scholarly journals Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan (Analisis Putusan Nomor. 52/PDT.G/2015/PN.RAP)

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-201
Author(s):  
Nur Hikmah ◽  
Darwinsyah Minin ◽  
Isnaini Isnaini
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
District Court ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Case Number ◽  
Selection Of

Peace is the most gentle answer as well as a win-win solutin, the existence of the basic law of mediation in Indonesia as an alternative to the dispute resolution outside the court can be seen in Article 130 HIR and Article 154 RBG which has set up a peace institution which then judges shall first reconcile the parties before the case is reviewed, as described in Article 130 HIR / 154 RBG and PERMA Number. 01 of 2008 on Mediation Procedures in Courts. The formulation of the problem is how the rules of mediation law as an alternative to the settlement of civil disputes in the Court, how the implementation and mechanism in the selection of Mediators at the District Court Rantauprapat and how the results of mediation on civil cases Number.52 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Rap generated from the mediation process, the aim is to know and simultaneously find the law of mediation as an alternative to civil disputes settlement in the Court and to know the implementation and mechanism of the selection of Mediator in Rantauprapat District Court and meganalisis the decision of civil case Number.52 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Rap resulting from the mediation process

scholarly journals DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS A CAUSE FOR DIVORCE: ARE THERE EFFORTS FOR MEDIATION?

Al-Bayyinah ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-211
Author(s):  
Jasmaniar Jasmaniar ◽  
Sutiawati Sutiawati
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases

AbstractMediation as an alternative to dispute resolution has been integrated in court. Further provisions for mediation as a process that must be carried out are further regulated in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 concerning mediation procedures in court. This means that cases filed in court including cases of divorce on the grounds of domestic violence are obliged to undergo mediation. This research is a normative legal research that focuses on solving legal problems by providing a basis for theoretical argumentation and adequate concepts. Sources of data in this study came from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The findings of the study indicate that in cases of divorce on the grounds of domestic violence, they still take the path of mediation. This is stated in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 which requires mediation in civil cases, even in the Supreme Court Regulation states that in the resolution of a civil case a judge does not take mediation, it is considered to have violated the law. Divorce cases on the grounds of domestic violence cannot be categorized as a criminal act, if the filing process is a civil process (divorce), it is different when the wife makes a complaint (complaint offense) and/or an ordinary offense which results in a violation of the Abolition of Domestic Violence. However, divorce cases are considered civil and processed according to other civil cases and on the grounds of domestic violence they still go through mediation. Keywords: Mediation; Divorce; Violence; Household.

scholarly journals Settlement of Syariah Economic Dispute through the Special Court of Syariah Economic in the Religious Courts

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saut Maruli Tua Manik
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Branch Office ◽  
Law Construction ◽  
Religious Courts

<strong>                                                                         ABSTRACT</strong><p>Since the growth of syariah banking in Indonesia, law constraints have been faced, Law Number 7 of 1992 concerning Banking changed into Law Number 10 Of 1998. Law Number 21 of 2008 on syariah Banking, Law Number 3 of 2006 has no effect on the method of dispute resolution of syariah economy. Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 93 / PUU-X / 2012 which strengthens the Religious Courts in accepting, examining, deciding syariah economic cases, but the practice there is still a syariah economic dispute resolution submitted to the District Court. Like the lawsuit to BPSK, against the decision of BPSK, its law remedy to the District Court, another example of using the District Court to resolve the syariah dispute is a matter between CV. Makmur Rezeki with PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri Branch Office Medan Ringroad. This creates a prolonged law uncertainty. This study examines the establishment of a special syariah economic court within the Religious Courts as an institution that can solve the law uncertainty. This study focuses on: First, the importance of the establishment of special courts within the Religious Courts in the settlement of syariah economic disputes; Secondly, the law construction of the establishment of a special syariah economic court within the Religious Courts. This research is a normative-empirical law research, the primary and secondary data sources Obtained from library research and field analyzed by using qualitative method. Qualitative analysis is done by taking into account the facts that exist in the field and combined with secondary data obtained from literature materials. The results of the study show that, Firstly, Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 93 / PUU-X / 2012 which strengthens Religious Courts as the institution authorized to receive, examine, decide the case of syariah economy. In fact, the resolution of the syariah economic dispute still exists in the District Court. The occurrence of dualism of dispute resolution of syariah economy was caused by the unharmonious of legislation and factor of Choice of Forum and factor of judge who should not refuse the case; Secondly, the existence of special court in solving of syariah economic dispute in the environment of Religious Court was supported by law construction namely Basic Law of 1945 and Law Number 48 of 2009 regarding Judicial Power, and position within the Religious Courts under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia in accordance with Law Number 3 of 2006 concerning Amendment to Law Number 7 of 1989 concerning Religious Courts and Law Number 50 of 2009 on the Second Amendment to Law Number 7 of 1989 on Religious Courts.</p><p><strong>Keywords: Establishment, Special Court, Syariah Economic Dispute</strong></p>

scholarly journals Procedures for Completing Small Claims Lawsuit of Civil Cases in District Court in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Marjo ◽  
Nanik Rofikoh
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
District Court ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Resolution Process ◽  
Dispute Resolution Process ◽  
Small Claims ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases

The development of legal relations in the economic and other civil sectors in community highly requires a faster and less costly dispute resolution process, especially in small civil disputes. In connection with this matter, Indonesian Supreme Court issued various Supreme Court regulations, including Regulation No. 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Completion of Small Claims. The issuance of this regulation was to resolve special civil disputes regarding the acts against the law. In a small claim court lawsuit, it is required that the plaintiff and defendant be in the same jurisdiction. The value of the material suit in a small claim lawsuit is at most IDR 200 million or equal to 13,811 USD. Furthermore, for a small claim examination and verification of a lawsuit, it is carried out in a small manner, where the period of completion is determined a maximum of 25 days from the first trial day to the decision.  

scholarly journals Esensi Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata melalui Mediasi Nonlitigasi

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Muten Nuna ◽  
Ibrahim Ahmad ◽  
Agustina Bilondatu ◽  
Dince Aisa Kodai ◽  
Roy Marthen Moonti
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Civil Dispute

There are legal issues in the society which resolved through a non-litigation mediation process, especially in civil disputes, where there are several factors that influence people prefer to settle legal issues through non-litigation aspects rather than resolving cases by litigation or through the court. This article aims at explaining how the principles and stages of civil dispute resolution through non-litigation mediation and the essence or value that can be used for the society in dispute. So it can be concluded that this article wants to explain that non-litigation mediation in principle has a consensual as well as collaborative nature, so the result will have win-win solution for each sides, so that the problematic side is cannot be harmed. Then there is a very large value which can be taken, if several problems that arise in society, especially in civil cases which resolved through non-litigation mediation aspects.

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM MENANGANI SENGKETA ANTARA PT. SINAR MENARA DELI DENGAN SARI ALAMSYAH

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Samuel Samuel ◽  
Siti Nurbaiti
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Consumer Protection Act ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

In principle, the resolution of consumer disputes can be pursued peacefully. through an alternative mediation dispute resolution. In Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Regulation of the Minister of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 / M-DAG / PER / 2017 concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body does not impose limits on the authority of BPSK in handling and adjudicating a consumer dispute. However, in reality many times the decisions of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) are submitted to the district court and stated that BPSK is not authorized to handle such disputes. How is the authority of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Board in handling disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli and Sari Alamsyah are the issues discussed. The method used in this research is descriptive normative legal research, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data with the law approach. The results of the study illustrate that BPSK is not authorized to handle disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli with Sari Alamsyah, because the business actors in this dispute have submitted a refusal to be resolved through BPSK and not achieving the requirements for consumer disputes. It is recommended that BPSK members pay more attention to the provisions in the Consumer Protection Act and other regulations concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body.

scholarly journals INTEGRASI LEMBAGA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ALTERNATIF DALAM PROSES ACARA PERADILAN PERDATA: STUDI TENTANG PUTUSAN PENGADILAN YANG DI MEDIASI BERDASARKAN PERMA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2008

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
AAN Roy Sumardika
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Negotiation Process ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Peace Agreement ◽  
Legal Concept ◽  
Legal Remedy ◽  
The Law ◽  
Court Proceedings

Mediation process means dispute resolution through negotiation process for obtaining a peace agreement between the parties by using a third party in settling the dispute. Article 130 HIR/154 RBg determines peace efforts may use since the trial began before a judge hands down the dispute. Mediation as part of the Alternative Dispute Resolution is a process outside the court, but Indonesian Supreme Court Rules No. 1/2008 integrates it in the court proceedings and allows the mediation process at the level of legal remedy. So the problem investigated is the court decision re-mediated and the peace agreement mediation results. The method used normative legal research by Legislation Approach and to deepen the research study also use a Legal Concept Analysis Approach which is intended to establish a view and legal arguments in solving the problem at hand. Case that has been decided by the courts is not possible to re-mediated. The mediation process at the level of legal remedy is contrary to the law, especially the provisions of Article 130 HIR / 154 RBg. Indonesian Supreme Court Rules as rules are hierarchically under the law (HIR/RBg) not justified material being regulated substance exceeding material are governed by higher laws. So Indonesian Supreme Court Rules No. 1/2008 can not be a legal basis to regulate the integration of mediation into the docket particularly about mediation at the level of legal remedy because the principle of lex superiori derogat legi inferiori and the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali not met.

scholarly journals EFFECTIVENESS IN IMPLEMENTING SUPREME COURT REGULATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 2 YEAR 2015 ON PROCEDURES SETTLEMENT OF SIMPLE LAWSUIT IN SETTLING THE CIVIL CASES

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
Wiryatmo Lukito Totok ◽  
Anik Iftitah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
District Court ◽  
Code System ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Effectiveness Index

President Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 Year 2015 on the National Medium Term Development Plan 2015-2019 mandates to carry out Reformation of the Civil Code system which is easy and fast, in an effort to improve the competitiveness of national economy. Related to this, the Supreme Court answered the vacancy of a simple lawsuit by issuing Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (PERMA) Number 2 Year 2015 on procedures for settlement of simple suit in settling civil cases. The empirical juridical research in the Court of Kediri showed that the implementation of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 Year 2015 made the lawsuit procedure simpler and very effective and in accordance with the principle of simple, fast and light cost. Effectiveness Index of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 year 2015 at Kediri District Court Class I B was in the "good" category, influenced by substance rule of the law, legal culture, structure of the law, and community knowledge. Keywords: Effectiveness, Simple Lawsuit Received: 07 January, 2017; Accepter: 15 March, 2017

scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN SITA JAMINAN DALAM HUKUM ACARA ARBITRASE

Yuridika ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujayadi . ◽  
Yuniarti .
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
The Law ◽  
To Come ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Resolution Processes ◽  
Selection Of

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) includes dispute resolution processes and techniques that act as a means for disagreeing parties to come to an agreement short of litigation. Despite historic resistance to ADR by many popular parties and their advocates, some courts now require some parties to resort to ADR of some type, usually mediation. The rising popularity of ADR can be explained by the increasing caseload of traditional courts, the perception that ADR imposes fewer costs than litigation, a preference for confidentiality, and the desire of some parties to have greater control over the selection of the individual or individuals who will decide their dispute. In Indonesia based on the Law No. 30/1999 concerning Alternative Dispute Resolution and Arbitration, ADR is interpreted as alternative to adjudication as it is reflected in the title of the Law No. 30/1999. Based on article 32 the collateral forclosure is enable to be done. The procedure of this were adopting the procedure of the collateral forclosure in civil court.Keyword : Alternative dispute resolution, collateral forclosure.

Leading Decisions of the Supreme Court of Israel and Extracts of the Judgment

1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 754-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Conditional Release ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
State Of Israel

Ganimat v. The State of Israel (1995) 49(iv) P.D. 589.The appellant was indicted in the Jerusalem Magistrate Court for two incidents of car theft. His detention was requested on the grounds that he posed a “danger to society”. The Magistrate Court agreed to his arrest, holding that a custom has been established whereby custody may be justified in crimes which have become “a nationwide scourge”, including car theft. The District Court rejected the appeal. The appellant was granted permission to appeal the decision in the Supreme Court (decision of Dorner J. and Barak J.; Cheshin J. dissenting) and his conditional release was ordered. However, it was decided to hold Special Proceedings in order to discuss some of the important issues raised by the case. The principal constitutional question raised by the case was whether the Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty influences the interpretation of the existing law, in the present case, the law of arrest as regulated by the Law of Criminal Procedure.

scholarly journals The Law Strength Of Under Hand Deed That Has Passed By Notary as an Authentic Deed in the Proof of Civil Case in District Court of Cirebon

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 661
Author(s):  
Yensih Yensih ◽  
Sukarmi Sukarmi ◽  
Lathifah Hanim
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Final Conclusion ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Literature Data Analysis ◽  
Legal Force

The purpose of this study was to determine: 1) The legal force under hand deed that has been approved by Notary as proof of the authentic deed in civil cases in District Court of Cirebon 2) The weakness of the legal strength under hand deed that has been approved by Notary as proof of the authentic deed in civil cases in District Court of CirebonThe approach used in this paper is empirical juridical with the help of primary data or empirical data as the main data. Sources of primary data obtained through interviews, while secondary data obtained rehabilitated and reconstructed by literature. Data analysis techniques with descriptive analysis.The final conclusion is:1.) The legal force under hand deed that has been approved by Notary as proof of the authentic deed in a civil case in court is not the same strength as the authentic deed, but the under hand deed could be evidence in a civil case in court, and the strength of the deed under hand legalized (legalization) Notary Having strength in numbers, the date, and the certainty of the signature of the parties. Under hand deed strength will be strong ruling legalizing if a Notary was brought to trial a witness to the truth of the deed under his hand legalized. 2) The weakness of the under hand deed, and that, if someone in the under hand deed does not admit the truth of the under hand deed strength is lost, but with the legalization of under hand deed can have the strength law even not same as authentic deed which has the perfect law strength.Keywords : Deed under hand; Legalization; and Strength of evidence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document