scholarly journals Study on Multi-GNSS Precise Point Positioning Performance with Adverse Effects of Satellite Signals on Android Smartphone

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (22) ◽  
pp. 6447
Author(s):  
Hongyu Zhu ◽  
Linyuan Xia ◽  
Dongjin Wu ◽  
Jingchao Xia ◽  
Qianxia Li
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Phase Error ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Noise Ratio ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Gnss Observations

The emergence of dual frequency global navigation satellite system (GNSS) chip actively promotes the progress of precise point positioning (PPP) technology in Android smartphones. However, some characteristics of GNSS signals on current smartphones still adversely affect the positioning accuracy of multi-GNSS PPP. In order to reduce the adverse effects on positioning, this paper takes Huawei Mate30 as the experimental object and presents the analysis of multi-GNSS observations from the aspects of carrier-to-noise ratio, cycle slip, gradual accumulation of phase error, and pseudorange residual. Accordingly, we establish a multi-GNSS PPP mathematical model that is more suitable for GNSS observations from a smartphone. The stochastic model is composed of GNSS step function variances depending on carrier-to-noise ratio, and the robust Kalman filter is applied to parameter estimation. The multi-GNSS experimental results show that the proposed PPP method can significantly reduce the effect of poor satellite signal quality on positioning accuracy. Compared with the conventional PPP model, the root mean square (RMS) of GPS/BeiDou (BDS)/GLONASS static PPP horizontal and vertical errors in the initial 10 min decreased by 23.71% and 62.06%, respectively, and the horizontal positioning accuracy reached 10 cm within 100 min. Meanwhile, the kinematic PPP maximum three-dimensional positioning error of GPS/BDS/GLONASS decreased from 16.543 to 10.317 m.

scholarly journals Performance Analysis of Static Precise Point Positioning Using Open-Source GAMP

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-60
Author(s):  
Jabir Shabbir Malik
Keyword(s):  
Performance Analysis ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Observational Data ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Position Accuracy ◽  
Point Positioning

AbstractIn addition to Global Positioning System (GPS) constellation, the number of Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS) satellites is increasing; it is now possible to evaluate and analyze the position accuracy with both the GPS and GLONASS constellation. In this article, statistical analysis of static precise point positioning (PPP) using GPS-only, GLONASS-only, and combined GPS/GLONASS modes is evaluated. Observational data of 10 whole days from 10 International GNSS Service (IGS) stations are used for analysis. Position accuracy in east, north, up components, and carrier phase/code residuals is analyzed. Multi-GNSS PPP open-source package is used for the PPP performance analysis. The analysis also provides the GNSS researchers the understanding of the observational data processing algorithm. Calculation statistics reveal that standard deviation (STD) of horizontal component is 3.83, 13.80, and 3.33 cm for GPS-only, GLONASS-only, and combined GPS/GLONASS PPP solutions, respectively. Combined GPS/GLONASS PPP achieves better positioning accuracy in horizontal and three-dimensional (3D) accuracy compared with GPS-only and GLONASS-only PPP solutions. The results of the calculation show that combined GPS/GLONASS PPP improves, on an average, horizontal accuracy by 12.11% and 60.33% and 3D positioning accuracy by 10.39% and 66.78% compared with GPS-only and GLONASS-only solutions, respectively. In addition, the results also demonstrate that GPS-only solutions show an improvement of 54.23% and 62.54% compared with GLONASS-only PPP mode in horizontal and 3D components, respectively. Moreover, residuals of GLONASS ionosphere-free code observations are larger than the GPS code residuals. However, phase residuals of GPS and GLONASS phase observations are of the same magnitude.

Single-Frequency Precise Point Positioning Using Multi-Constellation GNSS: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou

GEOMATICA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Abd Rabbou ◽  
Ahmed El-Rabbany
Keyword(s):  
Urban Areas ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Beidou Satellites ◽  
Gnss Observations

Single-frequency precise point positioning (PPP) presents a cost-effective positioning technique for a large number of users. However, it possesses low positioning accuracy and convergence time compared with the dual-frequency PPP. Single-frequency PPP commonly employs GPS satellite systems that suffer from poor satellite geometry, especially in dense urban areas. We develop a new single-frequency PPP model that combines the observations of current GNSS constellations, including GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and Beidou. The MGEX IGS final precise products are utilized to account for the orbital and clock errors, while the IGS final global ionospheric maps (GIM) model is used to correct for the ionospheric delay. The GNSS inter-system biases are treated as additional unknowns in the estimation process. The con tri bution of the additional GNSS observations to single-frequency PPP is assessed through solution comparison with its traditional GPS-only counterpart. Various GNSS combinations are considered in the assessment, including GPS/GLONASS, GPS/Galileo, GPS/BeiDou and all-constellation GNSS. It is shown that the additional GNSS observations enhance the PPP solution accuracy and convergence time in comparison with the tra di tional GPS-only solution. Except for stations with a sufficient number of tracked BeiDou satellites, both Galileo and BeiDou have marginal effects on the positioning accuracy due to their limited number of satel lites. However, for stations with a sufficient number of visible BeiDou satellites, an average of 40% PPP accuracy improvement is obtained. The major contribution to the PPP accuracy enhancement is obtained from GLONASS satellite observations.

scholarly journals Improving the Performance of Galileo Uncombined Precise Point Positioning Ambiguity Resolution Using Triple-Frequency Observations

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gen Liu ◽  
Xiaohong Zhang ◽  
Pan Li
Keyword(s):  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Simulated Data ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Processing Mode ◽  
Beidou Navigation Satellite System ◽  
Triple Frequency ◽  
Point Positioning

Compared with the traditional ionospheric-free linear combination precise point positioning (PPP) model, the un-differenced and uncombined (UDUC) PPP model using original observations can keep all the information of the observations and be easily extended to any number of frequencies. However, the current studies about the multi-frequency UDUC-PPP ambiguity resolution (AR) were mainly based on the triple-frequency BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) observations or simulated data. Limited by many factors, for example the accuracy of BDS precise orbit and clock products, the advantages of triple-frequency signals to UDUC-PPP AR were not fully exploited. As Galileo constellations have been upgraded by increasing the number of 19 useable satellites, it makes using Galileo satellites to further study the triple-frequency UDUC-PPP ambiguity resolution (AR) possible. In this contribution, we proposed the method of multi-frequency step-by-step ambiguity resolution based on the UDUC-PPP model and gave the reason why the performance of PPP AR can be improved using triple-frequency observations. We used triple-frequency Galileo observations on day of year (DOY) 201, 2018 provided by 166 Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) stations to estimate original uncalibrated phase delays (UPD) on each frequency and to conduct both dual- and triple-frequency UDUC-PPP AR. The performance of UDUC-PPP AR based on post-processing mode was assessed in terms of the time-to-first-fix (TTFF) as well as positioning accuracy with 2-hour observations. It was found that triple-frequency observations were helpful to reduce TTFF and improve the positioning accuracy. The current statistic results showed that triple-frequency PPP-AR reduced the averaged TTFF by 19.6 % and also improved the positioning accuracy by 40.9, 31.2 and 23.6 % in the east, north and up directions respectively, compared with dual-frequency PPP-AR. With an increasing number of Galileo satellites, it is expected that the robustness and accuracy of the triple-frequency UCUD-PPP AR can be improved further.

scholarly journals Precise Point Positioning Using Dual-Frequency GNSS Observations on Smartphone

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 2189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiong Wu ◽  
Mengfei Sun ◽  
Changjie Zhou ◽  
Peng Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Frequency Mode ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Static Mode ◽  
Position Errors ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Similar Accuracy ◽  
Positioning Algorithm ◽  
Gnss Observations

The update of the Android system and the emergence of the dual-frequency GNSS chips enable smartphones to acquire dual-frequency GNSS observations. In this paper, the GPS L1/L5 and Galileo E1/E5a dual-frequency PPP (precise point positioning) algorithm based on RTKLIB and GAMP was applied to analyze the positioning performance of the Xiaomi Mi 8 dual-frequency smartphone in static and kinematic modes. The results showed that in the static mode, the RMS position errors of the dual-frequency smartphone PPP solutions in the E, N, and U directions were 21.8 cm, 4.1 cm, and 11.0 cm, respectively, after convergence to 1 m within 102 min. The PPP of dual-frequency smartphone showed similar accuracy with geodetic receiver in single-frequency mode, while geodetic receiver in dual-frequency mode has higher accuracy. In the kinematic mode, the positioning track of the smartphone dual-frequency data had severe fluctuations, the positioning tracks derived from the smartphone and the geodetic receiver showed approximately difference of 3–5 m.

scholarly journals GPS AND GLONASS COMBINED STATIC PRECISE POINT POSITIONING (PPP)

2016 ◽  
Vol XLI-B1 ◽  
pp. 483-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Pandey ◽  
R. Dwivedi ◽  
O. Dikshit ◽  
A. K. Singh
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Open Pit ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Dilution Of Precision ◽  
Satellite Visibility ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Gps Observations

With the rapid development of multi-constellation Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs), satellite navigation is undergoing drastic changes. Presently, more than 70 satellites are already available and nearly 120 more satellites will be available in the coming years after the achievement of complete constellation for all four systems- GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou. The significant improvement in terms of satellite visibility, spatial geometry, dilution of precision and accuracy demands the utilization of combining multi-GNSS for Precise Point Positioning (PPP), especially in constrained environments. Currently, PPP is performed based on the processing of only GPS observations. Static and kinematic PPP solutions based on the processing of only GPS observations is limited by the satellite visibility, which is often insufficient for the mountainous and open pit mines areas. One of the easiest options available to enhance the positioning reliability is to integrate GPS and GLONASS observations. This research investigates the efficacy of combining GPS and GLONASS observations for achieving static PPP solution and its sensitivity to different processing methodology. Two static PPP solutions, namely standalone GPS and combined GPS-GLONASS solutions are compared. The datasets are processed using the open source GNSS processing environment <i>gLAB</i> 2.2.7 as well as <i>magicGNSS</i> software package. The results reveal that the addition of GLONASS observations improves the static positioning accuracy in comparison with the standalone GPS point positioning. Further, results show that there is an improvement in the three dimensional positioning accuracy. It is also shown that the addition of GLONASS constellation improves the total number of visible satellites by more than 60% which leads to the improvement of satellite geometry represented by Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP) by more than 30%.

scholarly journals Multi-GNSS Combined Precise Point Positioning Using Additional Observations with Opposite Weight for Real-Time Quality Control

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenju Fu ◽  
Guanwen Huang ◽  
Yuanxi Zhang ◽  
Qin Zhang ◽  
Bobin Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Global Navigation ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

The emergence of multiple global navigation satellite systems (multi-GNSS), including global positioning system (GPS), global navigation satellite system (GLONASS), Beidou navigation satellite system (BDS), and Galileo, brings not only great opportunities for real-time precise point positioning (PPP), but also challenges in quality control because of inevitable data anomalies. This research aims at achieving the real-time quality control of the multi-GNSS combined PPP using additional observations with opposite weight. A robust multiple-system combined PPP estimation is developed to simultaneously process observations from all the four GNSS systems as well as single, dual, or triple systems. The experiment indicates that the proposed quality control can effectively eliminate the influence of outliers on the single GPS and the multiple-system combined PPP. The analysis on the positioning accuracy and the convergence time of the proposed robust PPP is conducted based on one week’s data from 32 globally distributed stations. The positioning root mean square (RMS) error of the quad-system combined PPP is 1.2 cm, 1.0 cm, and 3.0 cm in the east, north, and upward components, respectively, with the improvements of 62.5%, 63.0%, and 55.2% compared to those of single GPS. The average convergence time of the quad-system combined PPP in the horizontal and vertical components is 12.8 min and 12.2 min, respectively, while it is 26.5 min and 23.7 min when only using single-GPS PPP. The positioning performance of the GPS, GLONASS, and BDS (GRC) combination and the GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo (GRE) combination is comparable to the GPS, GLONASS, BDS and Galileo (GRCE) combination and it is better than that of the GPS, BDS, and Galileo (GCE) combination. Compared to GPS, the improvements of the positioning accuracy of the GPS and GLONASS (GR) combination, the GPS and Galileo (GE) combination, the GPS and BDS (GC) combination in the east component are 53.1%, 43.8%, and 40.6%, respectively, while they are 55.6%, 48.1%, and 40.7% in the north component, and 47.8%, 40.3%, and 34.3% in the upward component.

scholarly journals Real-time Precise Point Positioning with a Xiaomi MI 8 Android Smartphone

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 2835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Chen ◽  
Chengfa Gao ◽  
Yongsheng Liu ◽  
Puyu Sun
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Mobile Phones ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Gnss Positioning ◽  
Positioning Errors ◽  
Positioning Method ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Time Required

The Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) positioning technology using smartphones can be applied to many aspects of mass life, and the world’s first dual-frequency GNSS smartphone Xiaomi MI 8 represents a new trend in the development of GNSS positioning technology with mobile phones. The main purpose of this work is to explore the best real-time positioning performance that can be achieved on a smartphone without reference stations. By analyzing the GNSS raw measurements, it is found that all the three mobile phones tested have the phenomenon that the differences between pseudorange observations and carrier phase observations are not fixed, thus a PPP (precise point positioning) method is modified accordingly. Using a Xiaomi MI 8 smartphone, the modified real-time PPP positioning strategy which estimates two clock biases of smartphone was applied. The results show that using multi-GNSS systems data can effectively improve positioning performance; the average horizontal and vertical RMS positioning error are 0.81 and 1.65 m respectively (using GPS, BDS, and Galileo data); and the time required for each time period positioning errors in N and E directions to be under 1 m is less than 30s.

scholarly journals Performance of Single-Epoch EWL/WL/NL Ambiguity-Fixed Precise Point Positioning with Regional Atmosphere Modelling

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 3758
Author(s):  
Wang Gao ◽  
Qing Zhao ◽  
Xiaolin Meng ◽  
Shuguo Pan
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Time Performance ◽  
Wide Lane ◽  
Reference Networks ◽  
Atmosphere Correction ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Single Epoch

Precise point positioning (PPP) with ambiguity resolution (AR) can improve positioning accuracy and reliability. The narrow-lane (NL) AR solution can reach centimeter-level accuracy but there is a certain initialization time. In contrast, extra-wide-lane (EWL) or wide-lane (WL) ambiguity can be fixed instantaneously. However, due to the limited correction accuracy of the empirical atmospheric model, the positioning accuracy is only a few decimeters. In order to further improve the real-time performance of PPP while ensuring accuracy, we developed a multi-system multi-frequency uncombined PPP single-epoch EWL/WL/NL AR method with regional atmosphere modelling. In the proposed method, the precise atmosphere, including zenith wet-troposphere delay (ZWD) and the slant ionosphere, is extracted through multi-frequency stepwise AR, which then is both interpolated and broadcast to users. By adding regional atmosphere constraints, users can achieve single-epoch PPP AR with centimeter-level accuracy. To verify the algorithm, four sets of reference networks with different inter-station distances are used for experiments. With atmosphere constraints, the accuracy of the single-epoch WL solution can be improved from the decimeter level to a few centimeters, with an improvement of more than 90%, and the epoch fix rate can also be improved to varying degrees, especially for the dual-frequency case. Due to the enlarged noise of the EWL combination, its accuracy is at the decimeter level, while the accuracy of the WL/NL solution can reach several centimeters. However, reliable NL ambiguity-fixing tightly relies on atmosphere constraints with sufficiently high accuracy. When the modelling of the atmosphere correction is not accurate enough, the NL AR performance is degraded, although this situation can be improved to a certain extent through the multi-GNSS combination. In contrast, in this case, the WL ambiguity can be successfully fixed and can support the precise positioning with an accuracy of several centimeters.

scholarly journals Changes in the GNSS precise point positioning accuracy during a strong geomagnetic storm

2020 ◽  
Vol 196 ◽  
pp. 01001
Author(s):  
Anna Yasyukevich ◽  
Semen Syrovatskii ◽  
Yury Yasyukevich
Keyword(s):  
Geomagnetic Storm ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Maximum Effect ◽  
Electron Content ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Period Range ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Total Electron ◽  
Point Positioning

Based on the data from dual-frequency receivers of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), we analyze the changes in GNSS positioning accuracy during the August 25-26, 2018 strong geomagnetic storm on a global scale. The storm is one of the strongest geomagnetic events of the solar cycle 24. To analyze the positioning quality, we calculated coordinates using the precise point positioning (PPP) method in the kinematic mode. We recorder a significant degradation in the PPP positioning accuracy during the main phase of the storm. The maximum effect is observed in the middle and high latitudes of the US-Atlantic longitude sector. The average PPP error during the storm is shown to exceed ~0.5 m, that is up to 5 times higher than the values typical on quiet days. Areas with increased PPP errors is revealed to correspond to the regions with significant increase in the intensity of total electron content variations of 10–20 min period range. This increase is presumably due to the auroral oval expansion toward middle latitudes.

Performance Evaluation of PPP-AR Method for Engineering Surveys with Embedded GNSS Chipset in a Smartphone

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caneren Gul ◽  
Taylan Ocalan ◽  
Nursu Tunalioglu
Keyword(s):  
Satellite System ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Economic Market ◽  
The World ◽  
Positioning Method ◽  
Gnss Receivers ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Gnss Observations

&lt;p&gt;Today, traditional Precise Point Positioning (PPP) method with high-cost geodetic grade Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers has been used commonly for surveying, navigation, geodesy, geophysics and other engineering applications where dm-cm level accuracy is required. On the other hand, while smartphones have created a growing economic market in the world, they serve positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) services in varying accuracy levels to the users besides many other facilities. One of the most significant components of the smartphones involving multi-sensors for outdoor point-positioning and navigation is the embedded GNSS chipset. Especially, the world&amp;#8217;s first dual-frequency GNSS smartphone produced by Xiaomi in May 2018, so-called Xiaomi Mi 8, brings a new aspect to PNT applications. In this study, a smartphone with dual-frequency embedded GNSS chipset was used to analyze the performance of PPP-Ambiguity Resolution (PPP-AR) method in engineering surveys. With respect to study aim, simultaneous static GNSS observations gathered with a geodetic grade GNSS receiver and a smartphone were conducted within a test setup. The static GNSS observations were repeated for 3 days and the campaign duration was 2 hours per day at the same daily time interval. All the raw GNSS observations were converted into Receiver Independent Exchange Format (RINEX) and processed by the relative point positioning method as a reference solution initially. Later, all observations were processed by the PPP-AR method. A widely used online post-processing GNSS service, namely CSRS-PPP, which was updated in August 2018 (GPSPACE to SPARK) were employed for PPP-AR solutions. As a conclusion, we analyze the performance of the embedded dual frequency GNSS chipset and assess the feasibility of them in different engineering surveys.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Keywords:&lt;/strong&gt; Smartphone Positioning, PPP-AR, Embedded GNSS Chipset, Dual-frequency, Engineering Surveys&lt;/p&gt;

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document