scholarly journals Maximal stability limits in adolescents with Tourette syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 013-022
Author(s):  
Blanchet Mariève ◽  
Prince François ◽  
Lemay Martin ◽  
Chouinard Sylvain ◽  
Messier Julie
Keyword(s):  
Postural Control ◽  
Tourette Syndrome ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Eyes Closed ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
Eyes Open ◽  
Stability Limits

We explored if adolescents with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) had functional postural control impairments and how these deficits are linked to a disturbance in the processing and integration of sensory information. We evaluated the displacements of the center of pressure (COP) during maximal leaning in four directions (forward, backward, rightward, leftward) and under three sensory conditions (eyes open, eyes closed, eyes closed standing on foam). GTS adolescents showed deficits in postural stability and in lateral postural adjustments but they had similar maximal COP excursion than the control group. The postural performance of the GTS group was poorer in the eyes open condition (time to phase 1 onset, max-mean COP). Moreover, they displayed a poorer ability to maintain the maximum leaning position under the eyes open condition during mediolateral leaning tasks. By contrast, during forward leaning, they showed larger min-max ranges than control subjects while standing on the foam with the eyes closed. Together, these findings support the idea that GTS produces subclinical postural control deficits. Importantly, our results suggest that postural control disorders in GTS are highly sensitive to voluntary postural leaning tasks which have high demand for multimodal sensory integration.

Nociceptive capacity of plantar irritating stimulus reduction influences postural control in children, teenagers, and adults.

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janin Marc ◽  
Lisandro Antonio Ceci ◽  
Rodolfo Borges Parreira
Keyword(s):  
Postural Control ◽  
Postural Balance ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Sensory Organization ◽  
Pressure Area ◽  
Adolescents And Adults ◽  
Eyes Open

Introduction: Sensory information from vestibular, visual, proprioception, and feet contribute on postural control. Plantar afferent contribution comes from the tactile and nociceptive cues of the plantar sole. Nociceptive capacity of plantar irritating stimulus (NCPIS) is one of the foot problems that induce nociception. Objective: Was to determine the postural impact of sensory input flow modifications induced by foam in people with and without nociceptive plantar irritating stimuli in different ages (children, adolescents, and adults). Method: 120 participants with (NP) and X without (Ct) NCPIS in different age group were evaluated (20 subjects in each age group and conditions). Postural balance assessment was performed during two-legged stance test using a force platform. Postural recoding was performed with eyes open in two conditions: on a hard surface and on a foam surface. The postural balance parameter analyzed was center of pressure area and variance of speed. Results: Area and variance of speed in control group increased, whereas decreased in NP subjects. No differences were observed for mean speed. In the Ct group, nociceptor and mechanoreceptor afferent sensations on foam induced postural variation with more oscillations (area and speed). Conclusion: NCPIS influenced postural control, and this foam neutralization of afferent nociception induced a new sensory organization. Foam surface imitated afferent plantar sensory information, induced postural variation as measured by CoP parameters with increasing postural control in subjects without NCIPS and decreasing postural control in subjects with NCPIS.

scholarly journals Variability in Postural Control With and Without Balance-Based Torso- Weighting in People With Multiple Sclerosis and Healthy Controls

2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (10) ◽  
pp. 1489-1498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte M. Hunt ◽  
Gail Widener ◽  
Diane D. Allen
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Postural Control ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Quiet Standing ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Movement Variability ◽  
Lateral Direction ◽  
Eyes Closed ◽  
Eyes Open

Background People with multiple sclerosis (MS) have diminished postural control, and center of pressure (COP) displacement varies more in this population than in healthy controls. Balance-based torso-weighting (BBTW) can improve clinical balance and mobility in people with MS, and exploration using both linear and nonlinear measures of COP may help determine whether BBTW optimizes movement variability. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of BBTW on people with MS and healthy controls during quiet standing. Design This was a quasi-experimental study comparing COP variability between groups, between eye closure conditions, and between weighting conditions in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions. Methods Twenty participants with MS and 18 healthy controls stood on a forceplate in 4 conditions: eyes open and closed and with and without BBTW. Linear measures of COP displacement included range and root mean square (RMS). Nonlinear measures included approximate entropy (ApEn) and Lyapunov exponent (LyE). Three-way repeated-measures analyses of variance compared measures across groups and conditions. The association between weighting response and baseline nonlinear variables was examined. When significant associations were found, MS subgroups were created and compared. Results The MS and control groups had significantly different range, RMS, and ApEn values. The eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions had significantly different range and RMS values. Change with weighting correlated with LyE (r=−.70) and ApEn (r=−.59). Two MS subgroups, with low and high baseline LyE values, responded to BBTW in opposite directions, with a significant main effect for weighting condition for the LyE variable in the medial-lateral direction. Limitations The small samples and no identification of impairments related to LyE at baseline were limitations of the study. Conclusions The LyE may help differentiate subgroups who respond differently to BBTW. In both subgroups, LyE values moved toward the average of healthy controls, suggesting that BBTW may help optimize movement variability in people with MS.

scholarly journals Balance Markers in Adolescents at 1 Month Postconcussion

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596711769550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Coralie Rochefort ◽  
Coren Walters-Stewart ◽  
Mary Aglipay ◽  
Nick Barrowman ◽  
Roger Zemek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Age Distribution ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Significant Group ◽  
Dual Task Condition ◽  
Eyes Closed ◽  
Eyes Open ◽  
Balance Deficits

Background: The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) shows that balance tends to recover within days after a concussion, whereas measures of the movement of the center of pressure (COP) show that balance deficits can persist up to 1 month after concussion. While approximately 30% of adolescents suffering concussion have functional consequences including balance deficits, evidence of the use of different balance assessments for concussion is limited within this population. Purpose: To compare performance on a series of balance assessments between adolescents with a diagnosed concussion at 1 month postinjury and noninjured control participants within the same age distribution. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Thirty-three adolescents 1 month postconcussion and 33 control participants completed the BESS followed by two, 2-minute trials standing on a Nintendo Wii Balance Board (WBB), during which the COP under their feet was recorded using 2 testing protocols: (1) double-leg stance, eyes open (EO) and (2) double-leg stance, eyes closed (EC). Participants then completed a dual-task condition (DT) with eyes open combining a double-leg stance and a Stroop color and word test while standing on the WBB. Three commonly used COP variables, anterior-posterior (A/P) and mediolateral (M/L) velocity and 95% ellipse, were computed for each condition performed on the WBB. Results: Participants postconcussion swayed over a significantly larger ellipse area compared with the control group in the EO ( P = .008), EC ( P = .002), and DT ( P = .003) conditions and also performed the DT condition with faster COP velocity in the M/L direction ( P = .007). No significant group difference was identified for BESS total score. Conclusion: At 1 month postconcussion, participants continued to demonstrate balance deficits in COP control despite scoring similar to controls on the BESS. Simple COP measures of balance may identify subtle impairments not captured by the BESS.

scholarly journals Should the Minimal Intervention Principle Be Considered When Investigating Dual-Tasking Effects on Postural Control?

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Wachholz ◽  
Federico Tiribello ◽  
Arunee Promsri ◽  
Peter Federolf
Keyword(s):  
Postural Control ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Dual Tasking ◽  
Minimal Intervention ◽  
Eyes Closed ◽  
Eyes Open ◽  
Postural Movement

Dual-tasking charges the sensorimotor system with performing two tasks simultaneously. Center of pressure (COP) analysis reveals the postural control that is altered during dual-tasking, but may not reveal the underlying neural mechanisms. In the current study, we hypothesized that the minimal intervention principle (MIP) provides a concept by which dual-tasking effects on the organization and prioritization of postural control can be predicted. Postural movements of 23 adolescents (age 12.7 ± 1.3; 8 females) and 15 adults (26.9 ± 2.3) were measured in a bipedal stance with eyes open, eyes closed and eyes open while performing a dual-task using a force plate and 39 reflective markers. COP data was analyzed by calculating the mean velocity, standard deviation and amplitude of displacement. Kinematic data was examined by performing a principal component analysis (PCA) and extracting postural movement components. Two variables were determined to investigate changes in amplitude (aVark) and in control (Nk) of the principal movement components. Results in aVark and in Nk agreed well with the predicted dual-tasking effects. Thus, the current study corroborates the notion that the MIP should be considered when investigating postural control under dual-tasking conditions.

scholarly journals Development of a theoretical model for upright postural control in lower limb prosthesis users

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Rusaw ◽  
Rasmus Alinder ◽  
Sigurd Edholm ◽  
Karin L. L. Hallstedt ◽  
Jessika Runesson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Model ◽  
Postural Control ◽  
Inverted Pendulum ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Quiet Standing ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Eyes Closed ◽  
Lower Limb Prosthesis ◽  
Eyes Open

AbstractMethods used to assess quiet standing in unilateral prosthesis users often assume validity of an inverted pendulum model despite this being shown as invalid in some instances. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the validity of a proposed unilaterally-constrained pin-controller model in explaining postural control in unilateral prosthesis users. Prosthesis users were contrasted against the theoretical model as were able-bodied controls that stood on a platform which unilaterally constrained movement of the CoP. All participants completed bouts of quiet standing with eyes open, eyes closed and with feedback on inter-limb weight bearing asymmetry. Correlation coefficients were used to infer inverted pendulum behavior in both the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions and were derived from both kinematic (body attached markers) and kinetic (centre of pressure) experimental data. Larger, negative correlation coefficients reflected better model adherence, whilst low or no correlation reflected poorer model adherence. Inverted pendulum behavior derived from kinematic data, indicated coefficients of high magnitude in both mediolateral (all cases range 0.71–0.78) and anteroposterior (0.88–0.91) directions, irrespective of groups. Inverted pendulum behavior derived from kinetic data in the anteroposterior direction indicated validity of the model with large negative coefficients associated with the unconstrained/intact limbs (prosthesis users: − 0.45 to − 0.65, control group: − 0.43 to − 0.72), small coefficients in constrained/prosthetic limbs (prosthesis users: − 0.02 to 0.07, control group: 0.13–0.26) and large negative coefficients in combined conditions (prosthesis users: − 0.36 to − 0.56, control group: − 0.71 to − 0.82). For the mediolateral direction, coefficients were negligible for individual limbs (0.03–0.17) and moderate to large negative correlations, irrespective of group (− 0.31 to − 0.73). Data suggested both prosthesis users’ and able-bodied individuals’ postural control conforms well to that predicted by a unilaterally-constrained pin-controller model, which has implications for the fundamental control of posture in transtibial prosthesis users.

scholarly journals Postural Control of Healthy Elderly Individuals Compared to Elderly Individuals with Stroke Sequelae

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fábio Marcon Alfieri ◽  
Marcelo Riberto ◽  
José Augusto Fernandes Lopes ◽  
Thais Raquel Filippo ◽  
Marta Imamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postural Control ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Force Platform ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Timed Up And Go ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Elderly Individuals ◽  
Eyes Closed ◽  
Healthy Elderly ◽  
Elderly Control

A stroke and aging process can modify the postural control. We aimed to compare the postural control of health elderly individuals to that of individuals with stroke sequelae. This cross-sectional transversal study was made with individuals capable of walking without any assistance and that were considered clinically stable. The study had 18 individuals in the group with stroke sequelae (SG) and 34 in the healthy elderly control group (CG). The participants were evaluated for the timed up and go test (TUG) and force platform. The SG showed the worst results in relation to the time of execution of the TUG and the force platform evaluation. The displacement of center of pressure was worse for both groups in the eyes-closed situation, especially in the anteroposterior direction for the CG. The GS showed worse results in the static and dynamic postural control. The healthy elderly showed more dependence on sight to maintain their static balance and there was no difference in the balance tests in relation to the side affected by the stroke.

scholarly journals Measures of Agility and Single-Legged Balance as Clinical Assessments in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Healthy Individuals

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 1260-1268
Author(s):  
Aleah N. Kirsch ◽  
Stephan G. Bodkin ◽  
Susan A. Saliba ◽  
Joseph M. Hart
Keyword(s):  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Clinical Assessments ◽  
Eyes Closed ◽  
Knee Position ◽  
Eyes Open ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Context Current clinical assessments used for patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may not enable clinicians to properly identify functional deficits that have been found in laboratory studies. Establishing muscular-function assessments, through agility and balance tasks, that can properly differentiate individuals with ACLR from healthy, active individuals may permit clinicians to detect deficits that increase the risk for poor outcomes. Objective To compare lower extremity agility and balance between patients with ACLR and participants serving as healthy controls. Design Case-control study. Setting Controlled laboratory. Patients or Other Participants A total of 47 volunteers in 2 groups, ACLR (9 males, 11 females; age = 23.28 ± 5.61 years, height = 173.52 ± 8.89 cm, mass = 70.67 ± 8.89 kg) and control (13 males, 12 females; age = 23.00 ± 6.44, height = 172.50 ± 9.24, mass = 69.81 ± 10.87 kg). Main Outcome Measure(s) Participants performed 3 timed agility tasks: Agility T Test, 17-hop test, and mat-hopping test. Balance was assessed in single-legged (SL) stance in 3 positions (straight knee, bent knee, squat) on 2 surfaces (firm, foam) with the participants' eyes open or closed for 10-second trials. Agility tasks were measured for time to completion. Eyes-open balance tasks were measured using center-of-pressure average velocity, and eyes-closed balance tasks were measured using the Balance Error Scoring System. Results For the Agility T Test, the ACLR group had slower times than the control group (P = .05). Times on the Agility T Test demonstrated moderate to strong positive relationships for unipedal measures of agility. The ACLR group had greater center-of-pressure average velocity in the SL bent-knee position than the control group. No differences were found between groups for the SL straight-knee and SL-squat balance tasks (P > .05). No differences in errors were present between groups for the eyes-closed balance tasks (P > .05). Conclusions The ACLR group demonstrated slower bipedal agility times and decreased postural stability when assessed in an SL bent-knee position compared with the control group.

Effects of Balance Training on Postural Stability

2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (13) ◽  
pp. 1237-1240
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Schmit ◽  
Deanna I. Rejacques ◽  
Michael A. Riley
Keyword(s):  
Postural Control ◽  
Postural Sway ◽  
Balance Training ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Group ◽  
Eyes Closed ◽  
Eyes Open ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Main Effects ◽  
The Relationship

The present study is designed to address the relationship between postural sway and balance training. We compared postural sway in a group of trained dancers to a group of physically fit, untrained participants (control group) in order to assess enhanced postural control with balance training, particularly under challenging balance conditions. We varied the difficulty of postural control by using two surface conditions (rigid surface, foam surface) and two visual conditions (eyes open, eyes closed), factorially combined. The data were evaluated using 1-between (group) × 2-within (vision and surface) analyses of variance (ANOVA). The three dependent variables were the standard deviation of the COP time series in the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) axes, and the COP path length. Significant main effects were found for surface and vision and the surface*vision interaction in all conditions. Significant group differences were found in the AP and ML axes. The results of this study indicate that balance training enhances the control of posture. Thus, it may be useful to provide balance training to workers who must operate under conditions that threaten balance.

scholarly journals Static postural control assessment during pregnancy

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Silvia Moccellin ◽  
Fernanda G. S. A. Nora ◽  
Paula H. L. Costa ◽  
Patricia Driusso
Keyword(s):  
Postural Control ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Postural Stability ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Pubic Symphysis ◽  
Eyes Closed ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Of Falls ◽  
Eyes Open

The hormonal and anatomic changes during pregnancy affect the musculoskeletal system and may lead to instability of static postural control and increased risk of falls. The aim of this study was to analyze changes in static postural control during the three trimesters of pregnancy, using variables derived from the center of pressure. This is a descriptive study in which posturographic tests were applied in four still standing positions, for three trials, with a combination of different visual conditions (eyes open - EO/eyes closed - EC) and support base configurations on 20 non-pregnant women (C) and 13 pregnant women during the gestational period (G1, G2 and G3). For static postural control assessment, a force plate (Bertec®) was used, and the variables analyzed were statokinesigram area, displacement amplitude, displacement velocity and sway frequency. The results demonstrate that, early in pregnancy, the woman's body seems to already change postural control, probably due to increased mobility of the sacroiliac joint and pubic symphysis caused by hormonal factors, and during the trimesters there is a decrease in postural stability, observed as an increase in the elliptical areas, amplitudes of center of pressure displacement and velocity of center of pressure displacement.

scholarly journals Static postural control assessment during pregnancy

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Silvia Moccellin ◽  
Fernanda G. S. A. Nora ◽  
Paula H. L. Costa ◽  
Patricia Driusso
Keyword(s):  
Postural Control ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Postural Stability ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Pubic Symphysis ◽  
Eyes Closed ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Of Falls ◽  
Eyes Open

<p>The hormonal and anatomic changes during pregnancy affect the musculoskeletal system and may lead to instability of static postural control and increased risk of falls. The aim of this study was to analyze changes in static postural control during the three trimesters of pregnancy, using variables derived from the center of pressure. This is a descriptive study in which posturographic tests were applied in four still standing positions, for three trials, with a combination of different visual conditions (eyes open - EO/eyes closed - EC) and support base configurations on 20 non-pregnant women (C) and 13 pregnant women during the gestational period (G1, G2 and G3). For static postural control assessment, a force plate (Bertec®) was used, and the variables analyzed were statokinesigram area, displacement amplitude, displacement velocity and sway frequency. The results demonstrate that, early in pregnancy, the woman's body seems to already change postural control, probably due to increased mobility of the sacroiliac joint and pubic symphysis caused by hormonal factors, and during the trimesters there is a decrease in postural stability, observed as an increase in the elliptical areas, amplitudes of center of pressure displacement and velocity of center of pressure displacement.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document