scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NHT DAN SNOWBALL THROWING PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR KELAS VIII SMP AL-NUR CIBINONG

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Irma Susanty
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Grade Student ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

AbstractThe aim of the research was to find out the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement. The learning model compared were NHT(Numbered Head Together), snowball throwing and convensional. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental by 3×1 factorial design. The population was the eight grade student of junior high school in Cibinong district on academic year 2017/2018. The sampling tecnique was cluster random sampling. The size of the sampel was 103 students consisted of 36 students in the first experimental group, 34  students in the second experimental group and 33 students in third experimental group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test. The data was analyzed using unbalanced one-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research was NHT learning model gives better mathematics achievement than Snowball Throwing and convensional learning model, and snowball throwing learning model give better mathematics achievement than convensional learning model.Keywords: NHT, Snowball throwing, mathematics achievement

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SNOWBALL THROWING DAN NHT DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN KELAS VII SMP AVICENNA CILEUNGSI

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati ◽  
Setiani Setiani
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Student Learning Style ◽  
Experimental Group

AbstractThe aim of the research was to find out the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student learning style. The learning model compared were snowball throwing and NHT (Numbered Head Together). The type of the research was a quasi-experimental by 2×3 factorial design. The population was the seven grade student of junior high school in Cileungsi district on academic year 2017/2018. The sampling tecnique was cluster random sampling. The size of the sampel was 60 students consisted of 30 students in the first experimental group and 30 students in second experimental group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and learning style questionnaire. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Snowball Throwing learning model gives better mathematics achievement than NHT learning model, and (2) The students with visual and auditory learning style have the same mathematics achievement and give better mathematics achievement than the students with kinesthetic learning style, (3) In all the students with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning style, snowball throwing learning model give the better mathematics achievement than NHT learning model. (4) In the snowball throwing and NHT learning models, students with auditory and visual learning style have the same mathematics achievement and have the better mathematics achievement than students with kinesthetic learning style.Keywords: Snowball throwing, NHT, learning style, mathematics achievement

scholarly journals PENERAPAN MODEL TSTS DAN NHT PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN FUNGSI EKSPONEN

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati ◽  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Patar Suparman
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Exponential Function ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Achievement Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

The aim of the research was to find out wich one that gives mathematics achievement between Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), Numbered Heads Together (NHT) or conventional learning models in exponential function. The sampel on this research was 108 students consisted of 36 students in the first experimental group, 36 students in the second experimental group and 36 students in the control group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test. The sampling teqnique is cluster random sampling. The analyze prerequisite Lilliefors metod for nourmality test and used Bartlett metod for homogeny tast. The data was analyzed using balanced one-way analysis of variance and to be assumed to Scheffe’ metod. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) TSTS learning model gives better mathematics achievement than NHT and conventional learning model, and NHT learning model gives better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.AbstrakTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui model manakah yang memberikan prestasi matematika antara model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), model Numbered Heads Together (NHT) atau model pembelajaran konvensional pada materi fungsi eksponensial. Sampel pada penelitian ini adalah 108 siswa yang terdiri dari 36 siswa pada kelompok eksperimen pertama, 36 siswa pada kelompok eksperimen kedua dan 36 siswa pada kelompok kontrol. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes hasil belajar matematika. Teknik pengambilan sampel adalah cluster random sampling. Metode analisis Lilliefors prasyarat untuk uji normalitas dan menggunakan metoda Bartlett untuk uji homogen. Data dianalisis menggunakan analisis varians satu satu jalan dengan sel sama dan dilanjutkan uji Scheffe. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut. (1) model pembelajaran TSTS memberikan prestasi matematika yang lebih baik daripada NHT dan model pembelajaran konvensional, dan model pembelajaran NHT memberikan prestasi matematika yang lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran langsung.Kata kunci: TSTS, NHT, konvensional, prestasi matematika.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TSTS–NHT DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENGANTAR BISNIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Business Students ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan :(1) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi dari mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis. (3) Untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi berjumlah 180 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2 dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial dengan menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 yang dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif, TST, NHT, gaya belajar, pengantar bisnis.  Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the NHT type. (2) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have theoretical learning styles and students who have pragmatic learning styles. (3) To determine the interaction between cooperative learning models with learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. This research was conducted at the Methodist University of Indonesia. The population is 180 people. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling. Quasi-experimental research method with 2 x 2 factorial design followed by inferential statistics using two-way ANAVA with a significant level α = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the cooperative learning model type TSTS were higher than the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the NHT type cooperative learning model; (2) the results of introductory business learning students who have theoretical learning styles are higher than the results of introductory business learning students who have pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. Keywords: cooperative learning model, TST, NHT, learning style, business introduction.

scholarly journals EFEKTIFITAS PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NHT DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL PADA PEMBELAJARAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingga Nico Pradana
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Direct Instruction ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Collection Methods

<p>The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of learning models to student achievement. Learning models compared between NHT-CTL, NHT and direct instruction. Method of research used quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3x1. Population of this research was all students class VIII in SMP Negeri at Madiun City. The sampling technique using a stratified cluster random sampling. Samples in this research were 266 students with 91 students as experimental class I, 88 students as experimental class II and 87 students as control class. Data collection methods used documentation and test.Hypothesis testing was performed using one-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testwere concluded that NHT-CTL learning model gave better achievement than NHT learning model and direct instruction, while NHT learning model and direct instruction gave the same achievement. </p>

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PROBLEM POSING PADA POKOK BAHASAN PELUANG DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS XI SMK DI KABUPATEN BOYOLALI TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidayat Bahktiar ◽  
Budi Usodo ◽  
Riyadi Riyadi
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Group Technology ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Problem Posing ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> This research aimed to find out: (1) which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of Think Pair Share (TPS) with Problem Posing, Think Pair Share (TPS) or conventional, (2) which one have better in mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (3) in each learning model, which one have better mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (4) in each student’s level of Adversity Quotient which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing, TPS or conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students class XI majors group technology, health and agriculture of SMK in Boyolali. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the documentation of mathematics achievement, questionnaire of Adversity Quotient and test of mathematics achievement. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows: (1) learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than model of TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional, (2) the students having climbers and campers had same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better  achievement than those having quitters, (3) in each learning model, the students having climbers and campers had the same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better achievement than those having quitters, (4) in each Adversity Quotient, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Think Pair Share (TPS), Problem Posing, and Adversity Quotient (AQ)</p>

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Conceptual Understanding Procedures Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Ditinjau Dari Sikap Ilmiah Peserta Didik Kelas X

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Ayu Suryani ◽  
Susilawati Susilawati ◽  
Kosim Kosim
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Grade Student ◽  
Scientific Attitude ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
10Th Grade ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Research aimed to find the effect of Conceptual Understanding Procedures learning model on the mastery of physics concepts observed from the scientific attitude of 10th-grade students. Type of research was quasi-experiment with 2x2 factorial design. Population was 10th grade students of MIA in SMAN 1 Gunungsari academic year 2017/2018, and the sampling technique was cluster random sampling. The data of the students’ mastery of concepts were collected by giving essays and the scientific attitude was measured by using questionnaires. The collected data were analyzed by applying 2-way ANOVA, assisted by SPSS 16 with (α) significance level of 5%. The results show that significant value for the effect of learning model consider from scientific attitude in amount 0,01 which its was smaller from (α), and significant value for interaction between Conceptual Understanding Procedures learning model with scientific attitude in amount 0,18 which its value is bigger from (α). According to data, can be conclude: there was an effect of Conceptual Understanding Procedures learning model to the mastery of physics concept in terms of scientific attitude from 10th grade student’; and there was no interaction between Conceptual Understanding Procedures learning model to scientific attitude to the mastery of physics concept from 10th grade student’. 

scholarly journals The Effect of Teams Games Tournament (TGT) and Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) Learning Models on The Mains of Discussion Reviewed From Student's Learning Creativity

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Iwan Kurnianto ◽  
Budi Usodo ◽  
Sri Subanti
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

<div class="WordSection1"><p class="BodyAbstract">This study aims to determine: which ones provide better Mathematics learning outcomes; which students have better Mathematics learning achievement, students with high, medium or low creativity; for each creativity level that gives better Mathematics learning outcomes; for each mathematics learning model that has better mathematics learning achievement in students of high, medium, or low creativity on Numbers material for learning TGT, TAI. This type of research is a quasi-experimental research with a 3 x 3 factorial design. The population in this study were all students of grade VII SMP in Kudus Regency 2015/2016 academic year. The research sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples of this study were students of class VII SMP Negeri 1 Mejobo, SMP Negeri 1 Bae, and SMP Negeri 3 Bae. The results obtained, TGT provides better mathematics learning achievement than TAI. students with high and moderate creativity have the same mathematics learning achievement. students with TGT have better mathematics learning achievement than TAI students. students with high and moderate creativity have the same mathematics learning achievement.</p></div><p class="BodyAbstract"> </p>

scholarly journals Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) berbantuan media powerpoint

AKSIOMA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-293
Author(s):  
I Putu Ade Andre Payadnya ◽  
Ida Bagus Ketut Perdata ◽  
Putu Yudi Antara
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

AbstrakJenis penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu (quasi experimental), desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah Post-test Only Control Design. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMAN 6 Denpasar tahun pelajaran 2018/2019. Sempel diambil dengan teknik Cluster Random Sampling, diperoleh 2 kelas yaitu kelas X IPA 3 sebagai kelompok kontrol dan kelas X IPA 4 sebagai kelompok eksperimen dengan total sampel sebanyak 83 siswa. Data dianalisis menggunakan t-test satu pihak (pihak kanan) dengan taraf signifikansi 5%. Rata-rata hasil belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TAI berbantuan media powerpoint () adalah 80,00 sedangkan rata-rata hasil belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran konvensional () adalah 73,7. Hasil analisis data penelitian menunjukkan bahwa thitung > ttabel yaitu 4,01 > 1,98969. Diperoleh thitung > ttabel maka H0 ditolak dan Ha diterima. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut terlihat bahwa hasil belajar kelompok eksperimen yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) berbantuan media powerpoint lebih baik daripada kelompok control yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran konvensional pada siswa kelas X SMAN 6 Denpasar tahun pelajaran 2018/2019. Penyebab lebih baiknya nilai rata-rata siswa pada kelas eksperimen dikarenakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) adalah salah satu tipe atau model pembelajaran kooperatif yang mudah diterapkan, melibatkan, aktivitas seluruh siswa tanpa harus ada perbedaan status, melibatkan peran siswa sebagai tutor sebaya dan reinforcement.Kata kunci: Perbedaan, Hasil Belajar, Kooperatif, TAI, Konvensional.  AbstractThis type of research is quasi-experimental research, the research design used is "Post-test Only Control Design". The population of this study was all students of class X SMAN 6 Denpasar in 2018/2019 academic year. The sample was chosen with the Cluster Random Sampling technique, obtained 2 classes namely Class X IPA 3 as a control group and Class X IPA 4 as an experimental group with a total of 83 students. Data were analyzed using a one-tail t-test (right tail) with a significance level of 5%. The average student learning outcomes taught by the TAI type cooperative learning model assisted by powerpoint media (1) is 80.00 while the average student learning outcomes taught by conventional learning models (2) are 73.7. The results of the analysis of the research data show that tcount> ttable is 4.01> 1.98969. Obtained tcount >ttable then H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. Based on these results it can be seen that the experimental group learning outcomes taught using the cooperative learning model TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) assisted by powerpoint media are better than the control group taught with conventional learning models in class X students of SMAN 6 Denpasar in the 2018/2019 academic year. The reason for the better average scores of students in the experimental class is because the cooperative learning model type TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) is one type or model of cooperative learning that is easy to apply, involves, activities of all students without having differences in status, involving the role of students as tutors peer and reinforcement.Keywords: Differences, Results, Learning, Model, TAI, Conventional.

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI HEURISTIK KRULICK RUDNICK BERBASIS ETNOMATEMATIKA TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN REPRERESENTASI GEOMETRI

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kadir Kadir ◽  
Eva Musyrifah ◽  
Ruspa Dewi Safitri
Keyword(s):  
Junior High School ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fish Food ◽  
Heuristic Strategy ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Mangrove Conservation

The purpose of this research is to analyze the effect of Krulick Rudnick Heuristic Strategy based on ethnomathematics on student geometric representation skill (GRS). The research conductes at Junior High School in Jakarta in Academic Year 2018/2019. This research was quasi-experimental method with randomized posttest only control group, which is involve 27 students in experimental class and 25 students in control class that choosen by cluster random sampling technique. The data collecting for GRS used by using the test. The result of research revealed that student’s GRS taught by Krulick Rudnick’s Heuristic strategy based on ethnomathematics is higher than those taught by expository strategy. That skills include visual, symbolic, and verbal indicators. Ethnomatematics involved include culture of bamboo fishtrap (bubu), transplantation of coral reefs, mangrove conservation, processed fish food, fishing activities (manyang), tourist resorts, historic building, and food served in traditional traditions (sea parties). The conclusion of this show that the use of Krulik Rudnick heuristic strategy based on etnomathematics is more effective in enhanching students’ GRS compared with an expository strategy. (η2=0,102).

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Siswa

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Agustina Novitasari Pour ◽  
Lovy Herayanti ◽  
Baiq Azmi Sukroyanti
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

[Title: The Effect of a Talking Stick Learning Model on Student Learning Activities]. A fun learning environment, active and meaningful for students need to be created by applying active learning model for students that learning model talking stick. This type of research is quasi-experimental. This research aimed to know there is or no effect of talking stick learning model toward students learning activeness. This research implemented in class VIII SMP Negeri 5 Mataram in academic year 2015/2016 from March to April 2016. The technique of sample using cluster random sampling, in order to obtain first-class VIII I totalling 30 students as an experimental class and class VIII E totalling 30 students as the control class. The results of this research are students activeness learning showed by using the instrument is activeness of student learning questionnaire. Based on data analysis showed that t-test was 8.28 and t- table was 2.000 (df = 58). So, t-test > t-table (8.28 > 2.000). This means that there is an effect of talking stick learning model toward students learning activeness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document