scholarly journals Certain problems of legal regulation of the conclusion of the purchase and sale contract (on the basis of analysis of examples from judicial practice)

Author(s):  
N.S. Milishchuk

The contract of purchase and sale is one of the most common contractual institutions. According to the Art. 655 of the Civil code of Ukraine, under the contract of purchase and sale one party (seller) transfers or undertakes to transfer property (goods) into property to other party (buyer), and the buyer accepts or undertakes to accept prop-erty (goods) and to pay for it a certain monetary amount. At the same time, according to the case law, no unified approaches have been developed to interpret the legal consequences of failure to reach agreement on all the essential terms of purchase and sales contracts and mechanisms to protect the interests of counterparties to such agreements. Examining the procedure for concluding a contract of purchase and sale, we can not ignore the problem of its «conclusion», «validity» and «non-conclusion». It should be noted that the Civil Code of Ukraine has not provided a legal definition of «failed contract» or «unconcluded contract». Instead, the Economic Code of Ukraine in the Part 8 of the Art. 181 has stipulated that in case the parties do not reach an agreement on all material terms, their contract will be considered unconcluded or failed. No less difficulties also arise in interpreting the contract of purchase and sale as invalid or not concluded if at least one of its parties denies the fact of signing. The approach according to which «in case of contesting the very fact of concluding a transaction, such a fact can be refuted by presenting a relevant conclusion on the inconsisten-cy in the motivating part of the court decision» – does not quite agree with Art. 55 of the Constitution of Ukraine and the principle of access to justice. For example, under the current approach in court practice, the plaintiff is not reimbursed for court costs (costs of paying court fees, legal aid costs, etc.). In any case, as of today, it is expedient to better address the relevant problems in order to provide a real opportunity for participants in civil traffic to effec-tively protect their rights and interests. 

Author(s):  
S. S. Galkin

The article analyzes the practical aspects of inclusion the lending right into the insolvency estate. Based on the analysis of existing legal regulations and judicial practice of their application, there are existing restrictions on the inclusion of lending rights in the insolvency state. These restrictions are analysed from a balance of interests of the owner, the debtor and his creditors, as well as the correct distribution of economic costs while providing priority protection to each of these entities. Based on the concept of flexible legal regulation, the author formulates possible approaches (de lege ferenda and de lege lata) to solving this problem. The article focuses on the definition of the elements of the theoretical concept of a flexible system of protecting rights in insolvency. This concept includes, for example, the following aspects: firstly, the need to relativize those absolute defenses that can directly negatively affect the general economic well-being (In this case, the insolvency estate), secondly, the enforcement search for the scope of the protection provided should be carried out by judicial weighing and procedural assessment of various relevant factors, as well as the corresponding gradation of legal consequences, which should be identified by legislator or superior court.


Legal Concept ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 19-26
Author(s):  
Natalia Ablyatipova ◽  
◽  
Anastasia Kravtsova ◽  

Introduction: currently, retail sales contracts are widely used, under which technically sophisticated goods are transferred to the property, which form a special group of goods and have the specifics of the legal regulation. Meanwhile, there is no legal definition of a technically sophisticated good, and there are no regulatory criteria for this legal category. In this regard, the authors set the goal: to summarize the approaches developed by judicial practice on this issue, to identify what normative justification of technical sophistication is used when including goods in the List of technically sophisticated goods. Results: the importance of qualifying a product as technically sophisticated is investigated, the problems of qualifying goods as technically sophisticated are identified, and the reasons for determining the category of wireless devices equipped with a touch screen, two or more functions, and the absence of similar devices without a touch screen in the List of technically sophisticated products are established. Conclusions: based on the analysis of the legislation and the materials of judicial practice, the problems of applying the List of technically sophisticated goods and the ambiguity of the law enforcement are identified. Based on the results of the work, the authors have developed the practical proposals and recommendations for improving the legislation.


Author(s):  
V. V. VOYNIKOV

This paper is devoted to the consideration of certain aspects of legal cooperation in civil matters related to the determination of jurisdiction, recognition and execution of court decisions, as well as the definition of law to be applied when considering cross-border cases within the EU. At the EU level, an entire system of unified legal norms has been created governing the procedure for handling cross-border disputes in civil matters within the Union. At the same time, the EU’s goal is not to replace national procedural legislation with Allied acts, but to facilitate access to justice in civil cases of a cross-border nature in the context of close economic integration. The author analyzes the concept of «legal cooperation in civil matters», and also reveals its key elements. The paper highlights and examines in detail the four modes of consideration of cross-border cases within the EU, notes their features, as well as analyzes judicial practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1141-1168
Author(s):  
Safura T. Bagylly ◽  
Larisa N. Pavlova

The article deals with the problematic items of choosing a court competent to review court decisions that have entered into legal force on newly discovered or new circumstances in civil and administrative proceedings. The aim of the authors is to conduct a study of the legal regulation of the jurisdiction of applications for review. The methodological basis of the article was formed by general scientific (analysis, analogy, description, synthesis, and systemic approach) and particular scientific methods (historical-legal, comparative-legal, and formal-legal). A retrospective analysis of legal acts of domestic legislation has been carried out. According to the results of the study, difficulties relate to interpreting and applying the existing rules on determining the appropriate instance for revision. Based on the analysis of the judicial practice of courts of general jurisdiction and arbitral courts, the authors come to the conclusion that there is no unified approach of the courts in determining the procedural and legal consequences of violations of the rules of jurisdiction. The conclusion summarizes proposals for improving the current legislation to eliminate ambiguities and achieve uniformity in judicial practice.


2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (0) ◽  
pp. 39-48
Author(s):  
Jerzy Akińcza

An important problem of practical application of the law is invalid perpetuated judicial practice. It connects call for mediation with art. 184 of the Civil Code, with the effects of limitations of art. 123 § 1 of the Civil Code. Summoning to a conciliation hearing isn’t directly aimed at the fulfillment of the provision, therefore cannot be identified with legal transactions, to be determined content of 123 § 1 of the Civil Code. Practice currently carried out in the case law leads to a prolonged state of legal uncertainty, actual creditor victimization and denying institutions of antiquity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Ihor Boiko ◽  

The article analyzes the features of the legal regulation of intellectual property in Ukraine, in particular in the Ukrainian lands of Austria and Austria-Hungary (1772-1918). The author shows that the main source of legal regulation of civil relations, in particular intellectual property, in Galicia as part of Austria and Austria-Hungary (1772–1918) was the Austrian Civil Code of 1811. Property rights under the Austrian Civil Code of 1811 were the right of ownership, the right of possession, the right to pledge, and easements. The author highlights that things were divided into corporeal, disembodied, movable and immovable, used and unused, with price and without price. The bodily things were those perceived by the sense organs. Disembodied things included, first of all, property rights - the right to fish, hunt, and so on. It is shown that in the Austrian Empire for the first time the provisions on the legal regulation of intellectual property were provided for in the Civil Code of 1811 (Articles 1164‒1170). The author shows that the Austrian legal acts of 1846 for the first time regulated the free use of works, including the right of translation, citation. According to the law of 1846, the artist had to reserve the right of reproduction and exercise it for 2 years under the threat of losing his rights. It is emphasized that the presence of Western Ukrainian lands in the Austro-Hungarian monarchy, in comparison with the previous period of the Commonwealth, contributed to the spiritual progress of the Ukrainian nation, intensified cultural and artistic processes in Ukrainian lands. The author reveals that an important and new normative act in the field of intellectual property regulation was the Austrian Copyright Act for works of literature, art and photography, adopted on December 26, 1895. Attention is focused on the fact that the development of industrial property rights was carried out under the influence of economic development, which in the western Ukrainian lands as part of Austria was slower than in the economically developed regions of Austria, and thus - Austria-Hungary. It is concluded that the development of legal regulation of intellectual property in Galicia as part of Austria and Austria-Hungary (1772-1918) formed a certain experience, which was characterized by the specification of objects, subjects, the definition of intellectual property, the consolidation of copyright and their defense in court.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasamin Rody

Trade secret protection requires secrets of a certain quality, and this can easily be lost. Within the EU’s Member States, the protection of business and trade secrets is different. To improve this protection, the EU adopted Directive (EU) 2016/943 on 8th June 2016. Article 2 (1) of the directive contains a legal definition of trade secrets. This puts the definition developed by case law in Germany under scrutiny. Does the German definition also meet European requirements? In order to answer this question, the author examines the characteristics of the concept of secrecy under German law and compares them with those of the directive. Furthermore, the author deals with the legal nature of business and trade secrets. This relates to the still controversial question of whether trade secrets constitute absolute rights according to section 823 (1) of the German Civil Code.


Author(s):  
Nikolay Ryabinin ◽  
Kseniya Filipson

The purpose of the study is to analyze the features of legal relations regulated by Art. 158 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Art. 227 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, as well as to identify and resolve the problems related to the proper legal definition of these relations. The main research methods are: structural-system, methods of logical analysis and synthesis, formallegal, comparative-legal, as well as collecting information through the study of scientific periodicals and materials of judicial practice on this issue. The article discusses in detail the features of the delimitation of relations arising in accordance with Art. 158 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Art. 227 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The authors note that in the theory and practice of both criminal and civil law, one of the most controversial issues is the problem of differentiating a criminal offense under Art. 158 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and acts that are not such (Article 227 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation). So, to date, there is no consensus about the signs of differentiation of these compositions, and the criteria that have been developed at the present time are very vague and contradictory. Misinterpretation and application of norms when qualifying relations in accordance with Art. 158 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Art. 227 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation does not allow citizens to protect effectively their rights and legitimate interests. Therefore, in order to prevent violations of civil rights, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive scientific study of the features enabling to differentiate the above mentioned relations. Considerable attention is paid to the problem of appropriation of the found someone else’s property, when this property has identifying features. The authors define the types of property in the possession of the owner or any other type of legal owner, and also disclose the main characteristics of the specified property. In addition, the article formulates the authors’ definitions of such concepts as «finding» and «appropriation» of what was found. Based on the analysis of judicial and investigative practice, the authors propose the following recommendations for changing the legislation and the practice of its application in order to resolve controversial issues arising from the qualification of crimes against property. First, it is necessary to make clarifications in the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 27, 2002 No. 20 «On judicial practice in cases of theft, robbery and banditry» which property should be recognized as being in the possession of the owner or other legal owners and determine the characteristic features of such property ... Secondly, it is necessary to formulate and consolidate the legal definition of a find in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Thirdly, to return into Chapter 21 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation «Crime against property» the part «Appropriation of the found property».


Author(s):  
M. Bondareva ◽  
S. Rabovska

The article deals with the legal regulation for removal from the right to inheritance and law enforcement of the norm of Art. 1224 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. The study aims at developing the theoretical foundations of the application of this legal norm on the basis of analysis of legislation and case law. Such methods and approaches as systematic analysis and competent legal interpretation have been applied. The Civil Code of Ukraine regulates cases and removal of grounds for the right to inheritance. Article 1224 of the Civil Code of Ukraine is applied to heirs at law; it distinguishes cases and grounds for exclusion from the right to inheritance by various criteria. However, what is typical for the countries of the continental group, the law needs to be clarified, first of all at the level of law enforcement practice. The highest jurisdiction of Ukraine – the Supreme Court of Ukraine and the Supreme Court, made appropriate clarifications and interpretations of relevant legal norms at the general theoretical level (decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine) and at the level of unification of general practice through expressing a legal position in specific cases. Such interpretation should be considered clearly and sufficiently for further processing. However, judicial interpretation is not competent to correct legislative inaccuracies. And the case law itself is characterized by a tautology and inconsistency, when the departure from the previously adopted legal position is disguised under the difference of legal and factual grounds of the claim. The results of such miscalculations include variability of methods of judicial protection for the heirs of the first turn (paragraph 2, part 3 of Article 1224 and part 5 of Article 1224 of the Civil Code of Ukraine) and procedural difficulties in proving claims – proving the testator's helplessness, address need assistance from the defendant, etc. In addition to legal uncertainty, which results in the poor functioning of institutions of exclusion from the right to inherit, this state of affairs creates grounds for abuse of rights. The authors propose measures to solve the problem, which can be divided into several groups. The first concerns amendments to Paragraph 2, Part 3 of Art. 1224 and Part 5 of Art. 1224 of the Civil Code of Ukraine: in terms of the subject composition, in particular, the permission of the heirs of other than the first turn, the order of inheritance, to sue on the basis of Paragraph 2 of part 3 of Article 1224 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. The second is aimed at intensifying the institution provided by Paragraph 2 of Part 3 of Article 1224 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, inter alia, due to the uniformity and consistency of judicial practice. The introduction of the principle of participation in inheritance by bona fide heirs as a reward for their care of the testator, and the relatively easy removal of the right to inherit those who did not show such care, will also contribute to the revival of law enforcement. Finally, the third group of measures is related to the promotion of inheritance through wills, which will limit the number of disputes in inheritance cases (mainly cases of invalidation of the will) and put an end to the issue of exclusion from the right to inherit.


2021 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 01039
Author(s):  
G.V. Stankevich ◽  
I.M. Vilgonenko ◽  
Y.N. Slepenok ◽  
O.M. Litvishko

Due to the development of information technologies, electronic document flow is actively becoming a part of modern life, and the activity of courts is not an exception. Electronic documents are increasingly considered by courts as evidence in civil cases. Judicial practice faces certain problems when evaluating such evidence due to the insufficiency of legal regulation of such kind of evidence. The article examines the theoretical and practical aspects of the existence of an electronic document as a type of written evidence, attempts to reveal the essence of an electronic document, define its features as compared to a traditional written document, and analyzes the approaches to the definition of the concept of ‘electronic document’, which have developed in Russian legal science. The analysis of the practice in the application of an electronic document as evidence with regard to relevance, admissibility and adequacy is carried out. Certain problems which judges have to face when using an electronic document as evidence have been identified. The authors’ understanding of an electronic document is submitted, the framework of problems and gaps under current civil procedure legislation is defined, and methods of solution are proposed. The need to define an independent type of evidence – electronic evidence is substantiated, with it further being enshrined in the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, as well as to formalize in legislation the concept of an ‘electronic information medium’.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document