scholarly journals Differential diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 102-108
Author(s):  
E. I. Shmelev ◽  
A. E. Ergeshov ◽  
V. Ya. Gergert
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Respiratory Diseases ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Interstitial Lung Diseases ◽  
Antifibrotic Therapy ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Diffuse Lung

The review is devoted to the urgent problem of modern pulmonology: the differential diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (ILF). ILF occupies a special place among many interstitial lung diseases for a number of reasons: 1) it is a deadly disease; 2) early diagnosis and adequate antifibrotic therapy significantly extend the life expectancy of patients; 3) anti-inflammatory drugs (corticosteroids) and cytostatics with ILF that are widely used in other forms of interstitial lung diseases are ineffective and accelerate the progression of the process; 4) the commonality of the main clinical signs (increasing respiratory failure) of various interstitial lung diseases. The list of respiratory diseases with which ILF should be differentiated is huge, and if with diffuse lung lesions of a known nature (disseminated pulmonary tuberculosis, pneumoconiosis, etc.) with a certain experience/qualification, the diagnosis is relatively simple, then the isolation of ILF from the group of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias always represents certain difficulties. The main methods used in the diagnosis of ILF are summarized taking into account current international and national recommendations.

scholarly journals Antifibrotic Therapies and Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (PF-ILD): Building on INBUILD

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2285
Author(s):  
John N. Shumar ◽  
Abhimanyu Chandel ◽  
Christopher S. King
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Interstitial Lung Diseases ◽  
Treatment Pathway ◽  
Antifibrotic Therapy ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
Fibrotic Lung Diseases

Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) describes a phenotypic subset of interstitial lung diseases characterized by progressive, intractable lung fibrosis. PF-ILD is separate from, but has radiographic, histopathologic, and clinical similarities to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Two antifibrotic medications, nintedanib and pirfenidone, have been approved for use in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Recently completed randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of antifibrotic therapy in patients with PF-ILD. The validation of efficacy of antifibrotic therapy in PF-ILD has changed the treatment landscape for all of the fibrotic lung diseases, providing a new treatment pathway and opening the door for combined antifibrotic and immunosuppressant drug therapy to address both the fibrotic and inflammatory components of ILD characterized by mixed pathophysiologic pathways.

Chronic fibrosing progressing interstitial lung disease: a decision of Multidisciplinary Expert Board

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 505-510
Author(s):  
S. N. Avdeev ◽  
S. Yu. Chikina ◽  
I. E. Tyurin ◽  
A. S. Belevskiy ◽  
S. A. Terpigorev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Interstitial Lung Diseases ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Antifibrotic Therapy

Introduction. The natural course of some interstitial lung diseases (ILD) is characterized by progressive fibrosing phenotype resembling idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Until recently, the antifibrotic drug nintedanib was approved for treatment of the only fibrosing ILD which was IPF. A new indication for this drug which has been registered in Russian Federation in 2021 includes other fibrosing ILDs with progressive phenotype (PF-ILDs) and ILD associated with systemic scleroderma (SS-ILD).The aim of this publication is to describe general considerations of the decision of Multidisciplinary Expert Board on diagnosis and treatment of PF-ILDs including SS-ILD.Results. According to the extension in nintedanib use mentioned above, the Expert Board created an algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of patients with PF-ILDs and criteria for nuntedanib administration in PF-ILDs.Conclusion. Antifibrotic therapy is needed for patients with PF-ILDs with the failure of the stanrard therapy. In those patients antifibrotic treatment should be initiated as early as possible to better preserve the lung function.

scholarly journals Gremlin-1 for the Differential Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Versus Other Interstitial Lung Diseases: A Clinical and Pathophysiological Analysis

Lung ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichiro Aoshima ◽  
Yasunori Enomoto ◽  
Shigeki Muto ◽  
Shiori Meguro ◽  
Hideya Kawasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Alveolar Epithelium ◽  
Interstitial Lung Diseases ◽  
Surfactant Protein D ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Pulmonary Functions ◽  
Gremlin 1

Abstract Purpose The differential diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), particularly idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) versus other non-IPF ILDs, is important for selecting the appropriate treatment. This retrospective study aimed to explore the utility of gremlin-1 for the differential diagnosis. Methods Serum gremlin-1 concentrations were measured using an ELISA in 50 patients with IPF, 42 patients with non-IPF ILD, and 30 healthy controls. The baseline clinical data, including pulmonary functions, prognosis, and three serum biomarkers (Krebs von den Lungen-6 [KL6], surfactant protein-D [SP-D], and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]), were obtained through a medical record review for analyzing their associations with serum gremlin-1 concentrations. To evaluate the origin of gremlin-1, we performed immunostaining on lung sections. Results Serum gremlin-1 concentrations were significantly higher in patients with IPF (mean concentration, 14.4 ng/mL), followed by those with non-IPF ILD (8.8 ng/mL) and healthy controls (1.6 ng/mL). The area under the curve for IPF versus non-IPF ILDs was 0.759 (95% confidence interval, 0.661–0.857), which was superior to that of KL6/SP-D/LDH. The sensitivity and specificity for gremlin-1 (cutoff, 10.4 ng/mL) was 72 and 69%, respectively. By contrast, serum gremlin-1 concentrations were not associated with the pulmonary functions nor the prognosis in all patients with ILDs. In immunostaining, the gremlin-1 was broadly upregulated in IPF lungs, particularly at myofibroblasts, bronchiolar/alveolar epithelium, and CD163-positive M2-like macrophages. Conclusions Gremlin-1 may be a useful biomarker to improve the diagnostic accuracy for IPF compared to non-IPF ILDs, suggesting a role of this molecule in the pathogenesis of IPF.

scholarly journals Antifibrotic therapy for fibrotic lung disease beyond idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (153) ◽  
pp. 190022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bridget F. Collins ◽  
Ganesh Raghu
Keyword(s):  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Interstitial Lung Diseases ◽  
High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽  
Pharmacological Agents ◽  
Antifibrotic Therapy ◽  
Fibrotic Lung Diseases

Two antifibrotic medications (nintedanib and pirfenidone) were recommended (conditionally) for the treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in the 2015 IPF evidence-based guidelines. These medications have been shown to reduce the rate of decline in forced vital capacity among patients with IPF over time and are the only two disease-modulating pharmacological agents approved by regulatory agencies and available for clinical use worldwide. With the evolved standard of care for interstitial lung disease evaluation including routine use of high-resolution computed tomography, fibrotic lung diseases other than IPF are increasingly recognised. In addition, it is becoming evident that genetic and pathophysiological mechanisms as well as disease behaviour in patients manifesting other “non-IPF progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases” (non-IPF-PF) may be similar to those in patients with IPF. Thus, it is biologically plausible that pharmacological agents with antifibrotic properties may be efficacious in non-IPF-PF. Indeed, studies are underway or planned to assess the safety and efficacy of nintedanib or pirfenidone among patients with several non-IPF fibrotic lung diseases. In this review, we briefly summarise the use of pirfenidone and nintedanib in IPF as well as the rationale and potential for use of these medications in non-IPF-PF that are being investigated in ongoing and upcoming clinical trials.

scholarly journals The epidemiology of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and interstitial lung diseases at risk of a progressive-fibrosing phenotype

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (150) ◽  
pp. 180077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy L. Olson ◽  
Alex H. Gifford ◽  
Naohiko Inase ◽  
Evans R. Fernández Pérez ◽  
Takafumi Suda
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
Interstitial Lung Diseases ◽  
Global Distribution ◽  
Clinical Classification ◽  
Heterogeneous Nature ◽  
Broad Overview

The availability of epidemiological data relating to interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) has increased over recent years, but information on the prevalence and incidence of ILDs of different aetiologies remains limited. Despite global distribution, the proportion of patients who develop a progressive phenotype across different ILDs is not well known. Disease behaviour is well documented in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis but idiosyncratic in other ILDs that may present a progressive fibrosing phenotype. Possible reasons may include the heterogeneous nature of the aetiology, the complexity of diagnosis (and subsequent documentation of cases) and the methods employed to retrospectively analyse patient databases. This review presents a broad overview of the epidemiological data available for ILDs that may present a progressive-fibrosing phenotype, collectively and stratified according to clinical classification. We also note where further data are needed in comparison to the well-studied IPF indication.

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Chest Imaging ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 453-457
Author(s):  
Cylen Javidan-Nejad
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Edema ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Primary Lung Cancer ◽  
Interstitial Lung Diseases ◽  
Pathologic Diagnosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) represents one of the most common chronic interstitial lung diseases. Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is the pathologic diagnosis of IPF and can be diagnosed when honeycombing is present with a basilar and peripheral predominance and findings not typical of UIP are absent. In the current era, when a diagnosis of UIP is made with confidence on HRCT, biopsy can be avoided. Yet, one must be familiar with mimics of UIP/IPF (most notably pulmonary edema superimposed on emphysema) to avoid confusion misdiagnosis. Radiologists must also be familiar with potential complications of UIP including progression, infection, accelerated fibrosis (which can be lethal) and primary lung cancer (which has an increased incidence in UIP).

scholarly journals Dynamics in diagnoses and pharmacotherapy before and after diagnosing idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 00479-2020
Author(s):  
Jesper Rømhild Davidsen ◽  
Lars Christian Lund ◽  
Christian B. Laursen ◽  
Jesper Hallas ◽  
Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Interstitial Lung Diseases ◽  
Opium Alkaloids ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Oral Corticosteroids ◽  
Drug Treatments ◽  
Respiratory Drugs

BackgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a well-characterised interstitial lung disease. Typically, IPF diagnosis is delayed due to nonspecific symptoms, but can also be delayed due to treatment attempts on false indication or due to treatment targeting common comorbidities. This observational study aimed to assess the dynamics in the medication and diagnosis patterns in the period before and after an IPF diagnosis.MethodsWe identified all Danish patients with IPF between 2002 and 2017. We evaluated new and ongoing drug treatments and incident diagnoses 36 months before and 12 months after an IPF diagnosis by use of Danish nationwide registries. To aid interpretation, 10 random controls were recruited for each case.ResultsA total of 650 IPF patients were identified (median age 73 years (interquartile range 65–78), 70.3% males). Prior to the IPF diagnosis, the most prevalent diagnoses were dyspnoea and non-IPF interstitial lung diseases. For drug use, IPF patients had higher initiation rates for antibiotics, oral corticosteroids and mucolytics. In terms of drug volume, IPF patients used more respiratory drugs, antibiotics, immunosuppressants, corticosteroids, proton pump inhibitors, benzodiazepines and opium alkaloids within the 6 months preceding their IPF diagnosis, compared to the controls. Overall drug use decreased after an IPF diagnosis, mainly due to a reduced glucocorticoid and cardiovascular drug use.ConclusionAmong IPF patients, an increased drug use was observed for diagnoses with symptoms overlapping those of IPF, particularly this was observed during the last 6 months before an IPF diagnosis. This emphasises the need for an increased IPF awareness.

scholarly journals CA 19-9 serum levels in patients with end-stage idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other interstitial lung diseases (ILDs): Correlation with functional decline

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 147997312095842
Author(s):  
Elisabetta Balestro ◽  
Gioele Castelli ◽  
Nicol Bernardinello ◽  
Elisabetta Cocconcelli ◽  
Davide Biondini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Lung Transplant ◽  
Functional Decline ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Interstitial Lung Diseases ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Rapid Progressors ◽  
End Stage

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis presents a progressive and heterogeneous functional decline. CA 19-9 has been proposed as biomarker to predict disease course, but its role remains unclear. We assessed CA 19-9 levels and clinical data in end-stage ILD patients (48 IPF and 20 non-IPF ILD) evaluated for lung transplant, to correlate these levels with functional decline. Patients were categorized based on their rate of functional decline as slow (n = 20; ΔFVC%pred ≤ 10%/year) or rapid progressors (n = 28; ΔFVC%pred ≥ 10%/year). Nearly half of the entire patients (n = 32; 47%) had CA 19-9 levels ≥37kU/L. CA 19-9 levels in IPF were not different from non-IPF ILD populations, however, the latter group had a median CA 19-9 level above the normal cut-off value of 37 KU/l (60 [17–247] kU/L). Among IPF patients, CA 19-9 was higher in slow than in rapid progressors with a trend toward significance (33vs17kU/L; p = 0.055). In the whole population, CA19-9 levels were inversely related with ΔFVC/year (r = −0.261; p = 0.03), this correlation remained in IPF patients, particularly in rapid progressors (r = −0.51; p = 0.005), but not in non. Moreover, IPF rapid progressors with normal CA 19-9 levels showed the greater ΔFVC/year compared to those with abnormal CA 19-9 (0.95 vs. 0.65 L/year; p = 0.03). In patients with end-stage ILD, CA 19-9 may represent a marker of disease severity, whereas its level is inversely correlated with functional decline, particularly among IPF rapid progressors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document