scholarly journals Comparison of Intrathecal Midazolam and Fentanyl Added to Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Appendicectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-337
Author(s):  
Puja Thapa ◽  
Sunita Panta ◽  
Biswo Ram Amatya ◽  
Mallika Rayamajhi
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Level ◽  
Tertiary Referral Hospital ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Prolonged Duration ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Effective Analgesia

Introduction: Hyperbaric Bupivacaine is the extensively used local anesthetic but the major disadvantage is profound sympathetic blockade leading to hypotension and prolonged duration of motor block. The addition of Fentanyl or Midazolam can provide excellent quality and prolong the duration of analgesia. The study aims to compare the effect of intrathecal Fentanyl with that of intrathecal Midazolam in combination with 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine on the duration and quality of spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing appendicectomy.Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, comparative and interventional study where patients were randomized into two equal groups. The study was conducted in a tertiary referral hospital from July 2018 to December 2018 after ethical approval. Group BF received Fentanyl and group BM received Midazolam The outcomes measured were, peak sensory level, quality of intraoperative analgesia and motor block, duration of effective analgesia, intraoperative and postoperative complications.Results: A total of 44 patients were studied with 22 in each arm. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, weight, height, duration of surgery, and ASA status of the patients. Peak sensory level and degree of motor block were not statistically different in the two arms. Duration of effective analgesia was 293.16±35 min in the BF group and 267.80±32 min in the BM group (p=0.01). Increased incidence of pruritus was recorded during the postoperative period in the Fentanyl group.Conclusions: Fentanyl and Midazolam both are equally effi cient adjuvant added to hyperbaric Bupivacaine for intrathecal use to improve the quality of spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing appendicectomy.

scholarly journals Anesthetic effects of varying doses of Fentanyl combined with spinal Bupivacaine in caesarean delivery

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Puja Thapa ◽  
Amir Babu Shrestha ◽  
Mallika Rayamajhi
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Caesarean Delivery ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Sensory Level ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Spinal Opioids ◽  
Effective Analgesia

<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p><p>Spinal opioids have gained popularity in recent years as they augment the analgesia produced by local anesthetics. Fentanyl is one of the opioids used for such purpose however the optimal dose has not been described adequately in the literature available so far in our setup. The aim of this study is to find out the effect of adding various doses of Fentanyl to low dose hyperbaric Bupivacaine intrathecally.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods</strong></p><p>Seventy-five parturients scheduled for caesarean delivery were randomly allocated into three groups (Bupivacaine-Fentanyl) BF10, BF20 and BF30 who received intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine 1.6 ml with Fentanyl 10µg, 20 µg and 30 µg respectively. Total volume was made to 2.2ml by adding normal saline. The outcomes measured were peak sensory level, degree of motor block, quality of intraoperative anesthesia, duration of effective analgesia, neonatal APGAR score and side effects were noted if any.</p><p><strong>Results</strong></p><p>Peak sensory level and degree of motor block was similar in all the groups. Peak sensory level (Thoracic Dermatome) was 4.52± 0.82, 4.32± 0.62 and 4.32± 0.74 (p=0.540) in BF10, BF20 and BF30 respectively. Degree of motor block was not significantly different (p=1.000). Quality of intraoperative anesthesia improved from BF10 to BF20 (P=0.040) but did not improve significantly from BF20 and BF30 (P=0.189). Duration of effective analgesia prolonged as the dose of Fentanyl increased which was in minutes 173.64±41, 216.80±32 and 273.16±35 (p=0.000) in BF10,BF20 and BF30 respectively. Neonatal APGAR scores were similar in all groups and very little adverse effects in higher doses.</p><p> <strong>Conclusion</strong></p><p>The combination of 1.6 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine and 20 µg of Fentanyl intrathecally provides excellent surgical anesthesia, prolonged postoperative effective analgesia with very few side effects. Increasing the dose of Fentanyl beyond it could prolong the postoperative pain relief but at the cost of increased adverse effects.</p>

Anesthetic effects of varying doses of Fentanyl combined with spinal Bupivacaine in caesarean delivery

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-10
Author(s):  
Puja Thapa ◽  
Amir Babu Shrestha ◽  
Mallika Rayamajhi
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Caesarean Delivery ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Sensory Level ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Spinal Opioids ◽  
Effective Analgesia

Introduction: Spinal opioids have gained popularity in recent years as they augment the analgesia produced by local anesthetics. Fentanyl is one of the opioids used for such purpose however the optimal dose has not been described adequately in the literature available so far in our setup. The aim of this study is to find out the effect of adding various doses of Fentanyl to low dose hyperbaric Bupivacaine intrathecally.Materials and methods:Seventy-five parturients scheduled for caesarean delivery were randomly allocated into three groups (Bupivacaine-Fentanyl) BF10, BF20 and BF30 who received intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine 1.6 ml with Fentanyl 10µg, 20 µg and 30 µg respectively. Total volume was made to 2.2ml by adding normal saline. The outcomes measured were peak sensory level, degree of motor block, quality of intraoperative anesthesia, duration of effective analgesia, neonatal APGAR score and side effects were noted if any.Results: Peak sensory level and degree of motor block was similar in all the groups. Peak sensory level (Thoracic Dermatome) was 4.52± 0.82, 4.32± 0.62 and 4.32± 0.74 (p=0.540) in BF10, BF20 and BF30 respectively. Degree of motor block was not significantly different (p=1.000). Quality of intraoperative anesthesia improved from BF10 to BF20 (P=0.040) but did not improve significantly from BF20 and BF30 (P=0.189). Duration of effective analgesia prolonged as the dose of Fentanyl increased which was in minutes 173.64±41, 216.80±32 and 273.16±35 (p=0.000) in BF10,BF20 and BF30 respectively. Neonatal APGAR scores were similar in all groups and very little adverse effects in higher doses.Conclusion: The combination of 1.6 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine and 20 µg of Fentanyl intrathecally provides excellent surgical anesthesia, prolonged postoperative effective analgesia with very few side effects. Increasing the dose of Fentanyl beyond it could prolong the postoperative pain relief but at the cost of increased adverse effects.

scholarly journals EFFECT OF INTRAVENOUS VERSUS INTRATHECAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE ON CHARACTERISTICS OF HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN LOWER LIMB SURGERY

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 427
Author(s):  
Laxman K Senapati ◽  
Priyadarsini Samanta
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Infusion Pump ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Sensory Level ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Lower Limb Surgery

Objectives: Dexmedetomidine was shown to prolong the duration of spinal anesthesia and enhance post-operative analgesia. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of intravenous (IV) versus intrathecal (IT) administration of dexmedetomidine on bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb surgery.Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted during the year 2014–15. 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–II aged 18–60 years scheduled for lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia were assigned randomly to two groups: (1) IT group (IT group) (n=30) patients received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 5 μg of dexmedetomidine intrathecally (100 μg/1 ml ampoule drawn in 40 IU/ml insulin syringe making 5 μg=2 IU=0.05 ml) and (2) IV group (IV group) (n=30) received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.05 ml of normal saline intrathecally followed 5 min later by IV dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg by infusion pump over 10 min as a single dose.Results: The IT group had a statistically significantly earlier sensory onset to T10 and shorter time from injection to highest sensory level (p<0.001). The regression times of two dermatomes, regression time to S1 dermatome and time to reach Bromage 3 motor block were significantly less in the IT group, whereas regression time to Bromage 0 was prolonged (p<0.001). The IT group showed a significantly longer time to the use of rescue analgesia and less analgesic consumption in first 24 h than the IV group (p<0.001). Furthermore, the intensity of pain was significantly less in the IT group as compared to IV group (p<0.001). Compared with IV group, the IT group had low sedation score, fewer overall side effects, which was statistically not significant (p>0.05).Conclusion: In bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for limb surgeries, dexmedetomidine, when administered intrathecally, has greater augmentation to sensory and motor block, more hemodynamic stability, better analgesic properties, and fewer overall side effects compared to the IV route of administration.

scholarly journals A comparative study of low doses of intrathecal ketamine and midazolam with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in infraumbilical surgeries

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 197
Author(s):  
Rajabhushanam M. ◽  
Sunil Kumar K. ◽  
Syed Ali Aasim ◽  
Venkatesh S.
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Rapid Onset ◽  
Spinal Block ◽  
P Value ◽  
Sensory Level ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Mean Time

Background: Infra-umbilical surgeries may be performed under local, regional (spinal or epidural) or general anaesthesia, spinal block is still a first choice, because of its rapid onset, high quality of blockade, lack of catheter related infection, less failure rate and also cost effective but the duration of block and postoperative analgesia is limited. The purpose of study was to compare the efficacy of adding ketamine to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with midazolam to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in elective infraumbilical procedures.Methods: A randomized, single blinded, clinical study. 60 subjects were enrolled from the patients presenting for elective infraumbilical surgeries after following the inclusion and exclusion criteria laid down for the study. Sixty ASA Grade I and II patients undergoing infra umbilical surgeries were randomly divided into one of the two equal groups (n=30).Results: Total 60 patients were included in this study. The mean time to achieve T10 sensory level and modified bromage scale III was prolonged in group M (4.33±1.09, 6.66±1.26 min) as compared to group K (3.3±0.7, 4.96±1.21 min) which was statistically significant (P value <0.05).Conclusions: The present study concludes that addition of intrathecal midazolam to hyperbaric bupivacaine provide very good and prolonged post-operative analgesia without significant intra-operative and post-operative side effects compared to intrathecal ketamine.

scholarly journals Influence of Positioning on Plain Levobupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Section

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Gori ◽  
Francesco Corradetti ◽  
Vittorio Cerotto ◽  
Vito Aldo Peduto
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Supine Position ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Sensory Level ◽  
Physical Status ◽  
Gravitational Forces ◽  
Block Level ◽  
Dermatomal Level

Background. The behaviour of isobaric levobupivacaine in relation to gravity when used in obstetric spinal anesthesia is unclear.Methods. 46 women with ASA physical status 1 undergoing cesarean section were randomly allocated to 2 groups. Spinal anesthesia with 12.5 mg levobupivacaine was performed in the sitting position in all women. Those in the first group were placed in the supine position immediately after the injection, while those in the second group were asked to remain seated for 2 minutes before assuming the supine position. The sensory block level, the onset of sensory and motor blocks, the regression of the sensory block for 2 dermatomes of the sensory block, the first request for analgesics, and the regression of motor block were recorded.Results. No differences in onset times, sensory level, or Bromage score were observed between the two groups. The time of first analgesic request was earlier in the seated group (supine131±42 min, seated106±29 min,P=.02).Conclusion. Isobaric levobupivacaine in women at term produces a subarachnoid block the dermatomal level of which does not depend on gravitational forces.

scholarly journals A COMPARISION OF INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPUVACAINE WITH BUPRENORPHINE AND HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE ALONE IN GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERIES FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (06) ◽  
pp. 773-777
Author(s):  
Archana Jadhav ◽  
◽  
Rashmi Bengali ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Respiratory Rate ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group B ◽  
Effective Analgesia

This study was performed at a tertiary care centre after the approval of the Institutional Ethical Committee and obtaining written informed consent from all patients. Sixty ASA I and II, aged 18- 65yrs, bodyweight 45-70kgs scheduled for gynaecological surgeries under spinal anaesthesia were chosen for the study and were divided into two groups named Group B and Group BN each comprising 30 patients. Group B received 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 0.5 ml normal saline and Group BN received 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 0.5ml (150mcg) of buprenorphine. Vital parameters like pulse rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, SpO2 were recorded at 0 (basal) 15, 30, 45, 90 and 180 minutes. Postoperatively heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate and SP02 were monitored at 3 ,6 ,12 and 24 hrs. The mean age, height, weight, duration of surgery were comparable. Time of onset of sensory blockade and motor blockade were noted. The time for rescue medication was 909.0±216.9 min in group BN with a range from 690 min to 1500 min and in group B it was 412.0±89.28 min with a range from 130 min to 195 min. Comparing both groups duration of effective analgesia was significantly higher in group BN with P<0.0001.thus, it can be concluded that addition of buprenorphine as an adjuvant in spinal anaesthesia excellently prolongs duration of analgesia in postoperative period with minimal side effects.

scholarly journals PERIOPERATIVE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL CLONIDINE AND FENTANYL WITH HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN SPINAL ANESTHESIA FOR VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 245
Author(s):  
Suman Chattopadhyay ◽  
Mallika Datta ◽  
Biswanath Biswas
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Mechanisms Of Action ◽  
Spinal Block ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Prolonged Duration ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Intrathecal Clonidine

ABSTRACTObjectives: Intrathecal fentanyl and clonidine are effective analgesics with different mechanisms of action. This study compares 25 µg of both thesedrugs given intrathecally regarding onset, quality, and duration of hyperbaric bupivacaine-induced spinal block and side effects.Methods: A total of 90 patients of ASA I and II were randomly allocated into three equal groups. Group A received 0.5 ml of 0.9% normal saline(placebo), Group B and Group C received 25 µg fentanyl and clonidine intrathecally added to 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, respectively. Theonset and regression time of sensory and motor blocks were recorded along with hemodynamic change, side effects, pain intensity (in terms of visualanalog score (VAS), and time to first rescue analgesic.Results: Intrathecal clonidine (25 μg) significantly prolongs sensory and motor blocks, with prolonged duration of analgesia in comparison withintrathecal fentanyl (25 µg) (325±15 minutes vs. 240±7.6 minutes). VAS score was similar, but sedation was more in clonidine group.Conclusion: We conclude that low-dose intrathecal clonidine is an effective adjuvant to bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia and provides betterpostoperative analgesia in comparison with intrathecal fentanyl.Keywords: Clonidine, Fentanyl, Bupivacaine, Regional, Spinal, Postoperative pain.

scholarly journals Comparison of effects of Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine in patients undergoing elective Caesarean section

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 859-863
Author(s):  
Sangeeta Subba ◽  
Arjun Arjun Chhetri ◽  
Rupak Bhattarai
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia is considered a reasonable choice for cesarean section. Bupivacaine and ropivacaine have been used as intrathecal drugs alone or in combination with various opioids. Ropivacaine is considered a valid and safe alternative to bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric ropivacaine with hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Methodology: Sixty pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section were allocated into two groups. Group R received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine (2 ml 0.75% plain ropivacaine mixed with 1 ml of 25 %dextrose) and Group B received 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Both the groups were compared in terms of onset of sensory and motor block, regression of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia and side effects. Results: The onset of sensory block was comparable in both groups but was statistically insignificant. The onset of motor block in Bupivacaine(7.53 ± 1.72) min was faster when compared to Ropivacaine group(14.33 ± 6.19) min. Regression of sensory and motor block both were faster in Ropivacaine group. Duration of analgesia was longer in Bupivacaine group(131.17 ± 32.95)min than Ropivacaine group(125.33 ± 30.54)min. Conclusion: Ropivacaine can be used as an alternative to Bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section but has a shorter duration of sensory and motor block.

CLONIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS UNDERGOING INFRAUMBLICAL SURGERIES

2021 ◽  
pp. 72-74
Author(s):  
Purushottam Singhal ◽  
Suresh Pandey ◽  
. S. P. Chittora
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Sensory Level ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Small Doses

Background: Use of adjuvant with small doses of local anesthetics is a preferred technique for spinal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries. This study tested the hypothesis that addition of small doses of clonidine augments the spinal block levels produced by hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients without affecting the side-effects. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Above 60 years patients were allocated to three equal groups. Group C received 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine without clonidine while Group C and Group C received 15 μg and 30 μg clonidine with 15 30 hyperbaric bupivacaine respectively for spinal anesthesia. Effect of clonidine on sensory block levels was the primary study outcome measure. Motor blockade and hemodynamic parameters were also studied. Results:Asignicantly higher median block levels were achieved in Group C (P < 0.05) and Group C (P <0.05) than Group C. Highest median 15 30 sensory block level, the mean times for sensory regression to T12 level and motor block regression were statistically signicant between Groups C15 and C and between Groups C and C. On comparison of fall in systolic blood pressure trends, there was no signicant difference in the clonidine 30 groups as compared with the control group. Conclusions: In elderly patients, clonidine when used intrathecally in doses of 15 μg or 30 μg with bupivacaine, signicantly potentiated the sensory block levels and duration of analgesia without affecting the trend of systolic blood pressure as compared to bupivacaine alone. Clonidine in doses of 30 μg however facilitated the ascent of sensory level block to unexpectedly higher dermatomes for a longer time.

COMPARISONS OF EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT DOSES OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS ADDITIVE IN INTRATHECAL BLOCKADE WITH 0.5% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN LOWER LIMB ORTHOPEDIC SURGERIES

2021 ◽  
pp. 21-23
Author(s):  
Shantanu Hazra ◽  
Debabanhi Barua ◽  
Sudeshna Mondal ◽  
Arpita Laha
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Sensory Level ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Stable Conditions ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group D

INTRODUCTION Lower limb surgeries may be performed under local, regional (spinal or epidural) or general anaesthesia, but neuraxial blockade is the preferred mode of anaesthesia. Spinal block is still therst choice because of its rapid onset, superior blockade, low risk of infection as from catheter in situ, 1 less failure rates and cost-effectiveness. Intrathecal local anaesthesia alone is associated with relatively short duration of action and thus early analgesic intervention is needed in post-operative period. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES With use of dexmedetomidine in 3 different graded doses with hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally as regional anaesthesia for lower limb surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY This Prospective double blinded randomized controlled study. The study will be conducted in adult patients aged between 18-50 years undergoing lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia in orthopedic OT, dept. of Anaethesiology, Medical college & hospital, Kolkata. Duration of the study One year (9 months for data collection & 3 months for data analysis, review& report writing). Total 63 patients in our study. RESULTS We found the mean of two segment regression time from highest sensory level in Group B was 130.56min; in group C was 171.34min; ingroup D was 217.85min So, block regression was signicantly slower with the addition of intrathecal dexmedetomidine (Group D) as compared to group C & B ( P < 0.0001) The mean regression time to S1 from highest sensory level for Group Bwas 289.43 min ( SD- 12.43) For Group C, the mean regression time to S1 from highest sensory level was 402.71 min ( SD- 28.60) For Group D, the mean regression time to S1 from highest sensory level was 584.43min ( SD- 38.92) Overall the mean regression time to S1 from highest sensory level was 425.52 min ( SD- 125.71) The sensory regression time to S1 from highest sensory level was signicantly higher with increasing dose of dexmedetomidine i. e. D>C>B . (P< 0.0001). CONCLUSION We recommend the use of 10mcg of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine as it seems to be a good alternative to other additives for long duration surgical procedures due to its profound intrathecal anesthetic and analgesic properties. It provides good quality of intraoperative analgesia, thermodynamically stable conditions, minimal side effects, and excellent quality of postoperative analgesia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document