scholarly journals DESAPROPRIAÇÃO, FUNÇÃO SOCIAL AMBIENTAL E EXPECTATIVAS SOCIAISDOI: 10.5773/rgsa.v4i3.328

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Anatercia Rovani
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Social Function ◽  
Property Right ◽  
Productivity Index ◽  
Social Expectations ◽  
Environmental Function ◽  
The Social

A proteção ambiental, conforme a Constituição Federal Brasileira integra o conteúdo da função social da propriedade. A disposição, o uso e a fruição da propriedade somente se configuram enquanto poderes plenos do proprietário, se respeitada sua função social. Nesse sentido, a gestão socioambiental da propriedade apresenta-se como um conceito que extrapola os limites da gestão organizacional empreendedora e passa a constituir uma exigência aos proprietários de imóveis rurais e urbanos. Baseada na percepção de que o proprietário, atualmente, constitui-se também em gestor socioambiental de sua propriedade, apresenta-se, nesta análise, um estudo da relação entre a função do proprietário e a proteção do meio ambiente. Este estudo inclui uma leitura sobre a evolução da concepção da propriedade no sistema jurídico brasileiro, até a inclusão da função social em seu próprio conceito, ou seja, a propriedade vinculada ao bem estar coletivo. Propõe-se uma leitura na qual o proprietário apresenta-se como necessário gestor de seu domínio, atento tanto para a efetividade do uso da propriedade, quanto da efetividade socioambiental desse uso. A proteção ambiental, portanto, tende a causar expectativa de eficácia no campo social, a qual nem sempre é confirmada pelas decisões judiciais. Após a análise conceitual histórica da conceitualização de propriedade, parte-se para uma leitura da primeira decisão judicial brasileira na qual a procedeu-se a desapropriação pelo desrespeito a função social ambiental, ou seja, por má gestão ambiental. Palavras-chave:propriedade, função social, desapropriação, meio ambiente, gestão. ABSTRACT The environmental protection is announced in the Brazilian Constitution as a fundamental guarantee. However, this guarantee depends on the accomplishment of the social function of property. In fact, the prerogatives regarding the use of the property by its owners are limited, preventing them to use the property as they want. What the Constitution intends is to guarantee that the property right could only be as a full right whether the owner accomplish to the social function of the property. The social function means to exert the property powers without damage neither the collectivities nor the environment. In this sense, the social and environmental function imposes to rural properties some rules for acting as: productivity index, environmental protection and labors protection. The focus of this article is to study the environmental protection as one of the requisites for the social function of the property. It is analyzed the evolution of the property concept into the Brazilian legal system and the first decision of the Brazilian Court concerning the property expropriation by bad environmental management. Keywords: expropriation, environmental and social function, social expectations

scholarly journals A Concessão de Direito Real de Uso, a Concessão de Uso Especial para fins de Moradia e a Gestão do Meio Ambiente

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (25) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Santos Araujo ◽  
Hamilton Da Costa Mitre De Andrade
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Social Context ◽  
Public Goods ◽  
International Law ◽  
Human Person ◽  
Social Function ◽  
Brief Assessment ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Right

Resumo: Sob a égide do Estado Democrático de direito brasileiro, o uso e fruição do solo são matérias relevantes e objeto de avaliação e discussão no contexto social. Principalmente, no que tange à destinação do solo, que, por diretriz legal, deve pautar-se pela específica submissão a uma função social, no sentido de salvaguarda de garantias mínimas, como, por exemplo, o direito à moradia como externalidade da pessoa humana e expressão de qualidade de vida; sob pena de perda da titularidade da posse, por contrariedade a preceito constitucional. Daí a relevância de uma breve avaliação da realidade brasileira, marcada por expressiva ocupação irregular, mediante observância da legislação nacional e internacional, sendo que, para tanto, são tomados por base o direito à moradia e alguns instrumentos jurídicos a ele correlatos, em especial, a Concessão de Direito Real de Uso e a Concessão de Direito Real de Uso Especial para fins de moradia, como meios de concretização do direito de habitação e de gestão do meio ambiente, mais especificamente em relação aos bens públicos imobiliários. O que conduz às considerações finais acerca de tais instrumentos perante os desafios então observados. Palavras-chave: Direito de Moradia. Direito Urbanístico. Concessão de Uso. Concessão de Direito Real de Uso. Concessão de Uso Especial para fins de Moradia. Estatuto da Cidade. Gestão Ambiental. Abstract: Under the aegis of the Brazilian Democratic Legal State the use and soil’s use and enjoyment are relevant matters and subject to evaluation and discussion in the social context. Mainly regarding the allocation of soil which legal guideline should be guided by specific submission to a social function, in order to safeguard minimum guarantees, for example, the right to housing as an externality of the human person and life’s quality expression under penalty of loss of possession ownership by the constitutional provision annoyance. Hence the relevance of a brief assessment of the Brazilian reality, marked by expressive illegal occupation by the observance of national and international law therefore are taken based on the right to housing and some legal instruments related thereto, in particular, the Grant of right to Use and Grant of right to Special Use for housing purposes, as a means of realizing the right to housing and environmental management, specifically in relation to public goods property. What leads to the final considerations of such instruments to the challenges then observed. Keywords: Right to Housing. Urban Law. Concession Granting Use of the Right to Use. Grant Special Use for Housing purposes. City Statute. Environmental Management.

scholarly journals EKSISTENSI PRINSIP PENCEMAR MEMBAYAR DALAM SISTEM PENEGAKAN HUKUM AGRARIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Fajar Sugianto ◽  
Sanggup Leonard Agustian ◽  
Nisa Permata Basti
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
International Law ◽  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Agrarian Reform ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Polluter Pays Principle ◽  
Compensation Payments ◽  
Economic Instrument

Law Number 32 of 2009 concern about Environmental Protection and Management does not provide adequate regulation in providing sanctions against perpetrators of pollution, except only providing a legal basis for employers to provide compensation payments to victims of pollution. Therefore it is necessary to know about the position of the Polluter Pays Principle in the Environmental Legal System as Agrarian Reform. The principle of paying polluters who have the function of authorizing should not be formulated in the explanatory section of the article. If following the explanation of Law No. 23 of 1997 concerning Environmental Management, the purpose of the principle of polluter pays, even has many meanings such as paying to pollute or can be interpreted as a license to pollute. As a result of the study of international law, the principle of polluter pays has two meanings, namely as an economic instrument with the intention of charging fees to potential polluters and is also interpreted as a basic instrument to hold legal liability for incidents of environmental pollution.Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup tidak memberikan pengaturan memadai dalam memberikan sanksi terhadap pelaku pencemaran, kecuali hanya memberikan landasan hukum bagi pengusaha untuk memberikan pembayaran kompensasi kepada korban pencemaran. Oleh karena itu perlu mengetahui mengenai kedudukan Prinsip Pencemar Membayar (Polluter Pays Principle) dalam Sistem Hukum Lingkungan Sebagai Reformasi Agraria. Prinsip Pencemar Membayar yang memiliki fungsi mengesahkan seharusnya tidak dirumuskan dalam bagian penjelasan pasal. Jika mengikuti penjelasan Undang-undang No. 23 Tahun 1997 tentang Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup, maka maksud Prinsip Pencemar Membayar, bahkan memiliki banyak pemaknaan seperti membayar untuk mencemari (paying to pollute) atau dapat dimaknai sebagai license to pollute. Hasil telaah hukum internasional, prinsip pencemar membayar memiliki dua pemaknaan, yaitu sebagai instrumen ekonomi dengan maksud pembebanan biaya kepada pelaku pencemar yang potensial dan diartikan juga sebagai instrument dasar untuk menuntut pertanggungjawaban hukum atas terjadinya kasus pencemaran lingkungan.

scholarly journals THE LAW OF WORDS: STANDING, ENVIRONMENT, AND OTHER CONTESTED TERMS

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 330
Author(s):  
David Nathan Cassuto
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Personal Injury ◽  
Environmental Services ◽  
Objective Standard ◽  
The Earth ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Citizen Suits ◽  
Definition Of

Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc., 528 U.S. 167 (2000), exposes fundamental incoherencies within environmental standing doctrine, even while it ostensibly makes standing easier to prove for plaintiffs in environmental citizen suits. According to Laidlaw, an environmental plaintiff needs only to show personal injury to satisfy Article ill’s standing requirement; she need not show that the alleged statutory violation actually harms the environment. This Article argues that Laidlaw’s distinbtion between injury to the plaintiff and harm to the environment is nonsensical. Both the majority and dissent in Laidlaw incorrectly assume that there exists an objective standard by which a plaintiff, society or a court can measure harm or injury. Using examples drawn both from history (the 7) aiI Smelter. Arbitration (1930-41)) and fiction (Barbara Klngsolver’s novel Animal Dreams), this Article illustrates that the inherent contingency of language renders it impossible to define harm or injury without acknowledging the systemic perspective from which the concepts are viewed. The path to an intelligible standing doctrine lies not in focusing on this artificial opposition, but instead in acknowledging statutory violations as injurious to the social and legal system of which we all form a part. Assuming the violated statute contains a citizen suit provision, the resulting harm to the system could and should enable individuals to sue. This policy would conform the Court’s standing jurisprudence to the language and intent of the statutes before Ii. Moreover, this policy would counter the undermining of the rhetoric of environmental protection that persists so long as the Supreme Court continues its frequent yet unsucceesfid efforts to retool its definition of cognizable legal injury.

La comprensión de los conflictos de interpretación en la práctica del perito social forense

2014 ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Iván Cisternas Villacura
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Social Role ◽  
Work Practice ◽  
Social Work Practice ◽  
Work Conflict ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
The Social ◽  
Forensic Expert ◽  
Trabajo Social

  RESUMEN El presente artículo es una reflexión sobre la práctica del trabajo social en el rol de perito social forense dentro del sistema de administración de justicia, donde su labor se funda en mediar entre la realidad del periciado –sujeto del que se debe dar cuenta en una investigación judicial– y quien requiere de los antecedentes necesarios para que el “Juez” dicte sentencia, lo que habitualmente genera un “conflicto de interpretaciones”. En tal sentido, es relevante discutir las dificultades que deben enfrentar las y los trabajadores sociales, en cuanto a la comprensión de una realidad cada vez más compleja, y al conflicto que se genera entre las interpretaciones de los mundos de vida de las personas y los requerimientos del sistema judicial chileno. Palabras clave: Pericia judicial social forense - Trabajo Social Pericial - Conflicto de interpretaciones. A compreensão dos conflitos de interpretação na prática do perito social forense RESUMO O presente artigo é uma reflexão sobe a prática do trabalho social no rol de perito social forense dentro do sistema de administração de justiça; onde seu labor funda-se em mediar entre a realidade do periciado – pessoa de quem se deve dar conta numa investigação judicial – e quem precisa dos antecedentes necessários para que o “Juiz” determine sentencia o que habitualmente, gera um “conflito de interpretações”. Neste sentido, é relevante discutir as dificuldades que devem enfrentar as e os trabalhadores sociais, em quanto á compreensão de uma realidade cada vez mais complexa, e ao conflito que se gera entre as interpretações dos mundos de vida das pessoas e aos requerimentos do sistema judicial chileno. Palavras chave: Pericia judicial social forense - Trabalho Socia Pericial - Conflito das interpretações. Understanding the conflicts of interpretation in the social forensic expert practice ABSTRACT This article is a reflection on social work practice in the social role forensic expert plays in the legal system, where their job is based on mediating between ‘periciado’ – individual who is being charged during a trial at the court and requires the necessary case background for the ‘Judge’ to deliver judgment, which usually generates a “conflict of interpretations”. In this view, it is relevant to discuss the difficulties faced by social workers, in terms of understanding an increasingly complex reality, and the conflict that emerges among the interpretations of the life of people and Chilean legal system requirements. Keywords: Forensic Social Legal Expertise - Forensic Social Work – Conflict of interpretations

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document