Nudges as Behavior Change Interventions to Improve Health and Well-Being. Protocol for a scoping review (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuliano Duarte Anselmi ◽  
Luis Ortiz ◽  
Oriana Figueroa ◽  
Denise Laroze
Keyword(s):  
Behavior Change ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Behavior Change Interventions ◽  
Evidence Summary ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Health And Well Being ◽  
Improve Health

UNSTRUCTURED Objective Our objective is to map and summarize the evidence on nudges that assess behavior change interventions to improve health and well-being. Design This is the protocol for a scoping review Data source A comprehensive search will be conducted on Cochrane database of systematic reviews (CDSR); Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE); HTA Database; PubMed; LILACS; CINAHL; PsyclNFO; EMBASE; EPPI-Centre Evidence Library; WHO institutional Repository for information Sharing; NICE public health guidelines and systematic reviews; through an advanced search in the Epistemonikos platform. The search will cover the period until the day before this protocol is submitted to a journal. Eligibility criteria for study selection and methods Only systematic reviews (SR) will be included, which are operationally defined as any secondary research that includes only primary clinical studies, with the above search strategy applied in at least two databases that have assessed the use of nudges related to health, including SR of broader scope. Primary studies, clinical practice guides, abstracts and other evidence summary designs will be excluded. The electronic search results will be added according to the inclusion criteria. This manuscript will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) [10] Ethics and Dissemination Ethical approval is deemed unnecessary. The results of this review will be widely disseminated through peer reviewed publications, social networks and traditional media.

scholarly journals Nudges as behavior change interventions to improve health and well-being. Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuliano Duarte-Anselmi ◽  
Luis E. Ortiz-Muñoz ◽  
Oriana Figueroa ◽  
Denise Laroze
Keyword(s):  
Behavior Change ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Digital Interventions ◽  
Behavior Change Interventions ◽  
Overview Of Systematic Reviews ◽  
Behavior Design ◽  
Health And Well Being ◽  
Improve Health

This project offers a series of subprojects aimed at improving and strengthening public health through the design, implementation and evaluation of new and innovative evidence-based interventions in relation to: decision-making in health, sustainable development, planetary health, change of the behavior and digital interventions. It also includes experimental studies on decision architecture, behavior design, technological persuasion, theories of behavior change and "nudge" associated with prevention and promotion of global health.

Humanising health and social care support for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Protocol for a scoping review (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madison Milne-Ives ◽  
Rohit Shankar ◽  
Daniel Goodley ◽  
Kristen Lamb ◽  
Richard Laugharne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Developmental Disabilities ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Intellectual And Developmental Disabilities ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Improve Health

BACKGROUND Healthcare is shifting towards a more person-centred model, however, people with intellectual and developmental disabilities can still experience difficulties in accessing equitable healthcare. Given these difficulties, it is important to consider how principles such as empathy and respect can be best incorporated into health and social care practices for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, to ensure they are receiving humanising and equitable treatment and support. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the current research landscape and knowledge gaps regarding the development and implementation of interventions based on humanising principles that aim to improve health and social care practices for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study (PICOS) frameworks will be used to structure the review. Six databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Web of Science) will be searched for articles published in English in the previous 10 years that describe or evaluate health and social care practice interventions under-pinned by humanising principles of empathy, compassion, dignity, and respect. Two reviewers will collaboratively screen and select references based on the eligibility criteria and extract the data into a predetermined form. A descriptive analysis will be conducted to summarise the results and provide an overview of interventions in three main care areas: health care, social care, and informal social support. RESULTS Results will be included in the scoping review, which will be submitted for publication by December 2021. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review will summarize the state of the field of interventions that are using humanising principles to improve health and social care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

scholarly journals Are People with Aphasia (PWA) Involved in the Creation of Quality of Life and Aphasia Impact-Related Questionnaires? A Scoping Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 688
Author(s):  
Marina Charalambous ◽  
Maria Kambanaros ◽  
Jean-Marie Annoni
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Direct Involvement ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Impact

Background: Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires are used to describe the impact of aphasia on stroke survivors’ life. People with aphasia (PWA) are traditionally excluded from research, potentially leading to a mismatch between the factors chosen in the tools and the realistic needs of PWA. The purpose of this review was to determine the direct involvement of PWA in the creation of QoL and aphasia impact-related questionnaires (AIR-Qs). Methods: A scoping review methodology was conducted by an expert librarian and two independent reviewers on health sciences based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) protocol, through a literature search in five databases: Medline Complete, PubMed, PsychINFO, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Search terms included ‘stroke’, ‘people with aphasia’, ‘communication’, ‘well-being’, and ‘quality of life’. Results: Of 952 results, 20 studies met the eligibility criteria. Of these, only four AIR-Qs studies (20%) were found reporting the direct involvement of PWA, while no QoL tools did so. Evidence showed involvement in the creation phase of AIR-Q, mainly in a consultation role. Conclusions: There is an absence of a framework for conducting and reporting the involvement of PWA in qualitative participatory research studies, which limits effectiveness to promote equitable best practice in aphasia rehabilitation.

scholarly journals Indigenous perspectives on concepts and determinants of flourishing in a health and well-being context: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e045893
Author(s):  
Vicky Nelson ◽  
Sarah Derrett ◽  
Emma Wyeth
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Research Team ◽  
Indigenous Health ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Empirical Literature ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Health And Well Being

IntroductionIndigenous people, including Māori in New Zealand, face many inequities in health and the determinants of health. Historically, the analysis and reporting of Indigenous health in the literature has usually taken a western medical view, often with a descriptive and deficit-oriented approach—ignoring the holistic nature of Indigenous health. This project takes a nondeficit approach and is interested in the factors that support the health and well-being of Indigenous people, including Māori. Flourishing is a recent and increasingly used term within the well-being literature; however, concepts, theories and determinants related to Indigenous flourishing are largely unknown. This scoping review aims to identify, describe and synthesise the nature and extent of the current empirical literature related to concepts, theories and determinants of Indigenous flourishing, in health and well-being contexts.Methods and analysisScoping review methods and guidelines included in the framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews, will be followed for best practice and reporting of this scoping review. The literature for this review will be identified by searching the following databases: Medline (OVID), EMBASE (Ovid), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, MAI journal, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. The research team has formulated a systematic search strategy, which will be restricted to articles published between January 1970 and May 2020 and published in the English language. Two reviewers will independently screen eligible studies for final study selection. A third reviewer will resolve any discrepancies that arise. Data from included studies will be extracted and included in thematic analysis, using a tool developed iteratively by the research team.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was not required for this review. Dissemination of results will include publication in peer-reviewed journal articles, presentation of results at conferences and interactive discussions with a project expert advisory group. This scoping review also informs a larger project, examining the long-term health and flourishing of Māori, the Indigenous people of New Zealand and their whānau (families).

scholarly journals Chicken and Poultry Consumption and Human Health: A Scoping Review of Available Research Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Gavin Connolly ◽  
Caroline Clark ◽  
Adam Byers ◽  
Robyn Campbell ◽  
Jason Reed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Human Health ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this scoping review was to systematically search and chronicle the available scientific literature pertinent to chicken/poultry intake and human health. Methods The protocol was uploaded to Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/2k7bj/) and was conducted in accordance with recommended guidelines from PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension for scoping reviews (PRIMSA-Scr). Studies and scientific literature of all types (observational, experimental, narrative/literature reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses) assessing chicken/poultry intake and human health were included. Results A total of 13,141 articles were identified and 540 met the inclusion criteria. Among these 540 articles, 215 articles focused on cancer morbidity and mortality; 23 on cancer risk factors; 38 on cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality; 42 on CVD risk factors; 32 on diabetes morbidity and mortality; 33 on diabetes risk factors; 43 articles on body weight and body composition, and; 179 categorized as “Other”, which included nutrient status, psychological well-being/mental health, cognitive outcomes, microbiome outcomes, chronic kidney disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, skin disorders, and fertility, among others. Among the included articles, 413 were observational, 93 were reviews and meta-analyses, and 78 were experimental. Conclusions This inaugural scoping review that systematically identified existing scientific literature pertinent to poultry intake and human health provides a foundation for future systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It also underscores the need for new experimental research to complement the current preponderance of evidence from observational studies. Funding Sources National Chicken Council

scholarly journals Public health implications of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern: a rapid scoping review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e055781
Author(s):  
Mari Somerville ◽  
Janet A Curran ◽  
Justine Dol ◽  
Leah Boulos ◽  
Lynora Saxinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Health Measures ◽  
Infection Control Measures ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
The Impact

ObjectivesThe four SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC; Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta) identified by May 2021 are highly transmissible, yet little is known about their impact on public health measures. We aimed to synthesise evidence related to public health measures and VOC.DesignA rapid scoping review.Data sourcesOn 11 May 2021, seven databases (MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Central Register of Controlled Trials, Epistemonikos’ L-OVE on COVID-19, medRxiv, bioRxiv) were searched for terms related to VOC, public health measures, transmission and health systems. No limit was placed on date of publication.Eligibility criteriaStudies were included if they reported on any of the four VOCs and public health measures, and were available in English. Only studies reporting on data collected after October 2020, when the first VOC was reported, were included.Data extraction and synthesisTitles, abstracts and full-text articles were screened by two independent reviewers. Data extraction was completed by two independent reviewers using a standardised form. Data synthesis and reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.ResultsOf the 37 included studies, the majority assessed the impact of Alpha (n=32) and were conducted in Europe (n=12) or the UK (n=9). Most were modelling studies (n=28) and preprints (n=28). The majority of studies reported on infection control measures (n=17), followed by modifying approaches to vaccines (n=13), physical distancing (n=6) and either mask wearing, testing or hand washing (n=2). Findings suggest an accelerated vaccine rollout is needed to mitigate the spread of VOC.ConclusionsThe increased severity of VOC requires proactive public health measures to control their spread. Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence for continued implementation of public health measures in conjunction with vaccine rollout. With no studies reporting on Delta, there is a need for further research on this and other emerging VOC on public health measures.

scholarly journals Interventions across the retirement transition for improving well-being: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e030484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Rodríguez-Monforte ◽  
Carles Fernández-Jané ◽  
Anna Martin-Arribas ◽  
Mercè Sitjà-Rabert ◽  
Olga Canet Vélez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Personal Information ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Retirement Transition ◽  
Perceived Quality Of Life ◽  
Scoping Reviews

IntroductionThe work-to-retirement transition involves a process of psychologically and behaviourally distancing oneself from the workforce that is often accompanied by other social changes. The person is confronted with new social roles, expectations, challenges and opportunities that can influence lifestyle and well-being. In the scientific literature, we find recent reports of interventions aimed at improving health and well-being in people at retirement age. However, there is still a gap of knowledge on how different interventions during retirement might improve health status. We intend to conduct a scoping review with the aim of describing interventions for improving well-being across the retirement transition.Methods and analysisThe methodological framework described by Arksey and O’Malley; the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines as well as the Preferred Reporting Items for scoping reviews and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols statements will be followed. Eligibility criteria comprise of: (a) all type of original studies, review articles or reports published on journals as well as grey literature; (b) describing interventions to improve the well-being in adults across their retirement transition; (c) including participants before, during and after retirement; (d) all publications must describe variables associated with participants’ physical and/or psychological and/or social well-being and/or perceived quality of life related to these; (e) no language restriction and (f) published from January 2000 to March 2019. The main findings will be summarised using a narrative descriptive synthesis approach and grouped following the population, concept and context principles. A stakeholder meeting will be held to provide feedback on the findings and to develop next steps in research and practice.Ethics and disseminationApproval from a research ethics committee is not required, as no personal information will be collected. We plan to disseminate our research findings at different levels: scientific community, clinical and social arenas, as well as to healthcare leaders and policymakers and general population. The project has been registered at Open Science Framework with the name TRANSITS: work to retirement transition project.

Supporting the Mental Health and Well-Being of First Responders from Career to Retirement: A Scoping Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Erin Smith ◽  
Greg Dean ◽  
Lisa Holmes
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Help Seeking ◽  
First Responders ◽  
Well Being ◽  
First Responder ◽  
Help Seeking Behaviors ◽  
Holistic Approaches ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Health And Well Being

Abstract Introduction: First responders are at greater risk of mental ill health and compromised well-being compared to the general population. It is important to identify strategies that will be effective in supporting mental health, both during and after the first responder’s career. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the PubMed database (1966 to October 1, 2020) and the Google Scholar database (October 1, 2020) using relevant search terms, truncation symbols, and Boolean combination functions. The reference lists of all relevant publications were also reviewed to identify further publications. Results: A total of 172 publications were retrieved by the combined search strategies. Of these, 56 met the inclusion criteria and informed the results of this overview paper. These publications identified that strategies supporting first responder mental health and well-being need to break down stigma and build resilience. Normalizing conversations around mental health is integral for increasing help-seeking behaviors, both during a first responder’s career and in retirement. Organizations should consider the implementation of both pre-retirement and post-retirement support strategies to improve mental health and well-being. Conclusion: Strategies for supporting mental health and well-being need to be implemented early in the first responder career and reinforced throughout and into retirement. They should utilize holistic approaches which encourage “reaching in” rather than placing an onus on first responders to “reach out” when they are in crisis.

scholarly journals Economics of healthcare access in low-income and middle-income countries: a protocol for a scoping review of the economic impacts of seeking healthcare on slum-dwellers compared with other city residents

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e045441
Author(s):  
Noemia Teixeira de Siqueira-Filha ◽  
Jinshuo Li ◽  
Eliud Kibuchi ◽  
Zahidul Quayyum ◽  
Penelope Phillips-Howard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Impact ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Purchase Power Parity ◽  
Healthcare Access ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Power Parity ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Slum Dwellers ◽  
Scoping Reviews

IntroductionPeople living in slums face several challenges to access healthcare. Scarce and low-quality public health facilities are common problems in these communities. Costs and prevalence of catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) have also been reported as high in studies conducted in slums in developing countries and those suffering from chronic conditions and the poorest households seem to be more vulnerable to financial hardship. The COVID-19 pandemic may be aggravating the economic impact on the extremely vulnerable population living in slums due to the long-term consequences of the disease. The objective of this review is to report the economic impact of seeking healthcare on slum-dwellers in terms of costs and CHE. We will compare the economic impact on slum-dwellers with other city residents.Methods and analysisThis scoping review adopts the framework suggested by Arksey and O’Malley. The review is part of the accountability and responsiveness of slum-dwellers (ARISE) research consortium, which aims to enhance accountability to improve the health and well-being of marginalised populations living in slums in India, Bangladesh, Sierra Leone and Kenya. Costs of accessing healthcare will be updated to 2020 prices using the inflation rates reported by the International Monetary Fund. Costs will be presented in International Dollars by using purchase power parity. The prevalence of CHE will also be reported.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for scoping reviews. We will disseminate our results alongside the events organised by the ARISE consortium and international conferences. The final manuscript will be submitted to an open-access international journal. Registration number at the Research Registry: reviewregistry947.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document