scholarly journals Treatment of maxillary canine transposition

2020 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 873-880
Author(s):  
Aldo Pedalino ◽  
Murilo Matias ◽  
Daniel Gaziri ◽  
Bruno Vieira ◽  
Luiza Alves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Lateral Incisor ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Normal Position ◽  
Maxillary Canine ◽  
Clinically Normal ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Treatment Procedures

ABSTRACT Transposition of maxillary teeth is an eruptive disturbance occurring in approximately 1 of every 300 orthodontic patients. Such cases are frequently very challenging in terms of treatment planning and orthodontic management. The canine is one of the most commonly transposed teeth, ectopically positioned with either the lateral incisor or the first premolar. This case report illustrates unique orthodontic treatment, describes treatment procedures, and presents the final outcome of bilateral maxillary canine-lateral incisor complete transpositions in which the involved teeth were moved to their clinically normal position in the dental arch without extracting premolars.

scholarly journals Orthodontic management of a complete and an incomplete maxillary canine-first premolar transposition

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Lorente ◽  
Pedro Lorente ◽  
Maria Perez-Vela ◽  
Cristina Esquinas ◽  
Teresa Lorente
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Normal Position ◽  
Maxillary Canine ◽  
Apical Position ◽  
Complete Transposition

ABSTRACT Maxillary canine and first premolar transposition is a complicated dental anomaly to treat, especially if the clinician's goal is to orthodontically move the canine into its normal position. Early diagnosis with cone-beam computed tomography simplifies the treatment of this pathology. This case report describes a patient with bilateral transposition, one complete and the other incomplete, involving the maxillary canine and the first premolar (Mx.C.1P). The orthodontic treatment involved the correction of both transpositions. In the complete transposition, the traction was mesial and upward to move the canine into a more apical position with a wider dentoalveolar process for easier crown interchange.

Canine Transposition – Prevalence, Distribution and Treatment Considerations among Orthodontic Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 268-273
Author(s):  
Tamar Finkelstein ◽  
Yehoshua Shapira ◽  
Aikaterini Maria Pavlidi ◽  
Moshe Davidovitch ◽  
Sigalit Blumer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Lateral Incisor ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Outcome Study ◽  
Maxillary Canine ◽  
Present Sample ◽  
Treatment Considerations ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Normal Place ◽  
Treatment Alternatives

Tooth transposition is a relatively rare dental anomaly of interchange in position of two adjacent teeth. Aim: To determine the prevalence and distribution of canine transposition in a sample of orthodontic patients and present treatment alternatives and outcome. Study design: The records of 3000 consecutively treated orthodontic patients from a university clinic were surveyed to detect canine transposition in both dental arches. The data was recorded according to gender, age, number and location. Results: Canine transpositions were detected in 15 subjects, 3 (20%) males and 12 (80%) females presenting a prevalence of 0.5%. Of them, 6 were between the maxillary canine and first premolar, 7 between the maxillary canine and lateral incisor, 2 transpositions were between the mandibular canine and the lateral incisor. A female to male ratio of 4:1 with left side predominance was found. Treatment options include extracting the transposed teeth, maintaining them in their transposed position, or repositioning them in their normal place within the dental arch. Conclusion :The prevalence of canine transposition in the present sample was found to be 0.5% with a greater frequency in the maxilla. Treatment options include extraction of one of the transposed teeth, alignment of the teeth in their transposed position or correction of the anomaly. The latter gives the best esthetic outcome.

ORTHODONTIC CORRECTION OF COMPLETE TRANSPOSITION BETWEEN MAXILLARY CANINE & LATERAL INCISOR : A CASE REPORT

2021 ◽  
pp. 15-17
Author(s):  
Amit Shaw ◽  
Kasturi Mukherjee ◽  
Manas Banerjee ◽  
Samit Mondol
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Lateral Incisor ◽  
Successful Management ◽  
Treatment Procedure ◽  
Maxillary Canine ◽  
Clinically Normal ◽  
Complete Transposition ◽  
Treatment Alternatives ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Supporting Structures

Transposition of maxillary teeth is not very uncommon nding in clinical practice and poses a challenge to the clinician. Maxillary canine is the most commonly involved tooth in transposition exchanging its place with either lateral incisor or rst premolar. This case report describes successful management of a case of transposition between maxillary canine and lateral incisor involving right side st only with an insight into etiology, treatment alternatives and treatment procedure. This case had been treated with extraction of all four 1 premolars and involved teeth were successfully moved to their clinically normal position without any signicant damage to supporting structures or roots.

scholarly journals Reposisi Gigi Kaninus Impaksi Palatal pada Perawatan Ortodontik Cekat Teknik Begg

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Iwan Wirasatyawan ◽  
Soekarsono Hardjono ◽  
Sri Suparwitri
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class I ◽  
Lateral Incisor ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Midline Shift ◽  
Maxillary Canine ◽  
Fixed Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Impacted Canine ◽  
Lateral Incisor Agenesis

Impaksi palatal kaninus sering mengakibatkan keluhan secara estetis. Faktor genetik merupakan faktor yang dominan serta beberapa faktor yang lain yaitu diskrepansi lengkung gigi, ukuran gigi, retensi gigi desidui, kerusakan dini, pencabutan dini , posisi yang abnormal benih gigi, agenese incisivus lateral dan kista. Tujuan laporan kasus ini adalah untuk memberikan informasi tentang perawatan kasus impaksi palatal kaninus rahang atas pada maloklusi kelas I skeletal menggunakan alat cekat teknik Begg. Pasien perempuan umur 15 tahun, datang ke klinik ortodonsia RSGM Prof. Soedomo FKG UGM. Pemeriksaan subyektif, pasien terganggu dengan keadaan gigi depan yang maju dan bercelah. Pemeriksaan obyektif menunjukkan adanya rudimenter, agenese gigi incisivus lateral kanan dan kiri rahang atas, impaksi palatal kaninus kiri atas. Transposisi kaninus kanan atas ke ruang incisivus lateral kanan atas, pergeseran midline. Maloklusi angle kelas I dengan relasi skeletal kelas I dengan bimaksiler retrusif disertai protrusif incisivus maksila dan retrusif incisivus mandibula. Perawatan diawali dengan pencabutan gigi rudimenter. Tahap I menggunakan multiloop archwire untuk leveling dan unraveling gigi anterior, koreksi pergeseran midline. Tahap berikutnya adalah pemasangan button pada kaninus impaksi untuk mengaitkan kawat ligatur pada archwire yang berfungsi untuk menarik kaninus impaksi palatal pada lengkung gigi. Perawatan ortodontik pada kasus dengan impaksi palatal kaninus rahang atas pada maloklusi kelas I skeletal menggunakan alat cekat teknik Begg dapat dilakukan dengan hasil perawatan yang baik. ABSTRACT: Repositioning of Palatally Impacted Canine in Orthodontic Treatment Using Begg Fixed Appliance. Palatally impacted canine often leads to esthetic complaints. Genetic factor is dominant followed by such other factors as dental arch discrepancy, tooth size, retention of deciduous teeth, early decay, premature extraction, abnormal position of tooth germ, lateral incisor agenesis, and cysts. This article provides information about the treatment of palatally impacted maxillary canine case in a skeletal class I malocclusion using Begg fixed appliance technique. A 15-year-old female patient came to the orthodontia clinic of RSGM Prof. Soedomo FKG UGM. The subjective examination found that the patient was disturbed by her protrusive, gapped front teeth. Then, the objective examination indicated the presence of rudimentary, lateral incisor agenesis of right and left upper jaw, and upper left palatally impacted canine. In addition, there was a transposition of upper right canine to lateral incisor area as well as a midline shift. Angle class I malocclusion with class I skeletal relationship and bimaxillary retrusion along with maxillary incisor protrusion and mandibular incisor retrusion also occurred. The treatment began with rudimentary tooth extractions. The first stage used a multiloop archwire for leveling and unraveling of anterior teeth as well as correction of midline shift. The button attached to the impacted canine could tie the ligature wire to the archwire that served to attract the palatally impacted canine in the dental arch. The orthodontic treatment in cases of palatally impacted maxillary canine with skeletal class I malocclusion using Begg fixed appliance technique can be applied with a good treatment result.

scholarly journals Treatment of a Patient with Multiple Impacted Teeth

2007 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 735-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Scott Conley ◽  
Scott B. Boyd ◽  
Harry L. Legan ◽  
Christopher C. Jernigan ◽  
Craig Starling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Permanent Tooth ◽  
Permanent Teeth ◽  
Treatment Sequence ◽  
Impacted Teeth ◽  
Case Complexity ◽  
Multiple Primary

Abstract An impacted or missing permanent tooth can add significant complications to an otherwise straightforward case. When multiple impacted teeth are present, the case complexity increases further. Developing a treatment sequence, determining appropriate anchorage, and planning and executing sound biomechanics can be a challenge. The following case report illustrates a patient reportedly diagnosed with mild scleroderma as an adolescent. He presented for orthodontic treatment as an adult with multiple retained primary teeth and multiple impacted teeth. Diagnosis, treatment planning, and various methods of managing guided eruption of impacted teeth will be discussed. Following orthodontic treatment that required extraction of multiple primary and permanent teeth as well as exposure and ligation of multiple permanent teeth by an oral surgeon, the patient finished with a significantly improved functional and esthetic result.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Cross Bite Among the Orthodontic Patients in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-12
Author(s):  
Naznin Sultana ◽  
Gazi Shamim Hassan ◽  
Digamber Jha ◽  
Towhida Nashrin ◽  
Lutfun Nahar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class I ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Diagnostic Model ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Posterior Crossbite ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Medical University ◽  
Functional Components ◽  
Congenitally Missing

Crossbite is one of the most prevalent malocclusion, posterior crossbite occurs in 8% to 22% of orthodontic cases and anterior crossbite has been seen in Class III cases, which accounts for 3.4% of orthodontic cases. The etiology of posterior crossbite can include any combination of dental, skeletal, and neuro muscular functional components, but the most frequent cause is reduction in width of the maxillary dental arch. Patients/cases seeking comprehensive orthodontic treatment in between 5 to 35 years were diagnosed for crossbite with diagnostic model and care record file. Out of 300 cases 163(54.3%) had crossbite, 90(30%) had anterior crossbite and 109(36.3%) had posterior cross bite. Among posterior crossbite 60(20%) had unilateral and 49(16.3%) had bilateral crossbite. Posterior crossbite was more prevalent than anterior crossbite. Cases with Class I molar relation showed more crossbite. Crossbite was more prevalent in cases with congenitally missing teeth.Bangladesh J Medicine Jan 2015; 26 (1) : 9-12

scholarly journals Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment using TADs: Case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-164
Author(s):  
Tina Pajevic ◽  
Jovana Juloski ◽  
Marija Zivkovic
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Temporary Anchorage Devices ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Incisor Retraction ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Introduction. Orthodontic treatment of Class II Division 1 (II/1) malocclusions in adults can be challenging since skeletal effects are limited. Possible treatment options are orthodontic camouflage or orthognatic surgery, in severe cases. The aim of this paper was to present a successful management of Class II malocclusion in an adult patient using temporary anchorage devices (TADs). Case report. After detailed clinical examination, study models and cephalometric analysis, a 26 years old patient was diagnosed with Class II malocclusion, an overjet of 12 mm, congenitally missing tooth 41 and midline shifted to the right in upper dental arch. In prior orthodontic treatment, patient had upper premolars extracted. Posterior teeth in upper left quadrant were shifted mesially. The camouflage treatment was considered, using temporary anchorage devices (TADs) to distalize posterior teeth on the left side, and gain space for incisor retraction and midline correction in upper dental arch. Results. Using TADs as additional anchorage in anterior region and coil spring for molar distalization, the space was made for tooth 23, midline correction and incisor retraction. After 40 months, a satisfactory result was achieved, overjet and midline correction, class I canines occlusion and class II molar occlusion. Conclusion. Class II/1 malocclusion in adults can be successfully treated using TADs. The success depends on the severity of malocclusion and patient cooperation.

scholarly journals Transmigrated Mandibular Canine Guided into its Normal Position

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itamar Antonio Taffarel ◽  
Ivan Pedro Taffarel ◽  
Gil Guilherme Gasparello ◽  
Matheus Melo Pithon ◽  
Orlando Motohiro Tanaka
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Aesthetic Outcome ◽  
Normal Position ◽  
Correct Position ◽  
Mandibular Canine ◽  
Treatment Complexity ◽  
Stable Result ◽  
Mandibular Incisors

Transmigrated mandibular canines increase treatment complexity in terms of both anchorage and biomechanical planning, posing challenges for both Orthodontists and Oral Surgeons. This case report presents the orthodontic treatment in a 12-year-old girl patient, with transmigrated and impacted mandibular right canine positioned horizontally below the apices of the mandibular incisors. The mandibular deciduous right canine was extracted followed by the traction of the transmigrated permanent canine. Eruption was properly guided, and the correct position of the tooth was orthodontically guided into its normal position in the arch. The patient’s occlusion was significantly improved with good aesthetic outcome, functional occlusion, and a stable result after 1.5 years of follow-up.

scholarly journals Dental anomalies and clinical features in patients with maxillary canine impaction

2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Mercuri ◽  
Michele Cassetta ◽  
Costanza Cavallini ◽  
Donatella Vicari ◽  
Rosalia Leonardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Features ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Dental Anomalies ◽  
Maxillary Canine ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Facial Profile ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Orthodontic Patients

Abstract Objective: To analyze the prevalence, distribution, clinical features, and relationship with dental anomalies of maxillary canine impaction. Materials and Methods: The complete pretreatment records of 1674 orthodontic patients were examined. Subjects with maxillary impacted canines were divided into two study groups: a palatally displaced canine (PDC) group (114 patients) and a buccally displaced canine (BDC) group (37 patients). These were compared to a control group of 151 patients who were randomly selected from the initial sample without maxillary canine impaction. The significance of associations between canine impaction and dental and clinical features and anomalies was examined with the chi-square test. Results: PDC patients presented with normal overjet and facial profile and a lower degree of dental arch crowding in comparison to the control patients. PDC patients showed a higher prevalence of impaction of other teeth, dental aplasia, transposition, and peg-shaped maxillary lateral incisors (odds ratios 3.3, 2.6, 8.3, and 5.8, respectively). Conclusion: PDC was frequently the only orthodontic problem of patients. BDC group patients did not present with notable differences in clinical and dental features or dental anomalies compared to control subjects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document