scholarly journals ANALISIS PENGARUH PERDAGANGAN INTRA DAN EKSTRA REGIONAL TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI NEGARA ANGGOTA ASEAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Desmayani Siregar

The aim of this research is to examine the effect of intra- regional trade in ASEAN, extra regional ASEAN, foreign direct investment, inflation and population to the economic growth of ASEAN member countries. The method of analysis which is used in the research is regression panel with Eviews software 7. The population which is used in this research is ten ASEAN member countries with study period from year 2010 till year 2014. The result showed that, intra- regional trade in ASEAN, extra regional ASEAN, foreign direct investment, inflation and total population simultaneously has a significant effect on the economic growth of ASEAN member countries. Partially, intra-regional ASEAN trade and the number of population have negative effect on the economic growth of ASEAN member countries. While intra- regional trade, foreign direct investment and inflation partially have positive effect on the economic growth on ASEAN member countries.

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dian Citra Amelia

This research is based on the fact that the state of economic growth in Indonesia tends to fluctuate, even more often decrease. This is because the government policy is not appropriate to improve the economic growth of Indonesia. This study aims to determine and analyze the factors of foreign direct investment, inflation, international trade, and government expenditure that affect economic growth in Indonesia. The problem in this research is due to the limited fund in economic development both structure and infrastructure so that economic growth tends to decrease. Therefore, appropriate strategies must be taken to overcome the limitations in promoting economic growth. From this problem, this research aims to see how big influence of foreign direct investment (FDI), inflation (INF), international trade (NX) and government expenditure (GE) variable to economic growth. The data used in this study is secondary data (periodical data) in the period of observation 1996-2014 obtained from the World Bank and Statistics of Indonesia. To identify the influence of the variables used in this study used the VAR (Vector Autoregression) method. The results of this study show that equation regression shows that FDI (-1) has a negative influence on economic growth and FDI (-2) has a positive effect on economic growth, INF (-1) and INF (-2) have positive effects on economic growth , Variable NX (-1) has a positive effect on economic growth but NX (-2) has a negative effect on economic growth, and GE variable (-1) has a positive effect on economic growth while GE (-2) has a negative effect on growth Economy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Dian Citra Amelia ◽  
Sri Fajar Ayu

This research is based on the fact that the state of economic growth in Indonesia tends to fluctuate, even more often decrease. This is because the government policy is not appropriate to improve the economic growth of Indonesia. This study aims to determine and analyze the factors of foreign direct investment, inflation, international trade, and government expenditure that affect economic growth in Indonesia. The problem in this research is due to the limited fund in economic development both structure and infrastructure so that economic growth tends to decrease. Therefore, appropriate strategies must be taken to overcome the limitations in promoting economic growth. From this problem, this research aims to see how big influence of foreign direct investment (FDI), inflation (INF), international trade (NX) and government expenditure (GE) variable to economic growth. The data used in this study is secondary data (periodical data) in the period of observation 1996-2014 obtained from the World Bank and Statistics of Indonesia. To identify the influence of the variables used in this study used the VAR (Vector Autoregression) method. The results of this study show that equation regression shows that FDI (-1) has a negative influence on economic growth and FDI (-2) has a positive effect on economic growth, INF (-1) and INF (-2) have positive effects on economic growth , Variable NX (-1) has a positive effect on economic growth but NX (-2) has a negative effect on economic growth, and GE variable (-1) has a positive effect on economic growth while GE (-2) has a negative effect on growth Economy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina Septriani Putri ◽  
Ariusni Ariusni

Abstract : This study examined and analysis the effect of remittances, foreigndirect investment, imports, and economic growth in Indonesia in the long run andshort run. This study using Error Correction Model (ECM) method and using theannual time series data from 1989 to 2018. This study found that: (1) remittancehave an insignificant positive effect on economic growth in the long run and shortrun,(2)foreign direct investment have a significant positive impact on economicgrowth in the long run and short run, (3) import have an insignificant positiveimpact on economic growth both in the long run and short run. To increase theeconomic growth in the future, this study suggests the government to decresingimports of consume goods and increasing the inflow of capital goods, rawmaterial goods, remittances and foreign direct investment.Keyword : Remittance, Foreign Direct Investment, Import, Economic Growth andECM


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daehee Bak ◽  
Chungshik Moon

AbstractThe positive influence of foreign direct investment (FDI) on host countries' economic growth has been widely debated. Given the mixed empirical evidence, scholars have sought to find the economic preconditions under which FDI spillovers are likely to occur and facilitate economic growth in the host countries. Those preconditions are not exogenously dictated but largely shaped by governments' policy preferences. Particularly in autocracies, an autocrat's policy preferences are the driving force that determines whether a host country is likely to be equipped with growth-friendly institutions and policies. We argue that such economic institutions and policies are dependent on the time horizons of autocrats in power. Our empirical analysis covering 64 autocratic countries from 1970 to 2005 supports our main argument that FDI has a positive effect on growth when autocratic time horizons are sufficiently long, and positive FDI spillovers mainly occur through the protection of property right institutions.


Media Ekonomi ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Desyana Eka Pramasty ◽  
Lydia Rosintan

<p><em>Economic growth is also one of the most important indicators</em><em> </em><em>in determining the standard of living of people in a country, because of an increase in the production capacity of an economy that is manifested in the form of national income. Economic growth is an indication of the success of economic development, measured by comparing, for example, for domestic size, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the current year with the previous year. This study aimed to analyze the factors that affect economic growth in seven ASEAN countries period from 1996-2013. This study use panel data analysis. The factors that affect economic growth in seven ASEAN countries, namely foreign debt, foreign direct investment, and the rate of inflation. Based on panel data analysis of the results showed that the foreign debt has negative effect and significant on economic growth, foreign direct investment has positive effect and significant on economic growth and inflation rate has negative effect and significant on economic growth in seven ASEAN countries period from 1996-2013.</em></p>


The study investigates the simultaneous equation model of the current account and real exchange rates in group of lower middle income in Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). This study uses time series from 2000-2017 (18 years) and cross section 6 countries (Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam, Lao, Myanmar, and Cambodia). There are three important findings in this study; first, for the current account is financial development has positive effect while government spending and foreign direct investment have negative effect; second, for the real exchange rate is economic openness, money supply, and interest rate have positive effect while foreign direct investment and current account have negative effect; third, only current account affects real exchange rates. Therefore, it is highly recommended for group of lower middle income in ASEAN to intervene in monetary policy variables so that uncontrolled deficits and fluctuations can achieve equilibrium in group of lower middle income in ASEAN.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Yugang He

This paper applies the annual data series from 1983 to 2016 and introduces an employment variable to analyze the interaction among foreign direct investment, economic growth and employment. Three variables are used to conduct an empirical analysis under the VAR model. Via the analysis of Augmented Dickey-Fuller test, Granger causality test, impulse response function and variance decomposition, the results show that the foreign direct investment has a positive effect on economic growth and employment, and the economic growth has a positive effect on employment. The employment and economic growth exist bidirectional causality. Meanwhile, the foreign direct investment can also result in an increase in the employment. More importantly, this paper provides some ideas for China’s government to settle some social problems such as employment and economic growth. Specifically, at present, China’s government still should encourage foreign investors to invest in China because it can be beneficial to employment and economic growth in China. Of course, the structure of employment also should be optimized so as to keep high speed economic growth. Simultaneously, the high speed economic growth can improve the employment in China.  


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-160
Author(s):  
Muhammad Safar Nasir ◽  
Ana Rahmawati Wibowo ◽  
Dedy Yansyah

The purpose of this research to examine influence several independent variables, especially corruption, foreign direct investment (FDI), population growth, and government expenditure on the economic growth of 10 Asia-Pacific countries, and prove the hypothesis of the sand wheels theory whether corruption causes a decline and a slowdown in economic growth. This study uses panel data. The results showed that the variables of corruption have a negative impact on economic growth, foreign direct investment (FDI), and government expenditure have positives that significantly affect the level of economic growth in 10 Asia-Pacific countries. However, population growth does not significantly affect economic growth. The result implies that corruption has a negative effect on economic growth in 10 Asia-Pacific countries. Such an outcome provides evidence and confirms the hypothesis that corruption can sand the wheel of an economy. Countries must eradicate all forms of corruption and maintain a conducive investment climate so that there is a level of trust, especially in the Asia-Pacific countries, to create productive economic growth.JEL Classification: O47, D73, C12How to Cite:Nasir, M. S., Wibowo, A. R., & Yansyah, D. (2021). The Determinants of Economic Growth: Empirical Study Of 10 Asia-Pacific Countries. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 10(1), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.18752/sjie.v10i1.15310.


Author(s):  
Hammed Oluwaseyi Musibau ◽  
Tobiloba Adedoyin Adenekan ◽  
Waliu Olawale Shittu

Nigeria, among other developing countries, faces a lot of challenges on growth and global competitiveness as a result of low foreign capital and energy insecurity, among others. Using a quantile-on-quantile regression technique on Nigeria’s data covering 1980–2017, this article examines the impacts of foreign direct investment (FDI), energy security and globalisation on economic growth. Our empirical findings suggest the following: (a) the net impact of energy security on economic growth is negative—implying that energy security impedes growth in Nigeria; (b) globalisation stimulates economic growth across all quantiles, but only significant at the third quantile; (c) as expected, each of labour and capital produces a positive effect on growth; and (d) there exists an adverse, non-significant effect of FDI on economic growth across all quantiles. Similarly, there is evidence of a bidirectional causality between economic growth and FDI; economic growth and energy security; economic growth and globalisation; FDI and globalisation; as well as between energy security and globalisation. There is, however, a uni-directional causality running from energy security through FDI. The policy recommendations of these findings are also explained in the concluding section. JEL: Q43, Q56


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle A. Johnston ◽  
Miguel D. Ramirez

<p class="ber"><span lang="EN-GB">This paper investigates the impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows on economic growth in Cote D’Ivoire during the 1975-2011 period. The selection of this African nation is motivated by the rapid inflows it has experienced over the past decade. Using unit root and cointegration analysis, the resulting error correction model (ECM) suggests that gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) has a short-run positive impact on economic growth, while FDI, the repatriation of net income abroad, and periods involving structural breaks, have a negative effect on economic growth in Cote D’Ivoire. In addition, the negative error correction term indicates that deviations from long-run per capita growth during the current year are corrected relatively quickly in the following year, c<em>eteris paribus</em>. The unexpected negative effect of FDI on economic growth may be due to the significant repatriation of profits and dividends the country has experienced in recent years. </span></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document