scholarly journals Corporate Governance and Financial Performance in Nepal

NCC Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pitambar Lamichhane

This paper analyzes the factors that affect corporate governance and influence on financial performance of Nepalese firms for theperiod of fiscal year 2009/10 to 2015/16 using descriptive and causal comparative research design. The profit margin and return on assets are dependent variables usedto measure financial performance and corporate governance and firm related variables such as corporate governance index, age of firms, size of assets, debt ratio, market to book ratio and ownership concentration are considered as explanatory variables. The result of this paper reveals thatprofit margin and return on assets of firms are positively related with age, market to book ratio and overall corporate governance index which implies that higher age, market to book ratio and corporate governance increase financial performance of Nepalese firms. Further, the regression result of the study shows that size of assets and debt ratio have negative effect and ownership concentration has no relationship with firms’ financial performance. Finally, result of this paper concludes that corporate governance, market to book value ratio, age, size of assets and debt ratio have strong explaining power of financial performance of Nepalese firms.NCC JournalVol. 3, No. 1, 2018, Page: 108-120

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 10-25
Author(s):  
Rusni Syamsuddin ◽  
Muhammad Ali ◽  
Muhammad Sobarsyah

Tax avoidance is a strategy applied by taxpayers to undertake legally burden taxes to decrease tax payment. Avoidance techniques by exploiting loopholes in tax laws. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of corporate governance (institutional ownership, the board size, independent commissioners, audit boards) on tax avoidance (ETR) mediated by financial performance measured by Return on assets (ROA). The samples used were companies listed in the LQ45 index from the period of 2014 to 2018, with a total of 30 companies collected through purposive sampling. The study applied path analysis techniques using IBM SPSS 23 statistical software. These results indicate that corporate governance simultaneously influences financial performance and tax avoidance. Institutional ownership and audit committees have a positive and significant effect on financial performance. Interestingly, the size of the board of commissioners and independent commissioners were found insignificant to financial performance. To tax avoidance, the size of the board of commissioners, independent commissioners, and the audit board has a significant positive effect, but institutional ownership does not have a significant negative effect on tax avoidance, while financial performance negatively correlates to tax avoidance. Financial performance can mediate institutional ownership of tax avoidance. Differently, other independent variables did not show relationships.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 5535
Author(s):  
Marco Benvenuto ◽  
Roxana Loredana Avram ◽  
Alexandru Avram ◽  
Carmine Viola

Background: Our study aims to verify the impact of corporate governance index on financial performance, namely return on assets (ROA), general liquidity, capital adequacy and size of company expressed as total assets in the banking sector for both a developing and a developed country. In addition, we investigate the interactive effect of corporate governance on a homogenous and a heterogeneous banking system. These two banking systems were chosen in order to assess the impact of corporate governance on two distinct types of banking system: a homogenous one such as the Romanian one and a heterogeneous one such as the Italian one. The two systems are very distinct; the Romanian one is represented by only 34 banks, while the Italian one comprises more than 350 banks. Thus, our research question is how a modification in corporate governance legislation is influencing the two different banking systems. The research implication of our study is whether a modification in legislation, thus in the index of corporate governance, is feasible for two different banking sectors and what the best ways to increase the financial performance of banks are without compromising their resilience. Methods: Using survey data from the Italian and Romanian banking systems over the period 2007–2018, we find that the corporate governance has a significant, positive and long-lasting effect on profitability and capital adequacy in both countries. Results: Taking the size of the company into consideration, the impact of the Index of Corporate Governance (ICG) on a homogenous banking system is positive while the impact on a heterogeneous banking system is negative. Conclusions: Our study provides evidence of the impact of IGC on financial performance and sheds light on the importance of the size of the company. Therefore, one can state that the corporate governance principles applied do not encourage the growth of large banks in heterogeneous banking sectors, thereby suggesting new avenues of research associated with new perspectives.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
Nadya Dianitasari ◽  
Hersugondo Hersugondo

<p><em>This study aims to analyze the effect of banks model, the different types of ownership, and ownership concentration on bank financial performance. State ownership, domestic ownership and foreign ownersip were used as the ownership indicators and Return On Asset (ROA) ratio were used as the proxied of financial performance. The Population that was used in this research consisted of all conventional and islamic commercial banks which is listed in Directory of Indonesian Banking 2018 and published the financial statements during 2014-2019. After passed the purposive sampling method there were 94 banks obtained as samples. The data analysis technique used is descriptive statistic, classical assumption test and panel regression test with random effect model. The result of this research showed that banks model and state ownership have positively significant impact on ROA and foreign ownership has negatively significant impact while domestic ownership and ownership concentration have insignificantly impact on bank financial performance</em></p><p><em><br /></em></p><p><em>Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan yaitu untuk menganalisis pengaruh struktur kepemilikan bank yang terdiri dari kepemilikan pemerintah, domestik dan asing, lalu model bank dan konsentrasi kepemilikan terhadap kinerja keuangan perbankan. Kinerja keuangan tersebut diukur dengan rasio profitabilitas yang diproksikan dengan Return On Assets (ROA). Populasi penelitian yang digunakan adalah bank umum syariah dan konvensional di Indonesia yang terdapat pada daftar Direktori Perbankan tahun 2018. Penelitian ini menggunakan sejumlah 94 sampel dengan metode purposive sampling. Metode analisis yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah statistik deskriptif, uji asumsi klasik dan regresi data panel dengan model efek random. Hasil yang didapat pada penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa model bank dan kepemilikan pemerintah berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap ROA dan kepemilikan asing berpengaruh negatif signifikan, sedangkan kepemilikan domestik dan konsentrasi kepemilikan tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja bank.</em></p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Retno Ryani Kusumawati ◽  
Indra Sulistiana

This study was conducted to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on Financial Performance and Company Value in State-Owned Corporation in Indonesia in the era of 4.0 and society 5.0. Research subjects are state-owned corporation listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2013-2017 period. The samples taken are 10 State-Owned Corporation (BUMN) that are included in the criteria. The method used to analyze the relationship between variables in this study is multiple linear regression analysis. Hypothesis test results show that the Independent Board of Commissioners and Audit Committee have an effect on the Return on Assets (ROA) with a significance value of 0.012. The results of testing the second hypothesis Independent commissioners and audit committees have no simultaneous effect on Company Values with a significance value of 0.082. Partially the independent Board of Commissioners has an effect on Return On Assets (ROA) and company value. While the second variable of the Audit Committee does not affect the Return on Assets (ROA) and company value.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Citra Chairunissa ◽  
Raden Rosiyana Dewi

<p><em>T</em><em>he  objective  of  the  emperical  study  is  to  examine  and  to analyze  1)  The Influence of Intellectual Capital to Financial Performance, 2 ) The Influence of Intellectual Capital to Market Value, 3) The Influence of Intellectual Capital to Financial Performance with Corporate Governance as an Moderating  4) The Influence of Intellectual Capital to Market Value with Corporate Governance as an  Moderating  Variable.  The sample of  this emperical  study is the company financing company that listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) 2010-2012</em>.<em>  </em><em></em><em>T</em><em>his  research  uses  purposive  sampling  method. Data  analysis  techniques include  1)  Descriptive  statistics, 2)  Normality  Test, 3)  Classical  Test Assumptions : Multicollinearity and Heteroskidastity , 4) Regression Testing : Coefficient of Determination Test , F Test , danUji T. The results of this empirical study are 1) Intellectual Capital significant positive effect on the company 's financial  performance ,  2)  Intellectual  Capital significant  negative effect  on market valuation , 3) Intellectual Capital no significant effect on the financial performance of companies   with   moderated Corporate Governance, 4) Intellectual Capital  had  no  significant  effect  assessment  of  the  performance market with moderated Corporate Governance</em></p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
Bambang Purnomo Hediono ◽  
Insiwijati Prasetyaningsih

This study aims to examine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) implementation on  company,s financial performance. Sample size in this study were 16 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The Company’s Good Corporate Governance Index Score is based on ranking the SWA Governance Index. The analytical method used in this study uses a linear regression model. The results showed that GCG had a positive effect on corporate income, operating profit and post-tax profit. This shows that GCG has a positive effect on financial performance. Meanwhile, GCG  has no significant effect on stock price. Key Words: Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Financial Performance ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh implementasi Good Corporate Governance (GCG) terhadap kinerja keuangan Perusahaan. Ukuran sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah 16 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Skor Indek GCG Perusahaan mendasarkan pada perangkingan Indek Tata Kelola SWA.  Metode analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan model regresi  linier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa GCG berpengaruh positif terhadap pendapatan perusahaan, laba operasional dan laba setelah pajak. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa implementasi GCG berpengaruh positif terhadap kinerja keuangan. Sementara itu, GCG tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja harga saham.  Kata Kunci: Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Kinerja Keuangan


2021 ◽  
pp. 71-80
Author(s):  
Nurtika Ekawati ◽  
◽  
Unggul Purwohedi ◽  
Ari Warokka ◽  
◽  
...  

The banking sector plays an important role in the country's economic growth. International experience shows that a weak banking sector not only threatens the long-term stability of a country's economy. It can also cause a financial crisis which can lead to economic crisis. Therefore, it is important to identify and investigate the factors on which the financial performance of banks depends. The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of risk management, third-party funds and capital structure on banking sector financial performance in Indonesia and Thailand with corporate governance as moderating variable. The authors use return on assets (ROA) as the key indicator of bank efficiency. The data used in this study are secondary data, including nonperforming loan (NPL), loan-to-deposit ratio (LDR), operating expenses to operating income (BOPO), net interest margin (NIM), third party funds (TPF), debt-to-equity ratio (DER), return on assets (ROA), corporate governance. The data was obtained from the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (www.idx.co.id) and the Thai Stock Exchange (www.set.or.th). The sample used in this study is 20 conventional banks listed on the Indonesia and Thailand Stock Exchange from 2015-2019. The methodological basis of this study is the use of the Structural Equation Model (SEM) with Partial Least Square (PLS). Data processing was performed in the WarpPLS 7.0 software. The study results show that NPL and LDR have a negative and significant influence on the financial performance of banks. At the same time, the BOPO and DER do not affect the financial performance of banks. The NIM and TPF have a significant and positive influence on the bank's financial performance. In addition, corporate governance does not moderate risk management relationship to the bank's financial performance. The results of this study can benefit bank shareholders and customers, and bank management.


Author(s):  
Chermian Eforis

Objective - The purpose of this research is to determine the effect of good corporate governance (GCG) on Indonesia's SOEs and the influence of state ownership on company performance. Methodology/Technique - This study examines State Owned Enterprises in Indonesia that were listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2011 and 2015. Findings - The empirical results show that GCG and state ownership both have a positive influence on the company's financial performance (in this case, Return On Assets). However, the percentage of state ownership has a negative effect on the relationship between Good Corporate Governance and Return On Assets. Novelty - One agency cost is monitoring expenditure by the principal. Privatization is one way to improve the performance of SOEs. Privatization is believed to improve the performance of SOEs, as a result of increased supervision of the performance of SOEs in Indonesia. Type of Paper: Empirical Keywords: State Owned Enterprises; Good Corporate Governance; State Ownership; Return On Assets; Indonesia. JEL Classification: G32, H70, G34.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document