Measuring Need to Achieve by n Ach-n Aff Scale—A Forced-Choice Questionnaire

1976 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 907-910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Clay Lindgren

To measure the need to achieve (n Ach), a questionnaire was constructed which required the subject to make a forced choice on each of 30 pairs of adjectives. Half the adjectives were based on the Need for Achievement scale and the other half on the Need for Affiliation scale of Gough's Adjective Check List. When the questionnaire was scored in the n Ach direction, differences between sex and age groupings of college students were negligible and nonsignificant, but scores for males were positively and significantly correlated with grades on midterms and GPA, whereas correlations for female students were low, positive, and significant only at the 10% level. Bank tellers' n Ach scores correlated positively with supervisors' ratings and were significantly lower than those of college students. Expectant mothers were the lowest scoring group on n Ach, while male Chinese-speaking immigrants under 30 scored the highest. Results were considered to be consistent with previous research and with expectations based on common sense and everyday impressions.

1976 ◽  
Vol 42 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1256-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Parish ◽  
William T. Bryant ◽  
Annmarie Shirazi

College students' attitudes toward smoking and changes in attitudes were assessed with the Personal Attribute Inventory, which is composed of 50 negative and 50 positive adjectives from Gough's Adjective Check List. Common sense quality of the data, including the change in attitude after passage of a law against smoking in elevators suggests the usefulness of the inventory.


1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Lubin ◽  
John Cain ◽  
Rodney Van Whitlock

The correlations of scores on the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List—Revised with selected scales of the Adjective Check List for 43 college students are presented. The pattern of significant intercorrelations adds to the knowledge of validity for the MAACL—R.


1967 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 573-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rio Sciortino

An iterative factor analysis was performed on the scores obtained from a Motivational Adjective Check List (MACL) for a combined sample of undergraduate male and female students ( N = 202). The initial matrix of significant factors was totated according to the quartimax, varimax, and equamax procedures. The promax rotation was, then, performed on each of the three orthogonal solutions obtaining the promax-quartimax, promax-varimax, and promax-equamax solutions. Interpretation of factors was based on the promax-equa max solution and the factors obtained were: striving and assertion.


1967 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 565-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rio Sciortino

An iterative factor analysis was performed on the scores obtained from a Motivational Adjective Check List (MACL) ( N = 102 undergraduate female students). The initial matrix of significant factors was rotated according to the quartimax, varimax, and equamax procedures. The promax rotation was then performed on each of the three orthogonal solutions obtaining the promax-quartimax, promax-varimax, and promax-equamax solutions. Interpretation of factors was based on the promax-equamax solution and the factors obtained were: dedication, persistence, self-confidence, assertion, striving, individuality, and pursuance.


1977 ◽  
Vol 41 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1141-1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Parish ◽  
Gerald M. Eads ◽  
David E. Adams

Self-concept scores on the 100-item Personal Attribute Inventory of 6 male and 36 female college students were significantly correlated (.80) with their scores on the 75-item “Unfavorable” subscale and (—.73) on the 75-item “Favorable” subscale of the Adjective Check List. In a second study with 16 males and 34 females, 4-wk. test-retest reliability for the inventory was .83.


1998 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rod Van Whitlock ◽  
Bernard Lubin

Three scales, the Fake Bad Scale, the Fake Good Scale, and the Fake Bad-Fake Good scales were developed and evaluated with respect to their capacity to detect response manipulation on the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised. Cutting scores for each scale were cross-validated in two samples consisting of three groups: (1) college students simulating either “fake good” or “fake bad,” (2) college students under standard instructions, and (3) psychiatric patients. Cutting scores on the three scales were compared with cutting scores established for the MAACL–R Dysphoria and Positive Affect plus Sensation Seeking. Analysis indicated that these scales were more accurate than the Positive Affect plus Sensation Seeking and the Dysphoria scales in detecting response manipulation.


1977 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 819-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louisa Cloyd

Accuracy, assumed similarity, and actual similarity were assessed for an acquaintance and a stranger target selected by the subject. Four standardized questionnaires were used to obtain separate estimates of each variable, Cattell's 16 PF test, Gough's Adjective Check List, the Abilities and Characteristics Scale of the Strong Vocational Interest Blank, and Bernreuter's Personality Inventory. All measures showed significant differences in the predicted direction for accuracy and no significant between-target differences for assumed similarity or actual similarity. The Adjective Check List proved to be very susceptible to social desirability response set and produced accuracy scores that were strongly associated with assumed similarity. On the other measures, accuracy scores were relatively independent of assumed similarity, suggesting that these instruments are suitable for studies of person perception.


1989 ◽  
Vol 65 (3_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 1167-1170
Author(s):  
Robert A. Hicks ◽  
Tonja Green ◽  
Jerayr Haleblian

Using Thayer's Activation-Deactivation Adjective Check List, the activation patterns of 95 Type A and 105 Type B college students were measured. The pattern of the group means suggests that Type A students are higher than Type B students on both energy and tension activation. When the responses of individuals were examined, the Type A students were 2.5 times more likely to exhibit this high activation pattern than was the case for the Type B students.


1999 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 1031-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Donald Kelly ◽  
Deborah Osborne

This study investigated the extent to which college students' preference for humor could be predicted by ego states derived from Transactional Analysis. Scores on The Adjective Check List determined the ego states of Nurturant Parent, Critical Parent, Adult, Free Child, and Adapted Child. Preferences for nonsense, ethnic, and sexual humor were measured by scores on the Antioch Sense of Humor Inventory. A step-wise multiple regression, used to test the predictive power of the ego states, indicated that the Critical Parent ego state had a strong negative evaluation of nonsense humor, while the Free Child and Adapted Child were the strongest predictors of negative evaluation of ethnic humor. Categories of Critical Parent and Adapted Child provided the strongest prediction of positive preference for sexual humor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document