scholarly journals Identification of Core Competencies for an Undergraduate Food Safety Curriculum Using a Modified Delphi Approach

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynette M. Johnston ◽  
Martin Wiedmann ◽  
Alicia Orta-Ramirez ◽  
Haley F. Oliver ◽  
Kendra K. Nightingale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Safety ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach

scholarly journals CMBE

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nebras Alghazawi
Keyword(s):  
Core Competencies ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Surgical Specialty ◽  
The Core ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach ◽  
Surgical Subspecialty ◽  
Data Driven Approach ◽  
Competency Based

Competency-based medical education promises to provide effective and structured training, relying on the identification and measurement of trainee competency through standardized guidelines. Shifting to competency-based education approaches has provided the opportunity for training programs to re-examine and formally define core competencies representative of their scope of practice. Members of our team were involved in identifying the core surgical competencies that graduating residents of one specialty (Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (OTL-HNS)) needed to acquire. We used a modified Delphi approach wherein key stakeholders, including past and present program directors for one surgical subspecialty across Canada, were asked to rate all surgical procedures included in key specialty-specific policy documents and in a compiled comprehensive list of all procedures pertaining to OTL-HNS. We set out to engage in a data-driven approach to build consensus regarding core competencies for OTL-HNS. After several Delphi rounds, the polarization of participants became ingrained, and the act of selecting core competencies had the effect of both defining and failing to define the core aspects of the speciality. We found core competencies can, and do, overlap between specialties, representing a blurring of necessary competencies across specialties. This blurring could create overlapping or confounding professional identities and influence the accreditation of residency programs. This paper will not report on the findings derived from the Delphi process, but rather describes insights gained throughout our failed consensus process and explore the unintended consequences of attempting to define core competencies in one surgical specialty and how it ultimately led to the termination of our research and consensus-building initiative.

scholarly journals Consensus-based approach to managing opioids, including opioid misuse and opioid use disorder, in patients with serious illness: protocol for a modified Delphi process

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e045402
Author(s):  
Caroline King ◽  
Robert Arnold ◽  
Emily Dao ◽  
Jennifer Kapo ◽  
Jane Liebschutz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Misuse ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Serious Illness ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Management Guidance

IntroductionManagement of opioid misuse and opioid use disorder (OUD) among individuals with serious illness is an important yet understudied issue. Palliative care clinicians caring for individuals with serious illness, many of whom may live for months or years, describe a complex tension between weighing the benefits of opioids, which are considered a cornerstone of pain management in serious illness, and serious opioid-related harms like opioid misuse and OUD. And yet, little literature exists to inform the management of opioid misuse and OUDs among individuals with serious illness. Our objective is to provide evidence-based management guidance to clinicians caring for individuals with serious illness who develop opioid misuse or OUD.Methods and analysisWe chose a modified Delphi approach, which is appropriate when empirical evidence is lacking and expert input must be used to shape clinical guidance. We sought to recruit 60 clinicians with expertise in palliative care, addiction or both to participate in this study. We created seven patient cases that capture important management challenges in individuals with serious illness prescribed opioid therapy. We used ExpertLens, an online platform for conducting modified Delphi panels. Participants completed three rounds of data collection. In round 1, they rated and commented on the appropriateness of management choices for cases. In round 2, participants reviewed and discussed their own and other participants’ round 1 numerical responses and comments. In round 3 (currently ongoing), participants again reviewed rounds 1 and 2, and are allowed to change their final numerical responses. We used ExpertLens to automatically identify whether there is consensus, or disagreement, among responses in panels. Only round 3 responses will be used to assess final consensus and disagreement.Ethics and disseminationThis project received ethical approval from the University of Pittsburgh’s Institutional Review Board (study 19110301) and the RAND Institutional Research Board (study 2020-0142). Guidance from this work will be disseminated through national stakeholder networks to gain buy-in and endorsement. This study will also form the basis of an implementation toolkit for clinicians caring for individuals with serious illness who are at risk of opioid misuse or OUD.

scholarly journals Building a neuroinfectious disease consensus curriculum

Neurology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 208-216
Author(s):  
Arun Venkatesan ◽  
Felicia C. Chow ◽  
Allen Aksamit ◽  
Russell Bartt ◽  
Thomas P. Bleck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
American Academy ◽  
Delphi Technique ◽  
Fellowship Training ◽  
Consensus Process ◽  
Diverse Range ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach ◽  
Modified Delphi Technique ◽  
Comprehensive Curriculum ◽  
American Academy Of Neurology

ObjectiveTo delineate a comprehensive curriculum for fellowship training in neuroinfectious diseases, we conducted a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus among 11 experts in the field.MethodsThe authors invited a diverse range of experts from the American Academy of Neurology Neuro-Infectious Diseases (AAN Neuro-ID) Section to participate in a consensus process using a modified Delphi technique.ResultsA comprehensive list of topics was generated with 101 initial items. Through 3 rounds of voting and discussion, a curriculum with 83 items reached consensus.ConclusionsThe modified Delphi technique provides an efficient and rigorous means to reach consensus on topics requiring expert opinion. The AAN Neuro-ID section provided the pool of diverse experts, the infrastructure, and the community through which to accomplish the consensus project successfully. This process could be applied to other subspecialties and sections at the AAN.

scholarly journals Selecting contextually appropriate performance indicators in a circumpolar context: a modified Delphi approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Rich ◽  
Thomsen D’Hont ◽  
Kellie E. Murphy ◽  
Jeremy Veillard ◽  
Susan Chatwood
Keyword(s):  
Child Health ◽  
Performance Measurement ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Maternity Care ◽  
Cultural Safety ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Maternal Child Health ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach ◽  
Maternal Child

Abstract Background Meaningful performance measurement requires indicators to be scientifically robust and strategically focused. For many circumpolar states, indicators aligned with national strategies may ignore the priorities of northern, remote, or Indigenous populations. The aim of this project was to identify contextually appropriate performance indicators for maternity care in circumpolar regions. Methods Fourteen maternity care and health systems experts participated in a modified Delphi consensus process. The list of proposed indicators was derived from a previously published scoping review. Fourteen participants rated each proposed indicator according to importance, circumpolar relevance, validity, and reliability and suggested additional indicators for consideration. Results Consensus was achieved after two rounds, as measured by a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87. Eleven indicators, many of which represented physical health outcomes, were ranked highly on all four criteria. Twenty-nine additional indicators, largely focused on social determinants of health, health care responsiveness, and accessibility, were identified for further research. Travel for care, cultural safety and upstream structural determinants of health were identified as important themes. Conclusions This study identified the important gaps between current performance measurement strategies and the context and values that permeate maternal-child health in circumpolar regions. The indicators identified in this study provide an important foundation for ongoing work. We recommend that future work encompass an appreciation for the intersectoral nature of social, structural, and colonial determinants of maternal-child health in circumpolar regions.

scholarly journals Caregiver-Centered Care Health Workforce Competencies: Developing Consistent Support for Family Caregivers

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 15-15
Author(s):  
Jasneet Parmar ◽  
Sharon Anderson ◽  
Lisa Poole ◽  
Wendy Duggleby ◽  
Jayna Holyroyd-Leduc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Health Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Healthcare Settings ◽  
Delphi Approach ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Centered Care

Abstract Family caregivers [FCGs] are the backbone of the health system. They provide over 80% of the care for people with dementia, chronic illnesses and impairments. Despite evidence of their contributions and consequences of caregiving, support for FCGs has not been a health system priority. Education to prepare health providers to effectively identify, engage, assess, and support FCGs throughout the care trajectory is an innovative approach in addressing inconsistent system of supports for FCGs. We report on development and validation of the Caregiver-Centered Care Competency Framework to help with curricular design and subsequent evaluation of effectiveness of care providers working within healthcare settings to engage and support FCGs. We used a three round modified Delphi approach. An expert panel of 42 international, national, and provincial stakeholders agreed to participate. In the first 2 rounds, multi-level, interdisciplinary participants, rated the indicators in terms of importance and relevance. In the 3rd round consensus meeting, participants validated the six competency domains, including indicators in small group sessions. Thirty-four experts (81%) participated in the round 1, 36 (85.7%) in round 2, and 42 people (100%) in round 3. There was stable consensus across all three rounds, 96.07% of participants rated the indicators as essential or important (Round 1, 95.81%; Round 2, 94.15; Round 3, 98.23%). FCG research has been primarily focussed on educating FCGs to provide care. These competencies will shape the design of educational curricula and interdisciplinary training programs aimed at supporting the health and social care workforce to provide caregiver-centered care.

What initiatives do healthcare leaders agree are needed for healthcare system improvement? Results of a modified-Delphi study

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 1002-1012
Author(s):  
Stuart Barson ◽  
Robin Gauld ◽  
Jonathon Gray ◽  
Goran Henriks ◽  
Christina Krause ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
System Leaders ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify five quality improvement initiatives for healthcare system leaders, produced by such leaders themselves, and to provide some guidance on how these could be implemented. Design/methodology/approach A multi-stage modified-Delphi process was used, blending the Delphi approach of iterative information collection, analysis and feedback, with the option for participants to revise their judgments. Findings The process reached consensus on five initiatives: change information privacy laws; overhaul professional training and work in the workplace; use co-design methods; contract for value and outcomes across health and social care; and use data from across the public and private sectors to improve equity for vulnerable populations and the sickest people. Research limitations/implications Information could not be gathered from all participants at each stage of the modified-Delphi process, and the participants did not include patients and families, potentially limiting the scope and nature of input. Practical implications The practical implications are a set of findings based on what leaders would bring to a decision-making table in an ideal world if given broad scope and capacity to make policy and organisational changes to improve healthcare systems. Originality/value This study adds to the literature a suite of recommendations for healthcare quality improvement, produced by a group of experienced healthcare system leaders from a range of contexts.

scholarly journals LO042: Sonography in Hypotension and Cardiac Arrest (SHoC) - Hypotension: derivation of an evidence-based consensus algorithm for the integration of point of care ultrasound into resuscitation of hypotensive patients

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S44-S44 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Atkinson ◽  
J. Bowra ◽  
J. Milne ◽  
M. Lambert ◽  
B. Jarman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Point Of Care ◽  
Disease Incidence ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Consensus Algorithm ◽  
Professional Organizations ◽  
Clinical Indication ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach

Introduction: Point of care ultrasound has become an established tool in the initial management of patients with undifferentiated hypotension. Current established protocols (RUSH, ACES, etc) were developed by expert user opinion, rather than objective, prospective data. We wished to use reported disease incidence to develop an informed approach to PoCUS in hypotension using a “4 F’s” approach: Fluid; Form; Function; Filling. Methods: We summarized the incidence of PoCUS findings from an international multicentre RCT, and using a modified Delphi approach incorporating this data we obtained the input of 24 international experts associated with five professional organizations led by the International Federation of Emergency Medicine. The modified Delphi tool was developed to reach an international consensus on how to integrate PoCUS for hypotensive emergency department patients. Results: Rates of abnormal PoCUS findings from 151 patients with undifferentiated hypotension included left ventricular dynamic changes (43%), IVC abnormalities (27%), pericardial effusion (16%), and pleural fluid (8%). Abdominal pathology was rare (fluid 5%, AAA 2%). After two rounds of the survey, using majority consensus, agreement was reached on a SHoC-hypotension protocol comprising: A. Core: 1. Cardiac views (Sub-xiphoid and parasternal windows for pericardial fluid, cardiac form and ventricular function); 2. Lung views for pleural fluid and B-lines for filling status; and 3. IVC views for filling status; B. Supplementary: Additional cardiac views; and C. Additional views (when indicated) including peritoneal fluid, aorta, pelvic for IUP, and proximal leg veins for DVT. Conclusion: An international consensus process based on prospectively collected disease incidence has led to a proposed SHoC-hypotension PoCUS protocol comprising a stepwise clinical-indication based approach of Core, Supplementary and Additional PoCUS views.

scholarly journals An international survey and modified Delphi process revealed editors’ perceptions, training needs, and ratings of competency-related statements for the development of core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals

F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1634 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Galipeau ◽  
Kelly D. Cobey ◽  
Virginia Barbour ◽  
Patricia Baskin ◽  
Sally Bell-Syer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Core Competencies ◽  
Training Needs ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Publication Ethics ◽  
International Survey ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Biomedical Journals ◽  
The World ◽  
Peer Reviewers ◽  
And Training

Background: Scientific editors (i.e., those who make decisions on the content and policies of a journal) have a central role in the editorial process at biomedical journals. However, very little is known about the training needs of these editors or what competencies are required to perform effectively in this role. Methods: We conducted a survey of perceptions and training needs among scientific editors from major editorial organizations around the world, followed by a modified Delphi process in which we invited the same scientific editors to rate the importance of competency-related statements obtained from a previous scoping review. Results: A total of 148 participants completed the survey of perceptions and training needs. At least 80% of participants agreed on six of the 38 skill and expertise-related statements presented to them as being important or very important to their role as scientific editors. At least 80% agreed on three of the 38 statements as necessary skills they perceived themselves as possessing (well or very well).  The top five items on participants’ list of top training needs were training in statistics, research methods, publication ethics, recruiting and dealing with peer reviewers, and indexing of journals. The three rounds of the Delphi were completed by 83, 83, and 73 participants, respectively, which ultimately produced a list of 23 “highly rated” competency-related statements and another 86 “included” items. Conclusion: Both the survey and the modified Delphi process will be critical for understanding knowledge and training gaps among scientific editors when designing curriculum around core competencies in the future.

scholarly journals Early management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in a hospital without neurosurgical/neuroendovascular facilities: a consensus and clinical recommendations of the Italian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SIAARTI)

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edoardo Picetti ◽  
Maurizio Berardino ◽  
Alessandro Bertuccio ◽  
Rita Bertuetti ◽  
Edoardo Pietro Boccardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Interventional Neuroradiology ◽  
Italian Society ◽  
Early Management ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach ◽  
Specialized Center ◽  
Early Transfer

Abstract Background The immediate management of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients in hospitals without neurosurgical/neurointerventional facilities and their transfer to a specialized center is challenging and not well covered in existing guidelines. To address these issues, we created a consensus of experts endorsed by the Italian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) to provide clinical guidance. Methods A multidisciplinary consensus panel composed by 19 physicians selected for their established clinical and scientific expertise in the acute management of SAH patients with different specializations (anesthesia/intensive care, neurosurgery and interventional neuroradiology) was created. A modified Delphi approach was adopted. Results A total of 14 statements have been discussed. Consensus was reached on 11 strong recommendations and 2 weak recommendations. In one case, where consensus could not be agreed upon, no recommendation could be provided. Conclusions Management of SAH in a non-specialized setting and early transfer are difficult and may have a critical impact on outcome. Clinical advice, based on multidisciplinary consensus, might be helpful. Our recommendations cover most, but not all, topics of clinical relevance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document