Pharmacological interventions for preventing rocuronium-induced pain responses and rocuronium-induced withdrawal responses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Pharmacological Interventions ◽

Study Objective ◽

Central Register ◽

Withdrawal Response

Study objective: Rocuronium is widely used during the induction of general anesthesia. However, it is associated with rocuronium-induced pain response, which can appear as a rocuronium-induced withdrawal response. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions in preventing rocuronium-induced pain response and rocuronium-induced withdrawal response using a network meta-analysis. Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs. Setting: Pharmacological interventions to prevent rocuronium-induced pain response and rocuronium-induced pain response and rocuronium-induced withdrawal. Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar were systematically searched from its inception until Mar 2020. Methods: We searched multiple databases and extracted randomized controlled trials that compared two or more pharmacological interventions to prevent rocuronium-induced pain response and rocuronium-induced withdrawal response in adult patients who received rocuronium injections for general anesthesia. We conducted network meta-analysis and used surface under the cumulative ranking curve values and rankograms to present the hierarchy of the pharmacological interventions evaluated. Results: In total, 43 studies (5,291 patients) were included in this network meta-analysis and 31 pharmacological interventions were evaluated. The rankogram and cumulative ranking plot showed that oxycodone followed by a combination of lidocaine and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), esmolol, alfentanil, and rocuronium mixed with NaHCO3 had the lowest frequency of rocuronium-induced withdrawal response. In terms of rocuronium-induced pain response, NaHCO3 mixed with rocuronium showed the lowest frequency, followed by a combination of lidocaine and NaHCO3, a combination of lidocaine and nitrous oxide, rocuronium mixed with lidocaine, and lidocaine. Conclusions: Lidocaine administration has been shown to reduce the incidence of rocuronium-induced pain response regardless of the method of injection or drug combination. The combination of lidocaine and NaHCO3 or mixing NaHCO3with rocuronium was effective at reducing rocuronium-induced withdrawal response. In particular, oxycodone was shown to be more effective than the other opioids evaluated and esmolol was also found to be effective at reducing rocuronium-induced withdrawal response.

Pharmacological interventions for COVID-19: Protocol for a Rapid Living Systematic Review with network meta-analysis

10.1101/2020.05.02.20088823 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Pinto ◽

Aline Pereira da Rocha ◽

Keilla Martins Milby ◽

César Ramos Rocha-Filho ◽

Felipe Sebastião de Assis Reis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Critical Appraisal ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Pharmacological Interventions ◽

Systematic Review Methodology ◽

Assessment Development ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

ABSTRACTCONTEXT AND OBJECTIVECoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged in China in December 2019 and rapidly spread. Although extraordinary efforts have been made on research regarding pharmacological interventions, none have proven effective. This is the protocol for a rapid living systematic review that aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of different pharmacological interventions for the treatment of COVID-19.METHODSrapid living systematic review methodology with Network Meta-Analysis following the recommendations of Cochrane Handbook. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-RCTs that evaluate single and/or combined pharmacological interventions at any dose for the treatment of COVID-19. We will search PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), LILACS, Scopus and SciELO to identify potentially eligible studies. No language restrictions will be used in the selection. We will perform the critical appraisal of included studies with the Risk of Bias tool and the certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030157 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (7) ◽

pp. e030157

Author(s):

Tianci Chai ◽

Zhimin Shen ◽

Sui Chen ◽

Yuhan Lin ◽

Zhenyang Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Oesophageal Cancer ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Malignant Tumours ◽

Central Register ◽

Registration Number ◽

Thoracic Approach ◽

Randomised Controlled

IntroductionOesophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours and has been identified as one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Surgery is considered to be the optimal treatment for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer can significantly extend the survival period of patients and provide a potential opportunity for a cure. However, there is still controversy regarding which thoracic approach (right or left) during oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer can lead to better surgical outcomes globally. This systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed to determine which thoracic approach during oesophagectomy will achieve longer patient survival and will be more beneficial for patients.Methods and analysisWe will search PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cancerlit, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar databases for relevant clinical trials published in any language before 1 October 2019. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, propensity score-matched comparative studies and prospective cohort studies of interest, published or unpublished, that meet the inclusion criteria will be included. Subgroup analysis of the type of operation, tumour pathological stage and ethnicity will be performed.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019124133.Ethics and disseminationBecause this study will be based on published or unpublished records and studies, there is no need for ethics approval. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Pharmacological prevention of fractures in patients undergoing glucocorticoid therapies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Rheumatology ◽

10.1093/rheumatology/keaa228 ◽

2020 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Jiawen Deng ◽

Zachary Silver ◽

Emma Huang ◽

Elena Zheng ◽

Kyra Kavanagh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Vitamin D ◽

Vertebral Fractures ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Vitamin D Metabolites ◽

Pharmacological Prevention ◽

Abstract Objective To perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) on the efficacy of antiosteoporotic interventions in the prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in adult patients taking glucocorticoids (GCs). Methods We performed NMAs based on a prospectively developed protocol. A librarian-assisted database search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Chinese databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antiosteoporotic interventions in adult patients taking GCs. Outcomes were vertebral and non-vertebral fracture incidences. Results We included 56 RCTs containing 6479 eligible patients in our analysis. We found that alendronate and teriparatide were associated with decreased odds of both vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Denosumab and risedronate were associated with decreased odds of vertebral fractures, while etidronate, ibandronate and alfacalcidol were associated with decreased odds of non-vertebral fractures. We observed low network heterogeneity as indicated by the I2 statistic, and we did not detect evidence of publication bias. All outcomes were based on a moderate quality of evidence according to GRADE. Conclusion Bisphosphonates, teriparatide and denosumab are associated with decreased odds of fracture in patients undergoing GC therapy. Vitamin D metabolites and analogues (e.g. alfacalcidol) may have greater anti-fracture efficacy compared with plain vitamin D. Systematic Review Registration The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)—CRD42019127073

Evaluation of the Effect of Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 on Gastrointestinal Infections in Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Microorganisms ◽

10.3390/microorganisms9071412 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (7) ◽

pp. 1412

Author(s):

Belén Pastor-Villaescusa ◽

Ruth Blanco-Rojo ◽

Mónica Olivares

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Well Being ◽

Preventive Therapy ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Gastrointestinal Infections ◽

Early Stages ◽

Central Register ◽

Present Systematic Review

Reducing the incidence of gastrointestinal infections (GIs) that occur at early stages to mitigate hospitalizations and treatments with adverse effects is a promising strategy for providing well-being to infants and their families. This systematic review and meta-analysis explores whether the early administration of Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 might be effective as a preventive therapy for GIs. We reviewed the literature to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness of milk formulas supplemented with L. fermentum CECT5716 administered to infants at early stages to reduce the incidence of GIs. The MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science (WoS), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via CENTRAL) databases were searched up to 15 June 2021. GI data from the included studies were synthesized in a random-effects model. Three RCTs were finally selected including 435 infants. There was a significant reduction in the incidence rate of GIs for those receiving L. fermentum CECT5716 compared with those receiving placebo (IRR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36–0.74, p = 0.0004). Heterogeneity between studies was moderate (I2 = 54.5%). Based on the present systematic review and meta-analysis, the administration of L. fermentum CECT5716 at doses from 1 × 109 to 8.4 × 108 cfu/day in milk formulas may prevent GIs in infants up to 12 months old. Longer-term studies including a higher number of infants are needed to determine whether the use of this probiotic during the early stages of life is an efficient way to reduce the incidence of GIs.

IgM ELISA for leptospirosis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ciência & Saúde Coletiva ◽

10.1590/1413-812320172212.14112016 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 22 (12) ◽

pp. 4001-4012 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Maria Ines Rosa ◽

Maria Fernandes dos Reis ◽

Carla Simon ◽

Eduardo Dondossola ◽

Maria Cecília Alexandre ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Sensitivity And Specificity ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Grey Literature ◽

British Library ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Medical Subject Headings ◽

Igm Elisa ◽

Abstract A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of IgM ELISA for Leptospirosis diagnosis. A search of Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Grey literature (Google Scholar and British Library) was conducted. The medical subject headings (MeSHs) and the words “leptospirosis”, “human leptospirosis” and “IgM ELISA” were used. Fifty-two studies were analyzed, which included 10,775 samples. The pooled sensitivity of all the studies was 86% (CI 95%, 85%-87%) and specificity was 90% (CI 95%, 89%-91%). In studies of the acute phase, the sensitivity and specificity were 84% (CI 95%, 82%-85%) and 91% (CI 95%, 90%-91%), respectively. In conclusion, IgM ELISA is sensitive for use as an initial screen for leptospiral infections.

Prevalence and Possible Role of Candida Species in Patients with Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mediators of Inflammation ◽

10.1155/2018/9602362 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2018 ◽

pp. 1-7 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Aldona Pietrzak ◽

Ewelina Grywalska ◽

Mateusz Socha ◽

Jacek Roliński ◽

Kinga Franciszkiewicz-Pietrzak ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Fungal Colonization ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Detection Rates ◽

Central Register ◽

Cross Sectional Studies

Although fungal colonization is implicated in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, its prevalence remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide an overview on the prevalence of Candida species in patients with psoriasis. We searched databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and http://clinicaltrials.gov) to identify studies involving subjects of any age with an established diagnosis of psoriasis and healthy controls, who were tested for carriage of Candida spp. on the skin or mucosal membranes (or saliva and stool), or presented with clinical candidiasis with microbiologically confirmed etiology. We identified nine cross-sectional studies including a total of 1038 subjects with psoriasis (psoriatics) and 669 controls. We found Candida species detection rates for psoriatics were significantly higher than those in the controls, especially in the oral mucosa milieux. These results suggest psoriasis may be one of the systemic diseases that predispose to oral Candida spp. carriage and infection.

Immune-related adverse events and efficacy outcomes in patients treated with immunotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.5_suppl.92 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (5_suppl) ◽

pp. 92-92

Author(s):

Eric Druyts ◽

Mark Boye ◽

Himani Agg ◽

Catherine Muehlenbein ◽

Andrew Frederickson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Head And Neck Cancer ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Efficacy Data ◽

Incidence Data ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

92 Background: Immunotherapy (IO) can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Evidence on the association of irAEs and efficacy is limited. Methods: We conducted a systematic review in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception to July 1, 2019) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting irAEs, incidence and efficacy data for pembrolizumab (PEM), nivolumab (NIVO), ipilimumab (IPI), atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, and aldesleukin in lung, renal, head and neck cancer, and melanomas. RCTs assessing IO monotherapy or IO combinations in at least one arm were included. Evaluated outcomes were 1) irAE incidence (rash, pruritis, diarrhea, colitis, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, transaminitis, hypophysitis, pneumonitis, arthralgia, anemia, and hepatitis); and 2) efficacy (response and survival). irAE incidence data will be pooled and meta-analysis performed to assess the association of irAEs with efficacy; heterogeneity between RCTs will be evaluated. Results: Fifty RCTs were included: IOs were compared to chemotherapy or chemotherapy-combinations (19), to other interventions (8), to placebo (3), and head-to-head (20). irAE reporting and definitions were heterogeneous across RCTs. The most common all-grade irAEs were skin, GI, and endocrine. For skin irAEs, rash ranged from 0% (PEM 2 mg/kg, n = 6) to 73% (NIVO + IPI, n = 11); pruritus was from 1% (PEM 2 mg/kg, n = 89) to 50% (NIVO + IPI, n = 6). For GI irAEs, diarrhea ranged from 0% (PEM 2 mg/kg, n = 6) to 64% (NIVO + IPI, n = 11); colitis was from 0% (NIVO 3 mg/kg, n = 98) to 23% (NIVO + IPI, n = 94). For endocrine irAEs, hypothyroidism ranged from 0% (NIVO 3 mg/kg, n = 12) to 83% (NIVO + IPI, n = 6), hyperthyroidism was from 0% (PEM 2 mg/kg, n = 6 and IPI 3 mg/kg, n = 46) to 27% (NIVO + IPI, n = 11), and hypophysitis was from 0% (PEM 10 mg/kg, n = 84 and NIVO 3 mg/kg, n = 25) to 26% (NIVO + IPI, n = 35). Liver, pulmonary, and musculoskeletal irAEs, and anemia, were reported less frequently and with lower incidence. Conclusions: irAEs are increasingly reported in IO RCTs, but lack reporting and definition consistency. The meta-analysis results may provide clarity on irAEs incidence and association with efficacy.

Effect of Berry Polyphenols on Glucose Metabolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Current Developments in Nutrition ◽

10.1093/cdn/nzaa100 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (7) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Theresa F Rambaran ◽

Jonathan Bergman ◽

Peter Nordström ◽

Anna Nordström

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Glucose Metabolism ◽

Randomized Controlled Trials ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Inverse Variance ◽

Central Register ◽

Mean Differences

ABSTRACT The effect of berry polyphenols on glucose metabolism has been evaluated in several studies; however, the results are conflicting. A systematic review and meta-analysis was therefore conducted to evaluate the effect of berry polyphenol consumption on glucose metabolism in adults with impaired glucose tolerance or insulin resistance. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL (EBSCO), and Scopus were searched for randomized controlled trials published by June 2019. Of the 3240 articles found, 21 met inclusion criteria. Study-specific effects were calculated as mean differences, which were pooled using fixed-effect, inverse-variance weighting. Overall, berry polyphenol consumption did not have a clear effect on biomarkers of glucose metabolism compared with placebo or no treatment. Although some analyses showed statistically significant effects, these effects were too small to be of clinical relevance. The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews as CRD42019130811.

Complications and Mortality Associated with Temporary Abdominal Closure Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/000313481708300220 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 83 (2) ◽

pp. 191-216 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Adam Cristaudo ◽

Scott Jennings ◽

Ronny Gunnarsson ◽

Alan Decosta

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Open Abdomen ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Final Analysis ◽

Fascial Closure ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽

Abdominal Closure ◽

Temporary abdominal closure (TAC) techniques are routinely used in the open abdomen. Ideally, they should prevent evisceration, aid in removal of unwanted fluid from the peritoneal cavity, facilitate in achieving safe definitive fascial closure, as well as prevent the development of intra-abdominal complications. TAC techniques used in the open abdomen were compared with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to identify which was superior. A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines involving Medline, Excerpta Medica, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Clinicaltrials.gov. All studies describing TAC technique use in the open abdomen were eligible for inclusion. Data were analyzed per TAC technique in the form of a meta-analysis. A total of 225 articles were included in the final analysis. A meta-analysis involving only randomized controlled trials showed that NPWT with continuous fascial closure was superior to NPWT alone for definitive fascial closure [mean difference (MD): 35% ± 23%; P = 0.0044]. A subsequent meta-analysis involving all included studies confirmed its superiority across outcomes for definitive fascial closure (MD: 19% ± 3%; P < 0.0001), perioperative (MD: -4.0% ± 2.4%; P = 0.0013) and in-hospital (MD: -5.0% ± 2.9%; P = 0.0013) mortality, entero-atmospheric fistula (MD: 22.0% ± 1.8%; P = 0.0041), ventral hernia (MD: -4.0% ± 2.4%; P = 0.0010), and intra-abdominal abscess (MD: -3.1% ± 2.1%; P = 0.0044). Therefore, it was concluded that NPWT with continuous fascial traction is superior to NPWT alone.

The Effects of Exercise on BDNF Levels in Adolescents: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph17176056 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 17 (17) ◽

pp. 6056

Author(s):

Kesley Pablo Morais de Azevedo ◽

Victor Hugo de Oliveira ◽

Gidyenne Christine Bandeira Silva de Medeiros ◽

Ádala Nayana de Sousa Mata ◽

Daniel Ángel García ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Randomized Controlled Trials ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Control Group ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Exercise Programs ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Central Register ◽

Before And After

The aim of this study was to analyze the evidence available in the literature about the effects of exercise on brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in adolescents. The literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, SportDiscus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and CINAHL. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials performed with adolescents (10–19 years) who underwent different exercise programs and who evaluated BDNF levels before and after the intervention were included. We included six studies, four RCTs and two non-RCTs in the systematic review with a total of 407 adolescents. In two randomized trials and one non-RCT, the intervention groups showed significant improvements in BDNF levels compared with the control group. The results presented in the meta-analysis indicate that despite the positive effect in favor of the intervention, there were no significant differences (standardized mean difference 0.28 ng/mL, 95% confidence interval −0.28 to 0.85; p = 0.32, I² = 0%). The results presented in our review indicate that aerobic exercise programs practiced in moderate- or high-intensity are promising strategies to increase BDNF levels in adolescents. However, further studies are required to support this finding.