scholarly journals SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL OF PRIVATE LAW OF RESEARCH AT THE PEOPLES' FRIENDSHIP UNIVERSITY OF RUSSIA: DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL LAW AND PROCESS AND PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 170-185
Author(s):  
Vitaly V. Bezbakh

-

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Наталия Марышева ◽  
Nataliya Maryshyeva ◽  
Татьяна Лазарева ◽  
Tatyana Lazaryeva ◽  
Наталия Власова ◽  
...  

The article is devoted to the analysis of the civil law concept of private international law, which comes down to the fact that private international law regulates private law relations: civil, family and labour, if they comprise a foreign element (foreign citizenship, foreign affiliation of a subject of law, etc). The authors provide arguments that private international law is an independent branch of law and legal studies; civil law concept of private international law is based on two methods of regulation of private law relations with a foreign element: conflict of laws (national and standardized through uniform rules contained in international conventions) and a substantive (standardized) element. The authors reveal the role in the development of the science of private international law played by professor L. A. Luntz, Laureate of the USSR State prize, who worked in the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law (ILCL) in 1939—1979. Special attention is paid to the contribution of L. A. Luntz and his successors — the ILCL researchers V. P. Zvekov, A. L. Makovskiy, N. I. Marysheva, O. N. Sadikov — to the formation and development of the Soviet and Russian legislation in the field of private international law, including drafting of the Bill on Private International Law and International Civil Procedure (1990), drafting and adoption of the respective sections within the Fundamental Principles of Civil Legislation of the USSR (1961, 1991), the Fundamental Principles of Marriage and Family Legislation of the USSR (1968), the RSFSR Civil Code (1964), the Marriage and Family Code of the RSFSR (1969), the present Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part III, 2001), the Family Code of the Russian Federation (1995), the Maritime Code of the Russian Federation (1999), the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (2002).


Author(s):  
Julia Hörnle

Jurisdiction is the foundational concept for both national laws and international law as it provides the link between the sovereign government and its territory, and ultimately its people. The internet challenges this concept at its root: data travels across the internet without respecting political borders or territory. This book is about this Jurisdictional Challenge created by internet technologies. The Jurisdictional Challenge arises as civil disputes, criminal cases, and regulatory action span different countries, rising questions as to the international competence of courts, law enforcement, and regulators. From a technological standpoint, geography is largely irrelevant for online data flows and this raises the question of who governs “YouTubistan.” Services, communication, and interaction occur online between persons who may be located in different countries. Data is stored and processed online in data centres remote from the actual user, with cloud computing provided as a utility. Illegal acts such as hacking, identity theft and fraud, cyberespionage, propagation of terrorist propaganda, hate speech, defamation, revenge porn, and illegal marketplaces (such as Silkroad) may all be remotely targeted at a country, or simply create effects in many countries. Software applications (“apps”) developed by a software developer in one country are seamlessly downloaded by users on their mobile devices worldwide, without regard to applicable consumer protection, data protection, intellectual property, or media law. Therefore, the internet has created multi-facetted and complex challenges for the concept of jurisdiction and conflicts of law. Traditionally, jurisdiction in private law and jurisdiction in public law have belonged to different areas of law, namely private international law and (public) international law. The unique feature of this book is that it explores the notion of jurisdiction in different branches of “the” law. It analyses legislation and jurisprudence to extract how the concept of jurisdiction is applied in internet cases, taking a comparative law approach, focusing on EU, English, German, and US law. This synthesis and comparison of approaches across the board has produced new insights on how we should tackle the Jurisdictional Challenge. The first three chapters explain the Jurisdictional Challenge created by the internet and place this in the context of technology, sovereignty, territory, and media regulation. The following four chapters focus on public law aspects, namely criminal law and data protection jurisdiction. The next five chapters are about private law disputes, including cross-border B2C e-commerce, online privacy and defamation disputes, and internet intellectual property disputes. The final chapter harnesses the insights from the different areas of law examined.


2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 523-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy Goode

It is a remarkable circumstance that with a few honourable exceptions all writers on international law in general and treaty law in particular focus exclusively on public law treaties. Private law conventions, including those involving commercial law and the conflict of laws, simply do not come into consideration. Yet such conventions, like public law conventions, are treaties between States and are governed by the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and many of them are of great significance. Their distinguishing feature is, of course, that while only States are parties, private law conventions deal primarily, and often exclusively, with the rights and obligations of non-State parties. So while the treaty is international it does not for the most part commit a Contracting State to any obligation other than that of implementing the treaty in domestic law by whatever method that State's law provides, if it has not already done so prior to ratification.


Author(s):  
Ernest Gramatskiy

Nowadays the processes of democratization, liberalization, integration of Ukraine into European and world space take place. Theundisputed significance for these processes is the signing of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the European Union. Thus, the rapprochement of Ukraine with the European community, which has taken place in recent years, affects the sphere of private law relations,which are complicated by a foreign element – the legal relations that make up the subject matter of international private law.Having analyzed current doctrine of international private law, the author can conclude that nowadays researchers are paying moreattention to a deep understanding and study of the general provisions of this branch of law rather than to analysis of individual sub-sectorsand institutes of private international law.Nowadays recodification of civil legislation is taking place in Ukraine. The main reason for the recodification of civil legislationis to increase legal certainty as a component of the rule of law. Legal certainty demonstrates an ability of legislation to satisfy the needsof the subjects of law in the respective benefits.At the same time some specific issues related to the recodification of civil legislation and its link with private international lawhave not been the subject to scientific research. In our opinion, these issues deserve special attention, as they make it possible to analyzenot only the current state of private international relations, but also to forecast the prospects and changes in the field of private international law. One aspect that is worth to be discussed is the consolidation of the private international law system of principles.The analysis of scientific points of private international law doctrine representatives gives grounds to conclude that there is currentlyno universal approach to understanding the system of principles of private international law. Neither private international lawlegislation, nor scientific approaches give clear vision of the system of principles of private international law.It is crucial to stress that recodification of civil legislation in Ukraine has its direct impact on private international law systemand its mechanism of legal regulations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (06) ◽  
pp. 259-262
Author(s):  
Akhmurodov Jakhongir ◽  

This article examines various opinions regarding the international civil procedure as part of private international law and concludes that international civil procedure is directly related to the definition of applicable law, and that substantive regulation of private law relations complicated by a foreign element is generally impossible in practice without addressing both conflict of laws and procedural problems.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 439
Author(s):  
Carmen Vaquero López

Resumen: En los últimos tiempos la lucha por alcanzar la igualdad de género y acabar con las injusticias que separan a hombres y mujeres se ha convertido en una auténtica “revolución” que ha invadido prácticamente todos los ámbitos sociales. Este movimiento debe también remover los principios que informan las soluciones de Derecho internacional privado en nuestro país. En el presente trabajo se analizan desde una perspectiva de género dos instituciones que tradicionalmente han sido bastión del patriarcado y cuya regulación se ha venido llevando a cabo desde consideraciones principalmente androcéntricas: el matrimonio y la maternidad.Palabras clave: estereotipo, principio de igualdad, dignidad, orden público, interés de la mujer.Abstract: In the latest times, the fight for achieving the gender equality and for putting an end to the injustices that separates men and women has become a true “revolution” that has invaded practically all social areas. This movement should also remove the principles that inform the solutions of International Private Law. In this paper we analyze from a perspective of gender two institutions that have traditionally been a bastion of patriarchy and whose regulation has been carried out from mainly androcentric considerations: the marriage and the motherhood.Keywords: stereotype, principle of equality, dignity, public order, interest of the woman.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 904
Author(s):  
María Jesús Sánchez Cano

Resumen: Partiendo del estudio de la Ley 54/2007, de adopción internacional y después de examinar la normativa sustantiva sobre la adopción en España, el presente trabajo aborda el análisis de algunas de las cuestiones controvertidas que se suscitan respecto de las adopciones de personas mayores de edad y menores emancipados, desde la perspectiva del Derecho Internacional Privado y específicamente, en lo referente a la constitución de la adopción por las autoridades españolas.Palabras clave: Ley de adopción internacional, adopción internacional de personas mayores de edad, Derecho Internacional Privado, ley aplicable, validez de adopciones constituidas por autoridades extranjeras.Abstract: Based on the study of Law 54/2007, on international adoption and after having examined the substantive legislation on adoption in Spain, this paper deals with the analysis of some of the controversial issues that arise regarding adoptions of adults and emancipated minors, from the Private International Law perspective and specifically with regard to the constitution of adoption by the Spanish authorities.Keywords: International adoption law, international adoption of adults, International Private Law, applicable law, constitution of adoption by Spanish authorities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (88) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
Aleksandrs Baikovs ◽  
Ilona Bulgakova

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the interplay between international public and private law and national law, and to provide an assessment of the theory of public and private law and its interrelationship.Private international law is closely linked to public international law. However, if public international law is an autonomous system of law, then private international law is an integral part of national law, since it governs cross-border private law relations.The objectives of the study stem from its purpose, namely:to clarify the nature and understanding of international public and private law; to clarify the relationship between international public and private law and national (internal) law. The object of the research is the problems of the relation and interrelation of international public and private law.As a result of the study, several conclusions were drawn, which are as follows: 1) public international law is an independent legal system, but private international law is an integral part of national law; 2) there is a relationship between public international law and private international law; 3) general theoretical categories and concepts are partly incompatible with the nature of both international public and private international law; 4) the value, validity, and credibility of contemporary theoretical research in international law largely depends on the inclusion of relevant categories andThe following methods have been used in the research: analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, abstracting, generalization, analogy, idealization, formalization, axiomatic method, systematic and historical research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document