CMBE
Competency-based medical education promises to provide effective and structured training, relying on the identification and measurement of trainee competency through standardized guidelines. Shifting to competency-based education approaches has provided the opportunity for training programs to re-examine and formally define core competencies representative of their scope of practice. Members of our team were involved in identifying the core surgical competencies that graduating residents of one specialty (Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (OTL-HNS)) needed to acquire. We used a modified Delphi approach wherein key stakeholders, including past and present program directors for one surgical subspecialty across Canada, were asked to rate all surgical procedures included in key specialty-specific policy documents and in a compiled comprehensive list of all procedures pertaining to OTL-HNS. We set out to engage in a data-driven approach to build consensus regarding core competencies for OTL-HNS. After several Delphi rounds, the polarization of participants became ingrained, and the act of selecting core competencies had the effect of both defining and failing to define the core aspects of the speciality. We found core competencies can, and do, overlap between specialties, representing a blurring of necessary competencies across specialties. This blurring could create overlapping or confounding professional identities and influence the accreditation of residency programs. This paper will not report on the findings derived from the Delphi process, but rather describes insights gained throughout our failed consensus process and explore the unintended consequences of attempting to define core competencies in one surgical specialty and how it ultimately led to the termination of our research and consensus-building initiative.