scholarly journals PRESS DISPUTE RESOLUTION: METODOLOGI RESOLUSI KONFLIK BERBASIS MEDIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-90
Author(s):  
Kurnia Sari Wiwaha ◽  
Ustadi Hamsah
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Online News ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
The Media

Islam has been known as a religion of Rahmatn lil’alamiin which guarantees inclusion and maintains a treatise on all humanity. However, the interpretation of universality of Islam does not meet a common understanding even though within Muslim community itself. Those diverse interpretations have resulted in how the universality of Islam has been expressed. One of those quarrels toward interpretation is the discussion of Islam Nusantara. West Sumatera is one of the regions in Indonesia which implements Islamic law as its customary law in which rejection against Islam Nusantara has been echoed across the borders. The rejection caused reactions from various parties since West Sumatera strongly stated the rejection as a way for preserving it. Those dispute has been sharpened by the online news in several Indonesian media that began to raise the phenomenon up. This research aim to find out how those medias frame the news and whether online media contribute on minimizing public tensions. This research used descriptive method with qualitative approach. The source of the data focused on Indonesian online media news on 2018 and was analyzed with framing analysis from Robert N. Entman and also using the concept of treatment recommendation as an analyzes of dispute resolution. The results discovered that media with its framing analysis technique has their own moral judgement and treatment recommendation as a form of dispute resolution towards discourses in the media. This moral judgment can show the tendency and alignment of a media regarding an issue. In addition, the media also has an important role in developing the audience’s mindset in the midst of dispute it can be analyzed from the treatment recommendation that can be used as a media based dispute resolution.   Islam merupakan agama rahmatan lil ‘alamiin dan bersifat universal serta hadir sebagai sebuah risalah seluruh umat manusia. Akan tetapi, pemaknaan terhadap universalitas Islam tidak seragam terlebih pemaknaannya bagi kalangan umat Islam itu sendiri. Hal ini menimbulkan banyak interpetasi yang bermacam-macam untuk mengekspresikan universalitas Islam ini. Salah satu bentuk interpretasi ini adalah munculnya istilah Islam Nusantara yang kembali menuai perdebatan. Sumatera Barat merupakan salah satu wilayah di Indonesia dengan hukum Islam dan adatnya yang sangat kuat menolak pengistilahan ini. Penolakan ini menimbulkan banyak reaksi dari beberbagai pihak. Hal ini dikarenakan, Sumatera Barat yang sangat menjaga kelestarian budayanya menolak wacana ini yang memiliki visi samaseperti yang dimiliki Sumatera Barat. Arena pertarungan ini diperluas oleh adanya pemberitaan di media-media online Indonesia yang mulai mengangkat fenomena ini. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menemukan bagaimana media membingkai pemberitaan dan apakah media juga memiliki peran untuk meminimalisasi ketegangan yang terjadi antara pihak yang bertikai. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Sumber data yang diperoleh mengacu pada pemberitaan media online mainstream Indonesia pada tahun 2018 dan dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik analisis framing media model Robert N. Entman dan treatment recommendation sebagai bentuk dispute resolution wacana di media. Hasil dari penelitan ini mengungkapkan bahwa dalam pembingkaian sebuah berita, media memiliki moral judgement-nya masing-masing. Moral Judgement ini yang dapat memperlihatkan arah atau keberpihakan suatu media terhadap suatu isu. Selain itu, media juga memiliki peranan penting dalam mendewasakan khalayak di tengah konflik. Hal ini terlihat dari adanya treatment recommendation yang dapat digunakan sebagai dispute resolution berbasis media.

scholarly journals Media and environment: how indonesia online news portal frames biodegradable issue?

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Monika Sri Yuliarti ◽  
Wikan Jatimurti
Keyword(s):  
Media Coverage ◽  
Environmental Issues ◽  
Online News ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Environmental Damage ◽  
Biodegradable Material ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Online News Sites

Environmental problems are still an important issue and cannot be resolved completely until now, even after the 1970s the United Nations established a world environmental day. Plastic waste is considered the most responsible for the problems of environmental damage today. Therefore, an innovation that comes from biodegradable material, with its biodegradable product is considered to be the answer to this environmental problem. This study examines how reporting on the environment is framed in online mass media, especially in relation to biodegradable material and biodegradable products. This is qualitative research, with the object of two Indonesian online news sites, namely www.detik.com and www.okezone.com. Data collection techniques used is document studies and data analysis techniques employed is Robert N. Entman's Framing analysis model which involves four elements, namely: define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgment, and treatment recommendation. The findings of this study are that environmental issues have not dominated online media coverage, and the biodegradable issue has not been framed thoroughly by online media.

scholarly journals Polemik Majelis Ulama Indonesia tentang Konsep Islam Nusantara: Sebuah Analisis Framing Media Online

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-36
Author(s):  
Zanniro Sururi Hsb
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Moral Judgment ◽  
Media Framing ◽  
Treatment Recommendations ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
The Public ◽  
News Reports

This study explores the Indonesian Ulema Council’s polemic coverage about the concept of Islam Nusantara through online media framing analysis. To look at online media framing, I use qualitative methods with Robert N. Etnman’s framing study that examines two things: selecting issues and the emphasis or promotion of certain aspects. The analysis contained four concepts: defining problems, diagnosing causes, making a moral judgment, and treatment recommendations. The results showed that three online media gave rise to a variety of news reports. Detiknews.com brings up news about scholars’ polemic in the Indonesian Ulema Council area behind Islam Nusantara’s concept eight times, CNNIndonesia.com five times, and Kompas.com three times. Interpretations of the three online media have different attitudes. Detiknews.com in framing can not be said to be neutral, but there has been a bit of a splash of neutrality by displaying statements as a bit of a counterparty, although dominated by pre-party views. CNNIndonesia.com is more impressed to provoke the public to respond to the construction of reality in framing because many use the election diction provocative title. Kompas.com is more neutral compared to Detiknews.com and CNNIndonesia.com. Kompas media tends to use the principle of cover both sides, and the news is more in the form of articles or public opinion.Studi ini mencoba untuk mengeksplorasi pemberitaan polemik Majelis Ulama Indonesia tentang konsep Islam Nusantara melalui analisis framing media online. Untuk melihat framing media online, penulis menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan analisis framing Robert N. Etnman yang mengkaji dua hal, yaitu seleksi isu dan penekanan atau penonjolan aspek-aspek tertentu. Analisis tersebut terdapat empat konsep, yaitu define problems (pendefenisian masalah), diagnose causes (memperkirakan penyebab masalah), make moral judgement (membuat pilihan moral), dan treatment recommendation (menekankan penyelesaian). Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa tiga media online memunculkan vitur berita yang beragam. Detiknews.com memunculkan berita tentang polemik ulama di kawasan MUI dibalik konsep “Islam Nusantara sebanyak 8 kali”, CNNIndonesia.com sebanyak 5 kali, dan Kompas.com sebanyak 3 kali. Interpretasi dari ketiga media online tersebut memiliki sikap berbeda-beda. Detiknews.com dalam melakukan framing belum bisa dikatakan netral, akan tetapi sudah ada sedikit percikan kenetralan dengan menampilkan pernyataan sekelumit pihak kontra walaupun didominasi pernyataan pihak yang pro. CNNIndonesia.com lebih terkesan memprovokasi masyarakat untuk menanggapi konstruksi realitas yang di framing karena banyak menggunakan pemilihan diksi judul yang provokatif. Kompas.com lebih netral dibandingkan dengan Detiknews.com dan CNNIndonesia.com. Media Kompas cenderung menggunakan prinsip cover both side dan pemberitaannya lebih banyak berbentuk artikel ataupun opini masyarakat.

scholarly journals Polemik “Buta” dan “Budek” dalam Pidato K.H. Ma’ruf Amin: Analisis Framing Robert N. Enmant pada Media Online

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-124
Author(s):  
Sutan Kumala Pontas Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
People With Disabilities ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
The Republic

The background of the problem in this research is how three online media, CNNIndonesia.com, Republika.co.id, and Tempo.co, framed speeches containing the words “blind” and “deaf” delivered by the candidates for Vice President of the Republic of Indonesia. K.H. Ma’ruf Amin on Saturday, November 10 2018 in the presence of Barisan Nusantara (BarNus) volunteers. The three media were chosen based on the argumentation about the diversity of ideologies they held. This research method uses framing analysis proposed by Robert N. Entman. The data obtained were analyzed in four stages, that is define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgement, and treatment recommendation. The results show that CNNIndonesia.com focuses more on the responses that arise from the community, especially people with disabilities; while Republika.co.id stated that the meaning of Ma’ruf Amin’s words did not refer to people with disabilities; and Tempo.co tended to be impartial by presenting neutral news.Latar belakang masalah pada penelitian ini adalah bagaimana tiga media online, CNNIndonesia.com, Republika.co.id, dan Tempo.co, membingkai pidato yang berisi kata-kata “buta” dan “budek” yang disampaikan oleh calon Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia, K.H. Ma’ruf Amin pada hari Sabtu 10 November 2018 di hadapan relawan Barisan Nusantara (BarNus). Ketiga media tersebut dipilih dengan argumentasi keragaman ideologi yang dianut pemiliknya. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan analisis framing yang dikemukakan oleh Robert N. Entman. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis ke dalam empat tahap, yakni pendefinisian masalah, memperkirakan sumber masalah, membuat keputusan moral, dan menekankan penyelesaian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa CNNIndonesia.com lebih menyoroti respon yang timbul dari masyarakat khususnya kaum disabilitas; sedangkan Republika.co.id menyebut bahwa maksud dari perkataan Ma’ruf Amin tidak menjurus kepada kaum disabilitas; dan adapun Tempo.co cenderung tidak berpihak dengan menyajikan berita yang netral.

scholarly journals Bingkai “Tampang Boyolali “ dalam Pidato Prabowo Subianto di Media Daring

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-92
Author(s):  
Mike Meiranti
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Media Framing ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Qualitative Research Method ◽  
The People

This article aims to explain and describe "tampang Boyolali" in Prabowo's speech which was explored using online media framing analysis. To see the framing of media online the authorused qualitative research method with framing analysis Robert N Entman who examined the analysis into four concepts namely: define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgement, and treatment recommendation. The results of the study using three online media gave rise to fitur diverse news. The diction "Tampang Boyolali" in Prabowo Subianto's speech invited controversy in the community and media. Government officials also contributed to the diction of his speech. The diction "Tampang Boyolali" seemed to demean the people of Boyolali, and immediately invited an angry reaction from the people of Boyolali. Researchers collected data in the form of images and text through 3 media, namely CNNIndonesia.com, Sindonews.com, and Kompas.Com. The three media are actively preaching "Tampang Boyolali" with different framing. In this case the author tried to analyze the news with Robert N. Entmen's analysis which resulted in the fact that CNNIndonesia.com did not respond well and discredited Prabowo's apology. Meanwhile Sindonew.com appreciated Prabowo's  gentleman attitude that dared to make an apology. As Kompas.com tend to be neutral, do not appreciate and do not discredit the figures reported.Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan mendeskripsikan “tampang Boyolali” dalam pidato Prabowo yang dieksplorasi menggunakan analisis framing media online. Untuk melihat framing media online penulis menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan analisis framing Robert N Entman yang mengkaji analisis menjadi empat konsep yaitu: define problems (pendefenisian masalah), diagnose causes (memperkirakan penyebab masalah), make moral judgement (membuat pilihan moral), dan treatment recommendation (menekankan penyelesaian). Hasil studi menggunakan tiga media online memunculkan fitur berita yang beragam. Diksi “Tampang Boyolali" dalam pidato Prabowo Subianto mengundang kontroversi di masyarakat dan media. Para petinggi pemerintahan pun turut andil mengomentari diksi pidatonya tersebut. Diksi “Tampang Boyolali" seakan merendahkan warga Boyolali, dan seketika mengundang reaksi marah warga Boyolali. Peneliti mengumpulkan data berupa gambar dan teks melalui 3 media, yaitu CNNIndonesia.com, Sindonews.com, dan Kompas.Com. Ketiga media tersebut aktif memberitakan “Tampang Boyolali” dengan framing yang berbeda-beda. Dalam hal ini penulis mencoba menganalisis berita dengan analisis Robert N. Entmen yang menghasilkan fakta bahwa CNNIndonesia.com tidak merespon baik dan mendiskreditkan permohonan maaf Prabowo. Sedangkan Sindonew.com sangat mengapresiasi sikap gentleman Prabowo yang berani menghaturkan permohonan maaf. Adapun Kompas.com cenderung netral, tidak mengapresiasi dan tidak mendiskreditkan tokoh yang diberitakan.

scholarly journals Kontroversi Tiruan Slogan Donald Trump dalam Pidato Pipres Prabowo: Analisis Framing dalam Tiga Media Online

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-110
Author(s):  
Erna Kurniawati
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Donald Trump ◽  
Pros And Cons

This study has a problem how three online media, Detik.com, Tribunnews.com and Tempo.co, in framing the reporting of the slogan “Indonesia First, Make Indonesia Great Again” delivered by Prabowo Subianto in his speech on Thursday, October 11, 2018 which considered imitating the President of the United States, Donald Trump. The three online media were selected on the basis of consideration of news sites that were quite intense and enthusiastic in reporting the slogan in the two-week period after the event (11-25 October 2018). The method in this study uses framing analysis proposed by Robert N. Entman. The data were analyzed in four stages, that is define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgement, and treatment recommendation. The results of this study indicate that Detik.com provides news from both pros and cons; Tribunnews.com places more emphasis on using more refined language, and Tempo.co puts forward the use of wise and contemporary languages.Studi ini memiliki belakang masalah bagaimana tiga media online, Detik.com, Tribunnews.com dan Tempo.co, dalam membingkai pemberitaan slogan “Indonesia First, Make Indonesia Great Again” yang disampaikan oleh Prabowo Subianto dalam pidatonya pada Kamis 11 Oktober 2018 yang dinilai meniru Presiden Amerika Serikat, Donald Trump. Ketiga media online tersebut dipilih atas dasar pertimbangan situs-situs berita yang cukup intens dan antusias dalam memberitakan slogan tersebut pada periode waktu dua minggu pasca kejadian (11-25 Oktober 2018). Metode pada penelitian ini menggunakan analisis framing yang dikemukakan oleh Robert N. Entman. Data dianalisis dalam empat tahap, yakni pendefinisian masalah, memperkirakan sumber masalah, membuat keputusan moral, dan menekankan penyelesaian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa Detik.com menyajikan berita dengan sumber baik dari yang pro maupun kontra; Tribunnews.com lebih menekankan pada penggunaan bahasa yang lebih diperhalus, dan Tempo.co lebih mengedepankan penggunaan bahasa-bahasa yang bijak dan kekinian.

scholarly journals Penahanan Rizieq Shihab dalam Bingkai Media Online Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-52
Author(s):  
Thibburruhany Thibburruhany
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Moral Judgment ◽  
Moral Judgement ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Stage Model ◽  
Framing Analysis

This article aims to compare the framing carried out by three Indonesian online media regarding the incidents of Rizieq Shihab's detention in Saudi Arabia. Using Robert N. Entman's framing analysis, the researchers uncovered how Kompas.com, Tribunnews.com, and Detik.com framed the incident. The three media were chosen based on the number of visitors accessing the Alexa.com website ranking (10 November 2018). Issue selection and aspect prominence are two things that the authors compare from the three selected sites. Both were analyzed using a four-stage model starting with (1) defining problems; (2) cause diagnosis; (3) make moral judgment; and (4) treatment recommendation. This study concludes that the three online media have various framing. This has implications for the image of Rizieq Shihab’s figure built by each media.Artikel ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan pembingkaian yang dilakukan oleh tiga media online Indonesia terkait peristiwa penahanan Rizieq Shihab di Arab Saudi. Menggunakan analisis framing Robert N. Entman, peneliti membongkar bagaimana Kompas.com, Tribunnews.com, dan Detik.com melakukan pembingkaian terhadap peristiwa tersebut. Ketiga media tersebut dipilih berdasar banyaknya pengunjung yang mengakses melalui ranking situs Alexa.com (10 November 2018). Seleksi isu dan penonjolan aspek adalah dua hal yang penulis bandingkan dari tiga situs terpilih. Keduanya dianalisis menggunakan model empat tahap yang dimulai dengan (1) mendefinisikan masalah (define problems); (2) menemukan alasan (diagnose cause); (3) membuat pernyataan moral (make moral judgement); dan rekomendasi penyelesaian (treatment recommendation). Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa ketiga media online tersebut memiliki pembingkaian yang beragam. Hal ini berimplikasi pada citra sosok Rizieq Shihab yang dibangun oleh masing-masing media.

scholarly journals Analisis framing pemberitaan korupsi massal di media online detik.com

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Muhammad Fairuz Satria Ananda ◽  
Aat Ruchiat Nugraha ◽  
Suwandi Sumartias
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Foundation ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Conceptual Foundation ◽  
Image Construction ◽  
Legislative Council ◽  
Corruption Case ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Media

This research aims to determine the construction of PDIP's image from the news framing on them as the party who has the most corrupted fraction members in the event of mass coruption case if the People’s Legislative Council (DPRD) of Malang City by the online media, Detik.com. This research is conducted through constructivism paradigm with the sudty of framing analysis by Robert M. Entman as a conceptual foundation with the framing concept of Entman, namely, define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgement, and treatment recommendation from journalist side; using the theory of the social mass media as a theoretical foundation. The results of the framing carried out by the online media, Detik.com tend to be neutral in delivering their news on the mass corruption case of the DPRD of Malang City in construction the image of PDIP as the most corrupted party. This is because the media deliver both side cover, even Detik.com’s journalists already included opinions in the titles and selecting images in the news. Although Detik.com tends to be neutral, becase Detik.com just deliver the facts. The bad image construction of PDIP has been constructed already, as the news is considered to be a bad news model.

scholarly journals Framing Analysis of News Article about Clashes between Police and Terrorist Prisoners in Indonesia Publishing by ABC.net.au and SBS.com

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-255
Author(s):  
Arbaiyah Satriani
Keyword(s):  
News Article ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
West Java ◽  
The World ◽  
The Media ◽  
Independent Media

In 10 May 2018, six policemen had been killed in clashes between Indonesian police and prisoners in the jail in the Mobile Police Brigade (Brimob) headquarters in Depok, West Java. It was located in outskirts of Jakarta. The incident had attracted people’s attention from all around the world. One of the reasons was because it taken place in the headquarters of the police. It can be said as a dramatic tragedy. Another reason that it magnetized public’s awareness was because it involved so call terrorist prisoners. Two of online media that distributed news article about it in Australia were ABC and SBS new sites. Both of them are independent media and have difference focus of publication in their media. The aim of this paper is to explore how the two media, ABC and SBS new sites, frame the event in their publication. It is interesting to observe how the media in Australia which has special attention to the issues of Indonesia published the news article related to a hot topic in Indonesia

scholarly journals Komparasi Bingkai Peristiwa Bencana di Media Online Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-78
Author(s):  
Zamhari Zamhari
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Moral Statement

This paper examines the differences between Tirto.id and Republika.co.id in framing reporting on the causes of the crash of the Lion Air JT-610 plane on October 29, 2018. This research is a qualitative study using Robert M. Entman's four-stage framing analysis, namely define problems, define causes, make moral statement, and treatment recommendation. The results of this study indicate that there are differences in framing between the three online media in reporting a disaster. Tirto.id focuses more on the professionalism of Lion Air's management, while Republika.co.id focuses more on the news about the cause of the crash of the Lion Air JT-610 plane because the Lion Air JT-610 aircraft is the latest release. This proves that every newsroom has a certain standard in applying the principles of disaster journalism. Tulisan ini mengulas perbedaan Tirto.id dan Republika.co.id dalam membingkai pemberitaan penyebab jatuhnya pesawat Lion Air JT-610 pada tanggal 29 Oktober 2018. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan analisis framing empat tahap Robert M. Entman, yaitu define problems, define causes, make moral statement, dan treatment recommendation. Hasil penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa terdapat perbedaan framing di antara ketiga media online tersebut dalam memberitakan sebuah bencana. Tirto.id lebih menyoroti profesionalisme manajemen Lion Air, sedangkan Republika.co.id lebih mem-framing pemberitaan penyebab jatuhnya pesawat Lion Air JT-610 lantaran jenis pesawat Lion Air JT-610 merupakan keluaran terbaru. Hal ini membuktikan bahwa setiap newsroom memiliki standar tertentu dalam menerapkan prinsip jurnalisme bencana.

scholarly journals The Naturalization Policy in Online News Media

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 456
Author(s):  
Dian Purworini ◽  
Engkus Kuswarno ◽  
Purwanti Hadisiwi ◽  
Agus Rakhmat
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Government Policy ◽  
News Media ◽  
Online News ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Internal Conflict ◽  
Framing Analysis ◽  
Royal Palace ◽  
The Media ◽  
The Government

Mediation by the government in the Royal Palace of Surakarta’s internal conflict was considered reasonable and appropriate policy by the media. The approach to the conflict did not emphasize a strong cultural aspect of that culture-based organization. This research aimed to examine how online news media reported on the Royal Palace of Surakarta’s internal conflict. Furthermore, this research used framing analysis as proposed by Stephen D Reese to analyze the news published in February 2014. The outcome indicated that there was framing construction of the government policies. The content of the news presented that framing processes occurred. Those started from the transmission of the various debated about government policy, then reinforced through elections sentence that supported certain policy and continued to the naturalization process. The final process was an important strategy to make mediation as an accepted policy that should be done by the government. In the conclusion, the perception to be formed was that government policies were appropriate, and so everyone should hold it. The conflict resolution could be achieved through the mediation as already conducted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document