scholarly journals Wound epithelium function in axolotl limb regeneration

2012 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 75-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi SHIMOKAWA ◽  
Satoru YASUTAKA ◽  
Rieko KOMINAMI ◽  
Harumichi SHINOHARA
1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (8) ◽  
pp. 739-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy A. Tassava ◽  
David J. Goldhamer ◽  
Bruce L. Tomlinson

Data from pulse and continuous labeling with [3H]thymidine and from studies with monoclonal antibody WE3 have led to the modification of existing models and established concepts pertinent to understanding limb regeneration. Not all cells of the adult newt blastema are randomly distributed and actively progressing through the cell cycle. Instead, many cells are in a position that we have designated transient quiescence (TQ) and are not actively cycling. We postulate that cells regularly leave the TQ population and enter the actively cycling population and vice versa. The size of the TQ population may be at least partly determined by the quantity of limb innervation. Larval Ambystoma may have only a small or nonexisting TQ, thus accounting for their rapid rate of regeneration. Examination of reactivity of monoclonal antibody WE3 suggests that the early wound epithelium, which is derived from skin epidermis, is later replaced by cells from skin glands concomitant with blastema formation. WE3 provides a useful tool to further investigate the regenerate epithelium.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Can Aztekin

Therapeutic implementation of human limb regeneration is a daring aim. Studying species that can regrow their lost appendages provides clues on how such a feat can be achieved in mammals. One of the unique features of regeneration-competent species lies in their ability to seal the amputation plane with a scar-free wound epithelium. Subsequently, this wound epithelium advances and becomes a specialized wound epidermis (WE) which is hypothesized to be the essential component of regenerative success. Recently, the WE and specialized WE terminologies have been used interchangeably. However, these tissues were historically separated, and contemporary limb regeneration studies have provided critical new information which allows us to distinguish them. Here, I will summarize tissue-level observations and recently identified cell types of WE and their specialized forms in different regeneration models.


Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 497-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Ferretti ◽  
J.P. Brockes ◽  
R. Brown

In order to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the regenerative ability of the urodele limb, it is important to identify regeneration-associated proteins and to study their regulation. We have recently shown that the anti-cytokeratin monoclonal antibody LP1K reacts strongly with newt blastemal cells, while its reactivity is restricted in normal limbs. By screening a cDNA expression library from the newt blastema with LP1K, we have identified cDNA clones coding for a type II keratin (NvKII) expressed both in the mesenchyme and the specialized wound epithelium of the blastema. While the rod domain of the protein is highly conserved, the homology between NvKII and mammalian type II keratins drops markedly at the N- and C-terminal regions. The expression of this keratin was analysed by Northern blotting and RNAase protection analysis of various newt tissues, and appears to be organ specific, since it is restricted to normal and regenerating limbs and tails. In particular, we have investigated the expression of this keratin mRNA in normal and regenerating limbs. The transcript is barely detectable in the proximal portion of the normal limb, but its level is high in the distal one. After amputation, NvKII mRNA is expressed both in proximal and distal blastemas, although at higher levels distally, indicating that this keratin is regeneration associated. The NvKII transcript is detectable both in mesenchyme and in the wound epithelium of the regenerate, while no transcript is detectable in normal epidermis. The level of NvKII mRNA is markedly down-regulated both in normal and regenerating limbs following intraperitoneal injection with retinoic acid, a putative endogenous morphogen in limb regeneration.


Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L. Poulin ◽  
K.M. Patrie ◽  
M.J. Botelho ◽  
R.A. Tassava ◽  
I.M. Chiu

Two closely related fibroblast growth factor receptors, FGFR1 and FGFR2, have been cloned from a newt (Notophthalmus viridescens) limb blastema cDNA library. Sequence analysis revealed that we have isolated both the bek and KGFR variants of FGFR2. These two variants differ only in the second half of the last of their three Ig-like domains. The expression patterns of FGFR1 and FGFR2 during limb regeneration have been determined by in situ hybridization. During the preblastema stages of regeneration, FGFR2 expression is observed in the basal layer of the wound epithelium and in the cells of the periosteum. As regeneration progresses to the blastema stages, FGFR2 expression continues to be observed in the basal layer of the wound epithelium with additional hybridization seen in the blastema mesenchyme closely associated with the bisected bones. From the early bud to the mid-bud blastema stage, FGFR1 expression is observed throughout the blastema mesenchyme but, unlike FGFR2, is distinctly absent from the wound epithelium. In the differentiation stages of regeneration, the mesenchymal expression of FGFR2 becomes restricted to the cells of the condensing cartilage and later to the perichondrium. During these later stages of regeneration, the wound epithelium hybridization to the FGFR2 probe is no longer observed. The expression patterns of these receptors suggest that FGFR1 and FGFR2 have distinct roles in limb regeneration, despite their sharing a number of the FGF ligands. Further investigation regarding the potential sources of the FGF ligands will help establish the role that FGFs and FGFRs play in limb regeneration.


2006 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony L. Mescher ◽  
Anton W. Neff

We review key aspects of what is known about limb regeneration in urodele and anuran amphibians, with a focus on the early events of the process that lead to formation of the regeneration blastema. This includes the role of the nerves and wound epithelium, but also covers the inflammatory effects of the amputation trauma and their importance for regenerative growth. We propose that immunotolerance is important for limb regeneration and changes in its regulation may underlie the loss of regenerative capacity during anuran metamorphosis.


2010 ◽  
Vol 344 (1) ◽  
pp. 518
Author(s):  
Michael P. Sarras ◽  
Ansgar Olsen ◽  
Robert Intine

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document