHIEVEMENT AND MOTIVATION Abstract This study aims to describe the effectiveness of the Quantum Teaching and Cooperative TGT Models and compare the effectiveness of the Quantum Teaching models with TGT in mathematics’ instruction viewed from the students’ achievement and learning motivation. This study was a quasi-experimental study using the pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. The research population was all grade VIII students, while the sample is students of Class VIII-D and VIII-E. The data collecting instruments consisted of a students’ learning achievement test and learning motivation to questionnaires. To test the effectiveness of the Quantum Teaching and TGT models, the data were analyzed using one sample t-test. Then, to comparethe effectiveness of the Quantum Teaching models TGT models, the data were analyzed using MANOVA and continued using the t-Beonferroni test. The results of the study show that the Quantum Teaching and TGT models are effective and the Quantum Teaching model is more effective than the TGT models in mathematics’ instruction viewed from the students’ achievement and learning motivation. Keywords: quantum teaching models, TGT models, learning achievement, learning motivation


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-43
Author(s):  
Reski Rahayu Ramadan ◽  
Safei Safei ◽  
Eka Damayanti ◽  
Jamilah Jamilah

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji perbedaan motivasi belajar biologi peserta didik yang diajar dengan penerapan strategi belajar overlearning yang menggunakan media edmodo dengan tanpa menggunakan media edmodo di kelas XI MIA SMA Negeri 9 Sinjai. Penelitian kuantitatif eksperimen semu (quasi eksperimental design), ini menggunakan the static comparasion group design. Sampel berjumlah 29 peserta didik kelas XI MIA 3 di kelas eksperimen dan sebanyak 29 peserta didik kelas XI MIA 4 di kelas kontrol. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan berupa angket motivasi belajar. Data dianalisis menggunakan independent sampel t test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan motivasi belajar biologi yang diajar dengan menerapkan strategi belajar overlearning menggunakan media edmodo dengan peserta didik yang diajar dengan menerapkan strategi belajar overlearning tanpa menggunakan media edmodo. Rata-rata motivasi belajar yang diajar dengan menerapkan strategi belajar overlearning dengan menggunakan media edmodo lebih tinggi daripada peserta didik yang diajar dengan menerapkan strategi belajar overlearning tanpa menggunakan media edmodo sehingga motivasi belajar peserta didik dapat ditingkatkan dengan penerapan strategi belajar overlearning melalui media edmodo. Kata kunci: media edmodo; motivasi belajar; strategi belajar overlearning ABSTRACTOverlearning strategies using edmodo media can increase the motivation of students in learning biologyThis study aims to examine the differences in biology learning motivation of students who were taught by applying the overlearning learning strategy using Edmodo media and students who were taught without using Edmodo media in class XI MIA SMA Negeri 9 Sinjai. This quasi-experimental quasi-experimental research used the comparison group design. The sample consisted of 29 students of class XI MIA 3 in the experimental class and 29 students of class XI MIA 4 in the control class. The instrument of the research was a learning motivation questionnaire. Data were analyzed using an independent sample t-test. The results showed there is a difference in the motivation of the students who were taught by applying the overlearning learning strategy using Edmodo media and the students who were taught without using Edmodo media. Learning motivation taught by applying overlearning learning strategies using Edmodo media higher than without using Edmodo media. It concluded that the students learning motivation can be improved by implementing overlearning learning strategies with Edmodo media.Keywords: edmodo media; learning motivation; overlearning learning strategy


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nevi Narendrati

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan CTL dan pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan minat belajar matematika, dan menyelidiki manakah yang lebih efektif antara pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan CTL dan pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan minat belajar matematika siswa SMK. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu, dengan rancangan pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design. Populasi penelitian mencakup seluruh siswa kelas XI SMK Negeri 5 Yogyakarta. Dari populasi yang ada diambil secara acak dua kelas sebagai sampel penelitian. Untuk menguji keefektifan pendekatan CTL dan problem posing digunakan analisis one sample t-test pada aspek prestasi dan uji proporsi pada aspek minat. Selanjutnya untuk membandingkan keefektifan pembelajaran matematika melalui pendekatan CTL dan problem posing, data dianalisis secara multivariat menggunakan uji T2 Hotelling. Jika terdapat perbedaan keefektifan, maka dilakukan uji lanjut t-univariat untuk menentukan variabel tertentu yang berkontribusi terhadap perbedaan secara keseluruhan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan CTL efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar matematika; (2) pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan problem posing efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan minat belajar matematika siswa SMK; (3) tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan antara pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan CTL dan pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan minat belajar matematika siswa SMK.Kata Kunci: pendekatan CTL, pendekatan problem posing, prestasi belajar, minat belajar matematika A Comparison of Statistics Learning Through CTL and Problem-Posing Approach in Terms of Learning Achievement and Interest in Learning Mathematics AbstractThis research aims to describe the effectiveness of statistics learning through the CTL approach and problem posing approach in terms of learning achievement and interest in learning mathematics and to investigate which approach is more effective in learning mathematics for Vocational School students. This research is a quasi-experimental research using the pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design. The research population comprised all year XI students of SMK Negeri 5 Yogyakarta. From the population, two classes were randomly selected as the research sample. To test the effectiveness of statistics learning through the CTL and problem-posing approach, one sample t-test was used in the aspect of learning achievement and a proportion test on the aspect of interest in learning. The data were analyzed using the T2Hotelling’s test to compare the effectiveness of the CTL approach and problem-posing approach. If differences in effectiveness were found, then further study of t-univariate was done to determine certain variables that contributed to the overall difference. The results show that: (1) statistics learning through the CTL approach is effective in terms of learning achievement; (2) statistics learning through the problem-posing approach is effective in terms of learning achievement and interest in learning mathematics; (3) there is no difference between the effectiveness of teaching using the CTL approach and teaching using the problem-posing approach in terms of learning achievement and interest in learning mathematics among Vocational School students.Keywords: CTL approach, problem-posing approach, learning achievement, interest in learning mathematics 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document