scholarly journals Trends in Use of Scientific Workflows: Insights from a Public Repository and Recommendations for Best Practice

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Littauer ◽  
Karthik Ram ◽  
Bertram Ludäscher ◽  
William Michener ◽  
Rebecca Koskela
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Scientific Workflow ◽  
Scientific Workflows ◽  
Public Repository ◽  
Workflow Systems ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
The Public ◽  
Open Discourse ◽  
User Friendly

Scientific workflows are typically used to automate the processing, analysis and management of scientific data. Most scientific workflow programs provide a user-friendly graphical user interface that enables scientists to more easily create and visualize complex workflows that may be comprised of dozens of processing and analytical steps. Furthermore, many workflows provide mechanisms for tracing provenance and methodologies that foster reproducible science. Despite their potential for enabling science, few studies have examined how the process of creating, executing, and sharing workflows can be improved. In order to promote open discourse and access to scientific methods as well as data, we analyzed a wide variety of workflow systems and publicly available workflows on the public repository myExperiment. It is hoped that understanding the usage of workflows and developing a set of recommended best practices will lead to increased contribution of workflows to the public domain.

Data Provenance in Scientific Workflows

2011 ◽  
pp. 46-59
Author(s):  
Khalid Belhajjame ◽  
Paolo Missier ◽  
Carole Goble
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Scientific Workflow ◽  
Scientific Workflows ◽  
Data Provenance ◽  
Workflow Systems ◽  
Scientific Experiments

Data provenance is key to understanding and interpreting the results of scientific experiments. This chapter introduces and characterises data provenance in scientific workflows using illustrative examples taken from real-world workflows. The characterisation takes the form of a taxonomy that is used for comparing and analysing provenance capabilities supplied by existing scientific workflow systems.

scholarly journals The PBase Scientific Workflow Provenance Repository

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Víctor Cuevas-Vicenttín ◽  
Parisa Kianmajd ◽  
Bertram Ludäscher ◽  
Paolo Missier ◽  
Fernando Chirigati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Workflow ◽  
Scientific Workflows ◽  
Data Reuse ◽  
Data Intensive ◽  
Research Collaborations ◽  
Provenance Data ◽  
Scientific Experiments ◽  
History Of ◽  
Scientific Results ◽  
User Friendly

Scientific workflows and their supporting systems are becoming increasingly popular for compute-intensive and data-intensive scientific experiments. The advantages scientific workflows offer include rapid and easy workflow design, software and data reuse, scalable execution, sharing and collaboration, and other advantages that altogether facilitate “reproducible science”. In this context, provenance – information about the origin, context, derivation, ownership, or history of some artifact – plays a key role, since scientists are interested in examining and auditing the results of scientific experiments. However, in order to perform such analyses on scientific results as part of extended research collaborations, an adequate environment and tools are required. Concretely, the need arises for a repository that will facilitate the sharing of scientific workflows and their associated execution traces in an interoperable manner, also enabling querying and visualization. Furthermore, such functionality should be supported while taking performance and scalability into account. With this purpose in mind, we introduce PBase: a scientific workflow provenance repository implementing the ProvONE proposed standard, which extends the emerging W3C PROV standard for provenance data with workflow specific concepts. PBase is built on the Neo4j graph database, thus offering capabilities such as declarative and efficient querying. Our experiences demonstrate the power gained by supporting various types of queries for provenance data. In addition, PBase is equipped with a user friendly interface tailored for the visualization of scientific workflow provenance data, making the specification of queries and the interpretation of their results easier and more effective.

scholarly journals CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO ORGANIZING MODEL OF UNIVERSITY STOMATOLOGICAL CLINIC, BASED ON PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (8) ◽  
pp. 1650-1654
Author(s):  
Vitaliy D. Chopchik ◽  
Oleksander A. Kaniura
Keyword(s):  
Technology Implementation ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
The Public ◽  
Training Professionals ◽  
The University ◽  
Social Economic Development

The aim: to substantiate conceptual approaches to organizing the model of university stomatological clinic based on the public-private partnership principles (PPP). Materials and methods: To achieve the aim the author used general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, generalization, interpreting scientific data as well as systemic and structural-functional approaches. The conceptual approaches comply with the Constitution of Ukraine, laws and other legislative standards of Ukraine, generally accepted standards and principles of world law in the healthcare, considering the Ukrainian and foreign experience. Results: The article represents conceptual approaches to organizing university clinic, based on the public-private partnership principles, in order to provide development of theoretical and practical stomatology, training professionals as well as to providing accessible and affordable high-quality stomatological service to population. Introduction of the conceptual approaches will provide for development of a modern model of the university clinic, creating public-private healthcare institution which will provide affordable and high-quality stomatological service corresponding to modern requirements and approaches ( last advances of science and technology). Implementation of the public-private partnership mechanisms will be a guarantee of steady long-lasting social-economic development of the clinic. Conclusions: The priority way of development of the university clinics under new economic conditions is basing their economic mechanisms on the PPP principles. To realize this, the conceptual approaches to organizing university stomatological clinic model based on the public-private partnership principles were introduced (with the example of university stomatological clinic).

scholarly journals The design and implementation of a workflow analysis tool

2010 ◽  
Vol 368 (1926) ◽  
pp. 4193-4208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasa Curcin ◽  
Moustafa Ghanem ◽  
Yike Guo
Keyword(s):  
Data Integration ◽  
Medical Informatics ◽  
Real World ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Scientific Workflow ◽  
Scientific Workflows ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Formal Modelling ◽  
Design And Implementation ◽  
Modelling Techniques

Motivated by the use of scientific workflows as a user-oriented mechanism for building executable scientific data integration and analysis applications, this article introduces a framework and a set of associated methods for analysing the execution properties of scientific workflows. Our framework uses a number of formal modelling techniques to characterize the process and data behaviour of workflows and workflow components and to reason about their functional and execution properties. We use the framework to design the architecture of a customizable tool that can be used to analyse the key execution properties of scientific workflows at authoring stage. Our design is generic and can be applied to a wide variety of scientific workflow languages and systems, and is evaluated by building a prototype of the tool for the Discovery Net system. We demonstrate and discuss the utility of the framework and tool using workflows from a real-world medical informatics study.

Russian Accounting Standard (PBU) 18/02: Principles on the balance method use

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1356-1382
Author(s):  
E.V. Olomskaya ◽  
A.A. Aksent'ev
Keyword(s):  
Balance Method ◽  
Deferred Taxes ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
The Public ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Original Approach ◽  
Descriptive Method ◽  
Tax Accounting

Subject. This article discusses the methodological features of Russian Accounting Standard (PBU) 18/02 Income Tax Accounting when using the balance method to account for deferred taxes. It considers whether the clarification of permanent tax differences is justified, and it analyzes in detail the features of accounting for temporary differences and offers a visual and descriptive method for determining and correlating them in accounts. Objectives. The article aims to justify the reason for linking permanent tax differences to such accounting categories as Income and Expenses. It also aims to develop a methodological toolkit that simplifies the perception of the balance method and demonstrates the procedure for determining temporary differences. Methods. For the study, we used the methods of analysis, synthesis, observation, comparison, and other general scientific methods. Results. The article justifies the clarification of permanent differences from the position of accounting categories. It offers an original approach that helps visually classify temporary differences. The formalization of the balance method helped identify the logic of its reflection in accounting statements. Conclusions and Relevance. To ensure that accounting is not distorted due to the impact of taxation, it is necessary to develop a unified conceptual framework, as well as develop existing methods and introduce new ones that do not contradict the public concept of interaction between accounting and tax accounting. The research results are intended for training, scientific and practical activities of specialists in the field of accounting and audit, as well as students studying under this program, in order to study the features of applying the balance method for accounting for deferred taxes.

scholarly journals Introducing New Guidelines on Geoheritage Conservation in Protected and Conserved Areas

Geoheritage ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Crofts ◽  
Dan Tormey ◽  
John E. Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Communication To The Public ◽  
The Public ◽  
Best Practice Guidelines ◽  
The World ◽  
New Guidelines ◽  
The Many ◽  
Ethical Basis ◽  
Improve Practice

AbstractThis paper introduces newly published guidelines on geoheritage conservation in protected and conserved areas within the “IUCN WCPA Best Practice Guidelines” series. It explains the need for the guidelines and outlines the ethical basis of geoheritage values and geoconservation principles as the fundamental framework within which to advance geoheritage conservation. Best practice in establishing and managing protected and conserved areas for geoconservation is described with examples from around the world. Particular emphasis is given to the methodology and practice for dealing with the many threats to geoheritage, highlighting in particular how to improve practice for areas with caves and karst, glacial and periglacial, and volcanic features and processes, and for palaeontology and mineral sites. Guidance to improve education and communication to the public through modern and conventional means is also highlighted as a key stage in delivering effective geoconservation. A request is made to geoconservation experts to continue to share best practice examples of developing methodologies and best practice in management to guide non-experts in their work. Finally, a number of suggestions are made on how geoconservation can be further promoted.

scholarly journals Order, experience, and critique: The phenomenological method in political and legal theory

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Loidolt
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Main Task ◽  
Phenomenological Method ◽  
The Public ◽  
Practice Models ◽  
Critical Phenomenology ◽  
Flexible Framework ◽  
The Public Sphere

AbstractThe paper investigates phenomenology’s possibilities to describe, reflect and critically analyse political and legal orders. It presents a “toolbox” of methodological reflections, tools and topics, by relating to the classics of the tradition and to the emerging movement of “critical phenomenology,” as well as by touching upon current issues such as experiences of rightlessness, experiences in the digital lifeworld, and experiences of the public sphere. It is argued that phenomenology provides us with a dynamic methodological framework that emphasizes correlational, co-constitutional, and interrelational structures, and thus pays attention to modes of givenness, the making and unmaking of “world,” and, thereby, the inter/subjective, affective, and bodily constitution of meaning. In the case of political and legal orders, questions of power, exclusion, and normativity are central issues. By looking at “best practice” models such as Hannah Arendt’s analyses, the paper points out an analytical tool and flexible framework of “spaces of meaning” that phenomenologists can use and modify as they go along. In the current debates on political and legal issues, the author sees the main task of phenomenology to reclaim experience as world-building and world-opening, also in a normative sense, and to demonstrate how structures and orders are lived while they condition and form spaces of meaning. If we want to understand, criticize, act, or change something, this subjective and intersubjective perspective will remain indispensable.

scholarly journals ‘Give Us The Tools!’: development of knowledge transfer tools to support the involvement of patient partners in the development of clinical trial protocols with patient-reported outcomes (PROs), in accordance with SPIRIT-PRO Extension

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e046450
Author(s):  
Samantha Cruz Rivera ◽  
Richard Stephens ◽  
Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber ◽  
Ameeta Retzer ◽  
Claudia Rutherford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Public Involvement ◽  
Patient And Public Involvement ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Flow Diagram ◽  
Additional Patient ◽  
The Public ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Trial Protocols ◽  
User Friendly

Objectives(a) To adapt the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT)-patient-reported outcome (PRO) Extension guidance to a user-friendly format for patient partners and (b) to codesign a web-based tool to support the dissemination and uptake of the SPIRIT-PRO Extension by patient partners.DesignA 1-day patient and public involvement session.ParticipantsSeven patient partners.MethodsA patient partner produced an initial lay summary of the SPIRIT-PRO guideline and a glossary. We held a 1-day PPI session in November 2019 at the University of Birmingham. Five patient partners discussed the draft lay summary, agreed on the final wording, codesigned and agreed the final content for both tools. Two additional patient partners were involved in writing the manuscript. The study compiled with INVOLVE guidelines and was reported according to the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2 checklist.ResultsTwo user-friendly tools were developed to help patients and members of the public be involved in the codesign of clinical trials collecting PROs. The first tool presents a lay version of the SPIRIT-PRO Extension guidance. The second depicts the most relevant points, identified by the patient partners, of the guidance through an interactive flow diagram.ConclusionsThese tools have the potential to support the involvement of patient partners in making informed contributions to the development of PRO aspects of clinical trial protocols, in accordance with the SPIRIT-PRO Extension guidelines. The involvement of patient partners ensured the tools focused on issues most relevant to them.

scholarly journals A taxonomy of scientific workflow systems for grid computing

2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 44-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Yu ◽  
Rajkumar Buyya
Keyword(s):  
Grid Computing ◽  
Scientific Workflow ◽  
Workflow Systems

Judgments of Value, Judgments of Fact: The Ethical Dimension of Biohistorical Research

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-99
Author(s):  
Russell Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Dna Analysis ◽  
Ethical Framework ◽  
Ethical Dimension ◽  
Dna Testing ◽  
Ethical Guidelines ◽  
Value Judgments ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
The Public ◽  
Historical Figures ◽  
Scientific Analysis

The public increasingly views DNA testing as an unassailable way to verify the identity of historical figures. The Chicago Historical Society explored the appropriateness of DNA analysis and other forensic scientific methods to authenticate Lincoln assassination-related artifacts in its collection. The study concluded that DNA testing would damage or destroy the artifacts. More importantly, it determined that DNA and other scientific analysis of historical artifacts or historical figures' remains should be done only in the context of an ethical framework. The article discusses the development of ethical guidelines for museums and historians to follow when considering such studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document