new laws in the order of formation of the federation council of the federal assembly of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (Extra-C) ◽  
pp. 125-130
Author(s):  
Gyulnaz Eldarovna Adygezalova ◽  
Olga Andreevna Kovtun ◽  
Natalia Dmitrievna Tereshchenko ◽  
Ruslan Mukharbekovich Dzidzoev ◽  
Irina Valerievna Shapiro

The purpose of this work is to study the constitutional and legal basis for the formation of the Upper House of the Federal Parliament in connection with the adoption of the Law of the Russian Federation on the Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of March 14, 2020, No. 1-FKZ "On Improving the Regulation of Certain Aspects of the Organisation and Functioning of Public Authority". Thus, the method of analyzing legal documents allowed concluding the gradual legal consolidation of the order of formation of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation in the conditions of building a legal democratic state. Having studied the theoretical and legal aspects of the formation of the Federation Council, the authors note that the current order reflects the socio-political realities, corresponds to the foundations of the constitutional system, and allows for a more complete reflection of the constitutional foundations of democracy, popular representation, and the principles of parliamentarism.

2020 ◽  
pp. 82-86
Author(s):  
R. F.o. Veliev

A current theoretical and practical legal basis for creation of regulatory acts in the Russian Federation is discussed. A current relationship between the issued regulatory acts and some criteria of legal norm classification is shown. Legalization of the President address to the Parliament of the Russian Federation as a substantial element of the legal norm-making in a democratic state is revealed.


Author(s):  
A. Luzakov ◽  
D. Tkachenko

Special assessment of working conditions (SAWС) is a set of measures to identify harmful and (or) dangerous factors of the production environment and the labor process and assess the level of their impact on the employee. SAWС is regulated by the law of the Russian Federation and is mandatory for employers organizations. The current rules have been applied in practice relatively recently, since 2014. Despite a lot of comments on the legal aspects of SAWС, there is little research on the subjective perception of customers and performers of problems related to special assessment. The article presents some of the results of a survey of experts who conduct SAWС and representatives of customer organizations. The difficulties and reasons for dissatisfaction arising during the SAWС are identified, which relate to the choice of the contractor, the interest and involvement of customers, and compliance with procedures and deadlines by both parties. Based on the results of the survey and regulatory documents, step-by-step recommendations were developed and presented to help customer organizations. Recommendations contain a list of common errors that should be avoided. They will allow you to properly prepare and conduct all the stages of the SAWС, starting from the formation of the Commission to the application of the results.


10.12737/9307 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 128-133
Author(s):  
Полина Виноградова ◽  
Polina Vinogradova

The subject of research is the legal status of the Constitutional Assembly, whose powers include the consideration of questions the constitutional system, which are defined the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation valid until 2020 as Russia´s national interests in the long term. In this article we focus on problems of realization provisions of the Constitutional Assembly, substantiates the necessity of the adopting the special law in order to regulate the functioning the necessity constitutional authority. The review of legislative initiatives on this issue is provided herein below. In order to ensure the effective functioning of the Constitutional Assembly the author has offered to settle the procedure for amending the Chapters 1, 2 and 9 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Conclusions promote maintaining legal and institutional mechanism for ensuring national interests by regulating the convening and functioning of the Constitutional Assembly.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Osipova

This article considers the legal regulation of collection activities in the Russian Federation. The author carries out the comparative study of the existing regulatory framework on this issue and, on this basis, the author identifies the legal status of collection agencies in Russia. The author also analyzes the application of the norms of the noted legal act on collection activities in practice which results revealing its gaps. In the course of the study, legal conflicts are identified, which arise in connection with the existing contradictions in the law. In its final clauses, the article gives an assessment of the new normative legal act in general.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 71-76
Author(s):  
D. V. GONENKO ◽  
◽  
A. N. NOVICHIKHIN ◽  

The article is devoted to current changes in public procurement in the Russian Federation. Attention is paid to the legal basis of procurement. The analysis of the amendments to the law that have entered into force and the draft resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation regarding amendments to the public procurement procedure is carried out. Proposals for improving the contract system are formulated.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 56-61
Author(s):  
S. A. Saibulaeva ◽  

Based on the study of historical and legal material, theoretical and practical generalizations, the article examines the issues of organizational and functional reform of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the light of the constitutional reforms of 2020 and the impact of this process on the establishment of the Russian constitutional system in its modern sense. Certain aspects of the functioning of the constitutional control bodies of foreign state-legal systems are analyzed. The purpose of the study is to determine the structural changes in the Russian legislation, their impact on the political and legal status of the federal body of constitutional control and trends in the development of the system of interaction of the highest state authorities. It is shown that constitutional changes have a systemic impact on both the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the constitutional system of the Russian state as a whole. The author draws attention to the possibility of functioning of a democratic state only if there is an independent and independent federal body of constitutional control.


2020 ◽  
pp. 10-15
Author(s):  
Ivan VINNYK

Introduction. The article is devoted to question of legal regulation of activities for repulse to armed aggression against Ukraine. In general the study was carried out through the prism of the armed aggression of Russian Federation, which began on February 20, 2014 in Ukraine and continues to this day. The study of the raised question was based on the Constitution of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine "On Defense of Ukraine" and other regulations that determine the grounds, the procedure for repel the armed aggression, and which concern the competence of the authorized subjects in the specified sphere. The position on the presence of a number of shortcomings in the legislation that regulates question of repel the armed aggression against Ukraine is expressed. The purpose of the paper is to study the evolution of Ukrainian legislation, which served as a tool to repel the armed aggression of the Russian Federation, to carry out the analysis of key regulations that regulate the repulse the armed aggression against Ukraine, and based on the analysis to identify the main shortcomings of this legal regulation, which, in turn, may negatively affect the effective repulse the armed aggression against Ukraine. Results. It is determined that at the initial step of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation the President of Ukraine did not take all the necessary actions, which arised from his duties, and, in particular, related to its effective repulse. The main reasons that served such inaction are identified. The main shortcomings of the legal regulation of the fight against armed aggression are singled out, concerning the procedure for the President to make decision on mobilization, imposition of martial law, use of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, other military formations, declaration of war, and approval by the Verkhovna Rada. Conclusion. The position is expressed on the need to improve the legal mechanisms for making decisions on general or partial mobilization, the imposition of martial law in Ukraine or its localities, the use of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, other military formations formed according to laws of Ukraine, and on declaration of war in case of armed aggression against Ukraine or the threat of attack on Ukraine, including the establishment of a special (abbreviated) procedure for the removal of the President of Ukraine from office, in case of his inaction to repel troops aggression, as well as the establishment of criminal liability for these actions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document