scholarly journals 2 Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Shellac

1986 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 309-327 ◽  

Cosmetic-grade Shellac is a mixture of hydroxyaliphatic and alicyclic acids and their polyesters. It is used in cosmetic formulations at concentrations up to 25%. Shellac had an LD50 of greater than 5 g/kg in rats. Results of acute animal toxicity studies using cosmetic formulations containing up to 6% Shellac indicated no adverse effects upon oral (rats), dermal (rabbits), ocular (rabbits), and respiratory tract (rabbits) exposure. Chronic inhalation of a Shellac hair spray formulation by rabbits produced no observable toxicity. No treatment-related toxic or pathologic effects were observed when concentrations of Shellac up to 10,000 ppm were fed to rats in a subchronic study. Ames' mutagenicity assays, with and without metabolic activation, were negative. Clinical assessment of safety of cosmetic formulations containing up to 6% Shellac indicated no measurable irritation and absence of sensitization and photosensitization. It is concluded that cosmetic-grade Shellac is safe for use in cosmetic formulations at concentrations up to 6%, the maximum concentration tested.

1982 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 169-192 ◽  

Glyceryl Stearate and Glyceryl Stearate/SE are the esterification products of glycerine and stearic acid, and are used in cosmetic formulations as emollients, emulsifiers, and stabilizers. In acute oral toxicity studies in rats, both ingredients were slightly toxic. Glyceryl Stearate in the diet of rats for three consecutive generations had no adverse effects. Five percent Glyceryl Stearate did not promote the carcinogenicity of DMBA in mouse skin. In subchronic and chronic dermal toxicity tests, Glyceryl Stearate was nontoxic to rabbits but did cause moderate irritation. Primary eye irritation studies, at concentrations up to 100%, were mildly irritating or nonirritating to rabbits. Single and Repeated Insult Patch Tests showed both ingredients to be nonsensitizing and nonirritating. Products containing 2% Glyceryl Stearate were nonphototoxic and nonphotoallergenic. On the basis of the available data, it is concluded that Glyceryl Stearate and Glyceryl Stearate/SE are safe for topical application to humans in the present practices of use and concentration.


1990 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-228 ◽  

AMP and AMPD are substituted aliphatic alcohols. AMP is used in cosmetic products at concentrations up to 10%, AMPD is used at concentrations up to 5%. AMP and AMPD when buffered, and orally administered, are practically nontoxic to rats and mice. In primary irritation studies, AMP and formulations containing AMP were, at most, minimally irritating to abraded and nonabraded rabbit skin. Cosmetic formulations containing AMPD were only minimally irritating to rabbit skin. AMP was not an intradermal sensitizer in guinea pigs. Cosmetic formulations containing AMPD and/or AMP were minimal to moderate ocular irritants. AMP and AMPD were nonmutagenic, both with and without metabolic activation, in Salmonella typhimurium strains. In clinical studies, AMP was neither a primary dermal irritant nor a contact sensitizer. AMPD was neither a primary irritant, fatiguing agent, nor sensitizer when tested in humans. AMP and AMPD are highly alkaline in pure form, they are buffered in cosmetic formulations, and, therefore, the adverse reactions seen with the undiluted chemical would not be expected with the cosmetic product. The highest level of both AMP and AMPD for which test data were available was 1.0%, therefore the safe use of these two compounds should be limited to this test value. Neither ingredient should be used in cosmetic products containing nitrosating agents.


1985 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 199-221 ◽  

Hydrolyzed Collagen is a hydrolysate derived from animal byproducts. It is used in cosmetic products as a conditioner or moisturizer at concentrations less than 5 percent. Hydrolyzed Collagen was practically nontoxic when administered orally or dermally in acute animal toxicity studies. This ingredient was minimally irritating to rabbit eyes when tested full-strength. Primary skin irritation tests in rabbits indicated that Hydrolyzed Collagen was nonirritating or minimally irritating when tested full-strength. Subchronic dermal studies on 2 cosmetic formulations containing 2 percent Hydrolyzed Collagen were negative for systemic toxicity. Hydrolyzed Collagen was nonsensitizing in guinea pigs. In clinical studies, Hydrolyzed Collagen produced no skin irritation, sensitization, or indication of phototoxicity. On the basis of the available animal and clinical data, it is concluded that Hydrolyzed Collagen is safe as a cosmetic ingredient in the present practices of use and concentration.


1986 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 373-390

Zinc Phenolsulfonate is a substituted phenol used in cosmetic products as an antimicrobial and astringent at concentrations up to 5%. This compound was moderately toxic when administered orally. No deaths or growth inhibition were reported in a 91-day rat feeding study. No significant toxicity was reported when Zinc Phenolsulfonate was applied dermally in acute and sub-chronic studies. A single insult patch test of a 5% aqueous Zinc Phenolsulfonate solution was negative for skin irritation in rabbits. Minimal skin irritation was reported when 100% Zinc Phenolsulfonate was tested. The Buehler test for delayed sensitization was negative. No eye irritation was observed in rabbits exposed to 5% aqueous Zinc Phenolsulfonate and only moderate irritation at 100%. No mutagenicity was observed when Zinc Phenolsulfonate was tested with and without metabolic activation in five Salmonella strains. Clinical assessment of Zinc Phenolsulfonate with product formulations indicated that Zinc Phenolsulfonate was at most a mild skin irritant in normal use, but not a sensitizer. It is concluded that Zinc Phenolsulfonate is safe as a cosmetic ingredient in the present practices of use and concentration.


1991 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 193-203 ◽  

Polyacrylamide is a polymer of controllable molecular weight formed from the polymerization of acrylamide monomers. Average concentrations of the monomer were reported as less than 0.01% by several manufacturers. Polyacrylamide is used as a foam builder and stabilizer in shampoo products and as a vehicle in sunscreen preparations. An acute oral toxicity study of Polyacrylamide in rats reported that a single maximum oral dose of 4.0 g/kg body weight was tolerated. In a subchronic oral toxicity study in both rats and dogs, animals were given a maximum dose of 464 mg/kg body weight, with no signs of toxicity in any animals. Two separate studies in rats reported no absorption when the compound was administered by gavage. In a 2-year chronic oral toxicity study, rats fed between 500 and 10,000 ppm in their diet had no significant adverse effects. Similar results were obtained in dogs. A 2-year feeding study in rats fed up to 5.0% Polyacrylamide reported no significant adverse effects. Cutaneous tolerance tests performed to evaluate the irritation of Polyacrylamide indicated that the compound was relatively well tolerated. Undiluted Polyacrylamide applied to the conjunctival sac of the rabbit caused a very slight response. No compound-related lesions were noted in a three-generation reproductive study in which rats were fed either 500 or 2000 ppm Polyacrylamide. On the basis of data presented in this report, it is concluded that Polyacrylamide, with less than 0.01% acrylamide monomer content, is safe as a cosmetic ingredient as currently used.


2003 ◽  
Vol 22 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10-35

Dimethicone is a fluid mixture of fully methylated linear siloxane polymers end-blocked with trimethylsiloxy units. Methicone is a linear monomethyl polysiloxane. The other dimethicones and methicones covered in this review are siloxane polymers of Dimethicone and Methicone. Most of these ingredients function as conditioning agents in cosmetic formulations at current concentrations of use of ≤ 15%. Clinical and animal absorption studies reported that Dimethicone was not absorbed following oral or dermal exposure. Dimethicone, Methicone, and Vinyldimethicone were not acutely toxic following oral exposure. No adverse reactions were found in rabbits following short-term dermal dosing with 6% to 79% Dimethicone, yet adverse effects were noted with a hand cream formulation containing 1% Dimethicone, suggesting something else in the preparation was toxic. Mice and rats were dosed for 90 days with up to 10% Dimethicone without adverse effect. Dimethicone did not produce adverse effects in acute and short-term inhalation-route studies, Methicone and Vinyldimethicone were negative in acute exposure studies using rats, but Hexyl Methicone was toxic to rats at 5 mg/L delivered in small particle (mean diameter of 0.29 μ) aerosols. Most dermal irritation studies using rabbits classified Dimethicone as a minimal irritant. Dimethicone (tested undiluted and at 79%) was not a sensitizer in four assays using mice and guinea pigs. It was not a sensitizer at 5.0% in a clinical repeated insult patch test using 83 panelists. Most ocular irritation studies using rabbits classified Dimethicone as a mild to minimal irritant. Dimethicone was tested in numerous oral-dose (using rats) and dermal-dose (using rats, rabbits, and monkeys) reproductive and developmental toxicity studies. In a few studies, treated males had significantly decreased body weight and/or decreased testes or seminal vesicles weights. No treatment-related adverse findings were noted in dosed pregnant females or fetuses. Dimethicone was negative in all genotoxicity assays. It was negative in both an oral (tested at 91%) and dermal (tested at an unknown concentration) dose carcinogenicity assay using mice. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel considered it unlikely that any of these polymers would be significantly absorbed into the skin due to their large molecular weight. Although adverse effects were noted in one inhalation study with small aerosol particles, the expected particle sizes for cosmetic products would primarily be in the range of 60 to 80 μ, and less than 1% would be under 10 μ, which is an upper limit for respirable particles. Overall, the safety test data support the safety of these ingredients at the concentrations they are known to be used in cosmetic formulations. Accordingly, the CIR Expert Panel was of the opinion that Stearoxy Dimethicone, Dimethicone, Methicone, Amino Bis-propyl Dimethicone, Aminopropyl Dimethicone, Amodimethicone, Amodimethicone Hydroxystearate, Behenoxy Dimethicone, C24–28 Alkyl Methicone, C30–45 Alkyl Methicone, C30–45 Alkyl Dimethicone, Cetearyl Methicone, Cetyl Dimethicone, Dimethoxysilyl Ethylenediaminopropyl Dimethicone, Hexyl Methicone, Hydroxypropyldimethicone, Stearamidopropyl Dimethicone, Stearyl Dimethicone, Stearyl Methicone, and Vinyldimethicone are safe as used in cosmetic formulations.


1991 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-19 ◽  

Cyclomethicone is a mixture of cyclic dimethylpolysiloxane compounds used primarily as an emollient and solvent in cosmetic formulations at concentrations from <0.1%to>50%. Cyclomethicone is not significantly absorbed through the skin. Small amounts of Cyclomethicone were absorbed by both humans and monkeys in oral feeding studies. The absorbed Cyclomethicone was detected in both the urine and expired air. Acute oral dose of Cyclomethicone to rats produced no deaths nor any gross lesions. Short-term dermal studies produced no behavioral, local skin, gross, nor histopathological changes. In subchronic inhalation studies in monkeys, no significant differences were found between exposed and unexposed animals. Undiluted Cyclomethicone applied to the intact and abraded skin of rabbits produced little or no irritation in two studies. Ocular studies indicated that Cyclomethicone produced only slight transient conjunctival irritation in washed and unwashed eyes. Cyclomethicone did not produce reproductive effects in rats. Cyclomethicone was not a mutagen when assayed in the Ames test. Cyclomethicone was neither irritating nor sensitizing to human skin in two clinical studies. On the basis of the available data, it is concluded that Cyclomethicone is safe as a cosmetic ingredient in present practices of use.


1999 ◽  
Vol 18 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Alan Andersen

Isostearamidopropyl Morpholine Lactate is the lactic acid salt of isostearamidopropyl morpholine used as an antistatic agent in 20 cosmetic formulations, mostly hair preparations. The concentration of use in hair preparations is in the 1-5% range- Isostearamidopropyl Morpholine Lactate was nontoxic in acute oral toxicity studies in rats. Although Morpholine is considered a cutaneous, ocular, and mucous membrane irritant, and a sensitizer, Isostearamidopropyl Morpholine Lactate exhibits none of the sensitization and irritant reactions observed with Morpholine. Isostearamidopropyl Morpholine Lactate was minimally irritating to rabbit eyes, and mildly irritating to intact and abraded rabbit skin. Although sensitization was not seen in clinical tests, some irritancy was noted. Isostearamidopropyl Morpholine Lactate was not mutagenic in the Ames test, with or without metabolic activation, although cell killing was seen at most test concentrations. Although Morpholine is readily nitrosated to form carcinogenic nitrosamines, N-nitroso impurities were not detected in Isostearamidopropyl Morpholine Lactate. Mutagenicity data on Isostearamidopropyl Morpholine Lactate in a mammalian system were not available, nor were data available on skin penetration or toxicity associated with inhalation exposures. Accordingly, the safety of this ingredient in leave-on cosmetic formulations could not be determined. Based on the available data, this ingredient was considered safe for use in rinse-off cosmetic products. Additional data needed for assessing the safety of leave-on uses include: (i) skin penetration; if there is significant skin penetration, then both a 28-day dermal toxicity study to assess general skin and systemic toxicity, and a reproductive and developmental toxicity study are needed; (ii) one genotoxicity study in a mammalian system; if positive, then a 2-year dermal carcinogenesis study using National Toxicology Program (NTP) methods may be needed; and (iii) inhalation toxicity data.


1988 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-351 ◽  

Polyquaternium-10 is a polymeric quaternary ammonium derivative of hydroxyethyl cellulose that is used in cosmetics as a conditioner, thickener, and emollient at concentrations of ≤0.1%–5%. Polyquaternium-10 has, at most, only a low potential to penetrate the stratum corneum but is adsorbed by keratinous surfaces. The oral LD50 of Polyquaternium-10 was not obtained at 16 g/kg in rats. Inhalation, dermal, and ocular animal test data indicated, at most, only a low degree of toxicity at test concentrations of Polyquaternium-10 greater than that used in cosmetic products. Polyquaternium-10 with and without metabolic activation was not a mutagen in three separate assay systems. Polyquaternium-10 was neither an irritant nor a human sensitizer when tested at 2.0%. Cosmetic products containing up to 1% Polyquaternium-10 were not human irritants, sensitizers, or photosensitizers. On the basis of the information presented, it is concluded that Polyquaternium-10 is safe as a cosmetic ingredient in the present practices of use.


1985 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-266 ◽  

p-Phenylenediamine is a cosmetic hair dye intermediate used in permanent hair coloring products at concentrations of up to 5 percent (diluted 1:1 with an oxidizing agent prior to application). The extensive animal toxicity test data on p-Phenylenediamine and permanent cosmetic hair dyes containing this compound show that the degree of toxicity varies with concentration, test system and animal species. Animal data support a conclusion that this compound is neither a teratogen nor a carcinogen. Epidemiological data also support that hair dyes containing this ingredient are not carcinogenic. p-Phenylenediamine is a sensitizer and some persons may be sensitized under intended conditions of use. For those persons not sensitized, it is concluded that p-Phenylenediamine is safe as a hair dye ingredient at the current concentrations of use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document