Comparing the use of sum-scores and Item Response Theory’s person location scores as measures of Functional Somatic Symptoms
Purpose: This study aims to compare the use of sum-scores and person location scores from Item Response Theory (IRT) as outcome measures of Functional Somatic Symptoms (FSS) in an epidemiological study. Method: Data from 1247 participants (60% female) from the Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS) general population cohort study at the fifth (mean age = 22.2, SD = 0.64) and sixth (mean age = 25.6, SD = 0.6) measurement waves was employed. We fitted the Graded Response Model (GRM) from IRT to the 12 items of the “physical complaints” subscale of the Adult Self-Report (ASR) to calculate item and person location parameters. We performed bootstrapped multiple linear regressions to analyze the relationship between Positive Affect (PA) and FSS using person location scores and compared the results to results obtained using sum-scores. Results: The items “nausea” and “abdominal pain” were most discriminative. ASR sum-scores and person location scores were highly correlated, although the latter captured more variability. Using sum-scores and person location scores to study the association between PA and FSS did not result in relevant differences. Conclusion: Although person location scores capture more variability, we did not find added value in the longitudinal analyses of the association between PA and FSS.