scholarly journals A Short Version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-20): Evidence on Construct Validity

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. e1312
Author(s):  
Valdiney Veloso Gouveia ◽  
Rafaella de Carvalho Rodrigues Araújo ◽  
Isabel Cristina Vasconcelos de Oliveira ◽  
Marina Pereira Gonçalves ◽  
Taciano Milfont ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Big Five ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Short Version ◽  
Final Version ◽  
Big Five Inventory ◽  
Procrustes Rotation ◽  
The Past ◽  
Potential Applicability ◽  
Psychometric Quality

Several measures were developed in the past decades to measure personality, focusing on the Big Five Factor Model (BFFM; Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism). Despite the relevance of their findings in different countries, a shared limitation of such measures is their length, demanding time from researchers and participants, which might cause boredom or fatigue, biasing the final results. This research aimed to provide a shorter version for the 44-Item Big Five Inventory (BFI), through two studies (NTotal = 8,119). The structure was assessed using a range of techniques (e.g., PAF analysis, Procrustes rotation). The best 20 items (4 per factor) were chosen to compose the final version of the BFI-20, which presented suitable psychometric evidences across the samples. Thus, due the growing need for shorter measures without losing their psychometric quality, our findings indicate the adequacy of the 20-item BFI and its potential applicability in research context.

Big-Five Adjective Marker Scales for Use with College Students

1995 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph L. Piedmont
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Principal Components Analysis ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Principal Components ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Procrustes Rotation ◽  
College Sample ◽  
Five Factors ◽  
Components Analysis

This report evaluated the psychometric integrity of an 80-item bipolar adjective scale which assesses the dimensions of the five-factor model of personality. Using a college sample of 149 women and 30 men, a principal components analysis employing an orthogonal Procrustes rotation identified the five factors which were comparable to factor structures found with adults. Researchers can therefore have some confidence in using these marker scales with college students.

Measurement Invariance and Sex and Age Differences of the Big Five Inventory–2: Evidence From the Russian Version

Assessment ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 472-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergei Shchebetenko ◽  
Aleksey Y. Kalugin ◽  
Arina M. Mishkevich ◽  
Christopher J. Soto ◽  
Oliver P. John
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Invariance ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Model Framework ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Big Five Inventory ◽  
Facet Structure ◽  
Russian Version

The Big Five Inventory–2 (BFI-2) is a recently published 60-item questionnaire that measures personality traits within the five-factor model framework. An important aspect of the BFI-2 is that it measures the traits at both the domain and facet levels and also controls acquiescence bias via the balanced number of true- and false-keyed items across the domains and facets. The current research evaluates factorial measurement invariance of a Russian version of the BFI-2 across sex and age within samples of 1,024 university students (Study 1) and 1,029 Internet users (Study 2). Across these samples, men scored lower on the domains of negative emotionality and agreeableness and slightly higher on extraversion. Sex differences were also obtained on various facets. In the Internet sample, age correlated modestly with several Big Five domains in accordance with the well-documented maturity principle. The newly developed Russian version of BFI-2 showed good reliability and validity across both samples. Moreover, random intercept exploratory factor analyses showed that the BFI-2 displayed a hierarchical five-domain-15-facet structure that demonstrated strict measurement invariance across sex and age.

On the Comparability of Basic Personality Models: Meta-Analytic Correspondence, Scope, and Orthogonality of the Big Five and HEXACO Dimensions

2021 ◽  
pp. 089020702110267
Author(s):  
Isabel Thielmann ◽  
Morten Moshagen ◽  
BenjaminE. Hilbig ◽  
Ingo Zettler
Keyword(s):  
Big Five ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Five Dimensions ◽  
The Past ◽  
Personality Models ◽  
Hexaco Model ◽  
Practical Implications

Models of basic personality structure are among the most widely used frameworks in psychology and beyond, and they have considerably advanced the understanding of individual differences in a plethora of consequential outcomes. Over the past decades, two such models have become most widely used: the Five Factor Model (FFM) or Big Five, respectively, and the HEXACO Model of Personality. However, there is no large-scale empirical evidence on the general comparability of these models. Here, we provide the first comprehensive meta-analysis on (a) the correspondence of the FFM/Big Five and HEXACO dimensions, (b) the scope of trait content the models cover, and (c) the orthogonality (i.e., degree of independence) of dimensions within the models. Results based on 152 (published and unpublished) samples and 6,828 unique effects showed that the HEXACO dimensions incorporate notable conceptual differences compared to the FFM/Big Five dimensions, resulting in a broader coverage of the personality space and less redundancy between dimensions. Moreover, moderator analyses revealed substantial differences between operationalizations of the FFM/Big Five. Taken together, these findings have important theoretical and practical implications for the understanding of basic personality dimensions and their assessment.

scholarly journals Trait Aggression is Primarily a Facet of Antagonism: Evidence from Dominance, Latent Correlational, and Item-Level Analyses

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Chester ◽  
Samuel James West
Keyword(s):  
Big Five ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Personality Dimensions ◽  
Big Five Inventory ◽  
Trait Aggression ◽  
Item Level

Trait aggression has been studied for decades and yet remains adrift from broader frameworks of personality such as the Five Factor Model. Across two datasets from undergraduate participants (Study 1: N = 359; Study 2; N = 620), we observed strong manifest and latent correlations between trait aggression and lower agreeableness (i.e., greater antagonism). Trait aggression was also linked to greater neuroticism and lower conscientiousness, but their effect sizes fell beneath our preregistered threshold. Subsequent item-level analyses were unable to articulate trait aggression and agreeableness items into separate factors using the IPIP-NEO, but not the Big Five Inventory. Our findings suggest that trait aggression is accurately characterized as primarily a facet of antagonism, while also reflecting other personality dimensions.

scholarly journals Validasi Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) untuk Indonesia: Belum sempurna tetapi valid dan reliabel mengukur kepribadian

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Awaludin Ahya ◽  
Ide Bagus Siaputra
Keyword(s):  
Principal Component Analysis ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Big Five Inventory ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Bahasa Indonesia

Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) merupakan versi terbaru dari alat ukur kepribadian menurut kerangka teori five factor model. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mereplikasi pengujian validitas BFI-2 pada versi Bahasa Indonesia. Uji validitas terkait struktur internal dilakukan menggunakan Principal Component Analysis (PCA) dan Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), sedangkan validitas konvergen melalui korelasi dengan skor BFI-1. Responden adalah 853 mahasiswa dari beberapa Perguruan Tinggi Negeri dan Swasta di Sumatra Utara dan Jawa Timur. Pengumpulan data secara online menggunakan Google Form. Hasil analisis PCA menunjukkan sebanyak 50 butir (83%) BFI-2 versi Indonesia memiliki muatan faktor memadai terhadap dimensi terkait. Hasil analisis CFA pada model level faset memiliki indeks fit yang lebih baik daripada level dimensi, artinya temuan ini mendukung model pengukuran faset pada BFI-2 Indonesia. Kelima dimensi BFI-2 Indonesia memiliki korelasi positif dengan dimensi BFI-1 pada tingkat moderat, sehingga temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa BFI-2 Indonesia terbukti konvergen dengan BFI-1.

A Comparison of the Validity of Very Brief Measures of the Big Five/Five-Factor Model of Personality

Assessment ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 107319112093916
Author(s):  
Chelsea E. Sleep ◽  
Donald R. Lynam ◽  
Joshua D. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Online Community ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Community Sample ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
The Past ◽  
Functional Implications ◽  
Varying Length

Personality is of great lay, clinical, and research interest with important functional implications. The field has largely settled on five- or six-factor models as being largely sufficient for descriptive purposes, at least in W.E.I.R.D settings and, as such, numerous measures have been created of varying length and breadth. For a number of reasons, however, super-short forms have come to be quite popular in research endeavors with a number created in the past 20 years. The goal of the present study was to compare the time with completion and general psychometric properties of these measures, as well as examine their convergence with one another and with longer measures in an online community sample ( N = 494). Generally, the psychometric properties of the measures varied considerably in terms of internal consistency and convergence with one another. The brief measures demonstrated mostly adequately convergence with longer measures. Despite this convergence, longer measures were found to contain considerably more variance that was not accounted for by brief measures. We consider the advantages and disadvantages of these measures and suggest that longer measures be prioritized whenever possible.

Social Desirability in Personality Inventories

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Bäckström ◽  
Fredrik Björklund
Keyword(s):  
Social Desirability ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Work Performance ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Peer Ratings ◽  
Personality Inventories ◽  
Model Study ◽  
The Difference ◽  
New Variables

The difference between evaluatively loaded and evaluatively neutralized five-factor inventory items was used to create new variables, one for each factor in the five-factor model. Study 1 showed that these variables can be represented in terms of a general evaluative factor which is related to social desirability measures and indicated that the factor may equally well be represented as separate from the Big Five as superordinate to them. Study 2 revealed an evaluative factor in self-ratings and peer ratings of the Big Five, but the evaluative factor in self-reports did not correlate with such a factor in ratings by peers. In Study 3 the evaluative factor contributed above the Big Five in predicting work performance, indicating a substance component. The results are discussed in relation to measurement issues and self-serving biases.

Assessing Personality With Multi-Descriptor Items

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-125
Author(s):  
Johannes Schult ◽  
Rebecca Schneider ◽  
Jörn R. Sparfeldt
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
The Other ◽  
Short Version ◽  
Big Five Inventory ◽  
Personality Inventories

Abstract. The need for efficient personality inventories has led to the wide use of short instruments. The corresponding items often contain multiple, potentially conflicting descriptors within one item. In Study 1 ( N = 198 university students), the reliability and validity of the TIPI (Ten-Item Personality Inventory) was compared with the reliability and validity of a modified TIPI based on items that rephrased each two-descriptor item into two single-descriptor items. In Study 2 ( N = 268 university students), we administered the BFI-10 (Big Five Inventory short version) and a similarly modified version of the BFI-10 without two-descriptor items. In both studies, reliability and construct validity values occasionally improved for separated multi-descriptor items. The inventories with multi-descriptor items showed shortcomings in some factors of the TIPI and the BFI-10. However, the other scales worked comparably well in the original and modified inventories. The limitations of short personality inventories with multi-descriptor items are discussed.

Construction and Validation of a Short Adjectives Checklist to Measure Big Five (SACBIF)

1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Perugini ◽  
Luigi Leone
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Selection Procedure ◽  
Factorial Structure ◽  
Personality Dimensions

The aim of this contribution is to present a new short adjective-based measure of the Five Factor Model (FFM) of personality, the Short Adjectives Checklist of BIg Five (SACBIF). We present the various steps of the construction and the validation of this instrument. First, 50 adjectives were selected with a selection procedure, the “Lining Up Technique” (LUT), specifically used to identify the best factorial markers of the FFM. Then, the factorial structure and the psychometric properties of the SACBIF were investigated. Finally, the SACBIF factorial structure was correlated with some main measures of the FFM to establish its construct validity and with some other personality dimensions to investigate how well these dimensions could be represented in the SACBIF factorial space.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document