scholarly journals Analisis Perhitungan Harga Pokok Produksi dan Penentuan Harga Jual Produk (Studi Usaha Kerupuk Ikan Bunda Oca Sungai Lekop, Kecamatan Bintan Timur, Kabupaten Bintan)

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Burhan Latif
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Selling Price ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Total Cost ◽  
Literature Reviews ◽  
Basic Production ◽  
The Cost

This study aims to analyze and determine the cost of goods manufactured using the full costing method and the selling price using the cost plus pricing method in the Usaha Kerupuk Ikan Bunda Oca. Full costing is a method of determining production costs consisting of raw material costs, direct labor costs, variable factory overhead costs, and fixed factory overhead costs. Cost plus pricing is a method of determining the selling price of a product by accumulating total cost and desired profit. The method used in this research is descriptive quantitative. Data were collected by direct observation and interviews in the field so that the types of data used were primary data and secondary data obtained from literature reviews. The results show that the basic production costs per kilogram for original and otak-otak fish crackers are approximately Rp23.667,93 and Rp27.596,95 respectively. In addition, the total selling prices including 50% profit per kilogram were estimated to be Rp36.361,17 and Rp42.265,07 for original and otak-otak fish crackers respectively. Our study suggested that the calculation of cost production using full costing method and the selling price using the cost plus pricing method are more effective and accurate compared with conventional methods. This is because the calculation is carried out by considering many cost elements during the production process.Keyword: Cost of Production, Full Costing, Cost Plus Pricing.

scholarly journals Peranan Perhitungan Harga Pokok Produksi Pendekatan Full Costing Dalam Menentukan Harga Jual Dengan Metode Cost Plus Pricing

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26
Author(s):  
Evi Noviasari ◽  
Richad Alamsyah
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Main Element ◽  
Selling Price ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
The Cost

The purpose of this study were to know the role of calculation cost of goods manufactured and  determination of the selling price of shoes in the Heriyanto’s shoes MSME. To knowing the extent of differences in determination the cost of goods manufactured by using the company method and the full costing approach and compare the selling price according to the company's method with using the Cost Plus Pricing. The type of research used is qualitative research. The analytical method used in this study is qualitative descriptive analysis. The data used in this study are primary data. Data were obtained directly through observation and interviews with the Heriyanto’s shoes MSME and data in the form of information on production costs such as raw material costs, labor costs, and factory overhead costs MSME during December 2018. While for secondary data. Data were obtained from intermediary media such as books or literature, journals related to the title of the research, and can also be via the internet. The results of the study it can be concluded that the cost of goods manufactured calculation according Heriyanto’s MSME is lower than the cost of  goods manufactured calculation using the full costing method. The cost of goods manufactured according heriyanto’s MSME is Rp. 15.675/pair or Rp. 313.492/score (Hamer Material) and Rp. 14.600/pair or Rp. 291.992/score (Kavaro Material). While the cost of goods manufactured used the full costing method, which is Rp. 16.310/pair or Rp. 326.201/score (Hamer Material) and Rp. 15.235/pair or Rp. 304.701/score (Kavaro Material). This is caused  factory overhead costs that are not calculate by Heriyanto’s MSME such as electricity costs, gas costs, maintenance costs for machinery and factory vehicles, and depreciation costs.             Determination of selling price must be appropriately because the determination of selling prices that are too high will result in difficulty competition with similar products while the determination of selling prices too low will result in reduced income generated by Heriyanto’s MSME. The difference in determination the cost of good manufactured will affect the Heriyanto’s MSME in determining the selling price, because the cost of goods manufactured is the main element in determination selling price. Calculation of selling prices according Heriyanto’s MSME is Rp. 18.026/pair or Rp. 360.516/score (Hamer Material) and Rp. 16.790/pair or Rp. 335.791/score (Kavaro material). While the selling price used the Cost Plus Pricing method which is Rp. 18.814/pair or Rp. 376.281/score (Hamer Material) and Rp. 17.578/pair or Rp. 351.556/score (Kavaro material). Keywords : Cost of Goods manufactured, Selling Price, Full Costing, Cost Plus Pricing

scholarly journals Effect of Calculation of Cost of Production on Selling Price of Products Manufacturing Companies in Papua (Case Study CV. Sagita Grafika)

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 6-10
Author(s):  
Mugiati ◽  
Bosta Sihombing
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Selling Price ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Total Cost ◽  
Method Of Calculation ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Costing Analysis

This study aims to determine how the effect of calculating the cost of an order made by the company and the method of calculation of full costing of the product selling price fixing mold. The data used is primary data, order data produced in the period from January 2013 to December 2013, the secondary data obtained from interviews and literature. From these results it can be seen that CV. Sagita Grafika calculate the cost of the product by using the order cost method that produces cost price and the selling price that is incompatible with existing theory, in which the charging of indirect labor and overhead costs shared equally on all types of orders in the amount of Rp. 11.78825 million for indirect labor costs and Rp. 3.1243 million for overhead costs so that volume orders will bear fewer overhead costs equal to the volume of orders more. By using a full costing analysis generated calculation method that the volume of orders that more will earn imposition overhead costs more, because in this calculation loading overhead costs charged by direct labor hours incurred for each order. So that orders with a total volume that many will use a lot of labor hours and vice versa. So in this study that most large orders received charging overhead is the order BS-02 Rp. 31,115,590.92 and most orders received little overhead loading is KK-01 orders in the amount of Rp. 2,208,622.32. Results of a comparison between the cost of the company with the full costing is the total cost of less Rp. 27,499,540.57, the selling price of Rp. 5,866,543.90, while the larger profit generated by using the full costing method that is Rp. 21,632,996.67

scholarly journals The Appropriate Calculation Cost of Goods Manufactured as Pricing Strategy for Small Sized Enterprises (SMEs)

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-10
Author(s):  
Popon Rabia Adawia ◽  
Aprilia Puspasari ◽  
Ayu Azizah ◽  
Asep Asep ◽  
Dede Mustomi
Keyword(s):  
Raw Materials ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Selling Price ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Calculation Results ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Variance Calculation ◽  
Supporting Materials ◽  
Descriptive Method

This research aims to identify all production costs incurred in production, to calculate the cost of goods manufactured correctly using the Process Costing Method and decision making for determining the selling price of shoes. The research was taken in one of small-sized enterprises shoe factory in East Karawang. The research method is descriptive comparative with a qualitative approach. The descriptive method is used to describe the production costs incurred in the production process including the raw materials costs, supporting materials costs, labor costs, and factory overhead costs. In this research, the data used are primary and secondary data. The COGM calculation results in show that there is variance calculation between company system and process costing method. It is due to calculations that companies do not identify production costs in detail, therefore the company’s COGM calculation is inaccurate. The COGM calculation appropriately can be the company’s strategy to determine the selling price. so that company profits can continue to increase.

scholarly journals ANALISIS ALOKASI BIAYA BERSAMA UNTUK PENENTUAN BIAYA PRODUKSI NUTELLA CHEESE CUPCAKE DAN COOKIES CUPCAKE PADA SHMILY CUPCAKES SAMRAT MANADO

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia A. Tumbol ◽  
Jantje Tinangon ◽  
Stanley Kho Walandouw
Keyword(s):  
Business Processes ◽  
Cost Allocation ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Operating Costs ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Selling Price ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Material Costs ◽  
Marketing Costs ◽  
The Cost

Guidance of in the company needs to improve its business processes so that the appropriate production produced products can compete in the market . One such effort is to utilize one or several main raw material to produce two or more types of products are almost the same but with different variations to accurately allocate costs to each product so as to maximize profits.To allocate these costs accurately on each product is the relative sales value method . Where the data used is primary data obtained directly from the company. The data used in the form of selling price , direct labor costs , raw material costs , plant operating costs and marketing costs .From the analysis conducted through joint cost allocation calculation using the relative sales value method can be seen that the results obtained from the calculation of the cost allocation with the Cupcake Shmily using the relative sales value method of cost allocation obtained with Nutella Cheese Cupcake for Rp 56 723 and Cookies Cupcake for Rp . 60 108 of the total cost of Rp116.716 shared, derived from raw material costs, direct labor costs and factory overhead costs.

Harga Pokok Produksi Dalam Menentukan Harga Jual Melalui Metode Cost Plus Pricing Dengan Pendekatan Full Costing

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-132
Author(s):  
Dian Purnama ◽  
Saiful Muchlis ◽  
Andi Wawo
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Production Equipment ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Selling Price ◽  
Setting Process ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive ◽  
The Cost

The purpose of this study is to determine the calculation of the cost of production and selling price setting process at PT. Istiqamah Prima Sejahtera. Calculating the cost of production for the full costing method and setting the selling price using a cost plus pricing. This type of research is quantitative research. Based on the characteristics of the issues raised by the researchers, the study is classified as a quantitative descriptive research. The data used in this study are primary data obtained directly from the company such as data from interviews with the company and the data contains information on the production costs of companies during the month of September 2016. As for the secondary data obtained from books, journals, internet or other media which supported this research. From the analysis of the data, the results showed that the company's calculation of the cost of production is lower than the production cost price calculation using a full costing method. Cost of production is calculated using a method that is equal Rp85.472 company and according to the full costing method that is equal to Rp85.962. This is because in the calculation of factory overhead cost companies do not take into account some costs into the cost of production as the cost of maintenance and maintenance of production equipment, and the cost of depreciation on a shredded fish product. In addition, setting the selling price of the company only to estimate the selling price calculations per kg of shredded fish with a mark-up rate of 40%, amounting to Rp120,000 to set the selling price on the packaging of 100 grams, 250 grams and 500 grams. While using the cost plus pricing method with a mark up of 40% lower than the selling price according to the company in the amount of USD 12 683. (100 grams), Rp 30,488 (250 grams), and USD 60 798 (500 grams). So, setting the selling price should be done precisely because the price is too high will make the product less competitive, while the sale price is too low will lead to losses for the company.

scholarly journals Penentuan Harga Pokok Produksi Dengan Metode Full Costing Sebagai Dasar Penetapan Harga Jual Pada UKM Tahu AN Anugrah

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16
Author(s):  
Sintia Anggreani ◽  
I Gde Sudi Adnyana
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Selling Price ◽  
Accurate Calculation ◽  
Calculation Results ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Keywords Cost

Cost of Goods Manufacture is an important component that must be calculated by the company in order to determine the selling price of the product. SMEs are often wrong in calculating the Cost of Goods Manufacture they do. One of the mistakes made by SMEs in calculating the Cost of Goods Manufacture is that the calculations carried out are very simple and do not specify all costs used in the production process to produce a product. This study aims to analyze (1) the calculation of the Cost of Goods Manufacture in SMEs Tahu AN Anugrah , (2) the determination of Cost of Goods Manufacture with the full costing method in SMEs Tahu AN Anugrah, and (3) the difference in calculation of Cost of Goods Manufacture according to SMEs AN Anugrah and according full costing method and its effect on selling prices.                The data used in this study are primary data and secondary data. The primary data used is obtained from the results of interviews and recording of information needed directly in SMEs Tahu AN Anugrah. While the secondary data are is obtained from literature studies such as previous journals, related books, documentation and reading in accordance with the research title.  The Research results show, there are differences in the calculation results of the Cost of Goods Manufacture carried out by the SMEs and by the full costing method. The calculation of Cost of Goods Manufacture by SMEs Tahu AN Anugrah for White Tofu products is Rp 200 and Yellow Tofu Rp 201.12 while by the full costing method for White Tofu products is Rp 218.41 and Yellow Tofu Rp 228.44. So that, there are differences in the calculation results, namely for White Tofu Rp 18.41 and Yellow Tofu Rp 27.32. Differences in calculation are due to the full costing method is more detailed by including all elements of production costs. This shows that the method provides a more accurate calculation to be able to set a better selling price.  Keywords: Cost of Goods Manufacture, Full Costing, Selling Prices, SMEs

scholarly journals Analisis Perhitungan Harga Pokok Produksi Dan Kelayakan Usaha Sedotan Prupuk (Phragmites karka (Retz) Trin ex Steud) Di Desa Tumbang Nusa, Pulang Pisau

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-104
Author(s):  
Arief R. Hakim ◽  
Asro L. Indrayanti ◽  
Novita Chandrawijaya
Keyword(s):  
Raw Materials ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Selling Price ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Capital Financing ◽  
Phragmites Karka ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
Break Even Point ◽  
The Cost

Communities in Tumbang Nusa Village, Jabiren Raya District Pulang Pisau Regency began to develop prupuk (Phragmites karka (Retz) Trin ex Steud) as a straw material to replace plastik that is difficult to decompose. This study aims to calculate the cost of production, develop a selling price scenario and conduct a feasibility study on the development of straws from prupuk. Primary data was collected from 20 people involved in making pru[uk straws and supplemented with secondary data from various previous studies and publications.The results of this study indicate that the cost of production of prupuk straws ranges between IDR 374.3 - IDR 408.68 per pcs. The proportion of prupuk straw financing is for the purchase of raw materials (59.72% to 65.14%), labor costs (34.36% to 39.58%) and overhead costs for capital financing (0.6% to 0.7 %). Determination of the selling price is done by adding the cost of goods manufactured to the desired profit (mark up method) with scenario I with a profit rate of 10% (amounting to IDR 389.04 for large packages and IDR 449.54 for small packages) to scenario VI with a level of 60% profit (IDR 565.88 for large packages and IDR 653.88 for small packages). In terms of price, determining the selling price up to scenario VI can still compete with the prices of its competitors, namely bamboo straws. Although the price of the product is competitive, the level of labor productivity is very low. At the break even point condition, the maximum labor income is only IDR 180,062.74. When compared with the UMR District of Pulang Pisau, the income contribution received from making this purun straw is very small (only 6.11%). In order to achieve an income level equivalent to the UMR of Pulang Pisau Regency, a production turnover of 383 pcs per person per day is needed or equal to 7,652 pcs per person per month. In order to improve the quality and quantity of prupuk straws, it is necessary to apply production technology.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN METODE TARGET COSTING DALAM PERHITUNGAN HARGA POKOK PRODUKSI PADA PEMBUATAN PRODUK INNER CARTON (STUDI KASUS PT. MAKMUR MULTI MITRA)

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fitri Farah Diba ◽  
Cholis Hidayati
Keyword(s):  
Raw Materials ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Selling Price ◽  
Target Costing ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Manufacturing Costs ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
Materials Used

ABSTRACTIn this study using descriptive qualitative research methods. Case study at PT. Makmur Multi Mitra which is engaged in the manufacture of inner carton products operating in Surabaya and research only focuses on making inner cartons for the period 2015. The data source used in this study is internal data sources namely data obtained from within the company consisting of primary data and secondary data. Management of PT. Makmur Multi Mitra has determined the price of its inner carton products of Rp. 5,000.00 per pcs and the price is lower than its competitors. From the selling price the company wants a profit of Rp. 1,500.00 per pcs but after analyzing the manufacturing costs which include the cost of raw materials, direct labor costs, and overhead costs it turns out that the actual profit obtained is only Rp. 1,369.00 because the actual cost of production is Rp. 3,631.00. Therefore, the authors provide a solution to reduce production costs by offering three scenarios and one of the scenarios suggested to be implemented is to make changes by replacing direct raw materials used by the company with slightly lower quality raw materials (KW II) while replacing materials for engineering coating of prints to reduce manufacturing costs to Rp. 3,465.00 per pcs inner carton or smaller Rp. 35.00 from the target cost and get a profit of Rp. 1,535.00 per pcs. Keywords: Target Costing, Cost of Production, Costs, Selling Price

scholarly journals Application of Economic Order Quantity Method in Controlling Raw Material Inventory

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (08) ◽  
Author(s):  
John EHJ. FoEh ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Economic Order Quantity ◽  
Economic Order ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Optimal Order ◽  
Order Quantity ◽  
Total Cost ◽  
Material Supply ◽  
The Cost

The research aims to determine the optimal order quantities of raw materials using Economic Order Quantity (EOQ), the total cost of raw material inventory, reorder point, order frequency, and application of the EOQ method on the CV. XYZ Kupang in an effort to optimize inventory costs. The data used in this study consisted of primary data and secondary data both qualitatively and quantitatively related to raw material supply. Primary data were obtained through direct observation and interviews with various key respondents at CV. XYZ Kupang. Secondary data were obtained from the documents and reports from Management Company. The results of this study indicate that the optimal quantity of raw material orders at CV. XYZKupang is 63.80 m3 in 2017, 63.04 m3 in 2018, and 72.80 m3 in 2019. The total cost of the company’s raw material supply that issued if EOQ policy appliedRp. 32.267.554 in the year 2017, Rp. 24.507.185 in the year 2018, and Rp. 28.020.251 in the year 2019.CV. XYZ Kupang must perform an order back in the level of inventories of 16.74 m3 in 2017, at 10.08 m3 in 2018, and 9.82 m3 in 2019.6.90 m3 in 2017, 6.20 m3 in 2017, and 5.75 m3 in 2019. CV. XYZ Kupang had to order as many as 9 times in the year 2017, 8 times in the year 2017, and 8 times in the year 2019. Thus the number of all bookings in the year 2017 of 7.09 m3, by the year 2018 of 7.88 m3 and in the year 2019 of 9.1 m3.CV. XYZ Kupang can optimize the cost of supplies, neither order of the cost of storage. If EOQ method applied, there is a saving from the total cost of the inventory in the year 2017 is Rp. 72.523.229, by the year 2018 is Rp. 68.476.912, and in 2019 is Rp. 76.468.558.

SELISIH BIAYA PRODUKSI SEBAGAI ALAT PENGENDALIAN MANAJEMEN PT INDO PUSAKA BERAU

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (02) ◽  
pp. 397
Author(s):  
SAFITRI NURHIDAYATI ◽  
RIZKI AMELYA SYAM
Keyword(s):  
Raw Materials ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Analytical Tool ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Material Costs ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Cost

This study aims to analyze whether the difference that occurs in the cost of raw materials, direct labor, and factory overhead costs between the standard costs and the actual costs in PLTU LATI is a difference that is favorable or unfavorable. Data collection techniques with field research and library research. The analytical tool used is the analysis of the difference in raw material costs, the difference in direct labor costs and the difference in factory overhead costs. The hypothesis in this study is that the difference allegedly occurs in the cost of raw materials, direct labor costs, and factory overhead costs at PT Indo Pusaka Berau Tanjung Redeb is a favorable difference. The results showed that the difference in the cost of producing MWh electricity at PT Indo Pusaka Berau Tanjung Redeb in 2018, namely the difference in the price of raw material costs Rp. 548,029.80, - is favorable, the difference in quantity of raw materials is Rp. 957,216,602, - is (favorable) , the difference in direct labor costs Rp 2,602,642,084, - is (unfavorable), and the difference in factory overhead costs Rp 8,807,051,422, - is (favorable) This shows that the difference in the overall production cost budget is favorable or profitable. This beneficial difference shows that the company is really able to reduce production costs optimally in 2018.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document