scholarly journals DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS A CAUSE FOR DIVORCE: ARE THERE EFFORTS FOR MEDIATION?

Al-Bayyinah ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-211
Author(s):  
Jasmaniar Jasmaniar ◽  
Sutiawati Sutiawati
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases

AbstractMediation as an alternative to dispute resolution has been integrated in court. Further provisions for mediation as a process that must be carried out are further regulated in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 concerning mediation procedures in court. This means that cases filed in court including cases of divorce on the grounds of domestic violence are obliged to undergo mediation. This research is a normative legal research that focuses on solving legal problems by providing a basis for theoretical argumentation and adequate concepts. Sources of data in this study came from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The findings of the study indicate that in cases of divorce on the grounds of domestic violence, they still take the path of mediation. This is stated in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 which requires mediation in civil cases, even in the Supreme Court Regulation states that in the resolution of a civil case a judge does not take mediation, it is considered to have violated the law. Divorce cases on the grounds of domestic violence cannot be categorized as a criminal act, if the filing process is a civil process (divorce), it is different when the wife makes a complaint (complaint offense) and/or an ordinary offense which results in a violation of the Abolition of Domestic Violence. However, divorce cases are considered civil and processed according to other civil cases and on the grounds of domestic violence they still go through mediation. Keywords: Mediation; Divorce; Violence; Household.

scholarly journals EFFECTIVENESS IN IMPLEMENTING SUPREME COURT REGULATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 2 YEAR 2015 ON PROCEDURES SETTLEMENT OF SIMPLE LAWSUIT IN SETTLING THE CIVIL CASES

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
Wiryatmo Lukito Totok ◽  
Anik Iftitah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
District Court ◽  
Code System ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Effectiveness Index

President Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 Year 2015 on the National Medium Term Development Plan 2015-2019 mandates to carry out Reformation of the Civil Code system which is easy and fast, in an effort to improve the competitiveness of national economy. Related to this, the Supreme Court answered the vacancy of a simple lawsuit by issuing Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (PERMA) Number 2 Year 2015 on procedures for settlement of simple suit in settling civil cases. The empirical juridical research in the Court of Kediri showed that the implementation of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 Year 2015 made the lawsuit procedure simpler and very effective and in accordance with the principle of simple, fast and light cost. Effectiveness Index of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 year 2015 at Kediri District Court Class I B was in the "good" category, influenced by substance rule of the law, legal culture, structure of the law, and community knowledge. Keywords: Effectiveness, Simple Lawsuit Received: 07 January, 2017; Accepter: 15 March, 2017

scholarly journals The Problematics of Simple Lawsuit Implementation To Reduce Civil Cases In Supreme Court

AL-HUKAMA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-194
Author(s):  
Bambang Sugeng ◽  
Zahry Vandawati Ch.
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Simple System ◽  
State Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Court Process

This research has purpose to analyze the implementation of a simple lawsuit settlement to reduce the accumulation of civil cases in the Supreme Court. Also to analyze the constraints and obstacles in the application of simple claim resolution to reduce the buildup of civil cases and investigate the constraints and obstacles in the application of simple claim resolution to reduce the buildup of civil cases. This research is normative legal research that used the approach of statute approach and conceptual approach. The result of this research indicated that the implementation of simple lawsuit mechanismin court process could be quite helpful for citizen to settle the civil cases on state court with a quick process, simple system and low cost. In the context of implementing a simple lawsuit mechanism in court proceedings, there are several obstacles and have not maximally utilized in society, such as the minimum limit for the value of material claims is at most Rp. 200,000,000.00 (two hundred million rupiahs).

scholarly journals Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan (Analisis Putusan Nomor. 52/PDT.G/2015/PN.RAP)

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-201
Author(s):  
Nur Hikmah ◽  
Darwinsyah Minin ◽  
Isnaini Isnaini
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
District Court ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Case Number ◽  
Selection Of

Peace is the most gentle answer as well as a win-win solutin, the existence of the basic law of mediation in Indonesia as an alternative to the dispute resolution outside the court can be seen in Article 130 HIR and Article 154 RBG which has set up a peace institution which then judges shall first reconcile the parties before the case is reviewed, as described in Article 130 HIR / 154 RBG and PERMA Number. 01 of 2008 on Mediation Procedures in Courts. The formulation of the problem is how the rules of mediation law as an alternative to the settlement of civil disputes in the Court, how the implementation and mechanism in the selection of Mediators at the District Court Rantauprapat and how the results of mediation on civil cases Number.52 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Rap generated from the mediation process, the aim is to know and simultaneously find the law of mediation as an alternative to civil disputes settlement in the Court and to know the implementation and mechanism of the selection of Mediator in Rantauprapat District Court and meganalisis the decision of civil case Number.52 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Rap resulting from the mediation process

scholarly journals REMODELLING AND REPOSITIONING OF COURT’S MEDIATION IN INDONESIA

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Benny Riyanto
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Ideal Model ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Civil Court ◽  
Legal Factor ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Ideal

This article is intended to explain the failure of the use of mediation in Indonesia, particularly mediation which is integrated with the court (court connected mediation). The focus of the problem in this study is about the ideal model of court connected mediation as a strategy to achieve the hope of strengthening and to maximize the function of judiciary institutions in resolving dispute in Indonesia. A method of socio-legal research is used to reveal things that make mediation has not worked effectively in resolving civil case in court. This study resulted that the practice of mediation in civil court is very limited, especially dealing with a model applied by mediators, so it is not always appropriate to the situation faced by the parties in disputes. Moreover, although the Supreme Court Regulation allows co-mediation, in practice, it is never implemented. Even court connected mediation has become part of the dispute because it has been registered and published to public. So that it becomes a non-legal factor that influence the parties to reach agreement.  Keywords : mediation, mediator, civil case, model, court.

scholarly journals Limitation of Application of Sharia Principles in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution in Religious Courts

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Zaidah Nur Rosidah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
And Training

This paper aims to find the basis for the philosophical rationality of applying sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes in religious courts as well as the prerequisites required by religious court judges to apply sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The type of research used is normative legal research to find philosophical rationality and the institutionalization of sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The approach used is a conceptual approach. Secondary data were collected through literature study. The research results obtained first, the philosophical rationality of the application of sharia principles in sharia economic dispute resolution in line with the first and third principles of Pancasila. Second, the institutionalization of sharia principles becomes effective if there are prerequisites that must be met, firstly enough information for judges to understand sharia principles, secondly the obstacles that come from the judges themselves who are still oriented towards the flow of legism / positivism will have an effect on providing legal basis and third the speed of instilling the institutionalization of sharia principles can be done through education and training organized by the Supreme Court for Religious Court judges.

scholarly journals PUTUSAN PENINJAUAN KEMBALI PERKARA PIDANA SEBAGAI NOVUM DALAM PENINJAUAN KEMBALI PERKARA PERDATA

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
ALI MARWAN HSB
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Literature Research ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Cases

ABSTRAKUndang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001 tentang Merek mengatur bahwa untuk penyelesaian sengketa atau pelanggaran merek dapat ditempuh melalui dua alternatif penyelesaian, yaitu dengan mengajukan gugatan ke pengadilan niaga (secara perdata) dan diadukan kepada penyidik untuk diselesaikan secara pidana. Kedua penyelesaian inilah yang ditempuh sekaligus oleh GG melawan GB. Kasus ini kemudian sampai pada upaya hukum luar biasa yaitu peninjauan kembali. Dalam peninjauan kembali perkara perdata, pihak GG mengajukan putusan peninjauan kembali perkara pidana sebagai novum. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, dapat dirumuskan permasalahan dalam tulisan ini adalah: apakah putusan peninjauan kembali perkara pidana dapat dijadikan novum dalam peninjauan kembali perkara perdata? Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif atau metode penelitian kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa jika dikaji dari alasan pengajuan peninjauan kembali yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 tentang Mahkamah Agung, suatu putusan pengadilan dapat dijadikan alasan dalam permohonan peninjauan kembali, apabila ada pertentangan antara putusan yang satu dengan yang lain. Pertentangan itu harus antara putusan oleh peradilan yang sama atau sama tingkatan. Pengajuan putusan peninjauan kembali perkara pidana menjadi novum dalam peninjauan kembali perkara perdata atau sebaliknya, tidak dapat dibenarkan.Kata kunci: peninjauan kembali, pidana, perdata, novum. ABSTRACT Law Number 15 of 2001 concerning Trademark stipulates that resolution of disputes or violations of brands can be taken through two alternative ways, namely filing a lawsuit to the Commercial Court (civil) and secondly filing a complaint with the investigator for a criminal settlement. These two solutions were taken at the same time by both parties, GG against GB. This case was then up to the extraordinary request for review. In the review of civil cases, GG filed a decision on a criminal case review as novum. Based on this, the problems outlined in this analysis is whether the decision of a criminal case review can be made novum in reviewing a civil case. The method used is a normative juridical research method or literature research method. As stipulated in Law Number 14 of 1985 concerning the Supreme Court, pertaining to the reasoning of filing an extraordinary request for case review, the research result shows that a court decision can be used as an excuse to file a case review, provided that there is conflict between one decision and another. Filing a criminal case review decision as novum in civil case review or vice versa cannot be justified. Keywords: case review, criminal, civil, novum.

scholarly journals The role of the advocate in the ensuring the unity of the judicial practice in civil cases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. I. Popov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Active Subject ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Status ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Grand Chamber ◽  
The Individual

The presented work highlights the possible ways of the advocate's influence on the implementation by the Supreme Court of the function of ensuring the unity of judicial practice in civil cases. Without denying the status of the Supreme Court as a central institution in the field of forming unified approaches to law enforcement, attention is focused on the fact that the dynamics of procedural legislation in terms of regulating procedures for access to cassation in civil cases allows us to rethink the mission and content of the representative function of a lawyer at the appropriate stage of the civil process. Based on the analysis of the current edition of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, it is argued that the ability of the advocate to be an active subject of influence on the formation of a unified law enforcement practice is most noticeably manifested when overcoming existing filters of access to cassation, in particular, when applying to the Supreme Court with a cassation appeal, which today demands from the advocate extended argumentation when proving the existence of grounds for cassation revision, with a thorough analysis of the established practice of the cassation court and, at times, giving reasons for the need to deviate from such practice and form new law enforcement approaches.          Along with the above, among the individual methods of influence of the advocate on ensuring the unity of judicial practice, the filing of a petition for the suspension of proceedings on the basis of a review of a court decision in similar legal relations (in another case) by way of appeal by the chambers of the Supreme Court, as well as a petition to transfer the case for consideration The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court in connection with the need to resolve an exceptional legal problem.

scholarly journals Criminal Liability in Environmental Crimes Committed by Corporations after the Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 at Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fitriani Rahmadia ◽  
Hari Sutra Disemadi ◽  
Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Environmental Crimes ◽  
Legal Entities

Corporations are organized groups of people and / or properties, both in the form of legal entities or non-legal entities. In relation to the corporation as a legal subject in environmental crime, it is formulated in Article 1 number 32 of the Law Number 31 Year 2009 about Environmental Protection and Management, each person is an individual or business entity, both legal entities and non-legal entities. The context of corporate crime in the environment is still not solid enough to ensure corporations in criminal sanctions because there is no legal basis regarding the procedures for handling environmental crimes committed by corporations. The Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Handling Corporate Crime provides a basis for enforcement of criminal law, then the purpose of writing this article is to find out the form of criminal liability for corporations for environmental crimes and legal consequences after the Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2013.The type of research used is legal research which is included in the normative legal research typology where this study focuses on positive legal norms in the form of legislation. The theory used by the author in analyzing is using the theory of criminal liability which is based on the principle of legality. The conclusions include: criminal sanctions that can be applied to corporations based on Article 4 of Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 are in the form of criminal fines, additional crimes, and disciplinary actions except prisons and confinement. Last, the legal consequences of the application Article 25 Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 with the principal criminal is a criminal fine and then the criminal added according to the law governing environmental criminal acts is the Law Number 32 Year 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document