scholarly journals Initiatives for immune-related adverse events by the outpatient pharmacist clinic

2022 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Kiyonori Hamatake ◽  
Kazuaki Kojima
Keyword(s):  
Early Detection ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Post Marketing Surveillance ◽  
Post Marketing ◽  
Detection Ratio ◽  
Pharmacist Clinic

Early detection is the key in managing side effects because immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are becoming more serious, and their onset time differs. In our hospital, we conducted an outpatient pharmacist clinic for early detection of irAEs by self-care practice for the cases of immune checkpoint inhibitor administration. As a result of a retrospective survey of 207 cases, the percentage of irAEs found by pharmacist’s suggestion of the outpatient pharmacist clinic increased over time, and a high detection ratio was obtained even for irAEs with a late onset time. The incidence of serious irAEs was higher than that in the immediate post-marketing surveillance, and different factors were considered. Although there were some problems, the outpatient pharmacist clinic had a certain effect.

scholarly journals AB0249 SAFETY OF BARICITINIB IN JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA): THE 2020 INTERIM REPORT FROM ALL-CASE POST MARKETING SURVEILLANCE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1150.1-1150
Author(s):  
T. Fujii ◽  
T. Atsumi ◽  
N. Okamoto ◽  
N. Takahashi ◽  
N. Tamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Aspiration Pneumonia ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Chugai Pharmaceutical ◽  
Post Marketing Surveillance ◽  
Otsuka Pharmaceutical ◽  
Post Marketing

Background:An all-case post marketing surveillance (PMS) of baricitinib (Bari), that started in Sep 2017, collects safety and effectiveness for the first 24 wks of treatment and continues to collect serious adverse events (SAEs) for 3 yrs.Objectives:To evaluate Bari safety in RA patients (pt) in clinical practice.Methods:We report pt baseline demographics and adverse events (AEs) up to 24 wks for pts whose case report files for 24-wk data were completed as of Jun 2020.Results:Data from 3445 pts were analyzed (females=80%, mean age=64yr, mean RA duration 12yr). Bari dose regimen was as follows: 4mg, 60%, 2mg, 27%, 4mg→2mg, 5%, 2mg→4mg, 5%, and others, 2%. Concomitant use of MTX and glucocorticoid was 65% and 48%, respectively. 74% continued treatment for 24 wks. AE and SAE were recognized in 887 (26%) and 122 pts (4%), respectively. 6 pts died of pneumonia, aspiration pneumonia, bacterial pneumonia, cerebral infarction/ILD/aspiration pneumonia, adenocarcinoma, and colorectal cancer. Major AEs were as follows: herpes zoster=3%, liver dysfunction=3%, serious infection=1%, anemia=1%, hyperlipidemia=1%, malignancy=0.3%, interstitial pneumonia=0.2%, MACE=0.1%, and VTE=0.1%.Conclusion:Data do not show new safety concerns and encourage guideline-compliant use of Bari.Disclosure of Interests:Takao Fujii Speakers bureau: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Eisai Co. Ltd; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Consultant of: Asahikasei Pharma Corp, Grant/research support from: Asahikasei Pharma Corp; AbbVie Japan GK; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co. Ltd; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Co.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tatsuya Atsumi Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK; Astellas Pharma Inc.; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Ltd; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd.; Eisai Co. Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co.; Pfizer Japan Inc.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Consultant of: AbbVie Japan GK; AstraZeneca plc.; Boehringer Ingelheim Co. Ltd.; Medical & Biological Laboratories Co. Ltd.; Novartis Pharma K.K.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Pfizer Japan Inc., Grant/research support from: Astellas Pharma Inc., Alexion Inc.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Pfizer Japan Inc.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Nami Okamoto Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK; Asahikasei Pharma Co.; AYUMI Pharmaceutical Co.Eisai Co. Ltd; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Co.; Pfizer Japan Inc.Sanofi K.K.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Novartis Pharma Co.; Teijin Pharma Ltd.; Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nobunori Takahashi Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK; Eisai Co. Ltd.; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co.; Pfizer Japan Inc.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; UCB Japan Co. Ltd.; Astellas Pharma Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Ltd., Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Ltd., Naoto Tamura Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK; Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Ltd.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Eisai Co. Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Glaxo Smith Kline K.K.; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Co.; Novartis Pharma Co., Atsuo Nakajima: None declared, Ayako Nakajima Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK; Actelion Pharmaceuticals Japan Ltd., Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd.,Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Glaxo Smith Kline K.K., Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co. Inc., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., Teijin Pharma Ltd., Grant/research support from: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Pfizer Japan Inc., Hiroaki Matsuno Speakers bureau: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Consultant of: Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Grant/research support from: Astellas Pharma Inc., Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K, Naoto Tsujimoto Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Atsushi Nishikawa Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Taeko Ishii Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Tsutomu Takeuchi Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. Eisai Co., Ltd. Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Co.; Novartis Pharma Co.; Pfizer Japan Inc.; Sanofi K.K.; UCB Japan Co., Ltd., Consultant of: AbbVie Japan GK, Astellas Pharma, Inc.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Eisai Co., Ltd.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp., Pfizer Japan Inc., Grant/research support from: AbbVie Japan GK, Asahikasei Pharma Corp., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd., DNA Chip Research Inc.; Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp., UCB Japan Co., Ltd., Masataka Kuwana Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK, Astellas Pharma Inc., Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Medical &Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd.; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co.; Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Pfizer Japan Inc., Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.; Medical &Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd.; Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Grant/research support from: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Medical &Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Michiaki Takagi Speakers bureau: Yes, but sponsored lectures without COI in the academic meetings, only.

Safety and tolerability of prescribed usage of Derise® (Darbepoetin Alfa, Hetero) in symptomatic anemia: A Post Marketing Surveillance Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shubhadeep Sinha ◽  
Vamsi Krishna Bandi ◽  
Bala Reddy Bheemareddy ◽  
Pankaj Thakur ◽  
Sreenivasa Chary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Darbepoetin Alfa ◽  
P Value ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Post Marketing Surveillance ◽  
Post Marketing

Abstract Background This post marketing surveillance, observational, prospective, safety study evaluated the safety, tolerability and long term immunogenicity of prescribed usage of Darbepoetin alfa, (DA-α, manufactured by Hetero Biopharma) in Indian patients with chronic kidney disease with anemia.Methods All patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease prescribed Hetero-Darbepoetin were the target patient population. The present study gathered the data from 503 Hetero-Darbepoetin alfa prescribed patients. This study collected information of patient demography, patient's medical history, concomitant medications, action taken with respect to Hetero-Darbepoetin-alfa, AE details (AE term, start date, stop date, severity, action taken, outcome and causality), periodic Hemoglobin (Hb) levels and abnormal laboratory tests results until treatment is discontinued or the patient is lost to follow-up. Immunogenicity data was collected in 121 patients at the end of treatment and after 1 year. Statistical analyses were performed to explore and analyze details of individual case safety reports of adverse events such as incidence, severity, seriousness, outcome, duration, action taken, and causality relationship of individual adverse event (AE) to the prescribed study drug. Results 87 AEs were reported in this study and most of them were mild to moderate in intensity. No deaths or serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in this study. Anti-drug antibodies were not detected in any subject at the end of treatment phase and after 12 months long term follow up period. Baseline mean Hemoglobin value was 8.34 (SD 1.24) g/dL and last visit mean Hemoglobin value was 10.42 (SD 1.28) g/dL. The mean difference between baseline and last visit was 2.10 [2.00, 2.20], statistically significant (p-value <.0001). Conclusions The safety and tolerability of the usage of DA-α (manufactured by Hetero Biopharma) is similar to that reported in the published literature of the innovator. No patients showed anti-drug antibodies after treatment. Additionally, the patients also showed significant improvement in hemoglobin levels, compared to baseline.Clinical Trial Registry Number: CTRI/2017/04/008338 [Registered on CTRI http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php : 12/04/2017]; Trial Registered Retrospectively

Baseline characteristics, diagnostic efficacy, and peri-examinational safety of IV gadoteric acid MRI in 148,489 patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (7) ◽  
pp. 910-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Braun ◽  
Reinhard Busse ◽  
Elisabeth Darmon-Kern ◽  
Oliver Heine ◽  
Jonas Auer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Contrast Agent ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Diagnostic Efficacy ◽  
Post Marketing Surveillance ◽  
Post Marketing ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri

Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations with intravenous (IV) contrast are performed worldwide in routine daily practice. In order to detect and enumerate even rare adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE), and to relate them with patients’ baseline characteristics and diagnostic effectiveness, high quantity sample size is necessary. Purpose To assess safety, diagnostic effectiveness, and baseline characteristics of patients undergoing IV gadoteric acid (Dotarem®) MRI in routine practice. Material and Methods Data from two observational post-marketing surveillance (PMS) databases compiled by 139 and 52 German centers in 2004–2011 and 2011–2013, respectively, were pooled, yielding data on a total of 148,489 patients examined over a 10-year period. Radiologists used a standardized questionnaire to report data including patient demographics, characteristics of MR examinations, and results in terms of diagnosis and patient safety. Results Overall, 712 AEs were reported in 467 (0.3%) patients, mainly nausea (n = 224, 0.2%), vomiting (n = 29, <0.1%), urticaria (n = 20, <0.1%), and feeling hot (n = 13, <0.1%). AEs were considered related to gadoteric acid in 362 (0.2%) patients. Higher frequencies of AEs were observed among patients with a previous reaction to a contrast agent (2.0%), liver dysfunction (0.7%), bronchial asthma (0.7%), and a history of allergies (0.6%). There were 49 SAEs in 18 (<0.1%) patients, including two children. No fatal SAE was reported. Examinations were diagnostic in 99.8% of all patients, and image quality was excellent or good in 97.7% of the patients. Conclusion Gadoteric acid is a safe peri-examinational and effective contrast agent for MRI in routine practice.

A Swedish national post-marketing surveillance study of natalizumab treatment in multiple sclerosis

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 708-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Holmén ◽  
Fredrik Piehl ◽  
Jan Hillert ◽  
Anna Fogdell-Hahn ◽  
Malin Lundkvist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Drug Effects ◽  
Surveillance Study ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Quality Registry ◽  
Post Marketing Surveillance ◽  
Natalizumab Treatment ◽  
Post Marketing

Background: A post marketing surveillance study was conducted to evaluate safety and efficacy of natalizumab in Swedish multiple sclerosis (MS) patients since its introduction in August 2006 until March 2010. Methods: Patients were registered in the web-based Swedish MS-registry at 40 locations and evaluated every 6 months. Adverse events and clinical outcomes were recorded. Results: One thousand one hundred and fifty-two patients were included (71.4% female) and 149 patients stopped treatment; the main reason was planned pregnancy. Anti-natalizumab antibodies were found in 4.5% (52 patients) of which 1.6% displayed persistent antibodies. Serious adverse events were rare, but included three cases with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). There were seven fatal cases, probably unrelated to the natalizumab treatment. For relapsing–remitting MS patients ( n = 901), mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS, −10.7%), Multiple Sclerosis Severity Scale (MSSS, −20.4%), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29, physical −9.9%, psychological −13.3%) and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT, +10.7%) all showed significant improvements during 24 months of treatment with natalizumab. The Swedish web-based MS quality registry proved to function as a platform for post-marketing MS drug surveillance, providing long-term data regarding drug effects and adverse events beyond clinical trials. Conclusions: Our results indicate that natalizumab is generally well tolerated and has sustained efficacy for patients with active MS, though the risk of PML is still an important concern.

scholarly journals Safety and reactogenicity of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine: experience from clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 251513552110574
Author(s):  
Joseph Fiore ◽  
Maribel Miranda Co-van der Mee ◽  
Andrés Maldonado ◽  
Lisa Glasser ◽  
Phil Watson
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Zoster Vaccine ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Pivotal Phase ◽  
Post Marketing Surveillance ◽  
Post Marketing ◽  
Recombinant Zoster Vaccine

An adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) is licensed for the prevention of herpes zoster. This paper reviews its safety and reactogenicity. A pooled analysis of two pivotal randomized Phase-3 trials (NCT01165177, NCT01165229) in adults ⩾50 years found that more solicited adverse events (AEs) were reported with RZV than placebo. Injection site pain was the most common solicited AE (RZV: 78.0% participants; placebo: 10.9%). Grade-3 pain occurred in 6.4% of RZV and 0.3% of placebo recipients. Myalgia, fatigue, and headache were the most commonly reported general solicited AEs (RZV: 44.7%, 44.5%, and 37.7%, respectively; placebo: 11.7%, 16.5%, and 15.5%, respectively). Most symptoms were mild to moderate in intensity with a median duration of 2–3 days. The intensity of reactogenicity symptoms did not differ substantially after the first and second vaccine doses. The pooled analysis of the pivotal Phase-3 trials did not identify any clinically relevant differences in the overall incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs), fatal AEs or potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) between RZV and placebo. Reactogenicity in five studies of immunocompromised patients ⩾18 years (autologous stem cell transplant, human immunodeficiency virus, solid tumors, hematological malignancies, and renal transplant; NCT01610414, NCT01165203, NCT01798056, NCT01767467, and NCT02058589) was consistent with that observed in the pivotal Phase-3 trials. There were no clinically relevant differences between RZV and placebo in the immunocompromised populations with regard to overall incidence of SAEs, fatal AEs, pIMDs, or AEs related to patients’ underlying condition. Post-marketing surveillance found that the most commonly reported AEs were consistent with the reactogenicity profile of the vaccine in clinical trials. Overall, the clinical safety data for RZV are reassuring. [Formula: see text]

scholarly journals Drug-Associated Delirium Identified in The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Adrian Wong ◽  
Angela Li ◽  
Kane Gill ◽  
Matthew P. Gray ◽  
Pamela L. Smithburger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Reporting System ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Food And Drug Administration ◽  
Public Knowledge ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
The Public ◽  
Post Marketing Surveillance ◽  
Post Marketing

Introduction: Drug toxicity and polypharmacy are major risk factors for delirium, especially in older adult patients with underlying comorbidities. However, numerous case reports have described drugs with a lower suspicion of being deliriogenic. The objective of this study was to identify deliriogenic drugs in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) to broaden the public knowledge and understanding. Study Design: Retrospective pharmacovigilance evaluation. Methods: FAERS reports from 2004 through 2015 were reviewed for delirium-associated terms, which were utilized to identify drugs most frequently reported to cause delirium. Drugs were categorized as: 1) known to be deliriogenic; 2) potentially deliriogenic; or 3) new potential to be deliriogenic. The 100 most frequently reported drugs were analyzed in reporting odds ratios (ROR). Results: Of the known deliriogenic drugs (n=32), paroxetine (ROR 4.1, CI 4.0-4.3), olanzapine (ROR 3.3, CI 3.2-3.4), and clozapine (ROR 2.9, CI 2.8-3.0) were most reported. Of the potentially deliriogenic drugs (n=54), duloxetine (ROR 3.2, CI 3.1-3.3), varenicline (ROR 3.1, CI 3.0-3.2), and gabapentin (ROR 2.9, CI 2.7-3.0) were most reported. Three drugs were considered to have new potential to be deliriogenic: heparin (ROR 1.5, CI 1.4-1.6), metformin (ROR 1.3, CI 1.3-1.4), and dalfampridine (ROR 1.1, CI 1.1-1.2). Conclusion: The majority of drugs were considered potentially deliriogenic. FAERS can provide post-marketing surveillance data to guide future studies on potentially deliriogenic drugs to guide management of causal agents.

scholarly journals Systematic analysis of protein targets associated with adverse events of drugs from clinical trials and post-marketing reports

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ines A. Smit ◽  
Avid M. Afzal ◽  
Chad H. G. Allen ◽  
Fredrik Svensson ◽  
Thierry Hanser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Adverse Event Reporting System ◽  
Quantitative Information ◽  
Carbonic Anhydrases ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Post Marketing Surveillance ◽  
Post Marketing

AbstractAdverse drug reactions (ADRs) are undesired effects of medicines that can harm patients and are a significant source of attrition in drug development. ADRs are anticipated by routinely screening drugs against secondary pharmacology protein panels. However, there is still a lack of quantitative information on the links between these off-target proteins and the risk of ADRs in humans. Here, we present a systematic analysis of associations between measured and predicted in vitro bioactivities of drugs, and adverse events (AEs) in humans from two sources of data: the Side Effect Resource (SIDER), derived from clinical trials, and the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), derived from post-marketing surveillance. The ratio of a drug’s in vitro potency against a given protein relative to its therapeutic unbound drug plasma concentration was used to select proteins most likely to be relevant to in vivo effects. In examining individual target bioactivities as predictors of AEs, we found a trade-off between the Positive Predictive Value and the fraction of drugs with AEs that can be detected, however considering sets of multiple targets for the same AE can help identify a greater fraction of AE-associated drugs. Of the 45 targets with statistically significant associations to AEs, 30 are included on existing safety target panels. The remaining 15 targets include 8 carbonic anhydrases, of which CA5B was significantly associated with cholestatic jaundice. We include the full quantitative data on associations between in vitro bioactivities and AEs in humans in this work, which can be used to make a more informed selection of safety profiling targets.

Efficacy of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) Monotherapy on Relapsed/Refractory Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1532-1532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Takeshita ◽  
Takaaki Ono ◽  
Yumi Kojima ◽  
Taiichi Kyo ◽  
Norio Asou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lung Damage ◽  
Surveillance Study ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Considerable Proportion ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Post Marketing Surveillance ◽  
Highly Effective ◽  
Post Marketing

Abstract Abstract 1532 The current standard initial treatment for APL is all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and anthracycline with or without citarabine, followed by ATRA maintenance. Although the treatment has greatly improved clinical outcomes of APL, a considerable proportion of patients still undergo disease relapse, requiring salvage therapy with such as arsenic trioxide (ATO). GO, an anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody conjugated with calicheamicin, is also highly effective on APL. Highly homogeneous expression of CD33, potential efficacy of calicheamicin and lower expression of P-glycoprotein on APL cells explain the high potency of GO on APL. We report here on the efficacy of GO monotherapy against relapsed/refractory APL in a post-marketing surveillance study of GO in Japan. All patients who were treated with GO alone were obligatorily registered into a post-marketing surveillance study run by Wyeth Japan, Co. Ltd. under the guidance of the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency. We obtained permission to access patients' data from each institution and Pfizer Japan, Co. Ltd. The survey items included adverse events, treatment outcome, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Clinical and biological characteristics were analyzed in APL and compared by chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical data, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous data. OS and RFS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method in APL, and then compared to those from the simultaneous post-marketing study in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by the log-rank test. Between 2005 and 2008, 27 relapsed/refractory APL patients were enrolled in this surveillance. Of these, two patients were excluded from analysis because of insufficient data, while 726 AML patients were enrolled and 503 were evaluable. Twelve (48%) and 2 (9%) APL patients who were treated with GO alone achieved CR and CRp, respectively, while 42 (8%) and 41 (8%) of AML achieved CR and CRp, respectively. Remission duration of first CR and number of relapses influenced CR rates, but previous usage of ATO and age did not in APL. OS and RFS at 2 years were 63% and 71% in APL, and 14% and 20% in AML, respectively. These were shown in figures. OS and RFS in APL were better than those in AML (P<0.0001 and P=0.0074, respectively). Treatment related adverse events of GO (grade 3 or 4) in APL patients were infection (24%), bleeding (8%), lung damage (4%) and reversible veno-occlusive disease (4%); these were similar in AML patients. Although other previous clinical studies failed to confirm clinical benefit of GO on AML, single use of GO is highly effective and relatively safe in relapsed/refractory APL. The efficacy was also observed in elderly patients and in relapsed ones after ATO therapy. Further studies are warranted, in which GO is included in addition to ATRA and ATO in the treatment of high-risk APL. Disclosures: Takeshita: Novartis Pharma: Research Funding; Takeda Pharma: Research Funding. Naoe:Kyowa-Hakko Kirin.: Research Funding; Dainipponn-Sumitomo Pharma.: Research Funding; Chugai Pharma.: Research Funding; Novartis Pharma.: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Zenyaku-Kogyo: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharma.: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document