scholarly journals Pemahaman Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah Terhadap Penerapan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 23 Tahun 2018 Tentang Penurunan Tarif Pajak Penghasilan

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunawan Hartadi ◽  
Bambang Suryono ◽  
Titik Mildawati

UMKM is considered as one of primary contributors to state revenue. Due to its largest tax contributor, UMKM, the Small-Medium Enterprises (SMES), is authorised by government perceiving distinctive final income tax. Since July 1st 2018, its income tax changed from 1% of gross turnover to 0.5% owing to a regulation PP No. 23 of 2018. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impact of PP No. 23 of 2018 application on the SMEs' desires to expand their business. Through this regulation, the calculation of income tax for SMEs has been converted 1% of gross turnover to 0.5%. This study applied qualitative research with an expectancy theory. In this study, the interviews were conducted to three informants. As the results, this study indicated that the government regulation assisted improving the desires of SMES to escalate their businesses. Then, the SMES generally did not understand the new regulations due to lack of socialization about PP No. 23 of 2018. Moreover, the regulation was identified as an encouragement so that SMEs would not divert into online sales system. Thus, the respondents running SMEs suggested the government to synchronize both central and regional regulations so that SMEs sectors could be increased rapidly.

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
Faiqotul Ilmia ◽  
Sri Andriani

In achieving the desired development by Indonesia, the government requires revenue from the State Tax Revenue and Non-Tax Revenues. One of the efforts undertaken by the Directorate General of Taxation (DGT) is enacted Government Regulation No. 46 of 2013, the tax base used is the gross turnover of each month at 1 % final income tax rates. The emergence of these regulations is to provide convenience for taxpayers in determining the amount of income tax payable, but enactment of these rules in the middle of giving trouble for taxpayers in the calculation, depositing and reporting taxes for the year 2013. Purpose of this study was to determine the impact of treatment of PP 46 of 2013 on income tax on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Gresik skull cap industry. This study used a qualitative descriptive approach with the aim of obtaining a picture of the object that is easily observed in the form of words on the focus of research on the impact of the enactment of Regulation 46 of 2013. The 3 (three) object of research is no skull cap Industry SMEs in Gresik . Data analysis aims to simplify the data processed, making it easy to read and interpret. Data were collected by means of observation, interviews, documentation. Analysis of the data through three stages: data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The results showed that the enactment of Regulation 46 of 2013 not only creates difficulties in terms of computation, depositing and reporting just as effective mid-year, but still there who do not know the regulations in terms of both has been the enactment of these regulations and in terms of the calculation mechanism. As for other effects of the government’s enactment of legislation, namely the amount of income tax payable is higher than the income tax calculations using norm bookkeeping or net income.


2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sintya Clara Assa ◽  
Jantje J. Tinangon ◽  
Rudy Pusung

Economic development of a country , is also caused by a number of micro, small and medium enterprises , as well as existing tax system in Indonesia has undergone some changes , to increase state revenue through tax receipts . This study aims to compare the general taxation system in accordance with the Government Regulation number 46 where applied in July 2013 and began to be paid in August 2013. Object of research is PT Berkat Teknik Jaya is a micro, small and medium enterprises company engaged in agriculture and trade. By taking the information in the form and amount of the income tax returns of the company. Based on calculations, by comparing the amount of tax due in the year 2013 by using each system of taxation, it is known that the amount of tax to be paid in accordance with the general taxation system that is Rp.21.000.000 while using Government Regulation No. 46 then the tax should in the pay of Rp .25.787.000. Based on the calculation and analysis , each system of taxation for micro, small and medium enterprises have advantages and disadvantages , but by terms of the amount of tax to be paid then it is more advantageous for the application in accordance with the general taxation system.


Author(s):  
Ni Wayan Maharatih

The tax is the most important sector for the country in the framework of national development. Government Regulation Number 46 the Year 2013 of income taxes from businesses that received or obtained taxpayers who have certain gross circulation create worry and fear the small businessmen who are pioneering efforts. The purpose of this research was to know and analyze the arrangements regarding the imposition of Final income tax on perpetrators of small medium enterprises according to the Government Regulation number. 46 the year 2013. This type of research is the study of the law normative approach to legislation. The results showed that according to article 2 paragraph (1) the Government Regulation Number 46 the Year 2013 mentioned businessmen who generate income that does not exceed Rp 4.8 Billion in future tax levied a tax of 1% of the total circulation gross (revenue) per month. But in fact, the imposition of a tax of 1% for small medium enterprises whose income Rp Rp-300jt 4, 8 m is not carried out effectively. Pajak merupakan sektor terpenting bagi negara dalam rangka pembangunan nasional. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun 2013 tentang Pajak Penghasilan dari Usaha yang diterima atau diperoleh wajib pajak yang memiliki peredaran bruto tertentu membuat khawatir dan ketakutan pelaku usaha kecil yang sedang merintis usahanya. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaturan mengenai pengenaan PPh Final pada Pelaku UMKM menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor. 46 Tahun 2013. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Penerapan tarif 1% dari pendapatan bagi Pelaku UMKM tidak bisa dipahami kecil, mengingat Pendapatan ini dihitung bukan dari hasil keuntungan, karena tidak bisa dijamin jika berpendapatan  besar maka pasti keuntungannya besar. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Menurut Pasal 2 ayat (1) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun 2013 disebutkan pelaku usaha yang menghasilkan pendapatan yang tidak melebihi Rp. 4,8 Miliar dalam satu masa pajak dikenakan pajak sebesar 1% dari jumlah peredaran bruto (pendapatan) setiap bulan. Namun pada kenyataannya, pembebanan pajak 1% bagi UMKM yang berpendapatan Rp. 300jt-Rp. 4,8M tidak terlaksana secara efektif. Apalagi pengenaan 1% dari pendapatan ini dianggap tidak adil karena dibebankan tanpa melihat apakah pelaku UMKM ini berada dalam keadaan untung ataupun rugi, dan juga diberlakukan bagi seluruh pelaku UMKM.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 36-45
Author(s):  
Yotasa Raidah Khairiyah ◽  
Muhammad Heru Akhmadi

Government Regulation Number 23 of 2018 is a form of tax incentives given by the government to tax payers for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). The regulations aim at realizing fair taxation and increasing state revenue. Data from the Ministry of UKM shows that the number of MSMEs in Indonesia until 2018 is 64,194,057 units and absorbs 107,376,540 people. This study examines the compliance of SMEs in paying taxes before and after the enactment of tax incentives. Using a qualitative approach, this study seeks to explain the impact of incentive policies on MSME taxpayer compliance and state revenue. Respondents were observed in the South of Tangerang city area with interview techniques. The results of the study showed that in terms of compliance, statistically 2016-2018 showed an increase in registered taxpayers, but the SMEs did not voluntarily pay taxes because they felt they had not benefited directly. In addition, the ability to keep books is still limited. This has an impact on the side of state revenue, which is still low tax revenue from the MSME sector when compared to taxation revenues from other sectors


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Susi Dwi Mulyani ◽  
Victor Siagian ◽  
Henik Hari Astuti Astuti ◽  
Aris Riantori Faisal ◽  
Giawan Nur Fitria

<em>Community Service Activities are one part of the Tri Dharma of Higher Education which is carried out as a form of direct contribution of academics in this case the Faculty of Economics and Business, Trisakti University (FEB Usakti) to the community. The purpose of this activity is to provide training on: i) review of tax incentives for MSME actors provided by the Indonesian government in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of Finance; ii) tax administration application training to obtain tax incentives; and iii) training on reporting procedures for tax incentives that have been received by MSME actors. On this occasion the FEB Usakti team had the opportunity to collaborate with PD Pasar Jaya, market unit of Santa as a partner, to socialize tax incentives for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This pandemic has caused a decline in the performance of MSMEs which then resulted in a very significant decrease in MSME income. The Indonesian government through the Ministry of Finance made a relaxation policy in the form of tax incentives for taxpayers affected by the 2019 corona virus disease pandemic. The Indonesian Ministry of Finance then issued a Minister of Finance Regulation number 44/pmk.03/2020, the last with PMK number 82/PMK.03/2021, one of which provides relaxation for PPh payments to MSME actors. Many MSME business actors do not know about this tax facility. For MSME actors who are subject to Final Income Tax based on Government Regulation Number 23 of 2018, due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the income tax is borne by the government. The PPh period borne by the government starts in April 2020 and has been extended several times. When the training was held, which was February 24, 2021, the government-paid PPh facilities were still valid and extended until December 31, 2021. This training can increase the understanding of MSME actors towards the tax facilities provided by the government, so that they will take advantage of this facility.</em>


BESTUUR ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Siti Rahma Novikasari ◽  
Duc Quang Ly ◽  
Kerry Gershaneck

<p>Government Regulation No. 46/2013 has not been optimal in providing legal compliance on taxation for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), especially in Yogyakarta. This policy was evaluated and amended with Government Regulation No. 23/2018. The amendment in tax policy for MSME actors was this research background to examine: First, how does the final income tax policy impact MSME taxpayers' compliance in Yogyakarta? Second, what are the legal compliance constraints of MSME taxpayers? The method used in this research was a juridical empirical, supported with the statute and conceptual approach. The results showed that the amendment in the final income tax tariff policy from 1% to 0.5%, as well as provide legal certainty of the timeframe of taxation had a positive impact on increasing taxpayer compliance. There was an increase in the number of taxpayers to 41,000 in 2019, or an increase of 15.5% compared to the number of taxpayers in 2017. However, tariff reduction has not been the answer to taxpayer non-compliance, the Regional Office of the Directorate General of Taxes of the Special Region of Yogyakarta still found tax avoidance. Tax compliance constraints were also caused by taxpayers' distrust of the government, poor tax morale, and tax knowledge. The government needs to conduct a cooperative compliance approach in taxation policies based on trust and dialogue between taxpayers and the government to improve MSME taxpayer compliance.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Tax Compliance; Final Income Tax Regulation; Micro; Small; Medium Enterprises.</p>


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuli Rawun ◽  
Agus T. Poputra ◽  
Lintje Kalangi

In an effort to increase voluntary compliance with tax obligations and encourage the contribution of revenues from the UMKM sector, the Government has issued Government Regulation No. 46 2013. The new Tax Regulation has the advantage of rates that are used less than the previous fare, ie 1% of gross turnover.Regulation No. 46 2013 taxpayer applies for personal and / or agency that has a certain gross income, ie income less than 4.8 M. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of adoption of Government Regulation No. 46 2013 of Paying Income Tax by Taxpayers at KPP Pratama Manado. The analytical method used is using two different test samples / dependent groups (paired) or Paired Sample T Test. Paired Sample t test course used when the two groups are interconnected. Two paired sample means a sample with the same subject but have two different treatments or measurements of, for example, before and after. Results of this study indicate that there is a difference between before and after the enactment of Government Regulation No. 46 Year 2013, but the difference that causes a decrease in the amount of tax paid by individual taxpayers who use the recording but for individual taxpayers who use the books there is no significant difference. As for corporate taxpayers that difference causes an increase on the amount of income tax payments by using final tax. Thus the application of Regulation No. 46 Year 2013 needs to be socialized again to taxpayers who are not registered in the KPP Pratama Manado in order to increase the amount of income tax payments.


Author(s):  
Lina Said

The Government has issued a new provision on Income Tax on Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), namely Government Regulation Number 23 the Year of 2018 about Income Tax Of Businesses Received or Obtained by Taxpayers Who Have Certain Gross Circulation, effective from 1st July 2018. The Government Regulation revokes Government Regulation Number 46 the year 2013 which has been effective for five years since its enactment on 1st July 2013. This new regulation is considered very important, especially for MSMEs because it regulates the reduction in final income tax rates for MSMEs with a turnover of maximum Rp. 4.8 billion per year, to 0,5% originally 1% (Government Regulation No.46/2013). The method used is descriptive analysis with a quantitative approach using questionnaires with respondents are MSMEs taxpayers in the knitting industry. The results of the research show that in general, knitting industry MSMEs do not know and understand about the implementation of Government Regulation Number 23 the Year of 2018. Taxpayer's perception of fairness is at 3.04, Certainty at 3.14, Convenience 3.20, and Economy/Efficiency 3.50.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Sizka Rismaningsih Lestary ◽  
Memed Sueb ◽  
Ivan Yudianto

This research aims to identify the effect of fairness, socialization, and understanding on the Micro Small Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) taxpayer compliance towards Government Regulation number 23/2018 regarding income tax from business received or accrued by taxpayers who have certain gross turnover. This research used a quantitative approach, and data were collected using the Likert scale questionnaire. In this research, the population was 283 SME actors registered at the Cooperatives and Small and Medium Enterprises Office, Bandung. The sampling method used was purposive sampling. The data analysis technique used in this research is path analysis. Based on the partial test on the first regression model hypothesis, tax fairness and tax socialization are positively and significantly associated with the tax understanding. The second regression model hypothesis's partial test indicates that tax fairness does not affect, while the taxation socialization and understanding of taxation positively affect MSME taxpayers' compliance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Chandrika Aditya

In July 2013, Indonesia implemented the presumptive tax regime on micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) by assigning Government Regulation No.46/2013. This regulation simplified the tax administration and provides tax cuts to MSMEs to help them grow and encourage voluntary tax compliance, which eventually will increase their contribution to state revenue. This study provides an analysis of the implementation of this new tax regime by comparing related literature on practices of this tax regime in many countries with the recent conditions in Indonesia after this regulation was applied. It seems that the new tax regime encourages voluntary tax compliance and stimulates the contribution of MSMEs to state revenue. However, some challenges, such as different definitions, lack of tax knowledge, impartiality to business losses, and the indication of tax avoidance must be overcome by the government by improving policies that favor MSMEs. Keywords: Indonesia, MSMEs, presumptive tax, threshold


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document