scholarly journals Media and environment: how indonesia online news portal frames biodegradable issue?

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Monika Sri Yuliarti ◽  
Wikan Jatimurti
Keyword(s):  
Media Coverage ◽  
Environmental Issues ◽  
Online News ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Environmental Damage ◽  
Biodegradable Material ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Online News Sites

Environmental problems are still an important issue and cannot be resolved completely until now, even after the 1970s the United Nations established a world environmental day. Plastic waste is considered the most responsible for the problems of environmental damage today. Therefore, an innovation that comes from biodegradable material, with its biodegradable product is considered to be the answer to this environmental problem. This study examines how reporting on the environment is framed in online mass media, especially in relation to biodegradable material and biodegradable products. This is qualitative research, with the object of two Indonesian online news sites, namely www.detik.com and www.okezone.com. Data collection techniques used is document studies and data analysis techniques employed is Robert N. Entman's Framing analysis model which involves four elements, namely: define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgment, and treatment recommendation. The findings of this study are that environmental issues have not dominated online media coverage, and the biodegradable issue has not been framed thoroughly by online media.

scholarly journals PRESS DISPUTE RESOLUTION: METODOLOGI RESOLUSI KONFLIK BERBASIS MEDIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-90
Author(s):  
Kurnia Sari Wiwaha ◽  
Ustadi Hamsah
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Online News ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
The Media

Islam has been known as a religion of Rahmatn lil’alamiin which guarantees inclusion and maintains a treatise on all humanity. However, the interpretation of universality of Islam does not meet a common understanding even though within Muslim community itself. Those diverse interpretations have resulted in how the universality of Islam has been expressed. One of those quarrels toward interpretation is the discussion of Islam Nusantara. West Sumatera is one of the regions in Indonesia which implements Islamic law as its customary law in which rejection against Islam Nusantara has been echoed across the borders. The rejection caused reactions from various parties since West Sumatera strongly stated the rejection as a way for preserving it. Those dispute has been sharpened by the online news in several Indonesian media that began to raise the phenomenon up. This research aim to find out how those medias frame the news and whether online media contribute on minimizing public tensions. This research used descriptive method with qualitative approach. The source of the data focused on Indonesian online media news on 2018 and was analyzed with framing analysis from Robert N. Entman and also using the concept of treatment recommendation as an analyzes of dispute resolution. The results discovered that media with its framing analysis technique has their own moral judgement and treatment recommendation as a form of dispute resolution towards discourses in the media. This moral judgment can show the tendency and alignment of a media regarding an issue. In addition, the media also has an important role in developing the audience’s mindset in the midst of dispute it can be analyzed from the treatment recommendation that can be used as a media based dispute resolution.   Islam merupakan agama rahmatan lil ‘alamiin dan bersifat universal serta hadir sebagai sebuah risalah seluruh umat manusia. Akan tetapi, pemaknaan terhadap universalitas Islam tidak seragam terlebih pemaknaannya bagi kalangan umat Islam itu sendiri. Hal ini menimbulkan banyak interpetasi yang bermacam-macam untuk mengekspresikan universalitas Islam ini. Salah satu bentuk interpretasi ini adalah munculnya istilah Islam Nusantara yang kembali menuai perdebatan. Sumatera Barat merupakan salah satu wilayah di Indonesia dengan hukum Islam dan adatnya yang sangat kuat menolak pengistilahan ini. Penolakan ini menimbulkan banyak reaksi dari beberbagai pihak. Hal ini dikarenakan, Sumatera Barat yang sangat menjaga kelestarian budayanya menolak wacana ini yang memiliki visi samaseperti yang dimiliki Sumatera Barat. Arena pertarungan ini diperluas oleh adanya pemberitaan di media-media online Indonesia yang mulai mengangkat fenomena ini. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menemukan bagaimana media membingkai pemberitaan dan apakah media juga memiliki peran untuk meminimalisasi ketegangan yang terjadi antara pihak yang bertikai. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Sumber data yang diperoleh mengacu pada pemberitaan media online mainstream Indonesia pada tahun 2018 dan dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik analisis framing media model Robert N. Entman dan treatment recommendation sebagai bentuk dispute resolution wacana di media. Hasil dari penelitan ini mengungkapkan bahwa dalam pembingkaian sebuah berita, media memiliki moral judgement-nya masing-masing. Moral Judgement ini yang dapat memperlihatkan arah atau keberpihakan suatu media terhadap suatu isu. Selain itu, media juga memiliki peranan penting dalam mendewasakan khalayak di tengah konflik. Hal ini terlihat dari adanya treatment recommendation yang dapat digunakan sebagai dispute resolution berbasis media.

scholarly journals Framing Analysis of Typo News Reports on Job Creation Through Online News Media

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 83-89
Author(s):  
Deska Rinanti Hayyattun Nuffuss ◽  
Sri Rohaningsih
Keyword(s):  
News Media ◽  
Media Coverage ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
News Coverage ◽  
Job Creation ◽  
Online News ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
The Government

The ratification of the Job Creation Law in early November 2020 created a lot of polemics in the society, this leads the news in the online media to have their own views in reviewing typos related to the content in the Job Creation Act. This study aims to unravel the results of media framing from a certain topic by reviewing news coverage by two different online news channels in the same upload period on November 3rd, 2020. The news reconstruction of journalists' points of view creates a gap between empirical truth and public awareness so readers can follow the media thought. The framing analysis was carried out on two news channels, namely CNBC Indonesia and Nasional Tempo, which reported typos in the writing of the Job Creation Law from a different point of view. The method used in this study is from Zhongdang Pan and Gerald M. Kosicki framing analysis model using four structures, namely Syntax, Script, Thematic, and Rhetorical. The results of this study indicate that media coverage of CNBC Indonesia tends to be in line with the government, while the Tempo National media constructs news coverage with a more critical tone. Additionally, other factors in the form of ownership and interests could also affect news framing. This is based on the fact that there is a trend of media conglomeration in Indonesia which can have certain implications for the news content.

ANALISIS FRAMING PEMBERITAAN POLITIK DINASTI JOKOWI PADA PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH SERENTAK TAHUN 2020 DI MEDIA ONLINE

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Abdul Aziz ◽  
Umaimah Wahid
Keyword(s):  
Problem Definition ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Moral Decision Making ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Public Attention ◽  
The Family ◽  
Dynastic Politics ◽  
Data Collection Technique

Dynastic politics has always been an issue that has attracted public attention to be discussed during the Regional Head Election (Pilkada) process. This is because in reality there is a tendency in many regional heads to try to build dynastic politics. The simultaneous Regional Head Election (Pilkada) in 2020 is quite interesting with several candidates emerging from the family of President Jokowi. This study aims to determine how online media of kompas.com and okezone.com in framing news about dynastic politics in the 2020 Pilkada. To achieve this goal, this study uses a qualitative research method, where the author uses the framing analysis model of Robert N. Entmant. The object of this research is news regarding the politics of President Jokowi's dynasty, in online media kompas.com and okezone.com. The data collection technique used literature study. The results of the analysis of this study present news about dynastic politics in the 2020 Pilkada. In the results of the news framing analysis using the Robert N. Entman model, there are several stages such as problem definition, problem estimation from problem sources, moral decision making, and problem solving. The news on kompas.com clearly highlighted news that was contra or disagreeable with the existence of dynastic politics in Indonesia, especially in the 2020 Pilkada, while the news on okezone.com clearly did not question the existence of dynastic politics in the 2020 Pilkada. The victory of the two PDI-Perjuangan candidates is part of the General Chair's commitment to ensure that his party leads to produce quality young leadership. Of course, the imbalance in the selection of sources in the news is very important so that people who see it can provide a more objective opinion of the news.

scholarly journals Investigative News of Online Media

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Septiawan Santana Kurnia ◽  
Dadi Ahmadi ◽  
Firmansyah Firmansyah
Keyword(s):  
News Media ◽  
Media Coverage ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Online News ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Online Journalism ◽  
Investigative Reporting ◽  
News Stories

An investigative reporting has changed quite rapidly in the last few periods after the development of information technology. The presence of online media encourages the emergence of online journalism. The existence of online journalism, within the framework of online media, gives a certain touch to investigative reporting activities. Investigative reporting developed in online media has managerial uniqueness and certain coverage patterns. The purpose of this study is to illustrate how the management of editorials and online media coverage patterns in Indonesia conducting investigative coverage.Data for this research is obtained through interviews with data analysis using a qualitative approach and a case study method of single case-multilevel analysis. Research subjects (journalism) and research objects (online investigative news) of this study are Detik.com and Tirto.id.The results of the study show that investigative data are at the core of investigative reporting in online media. It can be in the form of direct observation under investigation (disguising) or the disclosure of new facts that have not been revealed before. The online news media in Indonesia, although it relies on the speed, also still takes into account the accuracy and rules of journalism, especially in the coverage of investigations. The online media strategy in reporting investigations is to divide investigative data into several news stories with one theme, but each headline is different according to the investigative reporting to be reported in parts.

scholarly journals Polemik Majelis Ulama Indonesia tentang Konsep Islam Nusantara: Sebuah Analisis Framing Media Online

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-36
Author(s):  
Zanniro Sururi Hsb
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Moral Judgment ◽  
Media Framing ◽  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
The Public ◽  
News Reports

This study explores the Indonesian Ulema Council’s polemic coverage about the concept of Islam Nusantara through online media framing analysis. To look at online media framing, I use qualitative methods with Robert N. Etnman’s framing study that examines two things: selecting issues and the emphasis or promotion of certain aspects. The analysis contained four concepts: defining problems, diagnosing causes, making a moral judgment, and treatment recommendations. The results showed that three online media gave rise to a variety of news reports. Detiknews.com brings up news about scholars’ polemic in the Indonesian Ulema Council area behind Islam Nusantara’s concept eight times, CNNIndonesia.com five times, and Kompas.com three times. Interpretations of the three online media have different attitudes. Detiknews.com in framing can not be said to be neutral, but there has been a bit of a splash of neutrality by displaying statements as a bit of a counterparty, although dominated by pre-party views. CNNIndonesia.com is more impressed to provoke the public to respond to the construction of reality in framing because many use the election diction provocative title. Kompas.com is more neutral compared to Detiknews.com and CNNIndonesia.com. Kompas media tends to use the principle of cover both sides, and the news is more in the form of articles or public opinion.Studi ini mencoba untuk mengeksplorasi pemberitaan polemik Majelis Ulama Indonesia tentang konsep Islam Nusantara melalui analisis framing media online. Untuk melihat framing media online, penulis menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan analisis framing Robert N. Etnman yang mengkaji dua hal, yaitu seleksi isu dan penekanan atau penonjolan aspek-aspek tertentu. Analisis tersebut terdapat empat konsep, yaitu define problems (pendefenisian masalah), diagnose causes (memperkirakan penyebab masalah), make moral judgement (membuat pilihan moral), dan treatment recommendation (menekankan penyelesaian). Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa tiga media online memunculkan vitur berita yang beragam. Detiknews.com memunculkan berita tentang polemik ulama di kawasan MUI dibalik konsep “Islam Nusantara sebanyak 8 kali”, CNNIndonesia.com sebanyak 5 kali, dan Kompas.com sebanyak 3 kali. Interpretasi dari ketiga media online tersebut memiliki sikap berbeda-beda. Detiknews.com dalam melakukan framing belum bisa dikatakan netral, akan tetapi sudah ada sedikit percikan kenetralan dengan menampilkan pernyataan sekelumit pihak kontra walaupun didominasi pernyataan pihak yang pro. CNNIndonesia.com lebih terkesan memprovokasi masyarakat untuk menanggapi konstruksi realitas yang di framing karena banyak menggunakan pemilihan diksi judul yang provokatif. Kompas.com lebih netral dibandingkan dengan Detiknews.com dan CNNIndonesia.com. Media Kompas cenderung menggunakan prinsip cover both side dan pemberitaannya lebih banyak berbentuk artikel ataupun opini masyarakat.

scholarly journals Komparasi Bingkai Peristiwa Bencana di Media Online Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-78
Author(s):  
Zamhari Zamhari
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Moral Statement

This paper examines the differences between Tirto.id and Republika.co.id in framing reporting on the causes of the crash of the Lion Air JT-610 plane on October 29, 2018. This research is a qualitative study using Robert M. Entman's four-stage framing analysis, namely define problems, define causes, make moral statement, and treatment recommendation. The results of this study indicate that there are differences in framing between the three online media in reporting a disaster. Tirto.id focuses more on the professionalism of Lion Air's management, while Republika.co.id focuses more on the news about the cause of the crash of the Lion Air JT-610 plane because the Lion Air JT-610 aircraft is the latest release. This proves that every newsroom has a certain standard in applying the principles of disaster journalism. Tulisan ini mengulas perbedaan Tirto.id dan Republika.co.id dalam membingkai pemberitaan penyebab jatuhnya pesawat Lion Air JT-610 pada tanggal 29 Oktober 2018. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan analisis framing empat tahap Robert M. Entman, yaitu define problems, define causes, make moral statement, dan treatment recommendation. Hasil penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa terdapat perbedaan framing di antara ketiga media online tersebut dalam memberitakan sebuah bencana. Tirto.id lebih menyoroti profesionalisme manajemen Lion Air, sedangkan Republika.co.id lebih mem-framing pemberitaan penyebab jatuhnya pesawat Lion Air JT-610 lantaran jenis pesawat Lion Air JT-610 merupakan keluaran terbaru. Hal ini membuktikan bahwa setiap newsroom memiliki standar tertentu dalam menerapkan prinsip jurnalisme bencana.

scholarly journals Netralitas Konten Berita Online (Analisis Framing: Berita Reuni Alumni 212 di detik.com)

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ajeng Dwi Wardani ◽  
Heni Indrayani
Keyword(s):  
Media Coverage ◽  
Political Interest ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
National Media ◽  
Subjective Opinion ◽  
Religious Issue

Religion issue recently gets much attention in Indonesian media coverage. A Rally named ‘212 alumni reunion’ to celebrate the anniversary of a previous rally that demanded the prosecution of then Jakarta Governor Basuki ‘Ahok’ Tjahaja Purnama after he was accused of blasphemy became national-wide coverage of national media. By using the framing analysis method, this article tries to illustrate how an online media, detik.com, have or have not applied journalism principal in coveting that religious issue. The result of the study shows that detik.com have done media function because it has applied media principle of neutrality. This research did not find any subjective opinion and political interest in the text. Besides that, detik.com was more focusing on the using of ‘what’ element of news as well as the ‘who’ element for describing the issue more objectively.

The science grapevine: Influence of blog information on the online media coverage of the 2010 arsenic-based life study

Journalism ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 626-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunver Lystbaek Vestergaard
Keyword(s):  
Media Coverage ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
News Coverage ◽  
Online News ◽  
Online Media ◽  
News Frames ◽  
Life Study ◽  
Media Frames ◽  
News Content

Informal chatter has always been part of the scientific community, but with the emergence of online blogs these casual debates have become public. Here, I present a case study of how blog information influenced the online news frames during the December 2010 coverage of the arsenic-based life study. The results show how media frames were homogeneous and transformed abruptly from a positive ‘Gee Whiz’ frame towards a critical frame and lastly to a meta media frame over the course of a few days. From beginning to end, the blogosphere heavily influenced the news content, use of sources and spread of information between news outlets. Such rapid and uncontrollable influence of blogosphere information on online news coverage can be explained theoretically as an example of science grapevine communication.

scholarly journals Polemik “Buta” dan “Budek” dalam Pidato K.H. Ma’ruf Amin: Analisis Framing Robert N. Enmant pada Media Online

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-124
Author(s):  
Sutan Kumala Pontas Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
People With Disabilities ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
The Republic

The background of the problem in this research is how three online media, CNNIndonesia.com, Republika.co.id, and Tempo.co, framed speeches containing the words “blind” and “deaf” delivered by the candidates for Vice President of the Republic of Indonesia. K.H. Ma’ruf Amin on Saturday, November 10 2018 in the presence of Barisan Nusantara (BarNus) volunteers. The three media were chosen based on the argumentation about the diversity of ideologies they held. This research method uses framing analysis proposed by Robert N. Entman. The data obtained were analyzed in four stages, that is define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgement, and treatment recommendation. The results show that CNNIndonesia.com focuses more on the responses that arise from the community, especially people with disabilities; while Republika.co.id stated that the meaning of Ma’ruf Amin’s words did not refer to people with disabilities; and Tempo.co tended to be impartial by presenting neutral news.Latar belakang masalah pada penelitian ini adalah bagaimana tiga media online, CNNIndonesia.com, Republika.co.id, dan Tempo.co, membingkai pidato yang berisi kata-kata “buta” dan “budek” yang disampaikan oleh calon Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia, K.H. Ma’ruf Amin pada hari Sabtu 10 November 2018 di hadapan relawan Barisan Nusantara (BarNus). Ketiga media tersebut dipilih dengan argumentasi keragaman ideologi yang dianut pemiliknya. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan analisis framing yang dikemukakan oleh Robert N. Entman. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis ke dalam empat tahap, yakni pendefinisian masalah, memperkirakan sumber masalah, membuat keputusan moral, dan menekankan penyelesaian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa CNNIndonesia.com lebih menyoroti respon yang timbul dari masyarakat khususnya kaum disabilitas; sedangkan Republika.co.id menyebut bahwa maksud dari perkataan Ma’ruf Amin tidak menjurus kepada kaum disabilitas; dan adapun Tempo.co cenderung tidak berpihak dengan menyajikan berita yang netral.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document