scholarly journals MEKANISME PENEGAKAN HUKUM DALAM UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HAK KELOMPOK RENTAN (ANAK DAN PEREMPUAN) (Mechanism of Law Enforcement In Protecting the Rights of Vulnerable Group) (Child and Woman)

Jurnal HAM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Josefhin Mareta
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Vulnerable Group ◽  
Legal Subject ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Group Child

Anak dan perempuan menjadi subyek hukum yang rentan dalam proses penegakan hukum. Anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum dan perempuan sebagai korban kekerasan merupakan persoalan hukum di mana hak anak dan perempuan memerlukan perlindungan melalui mekanisme penegakan hukum yang efektif. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui mekanisme penegakan hukum dalam memberikan perlindungan hak kelompok rentan (anak dan perempuan). Penelitian yuridis normatif ini menggunakan analisis kualitatif dengan melakukan studi kepustakaan. Penulis menyimpulkan bahwa penegakan hukum terhadap kelompok rentan (anak dan perempuan) dilakukan melalui sistem peradilan pidana anak yang mengedepankan kepentingan anak, dan pemberian pelayanan, pendampingan, perlindungan kepada korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga oleh aparat penegak hukum.AbstractChild and woman become a vulnerable legal subject in law enforcement processing. The child against the law and woman as violence victim is a law entity which is child`s rights need protection through an effective law enforcement mechanism. This research examines law enforcement in protecting the rights of a vulnerable group (child and woman). It is a normative juridical using a qualitative analysis with library research. The writer concluded that law enforcement to a vulnerable group (child and woman) conducted by juvenile justice system prioritizing child interest, and giving services, counseling, protection to victims of domestic violence by law enforcers.

scholarly journals MEKANISME PENEGAKAN HUKUM DALAM UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HAK KELOMPOK RENTAN (ANAK DAN PEREMPUAN) (Mechanism of Law Enforcement In Protecting the Rights of Vulnerable Group) (Child and Woman)

Jurnal HAM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Josefhin Mareta
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Vulnerable Group ◽  
Legal Subject ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Group Child

Anak dan perempuan menjadi subyek hukum yang rentan dalam proses penegakan hukum. Anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum dan perempuan sebagai korban kekerasan merupakan persoalan hukum di mana hak anak dan perempuan memerlukan perlindungan melalui mekanisme penegakan hukum yang efektif. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui mekanisme penegakan hukum dalam memberikan perlindungan hak kelompok rentan (anak dan perempuan). Penelitian yuridis normatif ini menggunakan analisis kualitatif dengan melakukan studi kepustakaan. Penulis menyimpulkan bahwa penegakan hukum terhadap kelompok rentan (anak dan perempuan) dilakukan melalui sistem peradilan pidana anak yang mengedepankan kepentingan anak, dan pemberian pelayanan, pendampingan, perlindungan kepada korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga oleh aparat penegak hukum.AbstractChild and woman become a vulnerable legal subject in law enforcement processing. The child against the law and woman as violence victim is a law entity which is child`s rights need protection through an effective law enforcement mechanism. This research examines law enforcement in protecting the rights of a vulnerable group (child and woman). It is a normative juridical using a qualitative analysis with library research. The writer concluded that law enforcement to a vulnerable group (child and woman) conducted by juvenile justice system prioritizing child interest, and giving services, counseling, protection to victims of domestic violence by law enforcers.

scholarly journals CRIMINAL POLICY IN CHILDREN'S CONSTRUCTION EFFORTS AS A NARCOTIC CRIMINAL ACTION PERSON

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 144
Author(s):  
Frans Simangunsong
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Electronic Media ◽  
Daily Press ◽  
Special Provision

Cases of narcotics abuse are increasing. This is evidenced by the almost<br />daily press reports from newspapers and electronic media about smuggling, illegal<br />trade, arrests and detention related to the problem of narcotics abuse. The purpose of<br />narcotics abuse is a deviant or accidental use of narcotics. So the act violates the law and<br />is threatened with criminality. Criminal policy in an effort to control children as<br />perpetrators of narcotics crimes. Threats of imprisonment that can be imposed on<br />children no later than 1/2 (one half) from the maximum threat of imprisonment for<br />adults. This means that the criminal threat for children who become narcotics couriers is<br />half of the criminal threats contained in the Narcotics Law. For children who become<br />couriers or narcotics brokers, they must be based on the mechanism stipulated in the<br />Child Protection Act and the Juvenile Justice System Law. Law enforcement for<br />perpetrators who are still under age, there is a special provision called diversion, namely<br />the transfer of settlement of child cases from criminal justice processes to processes<br />outside of criminal justice

Legal Socialization in the Juvenile Justice System

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom R. Tyler ◽  
Rick Trinkner
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Young People ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Developmental Period ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Socialization ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
System P

Chapter 9 discusses legal socialization within the juvenile justice system. Adolescence is a developmental period during which many young people have contact with legal authorities, primarily the police. These contacts involve high levels of discretion for law enforcement, and studies show the manner in which that discretion is exercised has strong consequences for the subsequent orientations that adolescents have toward the law as well as their later law-related behavior. In particular, adolescents react to how fairly the authorities treat them. Juvenile justice is a particularly contentious area of policy with many punitive practices advocated in spite of evidence that they do not build legitimacy or reduce crime. On the other hand, experiencing justice is shown to promote legitimacy and lower offending.

scholarly journals Criminal Liability of Children Who Cause A Fire

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (07) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hotto Lumban Gaol ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Necessary Condition ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Data Collection Technique

Criminal liability is a necessary condition to impose a crime against a person who commits a crime, including a crime committed by a child which results in a fire. The problems that will be discussed in this study are related to how the criminal liability of children that causes fires and how the juvenile justice system is organized in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to determine the criminal liability of children who cause fires and to determine the implementation of the juvenile justice system in Indonesia. The data collection technique in this research is using the library research method. While the analysis technique carried out on the legal materials that have been collected by the author will be done deductively. The results of this study indicate that if the child who commits the crime that resulted in the fire is 12 years old, then the child can be burdened with criminal liability. Furthermore, the implementation of the juvenile criminal justice system in Indonesia starts from the investigation stage to the guidance stage after serving a crime.

scholarly journals Perluasan Pertanggungjawaban Terhadap Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 84-106
Author(s):  
Chairul Bariah ◽  
Mohd Din ◽  
Mujibussalim Mujibussalim
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
District Court ◽  
System State ◽  
Youth Offenders ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Family

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak menyatakan anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum selanjutnya disebut anak yang telah berumur 12 (dua belas) tahun, tetapi belum berumur 18 (delapan belas) tahun yang diduga melakukan tindak pidana. Maka dilihat dari usia anak tersebut haruslah mendapatkan perlakuan yang khusus terhadap anak yang melakukan tidak pidana. Sebagaimana dalamUndang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak disebutkan bahwa hakim wajib mengupayakan diversi paling lama 7 (tujuh) hari setelah ditetapkan oleh ketua pengadilan negeri sebagai hakim.Padadasarnya konsep pertanggungjawaban dari sebuah perbuatan pidana adalah ditanggung oleh pelakunya tanpa membebani pihak lain yang turut bertanggungjawab, namun dalam hal penyelesaian tindak pidana harus melibatkan pelaku, korban, keluarga pelaku/korban, dan pihak lain yang terkait, sehingga terdapat perluasan konsep pertanggungjawaban pidana. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan mengkaji sejauh mana orang tua dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban terhadap tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak dan konsep pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap orang tua dalam tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak dan apakah ada hubungan antara diversi dengan pertanggungjawaban terhadap orang tua. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan penelitian hukum kepustakaan.The Act Number 11, 2012 on the Juvenile Justice System state that a child who is in conflictwith the law hereinafter called as a child who ages 12 (twelve) years old, but not yet 18 (eightteen) year of age alleged to have committed a crime. Therefore, it is seen from the age of the child it should be treated specifically for youth offenders, it can be seen from the obligation for the judge to conduct a diversion for the child’s case. As mention in the The Act on Juvenile Justice System that the judge is obliged to conduct a diversion for a maximum of 7 (seven) days after being stipulated by the head of the district court sitting as a judge. Basically, the concept of criminal liability from the criminal act is borne by its perpetrator without burdening the other party responsible, but in the case of the settlement of the crime must involve the perpetrator, the victim, the family of the perpetrator or victim, and other related parties, and hence there is an extension of the concept of criminal liability. This research aims to explain and explore to which extent parents could be held liable for crimes committed by juvenile and the concept of criminal liability of parents towards crimes committed by their childrenand whether there is a relationship between diversion with responsibility to parents.This is doctrinal legal research or library research.

scholarly journals Penerapan Sistem Restoratif Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Azharil
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Community Participation ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials

 Abstract Restorative justice is an approach that focuses on the needs of victims, perpetrators of crime, and also involves community participation, and does not merely fulfill legal provisions or merely impose penalties. In this case victims are also involved in the process, while perpetrators of crimes are also encouraged to be accountable for their actions, namely by correcting the mistakes they have made by apologizing, repaying the losses suffered, or by providing community service. The application of restorative justice in Indonesia has been stated in Law No. 12 of 11 concerning the Juvenile Justice System, which instructs law enforcement officials to undertake diversion efforts, namely bringing together the perpetrator, the victim, and their families to sit together to find a way out. AbstrakRestorative justice  adalah suatu pendekatan yang memfokuskan kepada kebutuhan dari para korban, pelaku kejahatan, dan juga melibatkan peran serta masyarakat, dan tidak semata-mata memenuhi ketentuan hukum atau semata-semata penjatuhan pidana. Dalam hal ini korban juga dilibatkan di dalam proses, sementara pelaku kejahatan juga didorong untuk mempertanggungjawabkan atas tindakannya, yaitu dengan memperbaiki kesalahan-kesalahan yang telah meraka perbuat dengan meminta maaf, mengembalikan kerugian yang diderita, atau dengan melakukan pelayanan masyarakat. Penerapan restorative justice di indonesai telah tertuang dalam Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 11 Tentang Sistem Peradilan anak yang memerintahkan kepada aparat penegak hukum untuk melakukan upaya diversi yakni mempertemukan pelaku, korban, dan keluarganya untuk duduk bersama mencari jalan keluar

scholarly journals PENAL MEDIATION OF TREATMENTS FOR CHILDREN IN THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 264
Author(s):  
Irma Cahyaningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Court ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Philosophical Foundation ◽  
Analysis Method

The protection of children becomes the responsibility of all parties, namely family, community and government. Indonesia through the Act No. 11 Year 2012 on Juvenile Justice System provides protection namely diversion which should be emphasized as a penal mediation which can be used to solve a juvenile cases. There are two main problems; firstly, how is the penal mediation process in the juvenile justice system; secondly, how is the implementation of the penal mediation which is based on Pancasila? The research method used in this paper was normative juridical research method. The approach used in this study is socio legal approach and the data analysis method used a qualitative analysis. The results that in penal mediation in the juvenile cases namely diversion  aims to achieve restorative justice. The diversion process is very important and must involve the parties in order the mediation be effective. This process is what distinguishes from the treatments of juvenile’s cases before Act No. 11 Year 2012.  In the previous times, penal mediation was not acknowledged so law enforcement procedure is always ends at Juvenile court. Penal mediation in juvenile justice system must be based on Pancasila as the philosophical foundation of Indonesia, which means diversion process must be in accordance with the values of Pancasila, which are are religious moral values; humanistic values; nationalistic values, democratic, and social justice.

scholarly journals Diversion Against Crime by Children Confronting the Law to Achieve Restorative Justice

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 149
Author(s):  
Zulita Anatasia
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Structures ◽  
And Training

The purpose of this writing is to try to find out the existence of law enforcement regarding diversion in the handling of cases committed by children in the Juvenile Justice System Law and to see the effectiveness of implementing the diversion policy in handling cases of criminal acts committed by children. The research was carried out in a normative juridical manner, with a statute approach and a conceptual approach using descriptive qualitative analysis. The results of this paper show that law enforcement regarding cases involving children with a diversion policy is rigidly regulated in Law, namely Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System, as well as related regulations such as Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, and Law -Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims. In addition to law regulations there are implementing regulations such as Government Regulation Number 65 of 2015 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion and Handling of Children Not Aged 12 (Twelve) Years Old and Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for Implementing Diversion in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. In addition, the effectiveness of law enforcement does not run effectively in practice, this shows that the diversion policy to realize restorative justice is not being implemented properly, the linkages between external and internal components are not evenly distributed, both law enforcers and the roles of stakeholders, this has an impact The diversion policy and the goal of realizing restorative justice which has not been effectively implemented are influenced by several factors such as limited Human Resources (HR) who have not supported the implementation of the SPPA Law and training for legal structures.

Do School Resource Officers Really Refer Juveniles to the Juvenile Justice System for Less Serious Offenses?

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. May ◽  
Raymond Barranco ◽  
Ethan Stokes ◽  
Angela A. Robertson ◽  
Stacy H. Haynes
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
School Resource Officers ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Large Contribution ◽  
Resource Officers ◽  
Police In Schools ◽  
School Resource

In this article, we use 3 years of youth court data from a southeastern state to examine whether referrals that originated from school resource officers (SROs) involve greater proportions of less serious offenses than referrals from other sources. Referrals from SROs during the 3-year period were similar to referrals by law enforcement outside of school for status and serious offenses. SROs were less likely than law enforcement officers outside of school to refer juveniles for minor offenses during the 3-year period. Our findings suggest that schools, not solely police in schools, make a large contribution to the number of juveniles referred to the juvenile justice system for less serious offenses. Implications for policy and future research are also discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document