scholarly journals Disruptive Innovation on Competition Law: Regulation Issues of Online Transportation in Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Mukti Fajar ◽  
Dirk Zwerenz ◽  
Reni Budi Setianingrum

Disruptive innovation such as online transportation business is a leap of innovations of in services that triggered chaos in field of competition law. The emergence of new cumbent with its disruptive innovation has disturbed the market that dominated by the incumbent. This chaos cannot be overcome by the same legal approach because it has a different business model, in fact, it also happened in Indonesia. This study aims to: (a) reviewing whether disruptive innovation infringes the principles and provisions of competition law and; (b) identifying and evaluating various regulations regarding online transportation in Indonesia. The method of this research is normative legal research, which examines various legal principles, legal theories, and legislation. Findings of this study are; First, disruptive innovation is not an unlawful act because it does not infringe any provisions in the competition law. And also, this innovation is not contravene with the public order; its using new business platforms that are different from old business models. Second, Indonesian government has regulated this disruptive innovation by issuing regulation which has been sued for judicial review and amendment. Finally, Indonesian government has formulated an accommodative regulation format, i.e., online transportation is equalized to the specialized rental transportation.

Author(s):  
Stavroula Karapapa

Some defences are available on grounds that are extraneous to copyright and are based either on other bodies of law, such as competition law or e-commerce protection, or on general legal principles. These include, for instance, defences available to Internet service providers for infringements carried out by their users, including defences for hosting, caching, and ‘mere conduit’. Others are available on the grounds of competition law, such as refusal to license or abuse of dominant position, which could have a legal basis of application—inter alia—in certain mass digital activities of online services. Other available defences fall under general legal principles that can be invoked in cases where copyright exceptions do not cover an activity for which there is a principle-based justification for the particular conduct. Such a justification could be the public interest or the doctrine of the ‘abuse of right’. There are also a number of uses that can be permitted on grounds of benign infringement on the basis of the ‘innocuous use’ doctrine. Unlike other defences to copyright, these defensive rules represent instances where copyright may be subject to limitations as a result of its encounter with other legal orders. Such instances have either not been institutionalized within copyright law, such as speech entitlements or public policy privileges, or may have been partially included within it while offering principle-based explanations for acts of copyright infringement on the basis of legal grounds found in other areas of law or broader legal principles. These defences are an essential component to the understanding of the scope of permissible copyright use on the Internet as they can be extremely relevant in cases which involve online services and business models, such as hosting services, and online content use more broadly.


A discussion and analysis of the key aspects emerging during the course of the research comprise the basis of this chapter. It addresses, inter alia, the effect of the parallel importing debate on authors’ rights, the issue of publishing contracts, the idea of a “heavenly library” and copyright protection on the Internet, including a discussion on how existing territorial copyright structures may be affected by electronic publishing. This chapter also considers the Google initiatives and possible new business models for authors. The emerging theme of resale royalties for authors is examined and compared with the Resale Royalty Right for Visual Artists Act 2009. In conclusion, observations are made on the role of the author in the changing publishing landscape, situating the author as member of the “author sphere” in the context of the public sphere.


Author(s):  
Arash Najmaei

Today’s world of business is increasingly witnessing exemplary firms which introduce new business models, exploit new markets and disrupt established firms in order to create a unique competitive position. Although the theoretical and conceptual posture of this phenomenon is well grounded and explained in the extant literature on disruptive innovation, little is known about strategic logic of this phenomenon. In other words, the managerial paradigm or cognitive and mental model that underlies the orchestration of micro- and macro-organizational mechanisms of a disruptive move, such as market and technological knowledge, have surprisingly received little attention. In this sense, an analytical review of literature suggests that strategic logic of a disruptive technology can be well presented through the lens of business model (BM) and its innovation. Accordingly, it is argued that business model represents a mental model which underlines activities such as acquisition of market and technological insights, opportunities and requisite actions required for transforming a disruptive idea into a disruptive market movement. This view offers new insights into the study of disruptive phenomenon. It addresses the managerial (i.e. mental model) underpinnings of disruptiveness, instead of market, economical and technological dimensions. Business model innovation (BMI) is a disruptive change in the core logic of value creation and capture. It is a value-revolutionizing framework which explicitly delineates the strategic processes of a disruptive strategy. Thus, it is essentially a paradigm for strategizing the craft of disruptive innovation (technology). Given this view, this chapter conceptually explicates this contour and shows how BMI effectuates a disruptive technological phenomenon by presenting four propositions. Finally theoretical and managerial implications of this view are illuminated in order to furthering the practice and enhancing future research in this growing field of inquiry.


2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sucet Jimena Martínez-Vergara ◽  
Jaume Valls-Pasola

PurposeDisruptive innovation theory has attracted the interest of researchers and practitioners across many areas, resulting in the development of new business models and strategies. Despite the increasing scholarly attention, its definition has not yet been understood, the understanding of the term “disruptive” and the complex nature of this innovation has provoked some misinterpretations, and the meaning remains ambiguous. To address this confusion, this article undertakes a critical review of disruptive innovation in an attempt at providing a solid theoretical grounding.Design/methodology/approachThe review examines the key issues of published articles, identified after conducting a search in the Web of Science scholarly database. The analysis highlights the basic definitions of disruptive innovation, showing its evolution, types and its characteristics. This article also examines the behaviours adopted by the actors associated with disruptive innovation (i.e. incumbents, entrants and customers).FindingsOverall, this article finds that disruptive innovation has its own elements to be identified, requiring an in-depth analysis to avoid confusing with other innovation approaches. The findings suggest that disruptive innovation affects businesses and sectors in varied and complex ways because customers from low-end market and mainstream market appreciate this innovation. Further, its impact on practice is huge and incites further efforts in establishing a stronger theoretical grounding.Originality/valueOur research contributes on the evolution of this theory, helping to better understand the phenomenon of disruption and can be used for different types of research settings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Lu Lu ◽  
Yang Zhou ◽  
Chenxiao Wang ◽  
Qingpu Zhang

As a disruptive innovation on the traditional payment mode, the 3rd-party online payment has been involved in disruptive innovations featuring contextualized and modernized characteristics, but a theoretical summary is urgently needed for the dominant design of these disruptive innovations. Therefore, an in-depth case study is done with Alipay and PayPal as the subject, and it comes to elaborate four key aspects involved in the dominant design of disruptive innovations of the 3rd-party online payment. Namely, adopt new innovative derivations, create new product attributes, construct new business models, and process subsequent performance improvements. In addition, the factors that differ from the traditional disruptive innovations are also spotted, including two innovative driving forces, two new product features, and four business modes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 135-143
Author(s):  
А. В. Комзюк

Interaction is a necessary and important part of the work of the National Police, including in the field of public safety and order. Due to the interaction we achieve the coordination of actions and joint activities of the National Police with other entities. Existing forms and methods of the interaction between the National Police and the public do not meet the current requirements and need to be refined or finding new forms and methods. Therefore, there is the need to conduct a thorough study of the problems of the interaction of the National Police with other entities of ensuring public safety and order. The author of the article has analyzed the importance and legal principles of the interaction of citizens with the police in the field of public order protection and combating crime. The concepts and forms’ types of the specified interaction have been defined. It has been concluded that there is a lack of scientific research focused on the problems of the interaction of the National Police with the public in the field of public safety and order, in particular on finding its new forms. To achieve this purpose, the author has revealed the essence of the interaction of the National Police with the public in the field of public safety and order, their relations, as well as has defined the classification of forms of the interaction of the National Police with citizens and their associations in the field of public safety and order. The scientific novelty of the study is that it improves the understanding of the nature and types of forms of the interaction between the National Police and the public in the field of public safety and order. Summarizing the above, we can conclude that the effective implementation of the authorities in the field of public safety and order by the National Police of Ukraine requires the establishment of effective interaction with citizens and public associations. The author has offered some new forms of the interaction between the National Police and the public for the implementation, the use of which can improve the state of law enforcement and the fight against crime.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 633-666
Author(s):  
Aro Velmet

Abstract How does an imperial lens change our view of capitalism and science in early twentieth-century France? Using the colonial expansion of the Pasteur Institutes as a case study, this article argues that French microbiologists developed both new business models and new values of masculine comportment during their time in the colonies. There the dynamic interaction between economic success and demonstration of scientific masculinity became particularly important in reshaping how Pastorians both saw the future of their institution and interpreted the meaning of its past. Against the image of the ascetic, nonprofit scientist, Pastorians in the colonies opposed an ambitious and entrepreneurial hero. After the Great War undermined the ascetic model and weakened the economic power of the metropolitan institute, colonial Pastorians were able to shape representations of the Pastorian network to the public and narrate the history of its founder as a heroic conqueror of the microbial world. Comment une optique impériale change-t-elle notre perspective sur le capitalisme et la science au début du vingtième siècle ? Prenant l'expansion coloniale des instituts Pasteur comme exemple, cet article avance que les microbiologistes français ont développé à la fois de nouveaux modèles économiques et de nouvelles valeurs du comportement masculin au cours de leur séjour dans les colonies. Ici, l'interaction dynamique entre le succès économique et la démonstration de la masculinité scientifique est devenue particulièrement importante pour remodeler à la fois la façon dont les pastoriens voyaient l'avenir de leur institution et interpretaient le sens de son passé. Contre l'image du scientifique ascétique, les pastoriens coloniaux opposaient un héros ambitieux et entreprenant. Après que la Grande Guerre a sapé le modèle ascétique et affaibli le pouvoir économique de l'Institut métropolitain, les pastoriens coloniaux ont pu façonner des représentations publiques du réseau pastorien et raconter l'histoire de son fondateur comme conquérant héroïque du monde microbien.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupprecht Podszun ◽  
Marius Leber

Technologie- und innovationsgetriebene Märkte stellen Kartellbehörden und Gerichte vor immer neue Herausforderungen. Kaum eine Branche ist in den vergangenen zehn bis fünfzehn Jahren so stark gewachsen wie der Onlinehandel. Für die Internetökonomie gelten dabei ganz eigene Regeln: Die Märkte sind oftmals mehrseitig und durch starke Netzwerkeffekte geprägt. Innovation und Information sind die entscheidenden Wettbewerbsparameter. Der Markt entwickelt sich rasant und bringt laufend neue Geschäftsmodelle hervor; die Online-Player agieren zumeist global und verzichten zunehmend auf Intermediäre. Die Autoren beleuchten die Internetökonomie aus kartellrechtlicher Sicht und skizzieren die deutsche und europäische Entscheidungspraxis der letzten Jahre aus den Bereichen Zusammenschlusskontrolle, Kartellverbot und Missbrauchsaufsicht anhand einiger richtungsweisender Fälle. Neben einer wettbewerbspolitischen Einordnung des Fallmaterials wirft der Beitrag einige Schlaglichter auf den Paradigmenwechsel bei der Kartellrechtsanwendung in der Digitalwirtschaft. Neben dem Aufbrechen von Innovationsschranken und Pfadabhängigkeiten gehört eine Auflösung zu eng gesteckter Märkte sowie die Offenhaltung für technische Entwicklungen zu den wesentlichen Eckpfeilern einer zukunftsorientierten Kartellrechtsanwendung. In der Internetökonomie kommt dem Hayek’schen „Wettbewerb als Entdeckungsverfahren“ eine ungeahnte Aktualität zu. Technology and innovation-driven markets pose a challenge for competition authorities and courts. There is hardly any sector that has grown as much in recent years as e-commerce. The Internet sector has its own rationale: Markets are often multi-sided and shaped by strong network effects. Innovation and information become important competitive parameters. Online markets evolve at a fast pace and yield myriad of new business models. Most of the online players operate on a global level and cut out intermediaries or distributors. The authors examine the Internet economy from a competition law perspective by means of a sample of landmark rulings of German and European courts and authorities. They evaluate the cases in terms of competition policy and define the paradigms for a future-oriented application of competition law in digital markets. In Internet economics Hayek’s „competition as a discovery procedure“ gains a new momentum.”


2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 224
Author(s):  
Sri Nur Hari Susanto

This research aims to reconstruct the legal system, especially state administrative law so that it can function as a law that can serve the public interest. Other objectives is to study conceptually harmonize laws and regulations relating to public service. The method used is a normative legal research, which explores the use of a conceptual approach. The results showed that the reconstruction of the administrative law which is oriented toward public service, it must first pay attention to the paradigm shift of the administration of the state itself. It is thus necessary to take measures to harmonize the legislation of sectoral public services based on the principles / legal principles that are generally acceptedPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk merekonstruksi sistem hukum khususnya hokum administrasi negara sehingga dapat difungsikan sebagai hukum yang dapat melayani kepentingan publik. tujuan lainnya adalah melakukan kajian konsepsional mengharmonisasikan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan pelayanan publik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normative, yang membahas menggunakan pendekatan konseptual. (conceptual Approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa rekonstruksi hukum administrasi negara yang memiliki orientasi terhadap pelayanan publik, maka harus terlebih dahulu memperhatikan perubahan paradigma terhadap administrasi negara itu sendiri. Dengan demikian perlu dilakukan langkah-langkah untuk  mengharmonisasikan peraturan perundang-undangan sektoral bidang pelayanan publik dengan berpedoman pada prinsip-prinsip/asas-asas hukum yang berlaku umum


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document