scholarly journals Comparison of agar gel immunodiffusion test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and PCR in diagnostics of enzootic bovine leukosis

2005 ◽  
Vol 59 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 363-370
Author(s):  
Tadej Malovrh ◽  
M. Pate ◽  
M. Ocepek ◽  
B. Krt
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Response ◽  
Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Serological Test ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Agar Gel ◽  
Bovine Leukaemia Virus ◽  
Leukaemia Virus ◽  
Elisa Kit ◽  
Pcr Method

Bovine leukaemia virus (BLV) is a retrovirus that induces a chronic infection in cattle. Once infected, cattle remain virus carriers for life and start to show an antibody response within a few weeks after infection. Eradication and control of the disease are based on early diagnostics and segregation of the carriers. The choice of a diagnostic method depends on the eradication programme, money resources and characteristics of the herd to be analysed. The agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) test has been the serological test of choice for routine diagnosis of serum samples. Nevertheless, in more recent years, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has replaced the AGID for large scale testing. For this purpose, commercially available BLV-ELISA kits were compared to the AGID and to the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method performed with two sets of primers, amplifying env region. The ELISA kit based on the p24 core protein was found to be less specific and served as a screening test. The ELISA kit based on the envelope glycoprotein (gpSI) served as a verification test and gave a good correlation with the AGID test and PCR method. However, ELISA showed a higher sensitivity than AGID. The p24 based ELiSA was useful for screening a large number of samples, whereas gp51 based ELISA, AGID and PCR were more important for detecting the antibody response against the individual BLV-proteins and therefore for verification of the infection with BLV.

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of bovine leukaemia virus p24 antibody in cattle

1990 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
John B. Molloy ◽  
Peter J. Walker ◽  
F.Chris Baldock ◽  
Barry J. Rodwell ◽  
Jeff A. Cowley
Keyword(s):  
Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Bovine Leukaemia Virus ◽  
Leukaemia Virus

Can Osteopontin Be Considered a Biomarker for Endometriosis?

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (9) ◽  
pp. 2132-2134
Author(s):  
Daniela Roxana Albu (Matasariu) ◽  
Elena Mihalceanu ◽  
Alina Pangal ◽  
Carmen Vulpoi ◽  
Mircea Onofriescu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Serum Level ◽  
Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Pelvic Pain ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Multifactorial Disease ◽  
Elisa Kit ◽  
Healthy Women ◽  
Progesterone Treatment ◽  
Large Dispersion

Endometriosis is a multifactorial disease that is manifested by infertility and pelvic pain. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of progesterone treatment on the serum level of osteopontin, a multipotent cytokine, in patients with endometriosis. The study was prospective and we evaluated osteopontin levels that were measured in the serum of 40 patients with endometriosis and 12 healthy women using a standardized Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) kit. Osteopontin seric levels were lower in endometriosis patients and increased after progesterone treatment. Because of the large dispersion of data even in the control group, we find the association between osteopontin and endometriosis questionable.

Mechanization of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for large scale screening of sera

1977 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.J. Ruitenberg ◽  
J.A. van Amstel ◽  
B.J.M. Brosi ◽  
P.A. Steerenberg
Keyword(s):  
Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Large Scale Screening

Effect of Early Immunization on Antibody Response to Reimmunization with Measles Vaccine as Demonstrated by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-93
Author(s):  
M. Dianne Murphy ◽  
Philip A. Brunell ◽  
Alan W. Lievens ◽  
Ziad M. Shehab
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Response ◽  
Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
San Antonio ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Measles Vaccine ◽  
Young Infants ◽  
Antibody Titers

A measles epidemic in San Antonio, Texas provided a population of children who were immunized at ≤10 months of age and reimmunized at ≥15 months of age. Of these children, 302 were evaluated for measles antibody by the sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and their responses were compared with those of 300 children who had been immunized at the customary time (≥15 months) with a single immunization. There were only five seronegative findings in each group. The children immunized at the customary time did have significantly higher (P < .001) antibody titers than the children immunized at ≤10 months and reimmunized at ≥15 months. These results indicate that early immunization followed by reimmunization may be indicated when young infants are at significant risk of measles exposure. This approach should not create an increased number of serologically nonresponsive children when reimmunized at ≥15 months.

scholarly journals An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of IgG antibodies against Babesia equi in horses

2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1525-1529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiane Divan Baldani ◽  
Rosangela Zacarias Machado ◽  
Paulo de Tarso Landgraf Botteon ◽  
Felipe Santoro Takakura ◽  
Carlos Luiz Massard
Keyword(s):  
Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Serological Test ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Sao Paulo ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
São Paulo ◽  
Igg Antibodies ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Babesia Equi ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity

A crude antigenic preparation of Babesia equi was used to develop and establish the suitability of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of parasite carriers. Optimal dilutions of the antigen, using positive and negative reference sera, were determined by checkboard titrations. The specificity and sensitivity of the ELISA were 100 %. A total of 90 serum samples were taken from horses from the Northeast region of São Paulo State and examined for diagnosis of equine B. equi infection by ELISA. Approximately 75% (n=67) of all the horses tested were found serologically positive for B. equi. These results suggest that the ELISA described may prove to be an appropriate serological test for epidemiological studies on B. equi infections in the field and that equine piroplasmosis is a cause for serious concern in the State of São Paulo, Brazil.

scholarly journals Assessment of Mumps Virus-Specific Antibodies: Comparison of Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Estimates

2019 ◽  
Vol 220 (9) ◽  
pp. 1462-1468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphanie Ravault ◽  
Damien Friel ◽  
Emmanuel Di Paolo ◽  
Adrian Caplanusi ◽  
Paul Gillard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Response ◽  
Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Neutralization Test ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Mumps Virus ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Serological Response ◽  
Moderate Correlation ◽  
Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test

Abstract Background The plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT), which measures a subset of immunoglobulin antibodies (functional neutralizing antibodies), and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), which measures total immunoglobulin (neutralizing and nonneutralizing antibodies), characterize different aspects of the anti–mumps virus antibody response after vaccination. Methods Data from a recent phase 3 clinical trial (NCT01681992) of 2 measles-mumps-rubella vaccines were used to compare anti-mumps antibody responses measured using an unenhanced PRNT (GSK; seropositivity cutoff and threshold, 2.5 and 4 times the 50% end-point dilution, respectively) with those estimated using an ELISA (thresholds, 5 and 10 ELISA units/mL, respectively). Results Of 3990 initially seronegative samples, 3284 (82.3%) were seropositive after vaccination for anti-mumps antibodies in both assays. The Pearson correlation coefficient for double-positive samples was 0.57, indicative of a moderate correlation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that an ELISA threshold of 51.7 ELISA units/mL best corresponded to the PRNT seroresponse threshold. There was no obvious vaccine brand effect on the correlation between assays. Conclusions The moderate correlation between the anti-mumps antibody measurements obtained with PRNT and ELISA reflects different aspects of the serological response. In the absence of a well-defined protective serological threshold, PRNT provides complementary information on the antibody response, whereas ELISA remains a critically useful measurement of vaccine immunogenicity.

scholarly journals Determination of Prolactin in Canine Saliva: Is it Possible to Use a Commercial ELISA kit?

Animals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gutiérrez ◽  
Gazzano ◽  
Torracca ◽  
Meucci ◽  
Mariti
Keyword(s):  
Stress Response ◽  
Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Matrix Effect ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Elisa Kit ◽  
Cases Study ◽  
Dog Blood

Prolactin has been reported to be a remarkable index of stress response, both acute and chronic, in several species. The use of biological matrixes other than blood is receiving increasing interest in the study of hormones, due to the lower invasiveness in collection. This research aimed to investigate the possibility of using a commercial ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) kit for measuring canine prolactin in blood for the quantification of canine prolactin in saliva. Study 1 consisted of a validation protocol, using saliva samples collected from lactating and non-lactating dogs. Study 2 was conducted to investigate a possible correlation between prolactin concentration in saliva and plasma in sheltered dogs by using the same kit. Prolactin values were reliably read only when they came from blood samples, not from saliva, but tended to be low in most of the cases. Study 1 showed that saliva had a matrix effect. In study 2, saliva prolactin levels were low and in 42.9% of cases, not readable. No correlation between prolactin values in plasma and saliva was found (ρ=0.482; p=0.274). These findings suggested that the determination of prolactin in dog saliva through an ELISA kit created for measuring prolactin in dog blood was unreliable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document