scholarly journals Mengapa PBL (Masih) Diperdebatkan di Fakultas Kedokteran?

Author(s):  
Elisabeth Rukmini

Problem-based learning (PBL) has been implemented widely in most of faculty of medicine in Indonesia. Nevertheless, PBL as a learning method is still debated. This article tried to unravel the debate of PBL implementation in medical schools, as well as recommending important notes in order to find a well-defined PBL and to improve its implementation. PBL should be acknowledged as one of the student centered learning methods. Therefore, this condition would not rule out the possibility of the empirical progress in PBL implementation in faculty of medicine in Indonesia.

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Try Ayu Patmawati ◽  
Ariyanti Saleh ◽  
Syahrul Syahrul

Background : Critical thinking of nursing students have to be increased considering the importance of these things in making decisions, problem solving and clinical judgment and supported by self confidence. Although critical thinking and self confidence are important, but all of students are not able to do that. For this reason, clinical instructor have to make innovation through learning methods to achieve this. The purpose of this literature review is to identify the clinical learning method affecting the critical thinking and self confidence of nursing students.Method:   the data base used in making this review of literature are Pubmed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar published in 2007-2018. Result:  From the 12 articles used in this literature review, it was found that in order to improve the critical thinking and self confidence of nursing students in a clinical environment, the clinical supervisor can use student-centered learning methods and can even involve patients. The learning methods include simulation, nursing round method, demonstration models, clinical conference, and concept mappimg.Conclusion :   the learning method affected the critical thinking and self confidence of nursing students including clinical conference, simulations, demonstration models, concept mapping and nursing rounds. Therefore the supervisor must be able to know and choose what method is appropriate for clinical guidance.  


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-71
Author(s):  
Heru Raharjo ◽  
M. Khairudin ◽  
Jamil Abd Baser

One of the student-centered learning methods which is able to improve the students’ learning outcomes is Problem-Based Learning (PBL). This study examined (1) the difference in the learning results of students using PBL and Direct Teaching (DT) with high and low learning motivation and creativity, (2) the influence of learning methods with motivation and creativity toward learning outcomes, and (3) the difference in the learning results of students using PBL and DT in terms of learning motivation and creativity. The subject consisted of students of Vocational High Schools or Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan N 1 Ngawen. The data analysis used an ANOVA test and a T-test. The results revealed (1) insignificantly different  learning outcomes between the use of PBL and DT, (2) insignificantly different learning outcomes with the significance of 0.652 between students with high and low motivation, (3) significantly different learning outcomes with the significance of 0.039 between students with high and low creativity, (4) influence of the interaction between learning methods with learning motivation to the  learning outcomes, (5) influence of the interaction between learning methods with creativity to the learning outcomes, (6) insignificantly different  learning outcomes between students using PBL and DT in terms of learning motivation, and (7) insignificantly different learning outcomes between students using PBL and DT in terms of creativity.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-81
Author(s):  
Aliffia Ananta

Abstract                  Procrastination is a deliberate deliberate postponement and does other unnecessary work. Prokrastinya many experienced by students and influential on learning outcomes so it is important to be studied. This study aims to determine the level of student academic procrastination in terms of learning methods used by lecturers. Learning method in this research is Teacher Centered Learning (TCL) and Student CenteredLlearning (SCL). Subjects in this study as many as 150 students taken by purposive sampling, 75 subjects were students who got TCL method and 75 subjects were students who got SCL method. Data collection is done by using procrastination scale. Procrastination Scale consists of 16 items that have the validity of ≥ 0.03 with reliability of 0.805. The result of the research shows that there is no difference of academic procrastination between students who get TCL learning method with students who get SCL learning method.Key Words: Procrastination, Teacher Centered Learning, Student Centered Learning


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Yuaninda Usmani

Currently the Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Student Centered Learning (SCL) learning models are starting to be applied in universities with the aim of involving students actively in learning, one of which are Medical students of the UNS FK. One method of these learnings is Small Group Discussion (SGD). This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the SGD learning method that has been applied to Medical students of the UNS FK. The method used in this research is qualitative method. The result was found that the SGD learning method that had been applied was still less effective, but it was more effective compared to conventional learning methods. Therefore, it is necessary to make some improvements to this learning method so that it is more effective and the goal can be achieved.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mutiara Mutiara ◽  
Suryani Suryani ◽  
Ikeu Nurhidayah ◽  
Sri Hendrawati

Pendidikan keperawatan dituntut untuk menghasilkan sumber daya manusia perawat yang kompeten, baik secara akademik maupun dalam tataran praktik. Berbagai penelitian merekomendasikan pendekatan student centered learning dengan metode Problem-Based Learning (PBL) sebagai metode yang efektif memfasilitasi pencapaian kompetensi perawat. Metode ini akan memberikan pengalaman bagi mahasiswa untuk menghadapi real-world problem solving. Meski demikian, bagi mahasiswa program sarjana (undergraduate), pembelajaran PBL merupakan pengalaman baru. Selain itu, literatur juga menunjukkan mahasiswa yang justru frustasi saat menjalankan metode ini. Dengan demikian mengidentifikasi persepsi mahasiswa terhadap metode pembelajaran ini merupakan hal penting. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi perspektif mahasiswa tingkat akhir mengenai pembelajaran dengan menggunakan metode PBL. Penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif ini menggunakan total sampling dengan melibatkan 159 mahasiswa tingkat akhir di salah satu institusi pendidikan tinggi keperawatan di Bandung. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan Course Experience Quesionnaire yang dikembangkan oleh David Caroll (2013). Data dianalisis secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian secara umum menunjukkan 46,94% responden mempunyai perspektif netral; 42,86% responden mempunyai perspektif positif; dan 6,20% responden memiliki perspektif negatif. Dilihat berdasarkan dimensinya, 50% mahasiswa memiliki persepsi netral terhadap kualitas pembelajaran (good teaching scale); 83,3% persepsi positif dalam keterampilan umum (good skills scale); 100% persepsi netral dalam kepuasan mahasiswa (overal satisfaction); 80% persepsi netral terhadap kejelasan tujuan dan standar pembelajaran (clear goals and standars); 75% persepsi netral terhadap tingkat penugasan (appropriate workload scale); dan 33,3% persepsi positif terhadap evaluasi pembelajaran (appropriate assessment scale). Hal ini menunjukan mahasiswa tidak secara tegas menilai pelaksanaan PBL baik atau tidak baik. Hal tersebut dikarenakan di satu sisi mereka merasakan ada hal yang positif dari pelaksanaan PBL tetapi disisi lain ada hal yang negatif yang mereka alami.Kata kunci: Evaluasi, mahasiswa, metode, persepsi, problem-based learning. AbstractNursing education was demanded to form human resources that fulfill qualification such as academic potential and practice that are good in order to form a professional and competent nurse. Various studies recommend student centered learning approach with problem-based learning method as an effective method for the achievement of nurse competence, because it provides experience for students to face real-world problem solving. However, for undergraduate students, PBL learning is a new experience that is different from that obtained during high school, in addition some studies also show students who are frustrated in class, so the evaluation of how students’ perceptions of this learning method is important. The research aimed to identify final grade student’s perspective on learning using problem-based learning method. The research method was using descriptive qualitative, and instruments used Course Experience Quesionnaire developed by David Caroll (2013). The sample in this research is the final grade students at nursing higher education institution in Bandung with total 159 people and taken data by using total sampling technique. Data analyzed by frequency distribution. Results of research showed 46.96% of a neutral perspective respondent, 42.86% of a positive perspective respondent, and 6.20% of negative perspective respondent. Judging by its dimensions, 50% of students have neutral perceptions of the quality of learning (good teaching scale); 83.3% positive perceptions in general skills (good skills scale); 100% neutral perception in student satisfaction (overal satisfaction); 80% neutral perceptions of clarity of objectives and learning standards (clear goals and standars); 75% neutral perception of the workload (appropriate workload scale); and 33.3% positive perceptions of the learning assessment (appropriate assessment scale). The result shows that students do not explicitly assess the implementation of PBL as good or bad, due to they experienced positive and negative thing from the implementation of PBL.Keywords: Evaluation, method, problem based learning, student.


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (IX) ◽  
pp. 19-34
Author(s):  
Maratun Nafiah ◽  
Gusti Yarmi ◽  
Dudung Amir S.

The student centered learning is the learning method that activates the students and could be carried out by applying active, creative, effective, and joyfull learning (PAKEM). This qualitative research aims of findings out PAKEM is in implemented at four elementary schools in Bali and Central Java provinces. The research was carried out from February to October 2007, concludes: (1) a lot of conventional approach (teacher-centered) are still practical in the classroom; (2) the classroom situations doesn’t reflect any active, creative, effective, joyfull learning (PAKEM) characteristics; (3) none of student’s work show up on the classroom wall; (4) the classroom is not fully explored to be a learning resource; and (5) instructional methods use are dominated by the teacher. In addition it is also important to know that the learning process doesn’t take benefit of the existing facilities with in this situation, the group study, self study, and the problem based learning are not practised optimally neither the use of classs paces as the source of learning. More over, the methods being used were toll the one way instructional mode. It was also important to be mentioned that there were no usage of the sourrounding atmosphere as the leasy source. The optimalization of the group study, self study and the problem based learning hadn’t been achieved yet.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (36) ◽  
pp. 150-161
Author(s):  
Lamis Abdulkarim Al-Shuga'a ◽  
Kamariah Yunus

As a matter of fact, the cooperative learning method is considered one of the most effective student-centered learning methods used in teaching English language classes. It is an updated and effective pedagogic method that should be incorporated in classrooms. The previously reviewed studies showed that group work is better than individual work since student-centered learning methods may improve students’ knowledge of the language because of their effective cooperative engagement. This paper aims at investigating students' perceptions and attitudes towards the learning of global issues vocabulary using cooperative learning methods. The study employed a survey method research design where the quantitative data collection method was conducted. 25 participants are subjected to the intervention phase for seven weeks (40 hours) at MALI institute in Taiz, Yemen. Then a well-prepared questionnaire was conducted on the participants within a period of two days, immediately after the intervention phase. The descriptive statistic SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 25.0 was used to analyze data. Percentages were used for the questionnaire. The results from the questionnaire indicated that cooperative learning techniques had positive effects on students’ writing in classrooms. The participants gained confidence and their language skills were improved. Social skills like leadership, decision-making, trust-building, communication, and conflict-management skills were also developed. The study concludes that cooperative learning contributes to cognitive growth, increased autonomy, and productivity. The cooperative learning method should be integrated into English language classrooms to improve the growth and productive knowledge of students.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-69
Author(s):  
Amina Alobaidi

Background: PBL appears to answer many concerns regarding educational methods, encourages students to look for new solutions to relevant problems using available knowledge and resources. The process expands students' critical thinking and problem solving skills while enhancing their creative capabilities Objective: To develop a PBL modules for teaching of organic chemistry. Methods: This module was developed for implementation in the curriculum of Chemistry Departments in Colleges of Sciences and Education. This is an innovations to be developed for increasing the wide-ranging abilities of students. A series of strategies which are involved in PBL, concept mapping and online communications, are suggested and discussed in terms of encouraging student-centered learning.  


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-432
Author(s):  
Puji Lestari ◽  
Rina Rosdiana

AbstrakKemampuan pemecahan masalah merupakan bagian dari kurikulum pendidikan matematika saat ini. Fakta di lapangan menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa masih belum optimal, salah satu penyebabnya adalah masih banyak siswa yang menemui kesulitan dalam hal pemahaman konsep dasar. Mengoptimalkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah diantaranya dapat ditempuh melalui pembelajaran yang berpusat pada siswa. Model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7E dan Problem Based Learning merupakan dua dari beragam model pembelajaran yang berpusat pada siswa. Adapun tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan pencapaian kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis antara siswa yang mendapatkan model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7E dan Problem Based Learning. Hasil dari penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis antara siswa yang mendapatkan model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7E dan Problem Based Learning. Sementara itu, untuk kualitas peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang mendapatkan model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7E dan Problem Based Learning masing-masing berinterpretasi sedang namun skor perolehan nya berbeda. Secara umum, sikap siswa terhadap pembelajaran matematika menggunakan model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7E dan Problem Based Learning masing-masing berinterpretasi baik. Abstract (Students’ Problem Solving Ability through Learning Cycle 7E and Problem Based Learning)Currently mathematical problem solving ability was a part of mathematics curriculum. In fact, the mathematical problem solving ability of students was not optimized, one of the reasons is there are still many students who have problems in terms of understanding the basic concepts. To optimizing the mathematical problem solving ability of students, it, can be reached by implementing student-centered learning. Learning Cycle 7E and Problem Based Learning are two of a lot of student-centered learning models. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference of achievement mathematical problem solving ability between students who get Learning Cycle 7E and Problem Based Learning models.  The results of this study are there is not a difference enhancement of mathematical problem solving ability between students who get Learning Cycle 7E and Problem Based Learning models. Meanwhile, the quality of enhancement mathematical problem solving ability students who get Learning Cycle 7E and Problem Based Learning models are in the middle interpretation. In general, students' attitudes toward learning mathematics using Learning Cycle 7E and Problem Based Learning models each in good interpretation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 608
Author(s):  
Dyah Christina Iswandari ◽  
Johannes Ananto Prayogo ◽  
Bambang Yudi Cahyono

This study aims at examining the effect of environmental problem-based learning (PBL) on the environment-related vocabulary mastery and writing ability of Indonesian EFL students. Previous studies showed that problem-based learning is a student-centered learning approach that affects students’ learning positively and significantly. This study employed a quasi-experimental design by involving two classes of senior high school students, each consisted of 30 students. One class was assigned to be the experimental group and treated with environmental PBL, while the other class was assigned to be the control group and taught conventionally. A vocabulary test was used to measure the students’ environment-related vocabulary mastery, while a hortatory writing test was used to examine the students’ writing ability. The data were analyzed by using independent sample t-test. The results of the study showed that the students who were taught by using environmental PBL improved their environment-related vocabulary mastery and their writing ability significantly. The PBL approach is then recommended for future teaching and research. Nevertheless, before implementing this approach, other teachers and future researchers should consider the readiness of the curriculum, the students, and the school infrastructure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document