scholarly journals EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SCRAMBLE BERBASIS KONTEKSTUAL TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS IPS SISWA KELAS III SD NEGERI KEBONDALEM 01 BATANG

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 192
Author(s):  
Umul Farida ◽  
Ferina Agustini ◽  
Husni Wakhyudin

The low level of of third grade learning results on Subjects of social science is encouraging in this research ?. The goal in this research is to know the effectiveness of contextual-based scramble learning model in improving the critical thinking skills of third grade Social Science of Kebondalem 01 Batang Elementary School. This type of research is quantitative. The research method used is one group pretest-posttest design. After the treatment obtained an average grade of 79,833, while for ttest with dk = 23 and α = 5% obtained tcount = 10,866 and ttable = 1,714. Because tcount > ttable so Ho rejected Ha accepted. The critical thinking skills of third grade social science reaches the minimum mastery criteria that is 65. In comparative test  the critical thinking skills of Social Science obtained tcount = 13,273 with ttabel = 1,680, so critical thinking skills of Social Sciences after using contextual-based scramble learning model better than before using contextual-based scramble learning model. Based on the calculation of double correlation of the relationship between creative character and cooperation to the critical thinking skills of Social Science of 0,2733. On the significant test of double correlation coefficient with Fcount = 8,469 this price is consulted with Ftabel = 3.47 with α = 5% dk numerator = 2 and dk denominator = 21. From the above calculation turns Fcount > Ftabel then there is a correlation between creative character and cooperation to the critical thinking. It can be concluded “that the contextual-based contextual scramble model effectively improves the critical thinking skills of third-grade Social Science of Kebondalem Elementary School 01 Batang”.

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57
Author(s):  
M. Ihsan Ramadhani ◽  
Yulia Ayriza

The study aims at identifying the difference on the effectiveness between the Quantum Teaching Learning Model and the Expository Learning Model in improving the students’ critical thinking skills and concept understanding in Social Science. The method that has been selected is the quasi-experimental research using the non-equivalent pre-test and post-test control group design. Then, the subjects in the study are 22 students of Grade IV Gunung Raja State Elementary School as the experimental group and 23 students of Grade IV Pulau Sari 1 State Elementary School as the control group from the Academic Year 2015/2016. The selection of the experimental group and the control group is based on the students’ similar characteristics with random approach. Based on the results of the random sampling technique implementation, the students from Gunung Sari State Elementary High School is provided with the Quantum Teaching Learning Model (experimental group) while the students from Pulau Sari 1 State Elementary High School is provided with the expository learning model (control group). In analyzing the data that have been gathered, the researcher has conducted the independent sample t-test and the paired sample t-test with SPSS 23 for Windows. The results of the study show that the Quantum Teaching Learning Model has bee more effective in comparison to the Expository Learning Model for improving the students’ critical thinking skills with significance value 0.000 < 0.050. In the same time, the results of the study also show that the Quantum Teaching Learning Model has been more effective in comparison to the Expository Learning Model for improving the students’ Social Science concept understanding with significance value 0.000 < 0.050.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 346-356
Author(s):  
H. Lestari ◽  
W. Sopandi ◽  
U. S. Sa'ud ◽  
B. Musthafa ◽  
D. Budimansyah ◽  
...  

This study aims to describe the impact of online mentoring activities in implementing the RADEC (Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain, and Create) learning model on the competence of elementary school teachers in training students’ critical thinking skills. The method was a pre-experiment with a one-group pretest-posttest design involving 25 elementary school teachers in Indonesia. The teachers received online mentoring in implementing RADEC learning model. The research instrument was a questionnaire to measure teachers’ knowledge and skills in training critical thinking. The data processing technique was carried out by calculating the mean and the percentage of each item to obtain a description of the teachers’ knowledge and skills in training students’ critical thinking before and after treatment. The data were analyzed inferentially with a paired sample t-test using SPSS version 22 software to see the impact of the treatment on teachers’ competence in training critical thinking. Based on the results of the paired-sample t-test, for both the knowledge and skills aspects, the probability value (sig) was 0.00 <0.05. This result means that there was a significant difference in the knowledge and skills of teachers in training students’ critical thinking skills before and after mentoring activities. The study results indicate that the online mentoring in implementing the RADEC learning model improved teachers’ competence in training elementary school students’ critical thinking skills. 


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Ferawati Hutapea ◽  
Motlan .

The purpose of research are 1). To know are differences in science process skills of students with the applied of inquiry training learning model and direct instruction learning models, 2). To know are differences in science process skills of students who has high critical thinking ability and the  critically low ability, 3). To know the interaction inquiry training learning model and critical thinking ability toward students science process skills. The samples in this research conducted by cluster random sampling and  as many as two class , the first class (X-I) as experiment applied Inquiry Training learning model and the second class (X-2) as control class applied Direct Intruction learning model. The instrument used in this research is tests science process skills and critical thinking skills in the form of description and observation sheets science process skills. From these results it can be concluded that: 1) there are differences in students science process skills with applied inquiry training model and direct intruction model, 2) science process skills of students with high critical thinking ability is better than the science process skills of students with the ability to think critically low, and 3) the interaction inquiry training learning model and critical thinking ability toward the science process skills.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-93
Author(s):  
Madi Amin ◽  
Muliana Muliana ◽  
Rohantizani Rohantizani

The purpose of this study was to determine the mathematical critical thinking ability of students who were taught using the Auditory Intellectually Repetition learning model was better than the mathematical critical thinking skills of students who were taught through a scientific learning approach. This study uses a quantitative approach and the type of research used is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were 11th grade students of SMA Negeri 5 Simeulue Barat, the samples in this study were two classes selected using a nonprobability sampling technique of purposive sampling type, namely class 11 IPA-1 as an experimental class using the Auditory Intellectually Repetition model and class 11 IPA-2 as a control class using a scientific approach. The data processing technique uses SPSS version 25 with the results of the study showing that: the value of Sig (p-value) > 0.05), it is accepted that it is 0.629 in the experimental class and 0.273 in the control class so that the data has a normal distribution. The t-test analysis of students' mathematical critical thinking skills was obtained 0.001 < 0.05, then Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted. This means that the mathematical critical thinking ability of students who are taught with the Auditory Intellectually Repetition learning model is better than the mathematical critical thinking skills of students who are taught with a scientific learning approach.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Riky Rivaldi Pratama

Keterampilan berpikir kritis adalah keterampilan penting untuk kehidupan abad ke-21. Keterampilan berpikir kritis berkaitan erat dengan kemampuan memahami dunia yang kompleks dengan berbagai permasalahannya. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dengan menggunakan Quantum. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian tindakan kelas dengan pelaksanaan tiga siklus dan setiap siklus terdiri dari dua pertemuan. Masing-masing terdiri dari empat langkah yaitu siklus perencanaan, tindakan, observasi, dan refleksi. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan beberapa teknik seperti observasi, wawancara, dokumentasi, dan tes berpikir kritis. Model interaktif digunakan untuk menganalisis data. Hasil penilaian penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan berpikir kritis kedua peserta didik terus meningkat. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa melalui model kuantum berbasis eksperimen meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik tentang kalor dan perpindahan pada peserta didik kelas V<em>.</em>


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Wahyu Wulandari ◽  
Wahyudi

The purpose of this research is to see the effectiveness of the learning model of Problem Solving and Problem Posing in terms of the critical thinking skills of 4th grade students.the subject of this research is 4th grade in Bringin Elementary School 01 as 28 students dan Bringin 02 elementary school as 24 students. Data collection techniques using observation and tests. The research instrument uses RPP Problem Solving and Problem Posing, than istrument of students critical thinking. Data analysis used was quantitative description analysis as a prerequisite test, T test, and N-Gain. The results of hypothesis testing, with the t-sig (2-tailed) test obtained 0,000 < 0,05 with tcount 4,812 > ttable 2,012 then H0 is rejected which means there are differences in the critical thinking mathematics skills. That’s can provable with increase critical thinking students grade 4th in Bringin 01 Elementary School use Problem Solving model with first condition is 70,43 increase 15%. The increase of critical thinking students grade 4 in Bringin 02 Elementary School used Probem Posing with first condition is 70,43 increase be 87,18 with increase 17%. This condition to indicate Problem Posing model more effective than Probem Solving model reviewed by increased critical thinking mathematics.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 157
Author(s):  
Elza Pristy Latifah ◽  
Wahyudi Wahyudi ◽  
Yohana Setiawan

The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in effectiveness of PBL learning models with TPS in terms of the critical thinking skills of elementary school students in mathematics. This research is a quasi-experimental study. In this study, the Non-equivalent Control Group Design design is used to investigate the effects of the two variables used. In this study 19 students at Bacem Elementary School and 19 students at Waru Elementary School, Jepon District, Blora Regency. The two groups were given different treatments, namely the PBL learning model was treated in the experimental group at Bacem SDN, and the TPS model was treated in the control group at Waru Elementary School. Based on the results of the study, H_oditotak and H_a were accepted. The analysis in this study used the Ngain test to determine the increase in the average value of the results of the pretest and posttest. This is based on the results of the NGain analysis showing an increase in value after being given PBL treatment of 0.64, while the increase in value after being given TPS treatment was 0.53. Based on all analysis results, it can be concluded that there are significant differences in effectiveness in this study. Evidently the application of PBL learning models has a higher level of effectiveness when compared to the TPS learning model of the critical thinking skills of fifth grade students in mathematics


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 254
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Dyah Pramestika ◽  
I Gusti Agung Ayu Wulandari ◽  
I Wayan Sujana

In learning mathematics, students are still found to have difficulty in understanding and developing critical thinking skills. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the significant influence of the Problem Based Learning model assisted by concrete media on the ability to think critically mathematics in grade IV in elementary school. This research was a quasi-experimental study with a non-equivalent control group design. The population of class IV SD as many as 293 people. The sample was determined by cluster random sampling technique. The sample in the experimental group was 32 students and the control group was 30 students. Data used as a test method in the form of a subjective test (description). The data obtained were analyzed using the t-test analysis technique with the polled variance formula. The results of data analysis were obtained (t-count = 4.021> t-table = 2,000) at the significance level of 5% (dk = 32 + 30 - 2 = 67) which means that there was a significant difference in the ability to think critically mathematics between groups being taught with the model of Problem Based Learning with media aids Concretely with the group learned using conventional learning models in class IV elementary school. It can be concluded that the Problem Based Learning model assisted by concrete media influences the ability to think critically mathematics in class IV. The results of this study can be used as input for teachers to choose various learning models in teaching.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document