scholarly journals ERROR ANALYSIS IN WRITING OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF MAN 1 PALU

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-18
Author(s):  
Nur Intan ◽  
Darwis Jauhari Bandu ◽  
Yuni Amelia

Error analysis is an activity to identify, classify and interpreted or describe the errors made by someone in speaking or in writing and it is carried out to obtain information on common difficulties faced by someone in speaking or in writing English sentences. For students, error analysis is needed to show them in what aspect in grammar which is difficult for them, to show the errors made by the students, to know the source or the cause of the error and how the students can learn from their mistakes in order that they will not make some errors repeatedly. The purpose of this research is to describe the type of grammatical error faced by students in writing. This research used descriptive qualitative method. This research was carried out in using descriptive writing text to find out what types of error made by students of the tenth grade students MAN 1 Palu in writing and what causes of the students error in writing. The result of the research showed that the tenth grade students MAN 1 Palu still made 41 errors in their writing. They are three classification of error based on surface strategy taxonomy. The high frequency of error is selection (63,41%), omission (26,82), and The lowest frequency of error is addition (9,75). On the other hand, the highest cause of error is carelessness (75,6%), %), first language (7 or 17,07 %), while the lowest cause of error is translation (7.31%).

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-104
Author(s):  
Vincensia Geraldine

This research is conducted to find out the conjunction usage within the students’ writing assignments of vocational state school. The aims of this research are to find out the common errors on the use of conjunction in their writing, investigate types of errors that occur most frequently in students’ writing proposed by Ong in Taxonomy Cohesion, and categorizing the causes of errors using the theory proposed by Richard. The research discussed about error analysis on the use of adversative (but), additive (and), and causal (because, so) in students’ writing. This research used the qualitative method and the data source comes from the tenth-grade students’ assignments. The result of this research shows that the common errors in the use of conjunction in students’ writing were a conjunction and, followed by but, so, and because. Furthermore, frequent types of error occurred in the text error of misuse is the most types of errors occur within the students’ writing assignments and then followed by the error of redundant repetition, omission, and unnecessary addition. There are three causes of errors, which are; incomplete application of rules, ignorance of rules restriction, and over-generalization. The errors of misuse and omission found out in the data, is most likely caused by the incomplete application of rules. The error of unnecessary addition and redundant repetition were caused by the ignorance of rules restriction and over-generalization.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDER SORALUZE ◽  
OLATZ ARREGI ◽  
XABIER ARREGI ◽  
ARANTZA DÍAZ DE ILARRAZA

AbstractThis paper presents the improvement process of a mention detector for Basque. The system is rule-based and takes into account the characteristics of mentions in Basque. A classification of error types is proposed based on the errors that occur during mention detection. A deep error analysis distinguishing error types and causes is presented and improvements are proposed. At the final stage, the system obtains an F-measure of 74.57% under the Exact Matching protocol and of 80.57% under Lenient Matching. We also show the performance of the mention detector with gold standard data as input, in order to omit errors caused by the previous stages of linguistic processing. In this scenario, we obtain an F-measure of 85.89% with Strict Matching and of 89.06% with Lenient Matching, i.e., a difference of 11.32 and 8.49 percentage points, respectively. Finally, how improvements in mention detection affect coreference resolution is analysed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Megantari N.W.Y. ◽  
Budasi I.G.

This study was designed in the form of descriptive qualitative that describe the Analysis of Errors Reflected in Recount Writing Committed by the Tenth Grade Students of SMK Negeri 1 Denpasar. This study aimed at identifying and describing the types and sources of errors. The subjects of this study were the tenth grade students of SMK Negeri 1 Denpasar. The participants of this study were 28 students of class X RPL 1.The data were collected based on the students’ recount writings. There were two techniques to collect the data, namely guided writing and free writing. The errors were classified into 13 types of error as suggested by (Azar, 1999) and (Zawahreh, 2012) namely: singular/plural, word form, verb tense, add a word, omit a word, word order, spelling, punctuation, capitalization, meaning not clear, run-on sentence, preposition, and pronoun. The results of the analysis show there were 307 errors found in Holiday Task 1, 328 errors found in Holiday Task 2, 183 errors were found in Unforgettable Experience Task 1, and 264 errors were found in Unforgettable Experience Task 2. The sources of errors were classified into three types based on the result of student’s writing as suggested by (Richards, 1971) and Brown (1980) namely: Intralingual, Interlingual, and Communication Strategy. The most frequent sources of errors were caused by communication strategy with 587 errors (63%), intralingual with 336 errors (36,51%), and interlingual with 4 errors (0,42%).


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-78
Author(s):  
Agung Pranoto Kadiatmaja

Abstract The research is to find out the types of error analysis in students’ sentences and the most dominant types of error analysis in students’ sentences. This research uses qualitative method to look into errors in the second language acquisition and to collect empirical data. This method is applied to get the accurate data collection. The object of the research is students’ practice randomly taken from twelve advanced students of TOEFL Preparation Class – The Mushlih Institute (TMI) Surabaya. In acquiring the result of this error analysis, surface strategy taxonomy is applied to investigate more details. It is limited on the students’ sentences with inverted subjects and verbs error in their practice consisting of four error types. In summary, the types of sentences with inverted subjects and verbs errors produced by the students are (1) omission appearing 49 times or 79,03% of all, (2) addition appearing 9 times or 14,52% of all, (3) misordering appearing 3 times or 4,84% of all, and (4) misformation appearing a time or 1,61% of all. According to the research findings, the most dominant type of sentences with inverted subjects and verbs error is omission.   Keywords: Error Analysis, Writing Practice, Sentences.


Author(s):  
Gadis Selvia Sitorus ◽  
Kammer Sipayung

This thesis is the study about an error analysis of using phrases in writing recount text at tenth grader in SMA Parulian 2 Medan. The objective of the study is to identify the types of common phrases’ error made by the students of tenth grader in SMA Parulian 2 Medan in writing recount text. This study used descriptive qualitative research. The subject of this study is the tenth grade students of SMA Parulian 2 Medan which consists of three classes. The object of this study is class of X-A. The instrument of collecting data used writing test, writing recount text. The data were analyzed by identifying the students’ phrases errors by underlining each error from students’ answer sheet, after that classifying the types of error based on five types of phrases. Finally, the research result showed that there are 145 phrases errors made by the students X-A in writing recount text. The types of phrases which indicate common error is on noun phrase. The number of noun phrase error are 83 with percentage 57,24%, followed by verb phrase has 28 with percentage 19,31%, the third is prepositional phrase which has 22 with percentage 15,17%, the fourth is adjective phrase which has 10 with percentage 6,90%, the last is adverb phrase has 2 with percentage 1,38%.  It was caused the students constructed or arranged the words or sentences based on Indonesian meaning. English has different rules in constructing phrases. The students also were lack of knowledge about phrases. Therefore, English teachers are expected to focus on types of phrases in learning English.


Tamaddun ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-67
Author(s):  
Sholihin Sholihin ◽  
Abd Haris

The purpose of this study was to describe what kinds of error do the students in their writing essay and to describe the reasons why the students make the error in their writing essay at the four semester students of English education Programe of STKIP Taman Siswa Bima. This study applied case study method. The method unsuited to the error analysis procedures (following Chen, 2006:6) informed the processes to analyze the data consisted four steps were Data collection , Identification of errors, Classification of errors into error types, A statement of error frequency, Find out the case of error. The result of this research was concluded that the grammatical errors made by the fourth semester students of STKIP Taman Siswa Bima in writing essay are in Punctuation and Spelling for the highest errors 50.1%, the second is errors in Sentence Pattern 16%, followed by Auxiliaries  6,1%, Preposition 5.26%, Passive voice 4.48%, Verb Tense and Form 4.2%,  Subject-verb agreement 4.0%, Articles 4%, Plurality 3.8%, Word order 2.3% and Pronoun 1,1% of 521 errors obtained from their essays. The cause of error based on interview was succession approximation system.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Christanto Dwi Nugroho

<p align="center"><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p> </p><p>The objective of this study is to analyze the error of using Degrees of          Comparison at the seventh grade of SMP Kesuma Bangsa Depok.The technique was made of purposive sampling, the sample was 40 students.     The method of the research was descriptive qualitative as for the technique       of collecting data was test method. The writer<strong> </strong>applied the test as research       instrument. The data was described as a percentage by using percentage             analysis. The writer discover there are some errors in students’         descriptive writing initiated with subject 6,27%, <em>to be</em> 25,46%, adjective          17,71%, article 7,01%, spelling 8,59%, noun 2,58%, pronoun 9,23%,             preposition 1,85%, word choice 2,58%, capitalization 14,39%, conjunction             2,58%, and word order 1,85%. The most frequent errors are to be 25,46%,    adjective 17,71%, and capitalization 14,39%. The causes of errors are due to first             language interference and translation. In conclusion, it might be      deduced that there are errors of using Degrees of Comparison in students’         descriptive writing at the seventh grade of SMP Kesuma Bangsa Depok.</p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>Tujuan dari penelitian ini menganalisa kesalahan penggunaan perbandingan pada karangan deskriptif siswa kelas VII SMP Kesuma Bangsa Depok,  menggunakan teknik pengambilan sample sebanyak 40 siswa. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif, dan  teknik pengumpulan data. Peneliti menggunakan tes instrument. Data digambarkan dengan analisa persentasi. Peneliti menemukan ada beberapa kesalahan penulisan deskriptif siswa yaitu subyek 6.27%, kata kerja 25,46 %, kata sifat 17,71%, kata depan 7,01%, ejaan 8.59%, kata benda 2.58%, kata pengganti 9.23%, awalan 1.85%, pemilihan kata 2.58%, huruf kapital 14.39%, kata penghubung 2.58% and tata letak kata 1.85%. kesalahan yang sering terjadi adalah kata kerja sebanyak  25,46%,  kata sifat 17,71 % dan huruf capital 14.39% . penyebab kesalahan terjadi pengaruh Bahasa pertama dan terjemahan. Didapat kesimpulan bahwa ada kesalahan pada karangan deskriptif siswa kelas VII di SMP Kesuma Bangsa.</p>


ELT-Lectura ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-136
Author(s):  
Syaefani Arif Romadhon ◽  
M. Taufik Qurohman ◽  
Muchamad Sobri Sungkar

Most students have difficulty in learning English especially for Writing material, because in addition to the problem vocabulary there is also a lack of student’s understanding of Grammar. It takes a while to work on Writing because it should consider the aspects of Vocabulary and Grammar. This research was conducted to find some Grammar errors which commonly done by students of Accounting study Program at Politeknik Harapan Bersama Tegal. So the purpose of this research is to analyze student Grammar mistakes in particular in descriptive text. This research uses qualitative descriptive methods as a method of research. Data presented in the form of descriptive analysis. From the results of the study showed that students make mistakes on the Verb Agreement 7.07%, Capitalizing 34.84%, Grammatical Error (Usage) 2.52%, Sentence Pattern 4.04%, pronoun 49.49%, Spelling 2.02%. From the result, it can be concluded that the students should learn Grammar especially about pronoun, because of the mistakes that most students do.  


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Jibrel H. Al-Saudi

This paper aims at investigating the spelling mistakes made by students of English language in The World Islamic Sciences and Education University (WISE) in Jordan. The researcher adopted Cook&lsquo;s classification of errors in this study. Students mistakes were categorized into four classifications: substitution, omission, insertion, and transposition. Fifty students were participated in the study by enrolling in the &quot;Error Analysis&quot; course in two semesters of the academic year 2016/2017. The data for the study were derived from three exams: the first, the second, and the final exams, given to the students during the two semesters. Then the data were analyzed after completing the course in the second semester of 2016-2017. The results of the study revealed that (38%) of the errors referred to omission and (28%) to insertion. However, the study showed that (22%) of errors referred to substitution, while only (15%) of them referred to transposition. This study showed that using vowels and pronunciation incorrectly is one of the major causes of the learners&#39; errors. Further, the interference of the first language plays a significant role in this regard. The study concludes that more efforts and concern should be given to spelling errors made by students since the learning of spelling is an integral part of language learning. The researcher suggested some recommendations and pedagogical implications to be studied in the future.


Author(s):  
Muliyana Muliyana ◽  
Muhammad Zuhri Dj. ◽  
Andi Muhammad Yauri

This research about The Effect of Using Language Interference in ELT Writing Class at The Tenth Grade of Athirah Bone. It is intended to find out two problems of writing. The first problem is the types of errors made by the students in students’ writing skills of the tenth grade of Athirah Bone. This research used a qualitative method by implementing interview. The sample consisted of 9 students from Athirah Bone. The result shows that the students’ perception of the types of students’ errors in writing consist of five perceptions. The first is students’ perceptions relate to the feeling. The second is students’ perceptions relate with the first language’ influence students in mastering the second language. The third is the students’ perception relates to the students’ experiences and kinds of interferences that students have made on writing. The fourth is the students’ perception relates to the factors that cause students to do interfere in writing. The last is about the students’ perception of the difficulties in writing. The second problem is the factors that cause students to do interfere in writing through the observation, it is found that there are four factors that make the students of the tenth grade of Athirah Bone do interfere in writing. The first is do not master spelling. The second is still confused about using the article. The third is Missing using singular and plural nouns. The last is missing space.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document