scholarly journals Physiotherapy Questionnaires App to Deliver Main Musculoskeletal Assessment Questionnaires: Development and Validation Study (Preprint)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nestor Cavalcante Teixeira Neto ◽  
Yuri Lopes Lima ◽  
Gabriel Peixoto Leão Almeida ◽  
Márcio Almeida Bezerra ◽  
Pedro Olavo De Paula Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Paper Version ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
American Orthopaedic ◽  
Paper Format ◽  
Development And Validation

BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) translate subjective outcomes into objective data that can be quantified and analyzed. Nevertheless, the use of PROs in their traditional paper format is not practical for clinical practice due to limitations associated with the analysis and management of the data. To address the need for a viable way to group and utilize the main functioning assessment tools in the field of musculoskeletal disorders, the Physiotherapy Questionnaires app was developed. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explain the development of the app, to validate it using two questionnaires, and to analyze whether participants prefer to use the app or the paper version of the questionnaires. METHODS In the first stage, the app for an Android operational system was developed. In the second stage, the aim was to select questionnaires that were most often used in musculoskeletal clinical practice and research. The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) questionnaire were selected to validate the app. In total, 50 participants completed the paper and app versions of the AOFAS and 50 completed the FAOS. The study’s outcomes were the correlation of the data between the paper and app versions as well as the preference of the participants between the two versions. RESULTS The app was approved by experts after the adaptations of the layout for mobile phones and a total of 18 questionnaires were included in the app. Moreover, the app allows the generation of PDF and Excel files with the patients’ data. In regards to validity, the mean of the total scores of the FAOS were 91.54% (SD 8.86%) for the paper version and 91.74% (SD 9.20%) for the app. There was no statistically significant differences in the means of the total scores or the subscales (P=.11-.94). The mean total scores for the AOFAS were 93.94 (SD 8.47) for the paper version and 93.96 (SD 8.48) for the app. No statistically significant differences were found for the total scores for the AOFAS or the subscales (P>.99). The app showed excellent agreement with the paper version of the FAOS, with an ICC value of 0.98 for the total score (95% CI 0.98-0.99), which was also found for the AOFAS with the ICC for the total score of 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-0.99). For compliance, 72% (36/50) of the participants in the FAOS group and 94% (47/50) in the AOFAS group preferred the app version. CONCLUSIONS The Physiotherapy Questionnaires app showed validity and high levels of compliance for the FAOS and AOFAS, which indicates it is not inferior to the paper version of these two questionnaires and confirms its viability and feasibility for use in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Superior Pedal Function Recovery of Newly Designed Three Spike Insole Over Total Contact Insole in Refractory Plantar Fasciitis; A Randomized, Double-blinded, Non-inferiority Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Woo Shim ◽  
Seung-Yong Sung ◽  
Whan-Yong Chung ◽  
Jin Woo Lee ◽  
Kyung-Yil Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Minimal Important Difference ◽  
Information Service ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Research Information ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
American Orthopaedic

Abstract Background: Plantar fasciitis is one of the common foot complaints that is chronic and can induce dysfunction. Total contact insole (TCI) is simple but effective in treating plantar fasciitis. Nevertheless of the effect, the cost and the long duration for production have been the major flaws. Therefore, we developed newly designed three-spike insole (TSI) that can be commercially productive and compared the clinical outcomes with TCI.Methods: Patients with plantar fasciitis refractory to conservative treatment for more than 6 weeks were candidates. We produced insoles with hardness of 58 ± 5 Shore-A. Twenty-eight patients were randomly allocated to use either TSI or TCI evenly. The following assessment tools were used: visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, Karlsson-Peterson (KP) score, Short Form-36 for quality of life, and Foot Function Index. Non-inferiority was declared if VAS was within the statistical variability of minimal important difference. A blinded assessor evaluated the groups at baseline and after 6, 12, and 24 weeks.Results: The groups were homogenous for majority of variables at baseline. Overall patient-reported satisfaction showed improvement from mean 5.2 (range, 1 – 12) weeks of wearing and all clinical outcome scores showed significant improvements in both groups over time on the basis of Friedman test (p < .05). TSI showed non-inferiority to TCI at each time point. Post hoc analysis revealed that many scales showed significant superiority of TSI at 3 month (p < .0125) and KP score at 6 month (p < .001).Conclusion: We reaffirmed that semi-rigid insole is effective in refractory plantar fasciitis and showed TSI restores pedal function more rapidly than TCI. TSI can be not only effective in deriving better clinical outcomes but also be manufactured for popularization to lower the price and producing time of orthosis.Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0004737). Registered 28 February 2019 – Retrospectively registered, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/search_result_st01.jsp?seq=16839

scholarly journals Superior pedal function recovery of newly designed three spike insole over total contact insole in refractory plantar fasciitis: A randomized, double-blinded, non-inferiority study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0255064
Author(s):  
Dong Woo Shim ◽  
Seung-Yong Sung ◽  
Whan-Yong Chung ◽  
Kyung-Yil Kang ◽  
Sung-Jun Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Minimal Important Difference ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Long Duration ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
American Orthopaedic ◽  
Double Blinded

Introduction Plantar fasciitis is one of the common foot complaints that is chronic and can induce dysfunction. Total contact insole (TCI) is simple but effective in treating plantar fasciitis. Despite its effect, the cost and long duration for production have been the major flaws. Therefore, we developed a newly designed three-spike insole (TSI) that can be commercially productive and compared its clinical outcomes to TCI. Methods Patients with plantar fasciitis refractory to conservative treatment for more than 6 weeks were candidates. We produced insoles with hardness of 58 ± 5 Shore-A. Twenty-eight patients were randomized with equal allocation to either TSI or TCI. The following assessment tools were used: visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, Karlsson-Peterson (KP) score, Short Form-36 for quality of life, and Foot Function Index. Non-inferiority was declared if VAS was within the statistical variability of minimal important difference. A blinded assessor evaluated the groups at baseline and after 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Results The groups were homogenous for majority of variables at baseline. Overall patient-reported satisfaction showed improvement from mean 5.2 (range, 1–12) weeks of wearing and all clinical outcome scores showed significant improvements in both groups over time on Friedman test (p ≤.032). TSI showed non-inferiority to TCI at each time point. Post hoc analysis revealed that many scales showed significant superiority of TSI at 3 month (p ≤.008) and KP score at 6 month (p < .001). Conclusion We reaffirmed that semi-rigid insole is effective in refractory plantar fasciitis and showed TSI restores pedal function more rapidly than TCI. TSI can be not only effective in deriving better clinical outcomes but also be manufactured for popularization to lower the price and producing time of orthosis.

scholarly journals An evaluation of the efficacy of the locked plate with bone grafting in Sanders type III and IV intra-articular calcaneus fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 205031212110409
Author(s):  
Ali Varol ◽  
Yunus Oc ◽  
Bekir Eray Kilinc
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Locking Plates ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Calcaneal Fractures ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Heel Height ◽  
The Mean ◽  
American Orthopaedic

Objective: To demonstrate the efficacy of locking plate osteosynthesis performed by an L-shaped lateral approach in patients with Sanders type III and IV intra-articular calcaneal fractures with posterior facet displacement. Methods: Fifty-three patients with Sanders type III or IV unilateral calcaneal fractures treated with locking plates and additional bone grafting were included in the study. Böhler and Gissane angles, and heel height values were measured on the radiological examinations. Clinical results of the patients were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society and Maryland evaluation criteria. The presence of arthrosis was investigated with Broden’s view. Preoperative and postoperative values were evaluated. Results: The mean Gissane angle was 119.32°, the mean Böhler angle was 9.47° and the mean heel height was 40.82 mm on radiographs at initial presentation of the patients. The mean Gissane angle was 114.63°, the mean Böhler angle was 23.33° and the mean heel height was 47.84 mm on the early postoperative radiographs of the patients. In patients, a mean 4.69° recovery was achieved in the Gissane angle, 13.86° in Böhler angle and 7.02 mm in heel height. On the most recent follow-up, Böhler angle was 21.49°, Gissane was 114.88° and the mean heel height was 46.95 mm. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score and Maryland score were 86.91 and 86.53, respectively, on the last follow-up. Conclusion: Internal fixation and grephonage using low-profile locking plates provides good functional results to patients since it facilitates anatomic restoration of the subtalar joint and correction of calcaneal height, width and varus/valgus heel.

Results of an Internet Survey Determining the Most Frequently Used Ankle Scores by AOFAS Members

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 479-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johnny T.C. Lau ◽  
Nizar M. Mahomed ◽  
Lew C. Schon
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Management System ◽  
Data Evaluation ◽  
Internet Survey ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Foot Function ◽  
American Orthopaedic ◽  
Results Of Surgery

Background: With technological advances in ankle arthroplasty, there has been parallel development in the outcome instruments used to assess the results of surgery. The literature recommends the use of valid, reliable, and responsive ankle scores, but the ankle scores commonly used in clinical practice remain undefined. Methods: An internet survey of members of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) was conducted to determine which three ankle scores they perceived as most commonly used in the literature, which ones they believe are validated, which ones they prefer, and which they use in practice. Results: According to respondents, the three most commonly used scores were the AOFAS Ankle score, the Foot Function Index (FFI), and the Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System (MODEMS). The respondents believed that the AOFAS Ankle score, FFI, and MODEMS were validated. The FFI and MODEMS are validated, but the AOFAS ankle score is not validated. Conclusions: Most respondents preferred using the AOFAS Ankle score. The use of the empirical AOFAS Ankle score continues among AOFAS members.

Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing to the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure

2020 ◽  
pp. 107110072097266
Author(s):  
Joseph T. O’Neil ◽  
Otho R. Plummer ◽  
Steven M. Raikin
Keyword(s):  
Computerized Adaptive Testing ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Adaptive Testing ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Ability Measure ◽  
The Impact

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures are an increasingly important tool for assessing the impact of treatments orthopedic surgeons render. Despite their importance, they can present a burden. We examined the validity and utility of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) method to reduce the number of questions on the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), a validated anatomy-specific outcome measure. Methods: A previously developed FAAM CAT system was applied to the responses of patients undergoing foot and ankle evaluation and treatment over a 3-year period (2017-2019). A total of 15 902 responses for the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) subscale and a total of 14 344 responses for the Sports subscale were analyzed. The accuracy of the CAT to replicate the full-form score was assessed. Results: The CAT system required 11 questions to be answered for the ADL subscale in 85.1% of cases (range, 11-12). The number of questions answered on the Sports subscale was 6 (range, 5-6) in 66.4% of cases. The mean difference between the full FAAM ADL subscale and CAT was 0.63 of a point. The mean difference between the FAAM Sports subscale and CAT was 0.65 of a point. Conclusion: The FAAM CAT was able to reduce the number of responses a patient would need to answer by nearly 50%, while still providing a valid outcome score. This measure can therefore be directly correlated with previously obtained full FAAM scores in addition to providing a foot/ankle-specific measure, which previously reported CAT systems are not able to do. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

scholarly journals Comparison of Visual Analog Pain Score Reported to Physician vs Nurse in Nonoperatively Treated Foot and Ankle Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 1444-1448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin D. Martin ◽  
Trevor McBride ◽  
Jeffrey Wake ◽  
Jeffrey Preston Van Buren ◽  
Cuyler Dewar
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are taking a more prominent role in orthopedics as health care seeks to define treatment outcomes. The visual analog scale (VAS) is considered a reliable measure of acute pain. A previous study found that operative candidates’ VAS pain score was significantly higher when reported to the surgeon compared to the nurse. This study’s aim is to examine whether this phenomenon occurs in patients that do not undergo an operative procedure. We hypothesized that patients’ VAS pain scores reported to the surgeon vs the nurse would be the same. Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort of 201 consecutive nonoperative foot and ankle patients treated by a single surgeon. Patients were asked to rate pain intensity by a nurse followed by the surgeon using a horizontal VAS, 0 “no pain” to 10 “worst pain.” Differences in reported pain levels were compared with data from the previous cohort of 201 consecutive operative foot and ankle patients. Results: The mean VAS score reported to the nurse was 3.2 whereas the mean VAS score reported to the surgeon was 4.2 ( P < .001). The mean difference in VAS scores reported for operative patients was 2.9, whereas the mean difference for nonoperative patients was 1.0 ( P < .001). Conclusion: This study found statistically significant differences between VAS pain scores reported to the surgeon vs the nurse in nonoperative patients. These results support the trend found in our previous study, where operative patients reported significantly higher pain scores to the surgeon vs the nurse. The mean difference between reported pain scores was significantly higher for operative patients compared to nonoperative patients. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study.

scholarly journals Management of mal-united Pilon fractures with joint-sparing osteotomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0052
Author(s):  
Guang-rong Yu
Keyword(s):  
Type Ii ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Aofas Score ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Articular Surfaces ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
American Orthopaedic ◽  
Time From Injury ◽  
Pilon Fractures

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: To explore the effectiveness and operative methods to treat various mal-united Pilon fractures with joint-sparing osteotomy. Methods: Between January 2011 and October 2016, 21 patients with mal-united Pilon fractures were treated with joint-sparing osteotomy. There were 13 males and 8 females with an average age of 38.4 years (range, 22-48 years). 14 were left feet and 7, right. The time from injury to reconstructive operation was 4 months to 10 years. 17 received operative treatment previously, and 4 were treated by plaster fixation. According to Rüedi-Allgöwer classification, 16 were rated as type II (including 6 medial Pilon fractures, 5 anterior, 5 posterior) and 5, type III. All patients received standardized postoperative managements. Results: All patients were followed up for more than 1 year. All the fractures were reunited in an average time of 13.8 weeks (range 9 to 18 weeks). The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 2.42 (range 0 to 5) and the mean ankle and hindfoot scale of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 78.81(range 65 to 92) 6 months after operation. The VAS score was 5.27 (range 2 to 7) and the AOFAS score was 57.26 (range 20 to 81) before. Comparing to preoperative data, statistically significant difference was found postoperatively (P<0.05). Conclusion: Results by joint-sparing osteotomy to realign and reconstruct articular surfaces of ankles are acceptable. Functions and symptoms are improved significantly after operation. Joint-sparing osteotomy can be a considerable option for treating mal-united Pilon fractures.

scholarly journals Authorship and Citations in Foot and Ankle International from 1980-2017

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0015
Author(s):  
Daniel Bohl ◽  
Connor Wakefield ◽  
Emily He ◽  
Kamran Movassaghi ◽  
George Holmes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Reports ◽  
Country Of Origin ◽  
The United States ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Research Journal ◽  
Ankle Research ◽  
The Mean ◽  
American Orthopaedic ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Number Of Authors

Category: Other Introduction/Purpose: Orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery is a young and rapidly evolving orthopaedic subspecialty. Little is known regarding the authors contributing to the field. The purpose of this study is to characterize the demographics of the authors publishing foot and ankle research since the inception of the research journal of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Methods: All publications in the journal Foot and Ankle International between 1980 and 2017 were reviewed. Papers were characterized in terms of number of authors, number of institutions, and number of references. The first and corresponding authors were also characterized in terms of country of origin, gender, and degree qualification. Each of these characteristics was tested for trends over time. Results: In total, 5,323 publications were reviewed, including 4,297 research articles, 367 case reports, 262 editorials, 159 letters, and 121 technique tips. The mean number of authors per paper increased from 2.3 during the 1980s to 4.3 during the 2010s (p<0.001). The percent of publications with female first authors increased from 4.9% during the 1980s to 13.2% during the 2010s (p<0.001). The country of origin shifted markedly away from the United States during the 1980s towards Europe and other countries during the 2010s (Figure 1). Podiatrists consisted of 1.3% of first authors and 1.4% of corresponding authors—these proportions did not meaningfully change over time (p>0.05). The mean number of references to other work increased from 13.8 during the 1980s to 24.4 during the 2010s (p<0.001). Conclusion: The authors of the foot and ankle literature have changed markedly over the past 4 decades. Most notably, there have been shifts towards female and international authorship. The number of authors per paper has also nearly doubled over time. Such trends are likely to continue as the field of foot and ankle grows.

Assessment tools for palliative care.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 66-66
Author(s):  
Sarina Isenberg ◽  
Rebecca Aslakson ◽  
Sydney Morss Dy ◽  
Renee Wilson ◽  
Julie Waldfogel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Patient Reported

66 Background: Recent reviews have not comprehensively addressed palliative care (PC) assessment tools. This project summarizes the extent of evidence about PC assessment tools for patients and families, and how tools have been used for clinical care, quality indicators, and evaluation of interventions. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for systematic reviews of assessment tools for PC, from January 2007 to March 2016. We searched the grey literature for domains without systematic reviews, and for domains with systematic reviews > three years old. Paired investigators independently screened search results and grey literature to determine eligibility, and assessed risk of bias of systematic reviews. The team selected the most recent and highest-quality systematic reviews for each domain. One investigator abstracted information, and a second investigator checked the information. Results: Using the National Consensus Project Palliative Care Guidelines domains, we included nine systematic reviews with 167 tools, and six tools from grey literature. Most tools were in physical, psychological, psychiatric, and social aspects of care, care at the end of life, and tools that cross domains (quality of life and caregiver-reported experience). Only two tools directly addressed spiritual aspects and none addressed cultural or patient-reported experience. Internal consistency reliability was evaluated for almost all tools; most reported construct validity; and few reported responsiveness (sensitivity to change). Few studies evaluated the use of assessment tools in quality indicators or clinical practice. A systematic review of 38 PC interventions and the assessment tools used found that at least 25 interventions included physical, psychosocial and psychiatric, and quality of life tools, but the tools varied extensively, and only nine included patient experience tools. Conclusions: Although assessment tools exist in many PC domains, tools are needed to assess spiritual and cultural aspects of care, and patient-reported experience. Research is needed concerning: tools in clinical practice and quality of care; comparison of existing tools; and evaluation and dissemination tools with evidence of responsiveness.

scholarly journals Evaluation of functional outcome following ORIF of bimalleolar fractures of the ankle-A prospective study of 30 patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 6051-6055
Author(s):  
Yeshwanth subash ◽  
Vishnu S ◽  
Damodharan
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
The Mean ◽  
American Orthopaedic ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Mean Time

Bimalleolar fractures are common injuries, and stable fracture patterns can be treated conservatively, while complicated, unstable fractures would require surgical intervention. This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcome following ORIF (Open reduction and internal fixation) of these fractures. This was a study of 30 patients with bimalleolar fractures who presented between January 2013 to January 2016 treated with ORIF with a follow-up period of 3 years. Functional outcome was performed with the AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and ankle society) score. The mean age of the patients was 41.6 years. There was a female preponderance seen in our study with the left side being more commonly affected. The mean time to fracture union was 12.13 weeks, and we had excellent outcomes in 18 patients, good in 10, while two patients had a fair result. We did not lose any of our patients to follow up. All of our patients were happy with the functional outcome achieved. No significant complications were seen in our study. ORIF in bimalleolar fractures enables restoration of the ankle mortise to an anatomical position and facilitates early mobilization of the ankle resulting in good functional outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document