scholarly journals Pengaruh Gaya Belajar dan Sikap Siswa pada Pelajaran Matematika terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leny Hartati

<p>This study aims to determine the effect of learning styles and attitudes of <br />students in math on math learning outcomes. The method used is the method Expose Facto. The study sample drawn from a population with affordable proportional random technique, as many as 60 students. The instrument used in this study is a questionnaire instrument to measure learning style variables and variable attitudes of students in math, and test instruments, to measure the outcomes of learning mathematics. The research design used in this study is a 3 x 2 factorial design with three variables consisting of two independent variables, namely cognitive learning styles and attitudes of students in math, as well as the dependent variable, which is the result of learning mathematics. From the <br />data processing obtained the following results: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style, auditory and kinesthetic. It is in the show by the price of the F - count of 2,494 with a probability of 0.047 sig (sig &lt; 0.05) at significance level ? = 5 %. (2) The results of the mathematical learning of students who have a positive attitude at a higher math than students who have a negative attitude on math. It is in the show by the price of the F - count of 3,124 with a probability <br />of 0.018 sig (sig &lt; 0.05) at significance level. (3) There is no interaction between the learning styles of students in math attitudes toward math learning outcomes. It is in the show by the price of the F - calculated interaction probability value was 1.621 while sig. for interaction (learning styles * attitude of students in math) of 0.140 (sig &gt; 0.05). </p>

Author(s):  
Nastiti ◽  
Wahyu Rika Agustin

The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a difference between learning outcomes based on VAK learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) in Integrated Social Studies subjects for seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. Researchers used a comparative quantitative approach with a comparative causal design or ex post facto. The population in the study were all students of class VII, amounting to 295 students and the sample was 59 students taken from class VII H and I. The sample was taken using simple random sampling technique. The study used a questionnaire and documentation as data collection instruments. While the data analysis technique used kruskal wallis. The results showed that good learning outcomes based on visual learning styles were 20%, low learning outcomes were 60%, and moderate learning outcomes were 20%. Furthermore, good learning outcomes based on auditory learning styles are 68%, low learning outcomes are 3%, and moderate learning outcomes are 29%. Finally, good kinesthetic learning outcomes are 22%, low learning outcomes are 73%, and low learning outcomes are 5%. Based on these results, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in learning outcomes based on learning styles using the VAK learning style in Integrated Social Studies subjects class VII SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. This can be seen from the sig value. namely 0.000 <from the significance level of 5% (0.05).


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
Harun Sitompul

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junaidi Amin Sitepu ◽  
Samsidar Tanjung

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untu mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan metode pemelajaran role play dan hasil belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan metode ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditori, dan gaya belajar kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dengan gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar IPS. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan rancangan faktorial 2 X 3. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis varians (ANAVA) dua jalur dengan taraf signifikansi 5 % (α = 0.05).. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran role play lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditori, dan gaya belajar kinesteti; (3) terdapat interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar  dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar IPS. Kata Kunci: role play dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar ips Abstract: This study aims untu determine: (1) the results of social studies students that learned by using learning role play and learning outcomes of students that learned by using the expository method, (2) the learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style, learning style auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles, (3) the interaction between the learning method with learning styles in influencing learning outcomes IPS. The research method using quasi-experimental method with factorial design 2 X 3. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) two lanes with a significance level of 5% (α = 0,05) .. The results showed: (1) the results of social studies students that learned with learning methods play a higher role than the results of social studies students that learned with expository teaching methods; (2) there are differences in learning outcomes between students who have a visual learning style, auditory learning styles and learning styles kinesteti; (3) There is no interaction between teaching methods and learning styles to improve learning outcomes IPS. Keywords: role play and learning style on learning outcomes ips


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Marianto Pardosi

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika antara siswa yang diajar dengan model  pembelajaran inkuiri dan yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran masyarakat belajar, (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika  antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar auditorial, (3) interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VI Sekolah Dasar Negeri 118299 Aek Raso, Teknik penarikan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajarn inkuiri lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran masyarakat belajar, (2) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar auditorial, (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Perhitungan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan pada hasil belajar matematika antara model pembelajaran inkuiri dan masyarakat belajar, begitu pula anatara gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar auditorial. Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran, inquiri, masyarakat belajar, gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditorial, matematika Abstract: This study aims to find out: (1) Differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students taught with inquiry learning models and those taught with learning communities learning models, (2) Differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who have visual learning styles and auditory learning styles , (3) the interaction between learning models and learning styles on learning outcomes in mathematics. The population of this research is all students of grade VI of State Elementary School 118299 Aek Raso, withdrawal technique with cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial research design. Data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significant level α = 0.05. The research findings show that: (1) the learning outcomes of students who are taught with inquiry learning models are higher than the learning outcomes of students taught with learning models of learning communities, (2) the results of learning mathematics students who have higher visual learning styles than student learning outcomes which has an auditory learning style, (3) there is an interaction between the learning model and learning style on learning outcomes in mathematics. Further test calculations with the Scheffe test show significant differences in mathematics learning outcomes between inquiry learning models and learning communities, as well as between visual learning styles and auditory learning styles. Keywords: learning model, inquiry, learning society, visual learning style, auditory learning style, mathematics


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
Abdul Halim

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS terhadap hasil belajar fisika, pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika, dan interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar tehadap hasil belajar fisika. Metode quasi eksperimen dan desain faktorial 2x3 pada taraf signifikansi α=5%. Sebelum uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe dilakukan uji normalitas Lilifors serta uji homogenitas menggunakan uji F dan uji Barlett. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan ada pengaruh strategi pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar fisika. Hasil belajar fisika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar fisika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS. Ada pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika. Siswa yang memiliki kecenderungan gaya belajar auditorial memperoleh hasil belajar fisika lebih tinggi dibandingkan hasil belajar fisika siswa yang memiliki kecenderungan gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar kinestetik. Serta terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika siswa.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar fisika Abstract: This study aims to determine the effect of STAD type cooperative learning strategies and cooperative learning strategies of TPS type to the results of physics learning, the influence of learning styles on the learning outcomes of physics, and the interaction between learning strategies and learning styles tehadap the results of physics learning. Method of quasi experiment and 2x3 factorial design at significance level α = 5%. Before the advanced test with Scheffe test is done Lilifors normality test and homogeneity test using F test and Barlett test. The findings of this study indicate that there is an influence of learning strategies on physics learning outcomes. The result of student physics learning taught by STAD type cooperative learning strategy is higher than the students' physics learning result which is taught by cooperative learning strategy of TPS type. There is an influence of learning styles on the learning outcomes of physics. Students who have a tendency of auditorial learning style to obtain the results of physics learning is higher than the results of physics learning students who have a tendency of visual learning style and kinesthetic learning style. And there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles to student physics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, physics learning outcomes


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Bq. Malikah Hr ◽  
Sukandi Sukandi ◽  
Ni Putu Ety Lismaya Dewi

The research aims to know the effect of realistic mathematics learning in mathematics-II courses seen from the learning styles of Civil Engineering students. This type of research uses a quasi-experimental with a 2 x 3 factorial design. The sample consists of 30 second-semester students of Civil Engineering of Mandalika university of Education. The instruments in the research were a learning style questionnaire and an essay test that contained questions for mathematics II courses. The test of data analysis using two-way analysis of variance. The results showed that the learning method and learning style had a significant effect on student learning outcomes in mathematics II courses. The influence of learning methods was 26.8% and the influence of student learning styles was 37.8%. Based on the marginal average, the average of students with realistic mathematics learning methods was 70.73 and the average of students with conventional methods was 65.93. In a class that was treated with realistic mathematics learning, the average of students with visual learning styles was 75.80, the average of students with auditory learning styles was 70.80 and the average of students with kinesthetic learning styles was 65.60. It was concluded that in mathematics II courses, the application of realistic mathematics learning was effective in improving student learning outcomes and students with visual learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles and students auditory learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with kinesthetic learning styles.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tri Purna Widiyani ◽  
Wahyudi Wahyudi Wahyudi ◽  
Suhartono Suhartono Suhartono

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="581"><p> </p><p><strong>Abstract</strong></p><p><em>The study aimed to determine the possitive effect of learning style and learning motivation on mathematics learning outcomes to fifth grade students of public elementary schools in Kepatihan cluster Kebumen sub-district in academic year of 2019/2020</em><em>.</em><em> The research was quantitative correlational study. The population and samples were 155 fifth grade students of public elementary schools in Kepatihan cluster. Sampling technique was non </em><em>probability sampling</em><em> which was saturation sampling</em><em>. Data anaylisis used two-way analysis of variance with 2 x 2 factorial design. The results showed that: (1) there was positive effect of learning styles on mathematics learning outcomes that auditory learning styles were better than visual learning styles with F value = 4.427 </em><em>&gt;</em><em> F tabel = 3.11 and sig = 0.038 &lt; 0.05. The mean value of visual learning styles was 75.12 &lt; 79.67 of auditory styles and the contribution of learning styles to mathematics learning outcomes was 2.37%; (2) there was positive effect of learning motivation on mathematics learning outcomes that high learning motivation was better than low learning motivation  with F value = 16.885 </em><em>&gt;</em><em> </em><em>F tabel = 3.11 and sig = 0.000 &lt; 0.05. The mean value of high learning motivation was 81.83 &gt; 72.95 of low motivation and the contribution of learning motivation to mathematics learning outcomes is 9.93%.  </em></p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong><em>learning style, learning motivation, mathematics</em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui adanya pengaruh positif gaya belajar dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas V SDN se-Gugus Kepatihan Kecamatan Kebumen Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode korelasi. Populasi dan sampel adalah 155 siswa kelas V SDN se-Gugus Kepatihan dengan teknik non probability sampling jenis sampling jenuh. Analisis data menggunakan analisis varian dua jalur dengan rancangan faktorial 2 x 2. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) terdapat pengaruh positif gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika; gaya belajar auditorial lebih baik daripada gaya belajar visual dengan nilai F hitung = 4,427 &gt; F tabel = 3,11 dan nilai sig = 0,038 &lt; 0,05. Nilai rata-rata gaya belajar visual = 75,12 &lt; auditorial = 79,67 dan sumbangan efektif gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika sebesar 2,37 %. (2) terdapat pengaruh positif motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika; motivasi belajar tinggi lebih baik daripada motivasi belajar rendah dengan nilai F hitung = 16,885 &gt; F tabel = 3,11 dan nilai sig = 0,000 &lt; 0,05. Nilai rata-rata motivasi tinggi = 81,83 &gt; motivasi rendah = 72,95 dan sumbangan efektif motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika sebesar 9,93 %. </p><p><strong>Kata kunci:</strong><strong> </strong><em>gaya belajar, motivasi belajar, matematika</em></p><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table>


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Novidawaty Tambunan

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada strategi pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada gaya belajar Visual; (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, menggambar teknik Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) Differences in learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 between students taught with Mind Map learning strategies and expository learning strategies, (2) Differences in learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 between students who have visual learning styles with kinestetik, (3) interaction between learning strategy and learning style to learning result Drawing technique 1. Method research using quasi experimental method with 2 x factorial research designs 2. Data analysis technique using two-way ANOVA at significance level α = 0,05. The results showed that: (1) learning result Drawing technique 1 students taught by Mind Map learning strategy, higher than expository learning strategy; (2) learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 students who have a higher learning style Kinesthetic than Visual learning style; (3) there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes Drawing technique 1. Keywords: learning strategy, learning style, drawing technique


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-37
Author(s):  
Chaira Wati ◽  
Muzakkir Muzakkir

Teacher must understand Students learning style, because the learning style each student in learning mathematics is different. The aim of this study is to determine student learning style in learning mathematics at SMPN 10 Banda Aceh. The methodology use in this study is a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. The data are collected by using observation and questionnaires. The data analysis technique uses percentages and describes. The subjects of this research were the students of class VIII-C SMPN 10 Banda Aceh. The results of observations made in class indicate that students tend to have a visual learning style. Then the results of the student questionnaire showed that their students tended to have a visual learning style. Based on the research results obtained through observations and questionnaires on student learning styles in mathematics in class VIII-C of SMPN 10 Banda Aceh, they are more likely to have a visual learning style.Keywords: Mathematics Learning, Learning Style AbstrakPengetahuan guru tentang gaya belajar siswa sangat penting, dikarenakan setiap siswa memiliki gaya belajar yang berbeda – beda antara satu dengan lainnya. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui gaya belajar matematika siswa di SMPN 10 Banda Aceh. Metedologi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Pegumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan instrumen observasi dan angket. Teknik analisis data menggunakan persentase dan mendeskripsikan data yang diperoleh dari observasi dan angket. Subjek penelitian merupakan seluruh siswa kelas VIII-C SMPN 10 Banda Aceh. Hasil observasi yang dilakukan di kelas menunjukkan bahwa siswanya memiliki gaya belajar visual. Hasil angket siswa menunjukkan gaya belajar visual lebih dominan dari gaya belajar yang lain. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang diperoleh melalui observasi dan angket gaya belajar matematika siswa kelas VIII-C SMPN 10 Banda Aceh didominasi oleh gaya belajar visual.Kata kunci: Pembelajaran Matematika, Gaya Belajar


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Mursid

Abstrak: Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X Program keahlian teknik mesin SMK Negeri 2 dan SMK Negeri 5 Medan. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada gaya belajar Visual, (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin. Perhitungan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe menunjukkan hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, sedangkan hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran mind map dan ekspositori, gaya belajar, gambar teknik mesin Abstract: The purpose of this study is to determine: (1) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering among students who are taught by learning strategies Mind Map and expository, (2) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering among students who have a visual learning style with kinesthetic, (3 ) interaction between the learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes Figure engineering. The population of this research is all class X students of mechanical engineering expertise program SMK Negeri 2 and SMK Negeri 5 Medan. The research method using quasi-experimental research design 2 x 2 factorial ANOVA Analysis using two lanes at significance level α = 0.05. The findings show that: (1) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering students who are taught by learning strategy Mind Map, higher than in the expository, (2) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering students who have learning style Kinesthetic higher than learning styles Visual, (3) there is no interaction between the learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes Figure engineering. Further test calculations with Scheffe test showed learning outcomes Figure engineering students who have a kinesthetic learning style higher when taught by Mind Map instructional strategies, while learning outcomes Picture mechanical engineering students who have a visual learning style higher when taught by expository strategy. Keywords: learning strategies mind map and expository, learning styles, mechanical engineering drawings


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document