scholarly journals Juridical Analysis Of Application Of Forgiveness (Rechterlijk Pardon) As A Basis Of Judge Consideration In Deciding The Criminal

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 307
Author(s):  
Sisno Pujinoto ◽  
Anis Mashdurohatun ◽  
Achmad Sulchan
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Development Concept

The formulation of the problem in this study are: How is the principle position Rechterlijk Pardon in the criminal system in Indonesia, how the principles are applied Rechterlijk Pardon in a criminal ruling Decision Number 241 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Mjl andHow the development / concept of the Rechterlijk Pardon principle in the renewal of the Indonesian criminal law that will come related to the draft criminal law on the monodualistic principle?This study uses a sociological juridical approach, with descriptive analytical research specifications. The data used in this study are secondary data obtained through library research and primary data obtained through field research which are then analyzed qualitatively using legal theory, the forgiveness agency theory, criminal justice system theory, and progressive legal theory. Based on the results of that study The position of the Rechterlijk Pardon Principle in the Criminal System in Indonesia is forgiveness is a form of forgiveness / deliverance from mistakes made. As a form of forgiveness, then with forgiveness, someone who is guilty is not sentenced or does not need to feel the punishment. Provisions such as this basically exist in conditional criminal conduct (voorwaardelijke veroordeling) regulated in Article 14a-14f of the Criminal Code. Conditional penalties are also referred to by part of the community with the term criminal trial or there is also termed as conditional punishment. Application of the Rechterlijk Pardon Principle in Criminal Verdicts Number 241 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Mjl it is applied later to act as the final safety valve in the criminal justice system if a case is not filtered at the prosecution and preliminary hearing judge stage. Development / Concept of the Rechterlijk Pardon Principle in the Future Renewal of Indonesian Criminal Laws Associated with the Draft Criminal Laws on the Monodualistic Principle are Forgiveness institution, is an important element to answer problems that cannot be accommodated with only 3 (three) types of decisions (free, loose, criminal funds).Keywords : Institutions; Forgiveness; Rechterlijk Pardon; Considerations; Judges; Decisions.

scholarly journals Comparative Criminal Law Policy Positives With Foreign Countries In The Criminal Law Prosecuting Perpetrators Of Criminal Acts Of A Child In Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 337
Author(s):  
Tutut Suciati Handayani
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Sociological Approach ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law

In this study the issues to be discussed are: the policy positive criminal law in the prosecution of perpetrators of criminal acts of a child, criminal law policy of foreign countries in the prosecution of perpetrators of criminal acts of children and the barriers prosecutor in carrying out the task of prosecuting perpetrators of criminal acts of child and how the efforts countermeasures. The research method that will be used is the juridical sociological approach. In order to obtain primary data and secondary data that is accurate to the writing of this study, the data collection by means of a literature study to find materials relating to the principles and rules of law relating to criminal procedure law and the criminal justice system of children. Based on the results of this research is still fragmented between the investigator and the prosecutor so that ultimately the criminal justice system is not optimal child be a solution to cope with the child as a criminal. The issue of children as criminals not only be approached only by using purely legal approach, but also must use the instrument of social and economic approaches. That in conducting the prosecution against children, public prosecutors are often encountered problems due to its law system, the apparatus structure and legal culture. therefore it is necessary for the reconstruction of the criminal justice system of Indonesia, so it can be used as a reference for events that are special laws such as the juvenile justice system.Keywords: Comparative, Policy, Criminal Law.

scholarly journals Problematika Proses Penahanan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-19
Author(s):  
M Hasriadi K ◽  
Hardianto Djanggih
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Studies ◽  
As If

Penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis  tentang proses penahanan dalam sistem peradilan pidana dan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tentang proses penahanan dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Metode penelitian, kalau dilihat dari tipe penelitiannya maka termasuk penelitian hukum empiris karena penekanannya adalah menelaah fenomena hukum yang berkaitan dengan proses penahanan dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Sehingga data yang dibutuhkan dalam peneltian ini adalah data primer dan data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses penahanan dalam sistem peradilan pidana kurang efektif disebabkan karena didalam Pasal 31 KUHAP masih memberikan peluang untuk melakukan penangguhan penahanan bagi tersangka. Dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tentang proses penahanan dalam sistem peradilan pidana adalah faktor substansi hukum, sgtruktur hukum dan budaya hukum. Direkomendasikan bahwa perlu adanya suatu aturan yang jelas tentang penangguhan penahanan karena dalam Pasal 31 KUHAP sebenarnya tidak memberikan peluang untuk melakukan penangguhan penahanan tetapi kalau dikaitkan dengan Pasal 29 KUHAP seakan ada peluang untuk melakukan penangguhan penahanan. Dan jangka waktu penahanan terlalu lama pada tiap-tiap tahap pemeriksaan, sehingga perlu adanya suatu aturan baru yang mengatur tentang penahanan. This research is to know and analyze about the containment process in the criminal justice system and to know and analyze the factors that affect the containment process in the criminal justice system. The research method, when viewed from the type of research, includes empirical legal studies because the emphasis is on studying legal phenomena related to the detention process in the criminal justice system.sSo the data needed in this study are primary data and secondary data. The results showed that the detention process in the criminal justice system was less effective because in article 31, KUHAP still gave the opportunity to suspend the detention of the suspect. And the factors that affect the detention process in the criminal justice system are the legal substance factors, the legal and cultural sgtructure. It is recommended that there is a clear rule about the suspension of detention because in article 31 the criminal CODE does not actually provide an opportunity to suspend the detention but the Kmalau is associated with article 29 of the criminal CODE as if there is an opportunity to suspend the detention. And the period of detention is too long in each phase of the inspection, so there needs to be a new rule governing the detention of.

scholarly journals Legality Letter of Statement of Khilaf in Indonesia Criminal Justice System

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Rugun Romaida Hutabarat
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Primary Source ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Criminal Matters

In criminal law, a person charged with a criminal offense may be punished if it meets two matters, namely his act is unlawful, and the perpetrator of a crime may be liable for the indicated action (the offender's error) or the act may be dismissed to the perpetrator, and there is no excuse. The reasons may result in the death or the removal of the implied penalty. But it becomes a matter of how if the Letter of Statement Khilaf is the answer to solve the legal problems. The person who refuses or does not do what has been stated in the letters is often called "wanprestasi" because the statement is categorized as an agreement. The statement includes an agreement which is the domain of civil law or criminal law, so its application in the judicial system can be determined. This should be reviewed in the application of the law, are there any rules governing wrong statements in the criminal justice system. By using a declaration of khilaf as a way out of criminal matters, then the statement should be known in juridical rules. This study uses normative juridical methods, by conceptualizing the law as a norm rule which is a benchmark of human behavior, with emphasis on secondary data sources collected from the primary source of the legislation. The result of this research is that the statement of khilaf has legality, it is based on Jurisprudence No. 3901 K / Pdt / 1985 jo Article 189 Paragraph (1) of Indonesian criminal procedure law. However, this oversight letter needs to be verified in front of the court to be valid evidence, but this letter of error is not a deletion of a criminal offense, because the culpability of the defendant has justified the crime he committed. Such recognition, cannot make it free from the crime that has been committed.Keywords: Legality, Letter of Statement, Criminal Justice System

scholarly journals PERAN PENYIDIK DALAM PENERAPAN DIVERSI TERHADAP PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA ANAKDI WILAYAH KABUPATEN POHUWATO

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-46
Author(s):  
MUHAMMAD RIZAL LAMPATTA
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Research Libraries ◽  
Professional Worker

The perpetrator of the criminal act of the child cannot be equated with criminal adults. Therefore, it needs more attention in the case of children. However, the child is the successor Nations that should be developed physically and mentally. The purpose of this research is to analyze the role of the Ombudsman in the performance of Marisa Polres versioned as well as analyze constraints are faced by Investigators in implementation Marisa Polres versioned. This type of research is research used empirical research focus i.e. normative on secondary data sources (research libraries). This research uses the main data source, i.e. secondary data, backed up with primary data sources. Secondary data is used that is derived from legislation such as the ACT on criminal justice system of the child, the child protection ACT, Act No. 8 Of 1981 Year Book of the Police Act, Police ACT and some of the literature-literature as well as the results of his research, and books related to the role of the Ombudsman in conducting versioned on criminal act committed by the child. Research results show that Marisa Polres in performing the investigation is a criminal act committed by the child by women and children protection Unit (UPPA). Starting from the stage of investigation, arrest, detention up at the stage of investigation conducted in accordance with the mandate of the ACT on the criminal justice system. Investigators in conducting versioned, get consideration from BAPAS. In addition, the investigators also act/mediator to conduct deliberations involving the child and the parent/guardian, the victim and the parent/guardian, supervisor of community, social professional worker based on approach restorative. Obstacles faced by Investigators in the conduct of Marisa Polres diversion that is not yet the existence of BAPAS in counties Marisa so complicate investigators to coordinate in terms of asking for consideration in doing versioned. In addition the party victims sometimes do not want to make peace so that the attempted diversion by Investigators was not achieved.

scholarly journals The Criminal Enforcement Of The Fraud Mode Of Multiple Money (Case study Decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora)

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
Sumaryono Sumaryono ◽  
Sri Kusriyah Kusriyah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public

Fraudulent criminal acts that have been regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) with various modes, one of which is fraud by shamans with a multiplied money mode has made law enforcers increasingly have to rack their brains to be able to prove it. This study aims to examine and analyze law enforcement by the judge in decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora with consideration of the criminal elements. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach. The specifications of the study were conducted using descriptive analytical methods. The data used for this study are primary and secondary data. The data consists of primary data and secondary data using field research methods, interviews, and literature studies. Based on the research it was concluded that the case ruling number 61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN Bla with a fraud case with shamanism practices in the mode of duplicating the judge's money considering that the Defendants have been indicted by the Public Prosecutor with alternative indictments, so the Panel of Judges paid attention to the facts The aforementioned law decides on the first alternative indictment as regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code by considering the elements of that article.Keywords: Criminal Law Enforcement; Fraud; Multiple Money.

scholarly journals Analysis Of Judicial Policy In Deciding Criminal Acts Based Alternative Indictment (Case Study Decision Number 82 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora)

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Nur Dwi Edie W ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Field Observation ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Observation Methods ◽  
Case Number

In the criminal justice system process the judge plays a role in implementing the decision in which the decision was taken in consideration of the indictments by the prosecutors. In alternative indictments each indictment is mutually exclusive. The judge will choose one of the charges proven according to his conviction. Therefore the alternative indictment is also called the indictment of choice (keuze telastelgging). This research formed the formulation of the problem namely how is the juridical implication of alternative forms of indictment in case number 82 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora and what is the basis of the judge's judgment in deciding case Number 82 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora with alternative indictment. This research uses juridical sociological methods with descriptive analysis research specifications. The data used for this study are secondary data with field observation methods and literature and document studies. Based on the research it was concluded (1) the preparation of the indictment in the case of verdict number 82 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN Bla based on Article 378 of the Criminal Code, with an alternative Article 372 of the Criminal Code. In this case, the element that eliminates one another is about the "existence" of the goods in the possession of the defendant. (2) In decision number 82 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN Bla, the judge considers that based on the legal facts revealed in the trial the defendant violated the criminal provisions as in the Second Indictment of alternative charges Article 378 of the Criminal Code Jo Article 64 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code.�Keywords: Judge Policy; Criminal Decisions; Alternative Indictments.

scholarly journals Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Anak

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 374-378
Author(s):  
I Ketut Eka Yoga Juliantika ◽  
I Made Sepud ◽  
I Ketut Sukadana
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Trafficking In Persons ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Child Trafficking ◽  
Procedure Code

Children are often victims of child trafficking crime. There are a lot of factors that support the crime of child trafficking, one of which is the lack of regulation on child trafficking. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing how the regulation of child trafficking and how the criminal law policy against child trafficking. This research was designed using a normative legal research method. The results of this study indicated that the regulation of child trafficking is regulated in Law No. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, the Criminal Code (KUHP), namely Article 297, Article 301, Article 324, Article 328, and Article 330, RI Law No. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, Law No. 35 of 2014 on Amendments to Law no. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, and Law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Furthermore, the criminal law policy against child trafficking is regulated in the Criminal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Law no. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, Law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System, and Law no. 35 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law no. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection.

scholarly journals Access to Justice for the Disability Women as Victims in the Criminal Justice System

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 07012
Author(s):  
Cahya Wulandari
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Sociological Approach ◽  
Victims Of Violence

Women are the parties who have potential chance to be victims; this problem is regardless of patriarchy culture which is still very strong in the community. Women are considered vulnerable, moreover those who have dissabilities. Disability women are less able to protect themself from the violence. These problems are related to access to have the rights in justice for those disability women who become the victims of violence. This research used primary data and secondary data with qualitative research through juridical sociological approach. The violence which often occurs to women could be physical, verbal, sexual, as well as psychic violence. The disability women as victims get less access to justice and protection as set in regulations because they are lack of understanding from law enforcer about disability. Moreover, there is no infrastructure that can support the rights of disability women.

scholarly journals The Optimization of the Role of Correctional Centers in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 369
Author(s):  
Muhammad Arif Agus ◽  
Ari Susanto
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
No Value ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law

The purpose of this research is to examine and analyze (1) the role of Correctional Centers in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia; and (2) the Optimization of the Role of Correctional Centers in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative juridical approach. The results of the research concluded; (1) Correctional Centers in the juvenile criminal justice system and in the adult criminal justice system both have a role, but the role of Correctional Centers in the adult criminal justice system has not been optimized as in the juvenile criminal justice system, and it tends to be discriminatory. (2) The optimization of the role of Correctional Centers in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia needs to be carried out, because by optimizing the role of Correctional Centers, especially Correctional Research on adult cases, it will eliminate discrimination in treatment between children and adults and Correctional Research can be used as a reference for law enforcers. As a recommendation, it is suggested that in the Criminal Law Reform in Indonesia, both related to the renewal of the Criminal Procedure Law Code (KUHAP); the Criminal Code (KUHP); as well as the Corrections Law, the discrimination in making Correctional Research on juvenile cases and adult cases should be abolished, because it has no value of justice. The equalization of treatment related to Correctional Research will optimize the role of Correctional Research and also other law enforcers in achieving the value of justice in Indonesia.

scholarly journals Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Perspektif Integrasi

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Achmad Budi Waskito
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Functional Differentiation ◽  
Enforcement Policy ◽  
Research Show ◽  
Function Difference

AbstractCriminal justice system as a tool of law enforcemen didn�t work optimally, in fact criminal justice system in Indonesia be acquainted whith principle of function difference impact on law enforcemennt performance so it will be difficult to achieve its function, as a crime prevention effort. This research purpose to set system concept and ideal approaches the organization of a unified criminal justice system so as to achieve an optimal performance of the criminal justice system (CJS) in criminal law enforcement, by approachng the system and re-structural, substantial and cultural reorientation of the criminal justice system.the main object of research is againt criminal law enforcement policy, the approach used is a normative juridical and sosiological approach complemented by a historical aproach/contextual and global/comparative, by prioritizing secondary data whit qualitative analysis. The result of the research show the sub system in the criminal justice system (such as investigation, prosecution, adjudicate and execution) funcionally and institutionally has not yet shown the existence of an integrated criminal justice system when viewed partially, the components of the support component seem to separate from one another, and tend to be centric institutions. Understanding of the integrated criminal justice system is inseparable from an understanding that includes substantial meaning, but also a philosophical aspect about the meaning justice and be nefit integrated. Therefore the legal culture is an integral part. ����Keyword: implementation of the criminal justice system, functional differentiation, integrated approach.Abstrak Sistem peradilan pidana sebagai sistem penegakan hukum dengan menggunakan hukum pidana, tidak berjalan secara optimal bahkan sistem peradilan pidana di indonesia dikenal asas �differensiasi fiungsional� berdampak pada kinerja penegakkan hukum sehingga akan sulit untuk mencapai fungsinya, sebagai upaya penanggulangan kejahatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan konsep sistem dan pendekatan yang ideal penyelenggaraan sistem peradilan pidana yang integral sehingga terwujud suatu kinerja Sistem peradilan pidana (SPP) yang optimal dalam penegakan hukum pidana, dengan melakukan pendekatan sistem dan reorientasi struktural, substansial dan kultural terhadap sistem peradilan pidana. Objek utama penelitian ialah terhadap kebijakan penegakan hukum pidana, pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan analisis yuridis normatif dan sosiologis dilengkapi dengan pendekatan historis/kontekstual dan global/komparatif, dengan mengutamakan data sekunder dengan analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan sub-sistem dalam sistem peradilan pidana (sub-sistem penyidikan, penuntutan, mengadili dan pelakasana pidana) secara fungsional dan kelembagaan belum menujukkan adanya perihal sistem peradilan pidana terpadu (SPPT) apabila dilihat secara parsial, komponen-komponen pendukung terkesan terpisah antara satu dengan yang lainnya, serta cenderung bersifat �instansi sentris�. Pemahaman mengenai sistem perdilan pidana terpadu tidak terlepas dari pemahaman yang mencakup makna substansial, tapi juga menyentuh aspek filosofis mengenai makna keadilan dan kemanfaatan secara terintegrasi. Oleh karena itu budaya hukum merupakan bagian yang tidak terpisahkan.Kata kunci: Pelaksanaan Sistem Peradilan Pidana, differensiasi fungsional, Pendekatan terpadu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document