“Never swear even if you are righteous” is an inherent statement that reflects the psychological, sociological, as well as structural characteristics of swearing and oath making in the individual’s life. This paper tries to present an introduction to the speech act of swearing and oath making. Pragmatics is a moderately new order whose nature of request crosses with that of various other sociologies, like phonetics, applied etymology, basic talk examination, semantics, sociolinguistics, human science, brain research and humanities. Pragmatics does not have its procedure; however, it draws upon the system utilized in other sociologies. As the field of pragmatics is expansive and covers an assortment of strands, from the investigation of contextualized sentence meaning to the investigation of significance in the manner by which information is gathered and examined relies upon the sober-minded viewpoint received by the specialist, just as on the object of study. This paper has zeroed in on socio-pragmatics as its approach to handling the selected subject; to be specific, on the investigation of the basic standards of speaker and listener significance as reflected in the (fitting) acknowledgement of discourse acts, the association of discussion, affableness appearances and socio-pragmatic variety. It hypothesizes that swearing, oaths are deeds that are socially influenced, and so that they should, socio- pragmatically studied. It aims to show the socio-pragmatics insight of the use of swearing and oaths by answering the raised questions. The questions are as follows; Do swearing and oaths have significance in “Othello”? Do Swearing and oaths differ from one person to another? Does the position of the individual influence the swearing and the oaths of the person? Does sex affect the use of swearing and oaths? The paper is limited to Shakespeare’s “Othello” as a text that has many reflections for the use of swears and oaths. It ends with a conclusion that sums up the results of the discussion.