scholarly journals URGENSI PENGATURAN TRADING IN INFLUENCE SEBAGAI SARANA PEMBANGUNAN MASYARAKAT

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yolanda Islamy
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Community Development ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Development Tool ◽  
The Law

Abstract This study aims to determine the law enforcement of trading in influence in practices and urgency of trading in influence regulation as a community development tool. The method in this study uses a normative juridical method with descriptive analytical specifications. This research is different from previous research where an assessment was carried out in the urgency of trading in influence regulation which is connected with the theory of community development. In practice, to ensnare perpetrators of corruption by trading their influence often uses the provisions of the criminal act of bribery, this is because there is a legal vacuum in Indonesia's positive law. When described and reflected in regulations in other countries, trading in influence has a different element from bribery. To overcome the culture of influence trading which is a criminal act of corruption, a means of community development is needed to change the culture of corruption itself. The results of the study reveal that by looking at the law enforcement of Trading in Influence in practice, the public prosecutor often charges a defendant by using Article 11 of Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 64 paragraph (1), whereas it can be said that not all of the elements of the article are fulfilled for the act of Trading In Influence when compared with the regulations stipulated in Article 18 UNCAC. Due to the vacuum of law, law enforcers are not effective in carrying out their duties. In order for law enforcement to run optimally and on target, it is important to formulate trading in influence arrangements. For the formulation of Trading in Influence, it is necessary to change and reform the law aimed at community development so that legal objectives can be achieved.Keywords: development; public; trading in influenceAbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penegakan hukum trading in influence dalam praktik dan urgensi pengaturan trading in influence sebagai sarana pembangunan masyarakat. Metode dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi deskriptif analitis. Penelitian ini berbeda dengan penelitian terdahulu dimana dilakukan pengkajian dalam urgensi pengaturan trading in influence yang dihubungkan dengan teori pembangunan masyarakat. Dalam praktiknya untuk menjerat pelaku korupsi dengan memperdagangkan pengaruh yang dimilikinya seringkali menggunakan ketentuan tindak pidana suap, hal ini dikarenakan adanya kekosongan norma dalam hukum positif Indonesia. Apabila diuraikan dan bercermin pada pengaturan pada Negara lain, perdagangan pengaruh yang dikenal dengan trading in influence memiliki unsur yang berbeda dengan suap. Untuk mengatasi budaya perdagangan pengaruh yang merupakan tindak pidana korupsi diperlukan suatu sarana dalam pembangunan masyarakat untuk mengubah budaya korupsi itu sendiri. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan dengan melihat penegakan hukum trading in influence dalam praktik, seringkali penuntut umum mendakwakan seorang terdakwa dengan menggunakan Pasal 11 UU No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi juncto Pasal 55 ayat (1) juncto Pasal 64 ayat (1), padahal dapat dikatakan tidak seluruh unsur pasal tersebut terpenuhi untuk perbuatan trading in influence apabila dibandingkan dengan pengaturan yang diatur dalam Pasal 18 UNCAC. Oleh karena adanya kekosongan norma, penegak hukum menjadi tidak efektif dalam menjalankan tugasnya. Agar penegakan hukum dapat berjalan dengan maksimal dan tepat sasaran, pengaturan trading in influence menjadi hal penting untuk dirumuskan. Untuk perumusan trading in influence perlu adanya perubahan dan pembaharuan hukum yang bertujuan pada pembangunan masyarakat agar tujuan hukum dapat tercapai.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PENERAPAN SISTEM PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-42
Author(s):  
Sudirman Sudirman ◽  
Marwan Mas ◽  
Abd. Haris Hamid
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Proof System ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Law

Korupsi sebagai salah satu kejahatan yang bersifat luar biasa (Extra Ordinary Crime) dikarenakan begitu sulit dalam membuktikan kejahatan tersebut oleh penegak hukum, maka dari itu dibutuhkan kinerja extra untuk memberantas tindak pidana korupsi tersebut. Olehnya itu, mengenai pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dengan menggunakan ketentuan-ketentuan yang ada dalam Undang Undang hal itu diterapkan dalam Undang Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999. Undang Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, dimana beberapa pasalnya menganut tentang sistem pembuktian terbalik terbatas/berimbang. Pasal pasal yang mengatur tentang sistem pembuktian terbalik lebih jelas diatur dalam Pasal 12B, 12C, 37A, 38A, dan 38B. Pemberlakuan sistem pembuktian terbalik dalam perkara delik korupsi terhadap terdakwa meskipun hanya terbatas pada perkara suap (Gratifikasi) di atas Rp. 10 jt. Namun dengan adanya kewajiban terdakwa untuk membuktikan delik korupsi yang didakwakan kepadanya serta harta benda yang patut diduga berasal dari tindak pidana korupsi dan tidak bertumpuh lagi kepada jaksa penuntut umum, maka diharapkan dapat menjadi solusi dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi tersebut sebab perampasan terhadap harta benda terdakwa dapat dilakukan jika terdakwa tidak dapat membuktikan delik korupsi yang didakwakan kepadanya. Corruption is one of extraordinary crimes because it is so difficult in proving these crimes by law enforcement, and thus it requires extra performance to eradicate corruption. Therefore, regarding the eradication of corruption by using the provisions contained in the Law, this is applied in Law Number 31 Year 1999. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crime, in which several articles adhere to a reversed proof system is limited/balanced. Articles governing the reverse proof system are more clearly regulated in Articles 12B, 12C, 37A, 38A, and 38B. The implementation of the reversed proof system is in the case of corruption offenses against the defendant even though it is only limited to bribery cases (Gratification) over Rp10 million. However, with the defendant's obligation to prove the corruption offense charged with him and property that is reasonably suspected of originating from criminal acts of corruption and no longer rests on the public prosecutor, then it is expected to be a solution in eradicating these criminal acts of corruption because the confiscation of the assets of the defendant can be done if the defendant cannot prove the corruption offense charged with him.

scholarly journals REVERSAL BURDEN OF EVIDANCE ON A CRIMINAL CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 72
Author(s):  
Hasnawati Hasnawati
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Burden Of Proof ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Free Theory ◽  
Materials Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The research aim are to know the implementation of strict evidence in corruption committed in Indonesia and the constraint or obstacle faced by the corruption agency. The method of this research was normative juridical, because the research about reversal burden of proof of corruption in crime in Indonesia, which data obtained from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Research result reveal that implementation of proof in corruption cases is often felt to be ineffective and very burdensome to the Investigator apparatus therefor  two theories of proof, namely the free theory embraced by the dependent and negative theory according to the law adopted  by the public prosecutor or ordinary commonly called the theory reversal burden of  limited proof and in balance , the dependent has the right to proved that he has not commited a criminal act of corruption and that the prosecutor still has the duty to verify the indictment. The obstacles faced by law enforcement in implementing the burdening system of proof on the handling of corruption crime, namely the Contraints for the public Prosecutor and the obstacle for the judge divided into 2(two) types, namely : Juridical and Non Juridical Contrains

scholarly journals PENEGAKAN HUKUM LEGALISTIK DALAM PERSPEKTIF SOSIOLOGIS

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 216
Author(s):  
Cecep Wiharma
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Consciousness ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Law

The law society's awareness of the factors that strongly holds an important role in the efforts of the law enforcement itself, because it is this persfektif that need to be arranged so that the rule of law in this country can run. The relevance of the rule of law in the perspective of the rule of Justice as part of the legal consciousness of the public, is an alternative effort over mistrust against law enforcement officials of the ruling is positive and which is the mainstream of the view legalistic. When talking about the law in persfektif justice in the area of ethics or morality and does not discuss the legal issues in a sense narrow. How positive law is made, and whether it has made positive law represents the community's sense of fairness, as well as the legal apparatus that this mentality of enforcing the law? The culture of the law society legal culture depends on its members which is influenced by the background of his education, the environment, culture, position, even the interests. Keywords: Law enforcement, Legal Awareness, and Justice

scholarly journals VIOLATIONS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST MARK VIEWED FROM LAW NO. 20 OF 2016 CONCERNING MARK AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
Bakti Trisnawati
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Human Resources ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Material Wealth ◽  
The Public ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
The Law

<p>Right on marks are a source of material wealth for their owners because they have economic value that can bring high profits. Marks in trade also have dual<br />functions as competition tools and monopoly tools. Therefore, every mark owner needs to register his mark in order to get legal protection. Because in reality everyday there are many violations of the mark even though the mark has been registered, so the registered mark owner feels aggrieved. Violations due to people wanting to make a profit by cutting short the example of a registered and well-known mark, in addition to the Human Resources of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property itself also lacks control over the law on mark, so marks that should be rejected by many are approved. In addition, the Law Enforcement has indeed been implemented, but not maximal. This can be seen from the demands and fines of the Public Prosecutor and the Decision of the Panel of Judges is still very light</p>

Who Will Keep the Public Healthy? Assuring a Legally Prepared Workforce

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (S4) ◽  
pp. 81-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Anne Viverette ◽  
Jennifer Leaning ◽  
Susan K. Steeg ◽  
Kristine M. Gebbie ◽  
Maureen Litchveld
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
International Association ◽  
Department Of Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Rigorous Evaluation ◽  
The Public ◽  
Chiefs Of Police ◽  
The Law ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Evaluation Techniques

The Commission on the Accreditation of Law Enforcement (CALEA) employs rigorous evaluation techniques. Objective accreditation, such as made possible by CALEA, is important from the public’s perspective and in the national community of law enforcement.To counteract a general distrust of law enforcement agencies, the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) developed a grant to develop standards by which the quality and performance of law enforcement could be measured. LEAA developed 107 standards and, though well received by the law enforcement community, no single group or agency took the initiative to begin a program to evaluate and implement the standards. In 1979, the Department of Justice established an additional grant that effectively organized the four major law enforcement groups: the International Association of Chiefs of Police, the National Sheriff’s Association, the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives, and the Police Executive Research Forum.

scholarly journals The Request for Postponement of the Blashphemy Case Criminal Charge Reading by Police and Prosecutors

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-191
Author(s):  
Mohd Andalusia Masri ◽  
Dahlan Ali ◽  
Darmawan Darmawan
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Trust ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Police Intervention ◽  
The Public ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The North ◽  
Criminal Charge

This research aims to evaluate the police's request to postpone the criminal charge reading of the blasphemy case at the North Jakarta District Court, which was not based on Indonesia's positive law. The request to postpone a trial by the police without a legal basis could be considered a form of police intervention against the trial process, which has legal criminal consequences based on Article 3 Paragraph 2 and 3 of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Meanwhile, the request for a two-week trial postponement by the public prosecutors due to their inability to complete the criminal indictment, as well as considering the request from the police, has created an impression that the public prosecutors have complied with the request of the police. It also injured public trust that demanded a fair and transparent law enforcement process.

scholarly journals Optimizing The Role of Immigration Civil Servant Investigator in Treating Criminal Actions of People Smuggling

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-45
Author(s):  
Doniar Andre Vernanda ◽  
Tony Mirwanto
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Civil Servant ◽  
Immigration Law ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Case Files ◽  
National Police

Immigration law enforcement is carried out by civil servant investigators (PPNS) of Immigration by the mandate of Law No. 6 of 2011 on immigration. Immigration civil servant investigators have the authority to carry out the investigation process to hand over case files for subsequent prosecution in court by the public prosecutor. The results and discussion of this research are: (i) People smuggling is a crime where people illegally enter humans without legal and valid immigration travel documents aimed at personal or group gain by entering a country without going through an examination. immigration at the immigration checkpoint (TPI). Criminal sanctions related to human smuggling are regulated in article 120 of the Immigration Law with a maximum threat of 15 years and a fine of Rp. 1,500,000,000.00. (ii) According to the Immigration Law, pro Justitia law enforcement in immigration crimes is carried out by immigration civil servant investigators who have the duties and functions of carrying out investigations & investigations, coordinating with the National Police and other law enforcement agencies as well as carrying out other matters which are ordered by immigration Law

scholarly journals PENERAPAN UNSUR TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PADA PELAKSANAAN PROGRAM KEMITRAAN DAN BINA LINGKUNGAN (Studi Putusan Perkara Nomor 6/Pid.Sus-TPK/2016/Pn.Pdg dan Nomor 07/Pid.Sus-TPK/2016/PN.Pdg)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-232
Author(s):  
Zulkifli Zulkifli ◽  
Fitriati Fitriati ◽  
Ferdi Ferdi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Community Development ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Corruption Case ◽  
The Law ◽  
Partnership Program

In the law enforcement of corruption, there are at least 2 (two) articles that are often used to ensnare the defendant, namely Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of Law Number 20 Year 2001 regarding the Amendment of Law Number 31 Year 1999 regarding Eradication of Corruption. In practice, the provision has been applied by the Judge in the decision of corruption case in the implementation of partnership program and environment development with the actors from the private sector, as the Manager of Lubuk Alung Regional IV branch PT. Sang Hyang Seri (Persero) is found guilty because it has been proven legally and convincingly committed a criminal act of corruption by misusing and using the. Community Development Program fund from PT. Angkasa Pura and PKBL funds from PT. Pertamina and PT. Bukit Asam

scholarly journals Local Self-Government in the Public Government System: A New Constitutional Dimension

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 23-26
Author(s):  
Oleg A. Kozhevnikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Public Power ◽  
The Public ◽  
System A ◽  
International Obligations ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The article analyzes certain provisions of the Law of the Russian Federation on the amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of March 14, 2020 No. 1-FKZ “On improving the regulation of certain issues of the organization and functioning of public power” in terms of regulatory regulation of local self-government. According to the analysis the author comes to the conclusion that with the entry into effect of the mentioned legal act the content of individual elements of the constitutional-legal bases of local self-government will change, but the nature and scope of modifications in many respects will depend on the provisions of the rules of sectoral legislation aimed at implementing the relevant provisions of the Constitution. In this regard, the Federal legislator has a huge responsibility to create an “updated” legal framework for the implementation of the constitutional foundations of local self-government, taking into account the already established law enforcement practice, the positions of the constitutional court of the Russian Federation, as well as the state's international obligations under the European Charter on local self-government.

scholarly journals Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pengancaman dalam Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-58
Author(s):  
Sry Wahyuni ◽  
Elwidarifa Marwenny
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Values ◽  
District Court ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Research Implication ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law

The subject matter of this research is the Juridical Review of the Crime of Threats in the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (Case Study of the Koto Baru District Court). This issue is divided into two sub-discussions, first, how is the application of material crimes against criminal acts of threats in the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions, second, how are judges' legal considerations in imposing crimes against threats of threats in the Law on Electronic Information and transactions. The method used in this research is to use a normative juridical problem approach. about the problem that is the object of the problem.The results showed that efforts to apply sanctions were made to overcome the perpetrators of extortion and threats, namely: firmly enforcing the existing positive laws. For subjective positive law enforcement, it may be necessary to have instruments or law enforcers who have the instinct of justice, namely "Judges" who decide all existing cases. The research implication is: it is hoped that the inculcation of social values ​​and norms in society in using social media and in UUITE is not trapped in behavior that plunges them into criminal acts / crimes, it is also hoped that the Panel of Judges in deciding cases must consider more The facts of the trial, the elements of the offense, and the consideration of the severity of the crime with reference to the defendant's situation and the victim's loss.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document