scholarly journals An Examination of Social Physique Anxiety with Regard to Sex and Level of Sport Involvement

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Özgür Mülazimoğlu-Balli ◽  
Canan Koca ◽  
F. Aşçi
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Anxiety Scale ◽  
Social Physique Anxiety ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Competitive Athletes ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
The Difference

An Examination of Social Physique Anxiety with Regard to Sex and Level of Sport InvolvementThe primary purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in social physique anxiety among competitive athletes, exercisers and non-exercisers. The present study was also aimed to examine the sex differences in social physique anxiety between men and women. Two hundred and fifty-five exercisers, 261 competitive athletes and 350 non-exercisers voluntarily participated in this study. Social Physique Anxiety Scale (Hart, Leary and Rejeski, 1989) was used as the measure of social physique anxiety. Results of the present study indicated significant differences in social physique anxiety with regard to sex and level of sport involvement. Men had lower scores on social physique anxiety than women, and competitive athletes and exercisers had lower social physique anxiety scores than non-exercisers. Social physique anxiety of males and females did not differ with regard to level of sport involvement.

scholarly journals Sex Differences in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Short Literature Review

2020 ◽  
pp. 72-76
Author(s):  
Oleksandra Ositkovska ◽  
Oхana Bayer
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Processing Speed ◽  
Verbal Aggression ◽  
Difference Model ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Girls With Adhd

The review of the latest foreign literature on the issue of sex differences in ADHD carriers is presented. The analysis of theories on the causes of the prevalence of the disorder among boys and girls is presented, and minor sex differences are highlighted. Therefore, ADHD is more common among boys than among girls, which leads to arguments about the difference valid in the prevalence of the disorder among men and women. Also, many researchers have noticed certain differences in the symptoms and behaviour of girls compared to boys, both in childhood and adulthood. Boys and girls with ADHD appear to be more similar than different, and usually the symptoms are not sex specific, but still there is a difference. In general, these differences are manifested in the fact that girls have problems with the emotional sphere and the predominant inattentive symptoms of ADHD, while boys have problems with the behavioural sphere and the predominant impulsive and hyperactive type of ADHD. Moreover, boys are more aggressive in behaviour than girls, although girls are more likely to manifest verbal aggression than their female peers, who do not have the disorder. It has been found that the difference in the prevalence of the disorder among males and females can be described by the Cognitive Endophenotype Theory, which assumes the influence of generally accepted endophenotypes on the severity of ADHD, that means processing speed, inhibition and working memory. This theory does not preclude theories such as the Mean Difference Model and the Variance Difference Model, which state that men on the average have more severe symptoms than women, and thus the scale of the severity of the ADHD among boys is much wider than among women.

Sex Differences in the Relationship between Machiavellianism and Self-Disclosure

1978 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 715-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Domelsmith ◽  
James T. Dietch
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Sex Differences ◽  
Negative Correlation ◽  
Self Disclosure ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Willingness To Disclose ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Individual Achievement ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Existing Data

Previous research suggests that there should be a negative correlation between Machiavellianism (Mach) and willingness to reveal things about oneself. However, existing data are unclear and contradictory, especially regarding differences between males and females. College students (48 male, 77 female) completed measures of both Machiavellianism and self-disclosure, and the two sets of scores were correlated. As expected, Mach was significantly correlated with unwillingness to self-disclose among males. For the females, however, Mach was significantly correlated with willingness to disclose. The two correlations are significantly different. Culturally defined differences in the goals of men and women may account for the results. According to current stereotypes, men are oriented toward individual achievement, while die goals of women are more “social,” being popular, nurturant, skilled at getting along with others, etc. Women who accept these goals and who are willing to employ manipulative (Machiavellian) tactics to achieve them could use self-disclosure effectively, while it would be an ineffective strategy for men.

scholarly journals Sex Differences in Drug Disposition

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Offie P. Soldin ◽  
Sarah H. Chung ◽  
Donald R. Mattison
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Pharmacology ◽  
Sex Differences ◽  
Drug Disposition ◽  
Genetic Differences ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Effective Treatments

Physiological, hormonal, and genetic differences between males and females affect the prevalence, incidence, and severity of diseases and responses to therapy. Understanding these differences is important for designing safe and effective treatments. This paper summarizes sex differences that impact drug disposition and includes a general comparison of clinical pharmacology as it applies to men and women.

Reactions to Men and Women Who Cry: A Study of Sex Differences in Perceived Societal Attitudes versus Personal Attitudes

1982 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 479-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary A. Cretser ◽  
William K. Lombardo ◽  
Barbara Lombardo ◽  
Sharon Mathis
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Sex Role ◽  
Double Standard ◽  
Female Students ◽  
Stimulus Situation ◽  
Sex Role Attitudes ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Personal Attitudes ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Male Subjects

This study examined sex differences and similarities in sex-role attitudes using reactions to males' and females' crying as the stimulus situation. 285 male and 307 female students completed questionnaires. Subjects were asked to indicate their reactions to the sight of a woman crying and to the sight of a man crying. They were also asked to indicate how they thought “people” react to the sight of a man or a woman crying. Subjects perceived “people” as holding a double standard of crying, with much greater acceptance of females' than of males' crying. The proportion of subjects of both sexes who considered crying by males acceptable was significantly greater than the proportion who felt “people” would find it acceptable. Women seemed to hold a unisex standard of crying, while male subjects endorsed a double standard.

Sex Differences Concerning Prosocial Behavior in Social Dilemmas Are (Partially) Mediated by Risk Preferences But Not Social Preferences

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Angela R. Dorrough ◽  
Andreas Glöckner
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Prosocial Behavior ◽  
Sex Difference ◽  
Gender Inequality ◽  
Social Preferences ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Social Dilemmas ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Null Effect ◽  
The Difference

Abstract. Previous results on the prosociality of men and women in social dilemmas are mixed. Studies find more prosocial behavior for men and women; and a meta-analysis ( Balliet et al., 2011 ) reports an overall null effect. Including samples ( N = 1,903) from 10 countries that vary concerning gender inequality (e.g., China, Colombia, Sweden), we investigated sex differences in social dilemmas and drivers of these potential differences. We found that men behaved more prosocially, in that they transferred more of their endowment to their interaction partner. This sex difference was descriptively observed for all countries and was partially mediated by differences in risk but not social preferences. Gender inequality did not predict the difference in magnitude of sex differences between countries.

Sex Differences in Evaluating Heterosexual and Homosexual Promiscuity

1990 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 579-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold D. Froese ◽  
Krista L. Rumback ◽  
Leann D. Hard
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Sexual Behavior ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Behavior Study ◽  
Different Dimensions ◽  
The Difference

Our research focused on men's and women's interpretations of homosexually and heterosexually promiscuous behavior. Study 1 involved 21 men and 21 women who rated perceived differences between homosexually and heterosexually promiscuous behavior following a discussion of impersonal sex in public restrooms. Men perceived the two types of promiscuous behavior as more different than did women. In Study 2, 41 men and 23 women rated their perceptions of the difference between homosexually and heterosexually promiscuous behavior without any prior discussion. No sex differences were found, though a significant correlation between age and rating was observed. Men and women may focus on different dimensions when evaluating sexual behavior.

Some reflections on sex differences in aggression and violence

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-233
Author(s):  
Stephen C. Maxson
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Sex Difference ◽  
Evolutionary Explanation ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Human Aggression ◽  
Intrasexual Aggression ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Evolutionary Explanations

Four issues relevant to sex differences in human aggression and violence are considered. (1) The motivation for play and serious aggression in children and juvenile animals is different. Consequently, the evolutionary explanations for each may be different. (2) Sex differences in intrasexual aggression may be due to effects of the attacker or the target. There is evidence that both males and females are more physically aggressive against males and less physically aggressive against females. The evolutionary explanation for each component of the sex difference in intrasexual aggression may be different. (3) Aggression and violence are defined. The former is the attack, and the latter is the consequent injury or death. The evolutionary explanation for each may not be the same. (4) Most men and women are neither physically aggressive nor criminally violent. The evolutionary explanations of sex differences in aggression and violence should take this polymorphism into account.

A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Death Anxiety: A Brief Note

2007 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Lester ◽  
Donald I. Templer ◽  
Ahmed Abdel-Khalek
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Death Anxiety ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Anxiety Scale ◽  
Cultural Comparison ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Cross Cultural Comparison ◽  
The World ◽  
Scale Data

Data are reported from samples of undergraduates around the world who have been administered Templer's Death Anxiety Scale. Data from 24 American samples and from 16 nations were identified. Strong sex differences were found and an association between the scores of men and women.

SEX DIFFERENCES IN LENGTH OF GESTATION IN MAMMALS

1956 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
THOMAS McKEOWN ◽  
BRIAN MacMAHON
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Guinea Pig ◽  
Sex Difference ◽  
Litter Size ◽  
Alternative Explanation ◽  
Prenatal Growth ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Duration Of Gestation ◽  
Length Of Gestation

Observations on length of gestation of males and females are presented for man, the guinea-pig, sheep, pig and rabbit; from the literature, data are also available for the cow, horse, camel and goat. Pregnancy is longer for males than for females in the cow, horse and possibly the sheep and camel; it is longer for females than for males in man and possibly the guinea-pig. No definite conclusion is reached about the pig and rabbit, in which litter-size is normally large, or about the goat, in which the number of observations on record is small. The sex differences in length of gestation are reflected in the sex ratios of offspring born after different periods of gestation, and in the percentage distribution of the sexes by duration of gestation. The difference in length of gestation can be attributed to a sex difference in foetal weight in man, but not in the guinea-pig or in species such as the cow, in which gestation is longer for males than for females. It is suggested that in the cow the longer male gestation may be due to the fact that the proportion of males conceived is higher if mating takes place early, rather than late, in heat. (The only alternative explanation is a sex difference, attributable to something other than weight of foetus, in the period between fertilization and birth.) In man the earlier birth of males is apparently due to their greater weight, attributable wholly or in part to a sex difference in rate of prenatal growth. This observation does not exclude the possibility that in man, as in the cow, the proportion of males conceived is higher if mating occurs early in the cycle, since the method of recording length of gestation (from onset of menstruation) gives no information about time of mating.

Sex Differences in the Perception of Romantic Love-Mate Attraction

1978 ◽  
Vol 47 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1089-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Pellegrini
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Romantic Love ◽  
Female Respondent ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Mate Attraction ◽  
Sexist Attitudes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Male Supremacy

A sample of 450 male and 450 female single young adults were questioned as to whether they regarded romantic love-mate attraction as (a) easier for men than for women, (b) easier for women than for men, or (c) equally difficult for men and women. For both the males and females surveyed, the “equally difficult” alternative was endorsed the most frequently, the “easier for women” alternative the next most frequently, and the “easier for men” alternative the least frequently. The significant difference between the two distributions reflects a greater tendency among male than among female respondent to see mate attraction as easier for women. The results are thus contradictive of sexist attitudes of male supremacy in young people of both sexes, at least as far as the interpersonal marketplace is concerned. Directions for future research are outlined.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document