scholarly journals Significance of microvessel density in prostate cancer core biopsy

2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Salapura-Dugonjic ◽  
Slavica Knezevic-Usaj ◽  
Zivka Eri ◽  
Ljiljana Tadic-Latinovic
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Microvessel Density ◽  
Significant Positive Correlation ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Categorical Variable ◽  
Biopsy Specimens ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Study Population

Background/Aim. In prostate tumors, angiogenesis, measured as microvessel density, is associated with tumor stage and Gleason score. The aim of this study was determine neovascularization of prostatic adenocarcinomas in core biopsies and corresponding prostatectomies. Methods. The study population included 61 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate carcinoma patients and did not receive chemohormonal, or radiation therapy before surgery. Tumor blocks were immunostained using the endothelial-specific antibody CD31 and subsequently evaluated at x 400 magnification in both biopsies and corresponding prostatectomies. Results. When comparing microvessel density in core biopsies and corresponding prostatectomies, no statistically significant difference was found (p > 0.1). A statistically significant positive correlation was found when determining correlation between microvessel density (as linear and categorical variable, i.e. with the cut-off value of 48) that was associated with the Gleason score (p < 0.05) and tumor stage (p < 0.0001). There was no correlation between microvessel density and preoperative values of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (p > 0.1). Conclusion. Microvessel density can be reliably applied to needle prostate biopsy specimens. Quantification of the microvascular density in biopsies is an accurate pre-operative predictor of tumor stage, discriminating between organconfined and organ-extending neoplasms.

Gleason score upgrade among 10,282 men who underwent surgery as initial treatment in 2010: A population-based study.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 72-72
Author(s):  
Hong Zhang ◽  
Edward M. Messing ◽  
Hamza Ahmed ◽  
Yuhchyau Chen
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Time Of Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer

72 Background: Active surveillance is now accepted initial management for men who have localized prostate cancer with low risk of disease progression. Many criteria have been used for patient identification, including Gleason score (GS) obtained from prostate biopsy. Because of concerns of sampling error, some have recommended repeated biopsy before committing to active surveillance. However, there is limited information about the risk of missing high grade disease using the current standard biopsy approach. This study seeks to compare GS difference from biopsy and surgery to provide an estimated rate of GS upgrade. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program was used to identify men with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage T1-2cN0M0 prostate cancer diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2010. Patients who underwent prostatectomy were selected for further analysis. Based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and GS, cases were divided into low (PSA <=10 and GS <=6) and intermediate (10<PSA<=20 or GS=7) risk groups. The rates of GS upgrade were reported for each group. Chi-square tests were used to assess differences in categorical variables (e.g. age and race) between groups of GS upgrade and no change/downgrade. Results: A total of 10,282 men were evaluated, with 9.2% (n=942) having low-risk disease, and 90.8% (n=9340) having intermediate-risk disease. Among men with low-risk prostate cancer, 22.3% (n=210) had GS upgrade and 0.8% (n=8) had GS 8 disease. Among men with intermediate risk disease, 26.2% (n=2446) had GS upgrade and 2.3% (n=214) had GS 8 disease. There was no statistically significant difference in either age or race distribution among men who had GS upgrade versus no change or downgrade at the time of surgery. Conclusions: A substantial number of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients had GS upgrade at the time of surgery, but few had upgraded to GS 8 high risk disease. These observations suggest that repeat biopsy prior to active surveillance may not be necessary.

Diagnostic characteristics of men harboring lethal prostate cancer: A population-based analysis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 217-217
Author(s):  
John Thomas Helgstrand ◽  
Nina Klemann ◽  
Birgitte Grønkaer Toft ◽  
Ben Vainer ◽  
Klaus Brasso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Distant Metastatic Disease ◽  
Diagnostic Characteristics ◽  
Localized Disease

217 Background: Prostate specific antigen (PSA) based screening increases the number of men diagnosed with early localized prostate cancer (PCa). Further, curatively intended therapies have been demonstrated to reduce PCa mortality in randomized trials. However, controversy exists, and the overall impact on PCa mortality is less clear. Men who eventually die from PCa may constitute a subgroup with either adverse histopathological characteristics and/or clinically advanced disease at diagnosis. However, the clinical characteristics at diagnosis for men who eventually die from PCa are largely unknown. We retrieved clinical characteristics of all men dying from PCa in Denmark in an 18-year period. Methods: All men who died of PCa during the period 1995 to 2013 were identified in the Danish Causes of Death Registry. Age, Gleason score (GS), tumor stage classification, and PSA were retrieved from the Danish Prostate Cancer Registry (DaPCaR). For validation, manual revision of patient charts was performed. Patients were divided into three clinical phenotypes: distant metastatic disease, locally advanced/N+ disease, and localized disease. Patients with localized disease were further grouped according to GS and PSA. Results: A total of 19,487 men died of PCa in the period 1995-2013. In total, 46.7%, 16.8% and 25.1% of men presented with distant metastatic disease, locally advanced/N+ disease or localized disease, respectively. Among men with localized disease, 85.1% had GS ≥ 7 and only 2.1% (0.5% of all men dying from PCa) only, presented with low risk (PSA < 20 and GS ≤ 6) localized disease at the time of diagnosis. Conclusions: The majority of men (63.5%) who died from PCa had either locally advanced/N+ or M+ disease at diagnosis. Among men with localized PCa at diagnosis, the majority of men subsequently dying from PCa had either PSA > 20 ng/ml and/or adverse histopathological characteristics with Gleason score ≥ 7. A total of 94.5% of patients dying from PCa had either metastatic, locally advanced/N+, and/or GS ≥ 7 disease. Patients with localized disease, PSA < 20 ng/ml and GS ≤ 6 amounted for only 0.5% of all patients dying from PCa.

scholarly journals The Impact of Pathologic Upgrading of Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on the Risk of the Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juhyun Park ◽  
Sangjun Yoo ◽  
Min Chul Cho ◽  
Min Hyun Cho ◽  
Chang Wook Jeong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact

Objective. To investigate the impact of pathologic upgrading of Gleason score (GS) 7 prostate cancer on the risk of the biochemical recurrence. Materials and Methods. A total of 1678 patients with postoperative GS 7 prostate cancer without lymph node metastasis were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were categorized into four groups depending on pathologic upgrading: upgraded GS 3+4, nonupgraded GS 3+4, upgraded GS 4+3, and nonupgraded GS 4+3. Kaplan-Meier multivariate model was created. Results. The mean age was significantly higher in the nonupgraded GS 4+3 group than in other groups, whereas the mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was lower in the upgraded GS 3+4 group. Pathologic findings, such as extracapsular extension, seminal vesical invasion, and the surgical margin rate, were different from each other. Five-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was 85%, 73%, 69%, and 60% in upgraded GS 3+4, nonupgraded GS 3+4, upgraded GS 4+3, and nonupgraded GS 4+3 group, respectively. There was significant difference between the nonupgraded 4+3 and upgraded 4+3 group, as well as between upgraded 3+4 and nonupgraded 3+4 group. However, the two middle patient groups, that is, the nonupgraded GS 3+4 group and the upgraded GS 4+3 group, did not show the statistical difference (Log-rank test, p value = 0.259). Conclusion. The information on pathologic upgrading in the biopsy reports of patients could help to provide more detailed analysis for the biochemical recurrence of GS 7 prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Prostate cancer patients can benefit from 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor treatment: a meta-analysis

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e9282
Author(s):  
Tuo Deng ◽  
Xueming Lin ◽  
Xiaolu Duan ◽  
Zihao He ◽  
Zhijian Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Reductase Inhibitors ◽  
Online Databases ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Control

Background The efficacy and safety of 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) in treating prostate cancer (PCa) have not been fully determined. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 5ARIs for PCa patients. Methods A comprehensive literature search of online databases was conducted to obtain comparative studies exploring the effectiveness and safety of 5ARIs in treating PCa up to October 2019. Summarized odds ratio s (OR s) or hazard ratio s (HR s) were calculated to compare the outcomes between 5ARI and control groups. Our meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42018109809. Results A total of 2,277 patients from 10 studies were included. No significant difference was found in prostate-specific antigen progression between two groups (OR = 0.82, 95% CI [0.52–1.29], P = 0.40). However, 5ARI treatment significantly reduced the total progression of PCa (OR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.48–0.77], P < 0.0001), especially for patients with local (OR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.44–0.73], P < 0.00001) and low-Gleason score (≤7) PCa (OR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.48–0.84], P = 0.002). Additionally, 5ARIs also significantly prolonged the progression-free survival time (HR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.34–0.96], P = 0.04) for PCa patients. No significant difference was found in the occurrence of PCa recurrence, metastasis, biopsy reclassification, and side-effects between two groups. Conclusions Our study suggests that 5ARI treatment can benefit patients with local and low Gleason score (≤7) PCa, especially in delaying the disease progression. More studies with larger sample size and comprehensive study design are still needed to verify our outcomes.

Risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy or brachytherapy in men with low- or intermediate-risk disease.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 198-198
Author(s):  
N. D. Arvold ◽  
M. Chen ◽  
J. W. Moul ◽  
B. J. Moran ◽  
D. E. Dosoretz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference

198 Background: Radical prostatectomy (RP) and brachytherapy (BT) are widely utilized treatments for favorable-risk prostate cancer (PC). We estimated the risk of PC-specific mortality (PCSM) following RP or BT in men with low- or intermediate-risk PC using prospectively collected data. Methods: The study cohort comprised 5,760 men with low-risk PC (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level ≤ 10 ng/mL, clinical category T1c or 2a, and Gleason score ≤ 6), and 3,079 men with intermediate-risk PC (PSA level 10-20 ng/mL, clinical T2b or T2c, or Gleason score 7). Competing risks multivariable regression was performed to assess risk of PCSM after RP or BT, adjusting for age, treatment year, cardiovascular comorbidity, and known PC prognostic factors. Results: There was no significant difference in the risk of PCSM among men with low-risk PC (11 vs. 6 deaths: adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.62; 95% CI, 0.59–4.45; P = 0.35) who received BT compared to RP. However among men with intermediate-risk PC, despite significantly shorter median follow-up for men undergoing BT as compared to RP (4.1 vs. 7.2 years, P < 0.001), there was a trend toward an increased risk of PCSM (18 vs. 9 deaths: AHR, 2.30; 95% CI, 0.95–5.58; P = 0.07) for men treated with BT. Conclusions: The risk of PCSM among men with low-risk PC was not significantly different following RP or BT, however there may be a reduced risk of PCSM after RP as compared to BT in men with intermediate-risk PC. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Changes in prostate apparent diffusion coefficient values during radiotherapy after neoadjuvant hormones

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 359-364
Author(s):  
Andrew McPartlin ◽  
Lucy Kershaw ◽  
Alan McWilliam ◽  
Marcus Ben Taylor ◽  
Clare Hodgson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Diffusion Coefficient ◽  
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Prostate Gland ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Predictive Tool ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Apparent Diffusion ◽  
Adc Values

Background: Changes in prostate cancer apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide a noninvasive method for assessing radiotherapy response. This may be attenuated by neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NA-HT). We investigate ADC values measured before, during and after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) following NA-HT. Methods: Patients with ⩾T2c biopsy-proven prostate cancer receiving 3 months of NA-HT plus definitive radiotherapy were prospectively identified. All underwent ADC-MRI scans in the week before EBRT, in the third week of EBRT and 8 weeks after its completion. Imaging was performed at 1.5 T. The tumour, peripheral zone (PZ) and central zone (CZ) of the prostate gland were identified and median ADC calculated for each region and time point. Results: Between September and December 2014, 15 patients were enrolled (median age 68.3, range 57–78) with a median Gleason score of 7 (6–9) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis 14 (3–197) ng/ml. Median period of NA-HT prior to first imaging was 96 days (69–115). All patients completed treatment. Median follow up was 25 months (7–34), with one patient relapsing in this time. Thirteen patients completed all imaging as intended, one withdrew after one scan and another missed the final imaging. PZ and CZ could not be identified in one patient. Median tumour ADC before, during and post radiotherapy was 1.24 × 10−3 mm2/s (interquartile range 0.16 × 10−3 mm2/s), 1.31 × 10−3 mm2/s (0.22 × 10−3 mm2/s), then 1.32 × 10−3 mm2/s (0.13 × 10−3 mm2/s) respectively ( p > 0.05). There was no significant difference between median tumour and PZ or CZ ADC at any point. Gleason score did not correlate with ADC values. Conclusions: Differences in ADC parameters of normal and malignant tissue during EBRT appear attenuated by prior NA-HT. The use of changes in ADC as a predictive tool in this group may have limited utility.

scholarly journals PSA density is superior than PSA and Gleason score for adverse

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stavros Sfoungaristos ◽  
Petros Perimenis
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Cancer Prognosis ◽  
Psa Density ◽  
Pathologic Features ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and its kinetics have changed prostate cancer screening and diagnosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate their value in prostate cancer prognosis by determining the predictive potential of PSA density for adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy, in terms of positive surgical margins (PSM), extracapsular disease (ECD), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and/or lymph node invasion (LNI), and to compare their predictive ability with preoperative PSA and biopsy Gleason score.Methods: We retrospectively analysed 285 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and underwent a retropubic radical prostatectomy for clinically localized disease. Data concerning preoperative PSA, biopsy Gleason score and PSA density were collected and analyzed. PSA density was calculated by dividing preoperative PSA and the pathological volume of the prostate.Results: There was a significant difference in PSA density valuesbetween patients with PSM, ECD, SVI and LNI. Areas under thecurve for PSA density were higher than those of PSA and Gleason score for all parameters of adverse pathology. In multivariate analyses, it was shown that PSA density and Gleason score were the only statistically significant predictors for PSM and ECD, PSA density and PSA for SVI and only PSA density for LNI.Conclusion: PSA density is an accurate predictor for adverse pathology prediction in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Theseresults demonstrate that this parameter is useful to determine the aggressiveness of prostate cancer and can be used as an adjunct in predicting outcomes after surgery.

Prostate cancer aggressiveness and age: Impact of p53, BCL-2 and microvessel density

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 1142-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Calvocoressi ◽  
Edward Uchio ◽  
John Ko ◽  
Krishnan Radhakrishnan ◽  
Mihaela Aslan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Molecular Markers ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Microvessel Density ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cancer Aggressiveness ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Prostate Cancer Death ◽  
Therapeutic Decision Making

Older men are more likely to have advanced prostate cancer at time of their diagnosis, but whether prostate tumors are inherently (biologically) more aggressive with advancing age is uncertain. To address this gap in knowledge, we analyzed data from veterans (n=971) diagnosed with prostate cancer during 1991–1995. Factors included age, detection of prostate cancer by screening, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, anatomic stage, and Gleason score. Information on molecular markers obtained from immunohistochemical staining of prostate tissue, included B cell lymphoma-2 (bcl-2), p53, and microvessel density (MVD), each having a previously documented association with disease progression and increased risk of prostate cancer death. We first examined the bivariate association of demographic, clinical, and molecular factors with age, and found evidence that race, screening status, Gleason score, PSA, bcl-2, p53, and MVD varied across categories of age in this study population. After further characterizing the association between age and Gleason score, we used logistic regression to examine the association between age and molecular markers—accounting for race, screening status, PSA, and Gleason score. Comparing men older than 80 years to those younger than 70 years, adjusted ORs and 95% CIs were 1.89 (0.73 to 4.92), 1.91 (1.05 to 3.46), and 2.00 (1.06 to 3.78), for positive bcl-2, p53, and MVD markers, respectively; no statistically significant associations were found for men 70–79 years old, compared with men younger than 70 years. These novel findings suggest that very elderly men often present with biologically aggressive prostate cancer; the results also have potential implications for therapeutic decision-making.

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA Racemase and Hepsin as Urinary Prostate Cancer Markers

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiktor Dariusz Sroka ◽  
Marek Adamowski ◽  
Piotr Słupski ◽  
Joanna Siódmiak ◽  
Piotr Jarzemski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Urine Samples ◽  
True Positive ◽  
Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Before And After

Background Because of the numerous limitations of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) and hepsin have recently been suggested as potential biomarkers in prostate cancer (PC). This report presents a comparison study of the presence of AMACR and hepsin in urine collected before and after digital rectal examination (DRE) as a previously suggested diagnostic marker for PC. Methods Seventy-six urine samples (38 before and 38 after prostate massage) from patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and 66 urine samples (33 before and 33 after prostate massage) from patients with PC were analyzed. PC was confirmed by prostate biopsy. Urinary levels of AMACR and hepsin were determined by ELISA and related to the tumor stage, Gleason score and PSA level. Results AMACR and hepsin levels in urine collected after prostate massage were higher only in the PC group. There were no correlations between AMACR levels, hepsin levels, tumor stage and Gleason score. AMACR and hepsin did not differentiate between BPH and PC with better true positive and false negative rates than serum PSA. Conclusions AMACR and hepsin were unable to diagnose PC with better true positive and false negative rates than PSA. An additional procedure combined with other markers should be applied for the reliable diagnosis of PC.

Association of Plasma Interlukin-6 in Metastatic & Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients presented to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Lahore Pakistan.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Munazza Khan ◽  
Zaffar Uddin ◽  
Zarghuna Khan ◽  
Yasir Khan ◽  
Zarsanga Haider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Medical Institute ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is a complex, multi-factorial disease. In spite of its high prevalence, the Pathophysiology of thePC progression is poorly understood. Cytokines play important role in immune regulation. Cytokines (IL-6) regulates growth ofmany tumor cells including prostate cancer, therefor it can be used as a marker for PC.Objectives: To measure and compare the levels of IL-6 between metastatic and non- metastatic prostate cancer patients.Material and Methods: This study was a Cross-sectional analytical and was conducted in the Department of physiology FederalPsotgraduate Medical Institute (FPGMI) Lahore with collaboration of Urology department of Sheikh Zayed hospital Lahore.Patients with prostate cancer registered with Urology department, Sheikh Zayed Hospital Lahore were recruited for the study.Patients with inflammatory conditions, auto-immune diseases, obesity and Alzimer's disease were excluded. A standard Elisa kit(Thermo scientific made in USA) was used for estimation of serum IL-6 levels. Data was recorded on a structured checklist, whichcontained basic demographic data along with finding of prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostatic biopsy, bone scan and serum IL-6levels. Data was analyzed through SPSS version 20 for descriptive statistics.Results: A total of 50 (25 metastatic and 25 non-metastatic) prostate cancer patients were being part of the present study. Themean PSA level was 364.42 ± 86.7 among metastatic prostate cancer patients as compared to 30.71 ±23.48 non- metastatic,indicating significant difference (p =0.001). Similarly mean Gleason score was high (7.16±0.85) among metastatic prostate cancerpatients as compared to 6.28±0.54 among non-metastatic one. Significant difference (p=0.014) was observed regarding IL-6. Itwas 25.73±80.48 among metastatic patients in comparison with 1.56±1.38 among non-metastatic patients. There was strongcorrelation between PSA and Gleason score (r= 0.479**, p<0.001). Also positive association was found between IL-6 and PSA, (r=0.285*, p=0.045).Conclusion: Serum IL-6 might be considered as a predictor for metastatic prostate cancer. Along with PSA, serum IL-6 levelscould be a strong predictor for the diagnosis of metastatic condition of prostate cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document