ANALISIS SENTIMEN CALON PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN PERIODE 2019-2024 PASCA DEBAT PILPRES DI TWITTER

Social networking sites, such as Twitter and Facebook are one of the important spaces for political engagement. Twitter or Facebook have become common elements in political campaigns and elections, especially for Indonesia’s presidential election 2019. for the period 2019 - 2024 there are two presidential and vice presidential candidates namely Ir. H. Joko Widodo - Prof. Dr. K.H. Ma'ruf Amin and Lieutenant General (Ret.) H. Prabowo Subianto - H. Sandiaga Uno. B.B.A., M.B.A. the two candidates who ran for the election triggered a lot of related public opinion where the most suitable candidate to become the president of the next period. Public opinion is generally one of the determining factors for presidential candidates who will later win the election. Presidential candidate debate is the efforts of the election commission to facilitate the presidential candidates to introduce their work programs to the public while building public opinion that they are the right people to become leaders of the next period. Although of course, this is not the only major factor that shapes public opinion. The purpose of this study is to summarize the opinions of the people voiced through social media related to the election of candidates for the Indonesian President and Vice President for the period 2019-2024 post debate on the presidential election. While the benefit is to help the community so that they can understand in a broader context such as what the public opinion about presidential candidates, especially on social media Twitter. The results of this study were presidential candidate Joko Widodo - Makruf Amin obtained a 25% positive sentiment, 4.5% negative sentiment and 70.5% neutral sentiment. while the Prabowo Subianto - Sandiaga Uno pair received a 5.1% positive sentiment, 2.5% negative sentiment and 92.4% neutral sentiment.

Download Full-text

Analysis of Social Media Users Sentiments against Omnibus Law Based on Hashtags on Twitter

SISTEMASI ◽

10.32520/stmsi.v11i1.1685 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

pp. 197

Author(s):

Okta Fanny ◽

Heri Suroyo

Keyword(s):

Social Media ◽

Sentiment Analysis ◽

Main Topic ◽

Accuracy Score ◽

Test Results ◽

Bayes Classifier ◽

The Public ◽

Average Accuracy ◽

Positive Sentiment ◽

Negative Sentiment

From the research that has been done, it can be concluded that Sentiment Analysis can be used to know the sentiment of the public, especially Twitter netizens against omnibus law. After the sentiment analysis, it looks neutral artmen with the largest percentage of 55%, then positive sentiment by 35% and negative sentiment by 10%. The results of the analysis showed that the Naïve Bayes Classifier method provides classification test results with accuracy in Hashtag Pro with an average accuracy score of 92.1%, precision values with an average of 94.8% and recall values with an average of 90.7%. While Hashtag Counter For data classification, with an average accuracy value of 98.3%, precision value with an average of 97.6% and recall value with an average of 98.7%. The result of text cloud analysis conducted on a combination of hashtags both Hashtag pros and Hashtags cons, the dominant word appears is Omnibus Law which means that all hashtags in scrap is really discussing the main topic that is about Omnibus Law

Download Full-text

One of Many Tools to Win the Election

Advances in Public Policy and Administration - (R)evolutionizing Political Communication through Social Media ◽

10.4018/978-1-4666-9879-6.ch011 ◽

2016 ◽

pp. 210-228 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ashik Shafi ◽

Fred Vultee

Keyword(s):

Social Media ◽

Presidential Election ◽

Real Life ◽

Political Agenda ◽

Agenda Building ◽

Election Campaigns ◽

Presidential Candidates ◽

The Public ◽

Virtual Presence ◽

Us Presidential Election

Presidential campaigns today are increasingly integrating social media such as Facebook as an efficient tool to communicate with the public and organize their supporters. In a bid to explore how the Facebook is used by the politicians during election campaigns, this chapter explored official Facebook posts by two presidential candidates ahead of the 2012 US presidential election. The findings suggest Facebook was used in the campaign as a platform to organize like-minded voters, and reporting a virtual presence to the voters. Facebook was used strategically to resonate with the real-life campaign, and disseminate instant messages, rather than engaging in discussion with the public. The two candidates had only minor difference in the characteristics of their Facebook contents. The implication of the research for the online political agenda-building tactics is discussed.

Download Full-text

Don’t Republicans Tweet Too? Using Twitter to Assess the Consequences of Political Endorsements by Celebrities

Perspectives on Politics ◽

10.1017/s1537592719002603 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 18 (1) ◽

pp. 144-160

Author(s):

Jan Zilinsky ◽

Cristian Vaccari ◽

Jonathan Nagler ◽

Joshua A. Tucker

Keyword(s):

Social Media ◽

Presidential Election ◽

Presidential Candidate ◽

Hillary Clinton ◽

Donald Trump ◽

Presidential Candidates ◽

Political Preferences ◽

The Social ◽

Decision To Stay ◽

Presidential Election Campaign

Michael Jordan supposedly justified his decision to stay out of politics by noting that Republicans buy sneakers too. In the social media era, the name of the game for celebrities is engagement with fans. So why then do celebrities risk talking about politics on social media, which is likely to antagonize a portion of their fan base? With this question in mind, we analyze approximately 220,000 tweets from 83 celebrities who chose to endorse a presidential candidate in the 2016 U.S. presidential election campaign to assess whether there is a cost—defined in terms of engagement on Twitter—for celebrities who discuss presidential candidates. We also examine whether celebrities behave similarly to other campaign surrogates in being more likely to take on the “attack dog” role by going negative more often than going positive. More specifically, we document how often celebrities of distinct political preferences tweet about Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and Hillary Clinton, and we show that followers of opinionated celebrities do not withhold engagement when entertainers become politically mobilized and do indeed often go negative. Interestingly, in some cases political content from celebrities actually turns out to be more popular than typical lifestyle tweets.

Download Full-text

Psychological Analysis of Jokowi’s First 100 Days and Nawacita from Text in Twitter

Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik ◽

10.22146/jsp.27646 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 21 (3) ◽

pp. 173

Author(s):

Indro Adinugroho ◽

Smitha Sjahputri ◽

Judotens Budiarto ◽

Roby Muhamad

Keyword(s):

Social Media ◽

Public Opinion ◽

Human Behavior ◽

Strategic Plan ◽

Political Issues ◽

Public Response ◽

The Public ◽

Psychological Analysis ◽

Valence And Arousal ◽

Negative Sentiment

In recent days, the public often uses social media such as Twitter for delivering critics; appreciation and campaign related to Government and political issues. The existence of Twitter is changing human behavior rapidly. This study aims to identify Twitter as a medium to generate public opinion concerning two political issues, the 7th Indonesian President first 100 days and public response towards his strategic plan, Nawacita. Method applied in this study is a combination of contemporary research instruments that combines technology and psychology. In this study, the authors examined conversation on Twitter by using Tracker and Algoritma Kata (AK, words algorithm). Tracker is used to collecting conversation on twitter regarding Jokowi’s first 100 days and Nawacita, whereas AK is applied to identify valence and arousal in each tweet collected by Tracker. The finding shows the domination of positive tweets in every week. However, there is a moment where the number of positive tweets was close to negative tweets. In Nawacita issue, law reformation and enforcement was the issue that has highest negative sentiment among others.

Download Full-text

The 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election: Propaganda in Post-Truth Era

Nyimak (Journal of Communication) ◽

10.31000/nyimak.v5i1.3882 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. 135

Author(s):

Akhirul Aminulloh ◽

Myrtati Dyah Artaria ◽

Yuyun Wahyu Izzati Surya ◽

Kamil Zajaczkowski

Keyword(s):

Social Media ◽

Public Opinion ◽

Political Communication ◽

Presidential Election ◽

Qualitative Data ◽

Presidential Candidate ◽

Mixed Methods Approach ◽

Political Messages ◽

Literature Searches ◽

Quantitative And Qualitative Methods

Presidential elections often are colored by propaganda and post-truth politics in its campaign to influence public opinion. This study aimed to identify the way and forms of propaganda and post-truth communicate political messages from the 2019 presidential election in Indonesia through political communication on social media. This research employed a mixed-methods approach that combines quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative data were obtained from Twitter with social network analysis (SNA) from December 2018 to March 2019. Meanwhile, the qualitative data were obtained from literature searches and expert interviews. The results of this analysis indicated that presidential candidate Jokowi was widely rumored to be a liar, claimant of success, weak leader, communist, pro-China, and anti-Islam. There were also many rumors that referred to presidential candidate Prabowo as a pro caliphate, human rights violator, person with a questionable religion, bad-tempered person, inexperienced leader, and hoax spreader. These negative issues constitute propaganda in the form of stories, rumors, and myths that were manipulated to influence public opinion on social media. Some parts of society believed them based on emotional belief instead of on rationally observed facts. We conclude that even when it involves many people in a big nation, propaganda can be manipulated to influence public opinion.Keywords: Propaganda, post-truth, social media, political communication, presidential election ABSTRAKPemilihan presiden sering kali diwarnai oleh propaganda dan politik pasca-kebenaran dalam kampanyenya untuk memengaruhi opini publik. Kami mempelajari kasus pemilihan presiden di Indonesia tahun 2019. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi bagaimana bentuk-bentuk propaganda dan post-truth mengkomunikasikan pesan politik melalui komunikasi politik di media sosial. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan metode campuran, yaitu kombinasi metode kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Data kuantitatif diperoleh dari media sosial Twitter dengan analisis jejaring sosial (SNA) dari Desember 2018 hingga Maret 2019. Data kualitatif diperoleh dari penelusuran literatur dan wawancara ahli. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa capres Jokowi banyak diisukan sebagai pembohong, klaim keberhasilan, pemimpin lemah, komunis, pro-China, dan anti-Islam. Banyak rumor yang menyebut calon presiden Prabowo sebagai pro khilafah, pelanggar HAM, orang yang agamanya dipertanyakan, pemarah, pemimpin yang tidak berpengalaman, dan penyebar hoax. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa isu-isu negatif tersebut merupakan propaganda berupa cerita, rumor, dan mitos yang dimanipulasi untuk memengaruhi opini publik di media sosial. Sebagian masyarakat percaya bahwa propaganda ini sebagai kebenaran karena didasarkan pada keyakinan emosional, bukan fakta yang diamati secara rasional. Kami menyimpulkan bahwa meskipun melibatkan banyak orang di negara besar, propaganda dapat dimanipulasi untuk memengaruhi opini publik.Kata Kunci: Propaganda, post-truth, media sosial, komunikasi politik, pemilihan presiden

Download Full-text

Beginner Voter Perception of Presidential Candidates (Case Study of the Presidential Election in 2019)

Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal ◽

10.33258/birle.v3i2.941 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 3 (2) ◽

pp. 795-801

Author(s):

Syahrur Razy ◽

Winarno Winarno ◽

Rusnaini Rusnaini

Keyword(s):

Social Media ◽

Presidential Election ◽

Vice President ◽

Study Data ◽

General Election ◽

Presidential Candidates ◽

Descriptive Research ◽

Study Population ◽

The Media ◽

Quantitative Descriptive

In the 2019 general election, the Indonesian people simultaneously elected the President and Vice President and legislative members. The Indonesian people are waiting for who will lead the next five years, especially for the President and Vice President with figures Joko Widodo - Ma'ruf Amin and challenger Prabowo Subianto - Sandiagan Uno. This study aims to determine the perceptions of first-time voters in the two-figure Presidential election in 2019. This study uses a quantitative descriptive study, data obtained from the sample of the study population were analyzed according to the statistical methods used. Descriptive research in this study is intended to get the perception of novice voters at SMAN 5 Surakarta of the presidential candidates in the 2019 general election. There are several things that can affect perceptions about the figure of the President, namely leadership, anti-corruption, welfare, nationalism and change for a more Indonesian state good. All factors are obtained through social media owned by novice voters. Beginner voters in SMAN 5 Surakarta are in the category of critical voters because with knowledge of social media and issues in the media are able to assess whether the prospective leader is eligible to be elected in the general election.

Download Full-text

Changes in public response associated with various COVID-19 restrictions in Ontario, Canada: an observational study using social media time series data (Preprint)

10.2196/preprints.28716 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Antony Chum ◽

Andrew Nielsen ◽

Zachary Bellows ◽

Eddie Farrell ◽

Pierre-Nicolas Durette ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Public Health ◽

Social Media ◽

Public Opinion ◽

News Media ◽

School Closure ◽

Social Distancing ◽

Public Response ◽

Collective Attention ◽

Positive Sentiment ◽

Negative Sentiment

BACKGROUND News media coverage of anti-mask protests, COVID-19 conspiracies, and pandemic politicization has overemphasized extreme views, but does little to represent views of the general public. Investigating the public’s response to various pandemic restrictions can provide a more balanced assessment of current views, allowing policymakers to craft better public health messages in anticipation of poor reactions to controversial restrictions. OBJECTIVE Using data from social media, this study aims to understand the changes in public opinion associated with the implementation of COVID-19 restrictions (e.g. business and school closure, regional lockdown differences, additional public health restrictions such as social distancing and masking). METHODS COVID-related tweets in Ontario (n=1,150,362) were collected based on keywords between March 12 to Oct 31 2020. Sentiment scores were calculated using the VADER algorithm for each tweet to represent its negative to positive emotion. Public health restrictions were identified using government and news media websites, and dynamic regression models with ARIMA errors were used to examine the association between public health restrictions and changes in public opinion over time (i.e. collective attention, aggregate positive sentiment, and level of disagreement) controlling for the effects of confounders (i.e. daily COVID-19 case counts, holidays, COVID-related official updates). RESULTS In addition to expected direct effects (e.g. business closure led to decreased positive sentiment and increased disagreements), the impact of restriction on public opinion is contextually driven. For example, the negative sentiment associated with business closures was reduced with higher COVID-19 case counts. While school closure and other restrictions (e.g. masking, social distancing, and travel restrictions) generated increased collective attention, they did not have an effect on aggregate sentiment or the level of disagreement (i.e. sentiment polarization). Partial (region-targeted) lockdowns were associated with better public response (i.e. higher number of tweets with net positive sentiment and lower levels of disagreement) compared to province-wide lockdowns. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates the feasibility of a rapid and flexible method of evaluating the public response to pandemic restrictions using near real-time social media data. This information can help public health practitioners and policymakers anticipate public response to future pandemic restrictions, and ensure adequate resources are dedicated to addressing increases in negative sentiment and levels of disagreement in the face of scientifically informed, but controversial, restrictions.

Download Full-text

PERBANDINGAN PESAN POLITIK DALAM KONFERENSI PERS JOKOWI DAN PRABOWO PASCA PENDAFTARAN CAPRES 2019

SUAR BETANG ◽

10.26499/surbet.v14i1.99 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Ali Kusno

Keyword(s):

Discourse Analysis ◽

Critical Discourse Analysis ◽

Presidential Election ◽

Vice President ◽

Critical Discourse ◽

Presidential Candidate ◽

Political Speech ◽

Presidential Candidates ◽

Political Speeches

Presidential and vice presidential candidates, Joko Widodo-Ma’ruf Amin and Prabowo-Sandi have been officialy registered as president and vice president candidates for Indonesia Presidential Election 2019. Both of president candidates gave a political speeches after registering at the KPU. Those speeches become a representation of their perception regarding presidential election 2019. That is why it is so important to reveal their political speech. This research used Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis. They both realize if the registration for presidential election just for the importance of Indonesian. Prabowo just give a different emphasis about KPU which have to guard the presidential election of 2019 that free from cheating. That point based on consideration if Prabowo as the president candidate who ever lose in presidential election of 2014 and has an argument if the defeat caused by cheating. Unfortunately, the commitment of pair of presidential and vice presidential candidate is still far from hope. The fact is everyday the community get a treated of bad political. Political that abuse each other and emmity. There is a parts who played the issues SARA to catch a sympathy the electors to get a dominance.

Download Full-text

One of Many Tools to Win the Election

Media Influence ◽

10.4018/978-1-5225-3929-2.ch003 ◽

2018 ◽

pp. 24-42

Author(s):

Ashik Shafi ◽

Fred Vultee

Keyword(s):

Social Media ◽

Presidential Election ◽

Real Life ◽

Political Agenda ◽

Agenda Building ◽

Election Campaigns ◽

Presidential Candidates ◽

The Public ◽

Virtual Presence ◽

Us Presidential Election

Download Full-text

Pengaruh Sosok Sandiaga Uno dalam Meraih Suara Generasi Milenial Pada Pemilihan Presiden Tahun 2019

KOMUNIDA : MEDIA KOMUNIKASI DAN DAKWAH ◽

10.35905/komunida.v9i1.1130 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 21-36

Author(s):

Aisy Nur Albar ◽

Acep Ikbal Hidayatullah

Keyword(s):

Social Media ◽

Mass Media ◽

Millennial Generation ◽

Democratic Party ◽

Vice President ◽

Presidential Candidate ◽

The Public ◽

Bargaining Position ◽

Survey Results ◽

The Voice

The Indonesian nation holds the largest democratic party, namely the election ofthe President and Vice President in 2019. Each candidate pair competes with each otherto win the public vote. One of the sound holes that has an effect on the presidentialelection later is the Millennial generation. Generation that is able to create change.According to the survey results, the millennial generation is still faltering in makingchoices or the presidential candidate must be concerned about reaching the millennialvote. The figure of Sandiaga Uno is someone who is believed to be able to embrace thevoice of the Millennial generation because of Uno's background that is very muchassociated with them. Handsome, young, polite, successful is a prominent thing from aSandiaga. This is what attracts the attention of the Millennial generation who prioritizevisual appearance. Various strategies are carried out in achieving sympathetic millennialgeneration starting from using mass media and social media. The struggle for the voice ofthe millennial generation in political battles in 2019 cannot be underestimated.Millennials have a favorable bargaining position so that they are expected to contribute alot of votes later.

Download Full-text