scholarly journals Estratégias de retórica e enquadramento na cobertura do segundo mandato de Dilma Rousseff pelas revistas semanais brasileiras

Compolítica ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Marcos Paulo Da Silva ◽  
Raquel De Souza Jeronymo

<p><strong>RESUMO</strong></p><p>Este texto volta-se à matriz de referências da framing analisys para estudar o modo como duas das maiores revistas semanais brasileiras – Veja e IstoÉ – valem-se de estratégias retóricas para estabelecerem enquadramentos noticiosos semelhantes na cobertura do primeiro ano do segundo mandato da presidenta Dilma Rousseff. Como recorte empírico, o trabalho debruça-se sobre as edições dos meses de janeiro e dezembro de 2015, período marcado por uma profunda crise política envolvendo o Governo Federal brasileiro. Conclui-se que o tratamento realizado pelas revistas semanais estudadas, sobretudo em seus processos de seleção de fontes, hierarquização de informações e utilização de figuras retóricas, aproxima-se de um modelo de enquadramento noticioso hegemônico nos termos trabalhados por Gitlin (2003), Porto (2002), Sigal (1974) e Soley (1992), tais como: a simplificação, a dramatização, o silenciamento de atores políticos e a constituição de um padrão hegemônico das fontes.</p><p> </p><p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p>The article uses the framing analysis references in order to study how two of the largest Brazilian weekly magazines – Veja and IstoÉ – employ rhetorical strategies to similarly frame their news coverage of the first year of the second term of President Dilma Rousseff. As empirical frame, the study focuses on the issues of January and December, 2015, a period marked by a deep political crisis involving the Brazilian federal government. It can be concluded that the approach of the two weekly magazines, especially in their sources selection processes, hierarchy of information and use of rhetorical figures, resembles a hegemonic news framing model such as those employed by Gitlin (2003), Porto (2002), Sigal (1974) and Soley (1992), such as: simplification, dramatization, muting of political actors and construction of a hegemonic pattern of sources.

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-170
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Phillips

This article examines the boundary work of frames and the methodological significance of understanding this work when conducting rhetorical framing analysis. While the boundary properties of frames have been theorized by scholars, there remains a lack of clear engagement with how to effectively address these discursive boundaries methodically. I argue that agenda-dismissal, which makes use of both prolepses and blind spots, ought to be addressed in addition to agenda-setting and agenda-extension when conducting rhetorical framing analysis. A case study is provided in which the rhetorical framing of vegan parenting in online news media is analyzed and critiqued for confining the issue within a dominant health-based frame. Strategies for dismantling discursive boundaries and reframing public issues are also considered within the context of the case study.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 434-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Hammond

This article examines the problem of how to interpret competing, clashing or contradictory news frames in coverage of war and conflict, focusing on the reporting of the 1992–1995 Bosnian war. ‘Ethnic war’ and ‘genocide’ featured as competing news frames in news coverage of Bosnia and several subsequent conflicts, and are often understood to be contradictory in terms of their implied explanations, moral evaluations and policy prescriptions. The author questions the assumptions that many journalists and academics have made about these frames and the relationship between them. He asks how we can make sense of clashing or contradictory scholarly analyses of these competing frames and considers a number of broader issues for framing analysis: the significance of historical context for understanding the meaning of particular framing devices, the importance of quantification in framing analysis and the role of influential sources in prompting journalists to adopt particular frames.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey B. Arnold ◽  
Aaron Erlich ◽  
Danielle F. Jung ◽  
James D. Long

Scholars debate whether and how campaigns influence political behavior and electoral outcomes. No consistent theoretical framework, however, defines, measures, and analyzes election-related content from within the media's coverage, particularly in emerging democracies. We apply machine learning techniques on texts from nearly 100,000 news articles during South Africa's 2014 election, and use a theoretically-informed classification of election coverage to demonstrate how the conceptual scope of elections shapes voters' campaign information environment. Our results produce distinct representations of political actors and institutions during elections: a narrow classification provides heuristics cuing race, party, and incumbent performance; a broad definition reflects policy and service concerns parties debated. Topic models and word vectors show that campaign content clusters with parties and their associations with government performance and policies, but candidates vary in how much distinct coverage they obtain on valence issues. We provide methods and evidence to replicably study electoral news coverage across developing countries.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-72
Author(s):  
Tasya Fasa Anjani ◽  
Ika Novita ◽  
Shavira Amellia Damayanti ◽  
Saifuddin Zuhri

Abstrak. Terjadinya pandemi covid-19 telah banyak membawa perubahan secara global, kerugian dari berbagai sektor ikut dirasakan oleh masyarakat Indonesia khususnya dalam bidang tenaga kerja yang saat ini mengalami penurunan omset pada setiap perusahaan. Portal berita media online menjadi alat masyarakat untuk mengetahui informasi mengenai penyebaran wabah covid-19 terutama terkait dengan kinerja pemerintah dalam menangani lonjakan pengangguran yang saat ini sedang terjadi akibat banyaknya tindakan berupa pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeksripsikan framing berita media online terkait dengan efektivitas kinerja pemerintah dalam menanggulangi tingginya kasus PHK di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode analisis framing Robert M. Entman, dengan objek penelitian dari dua portal berita yang membahas kinerja pemerintah dalam menghadapi lonjakan pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) pada Tirto.id dan CNN Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa baik Tirto.id maupun CNN Indonesia memperlihatkan sisi positif dan negatif dari masalah tersebut, namun yang cukup terlihat yaitu sisi negatif dari pernyataan dan juga kritik yang dimasukkan dalam isi beritanya sedangkan CNN Indonesia dalam mengemas berita mengenai masalah tersebut dari sisi pro dan kontra. Namun yang lebih terlihat yaitu sisi pro.Kata Kunci : Analisis Framing, Berita, Covid-19, Media online, PHK. ABSTRACT. The occurrence of the Covid-19 pandemic has brought many changes globally, losses from various sectors are also felt by the Indonesian people, especially in the field of labor, which is currently experiencing a decline in turnover at each company. Online media news portals are a tool for the public to find out information about the spread of the Covid-19 outbreak, especially related to the government's performance in dealing with the spike in unemployment that is currently happening due to the many actions in the form of layoffs (layoffs). The purpose of this study was to describe the online media news framing related to the effectiveness of government performance in overcoming the high number of layoffs in Indonesia. The research method used is the Robert M. Entman framing analysis method, with the object of research from two news portals that discuss the government's performance in dealing with a spike in layoffs (PHK) at Tirto.id and CNN Indonesia. The results show that both Tirto.id and CNN Indonesia show the positive and negative sides of the problem, but what is quite visible is the negative side of the statement and also the criticism that is included in the content of the news, while CNN Indonesia in packaging news about the problem from the pro and counter. But what is more visible is the pro side.Keywords: Framing Analysis, News, Covid-19, Online media, layoffs.


2009 ◽  
pp. 27-42
Author(s):  
Jean Lpuis Briquet

- According to the standard thesis, the political crisis in Italy between 1992 and 1994 and the collapse of the Christian Democrat regime are related to the revelation of corruption of the political elite by the judiciary. However, judicial revelations and corruption scandals have regularly occurred in Italy, before and after this crisis, without provoking a drastic political change and the reject of the political system by the electorate. Considering this paradox, the article suggests an alternate account of the 1992-1994 events that underline the way in which the political competition had been affected by the scandals: the moral crusades against corruption had in this period a political impact because they had been relayed and supported by emerging political actors in order to challenge the established elites and to claim a leading role in reshaping the political system.


Author(s):  
Brian C. Harrell

This chapter explores the idea, and offers three real-life, classroom tested assignments, of using the rules of social media, specifically Twitter, to teach students the rhetorical moves needed to write essays of college length and quality. The assignments provide first-year composition students the tools necessary to read an academic article, understand the rhetoric behind it, and apply rhetorical strategies it to his or her writing. The three assignments: 1) rhetorically analyze Twitter and create a formula for an effective tweet; 2) rhetorically analyzing an academic article 140 characters at a time; and 3) rhetorically analyzing a student's own paper using these same 140-character sound bites, have shown to put students in a position to be successful in the academy. Each assignment has been fully vetted over three years, with a myriad of student examples. This paper shows that the rules of Twitter can be used academically to provide a knowledge base and scaffolding for student writers.


2011 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Héctor Perla

AbstractThis article examines the determinants of public support for the use of military force. It puts forward a Framing Theory of Policy Objectives (FTPO), which contends that public support for military engagements depends on the public's perception of the policy's objective. However, it is difficult for the public to judge a policy's objective because they cannot directly observe a policy's true intention and influential political actors offer competing frames to define it. This framing contestation, carried out through the media, sets the public's decision-making reference point and determines whether the policy is perceived as seeking to avoid losses or to achieve gains. The FTPO predicts that support will increase when the public perceives policies as seeking to prevent losses and decrease when the public judges policies to be seeking gains. I operationalize and test the theory using content analysis of national news coverage and opinion polls of U.S. intervention in Central America during the 1980s. These framing effects are found to hold regardless of positive or negative valence of media coverage.


2016 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 986-1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aysel Morin

The study identifies seven rhetorical strategies newspapers use to frame the acts of violence as terrorism or crime by comparatively analyzing the news coverage of the Ft. Hood and the Washington, D.C., Navy Yard shootings in three major newspapers. It examines the framing of the incidents, the strategies used to constitute the frames, the functions these strategies serve, and the media’s contribution to the discourse of terror.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document