scholarly journals Pengelolaan Pasar Klewer Pasca Kebakaran Berbasis Collaborative Governance (Perspektif Civil Society)

Author(s):  
Yitno Puguh Martomo ◽  
Khairul Khairul

Kompleksitas yang muncul pasca kebakaran pasar Klewer diteliti melalui  pengelolaan yang berbasis collaborative governance, dengan mensinergikan antara government,  civil society, dan privat. Tujuan penelitian menganalisis pelaksanaan collaborative governance dari perspektif civil society. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode fenomenologi untuk mengungkapkan realita dari sudut pandang orang yang mengalaminya secara langsung atau berkaitan dengan pengalamannya. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan Teknik wawancara, Teknik observasi, dan dokumentasi.  Sedangkan analisis data menggunakan model inter aktif yang meliputi pengumpulan data, kondensasi data, sajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Civil society sebagai perspektif  dalam collaborative governance dari aspek ketahanan budaya berhasil mempertahankan nilai luhur budaya lokal warisan Keraton. Aspek Benefit menghasilkan semangat untuk bangkit dan menjadi  motivasi dalam memenuhi tuntutan kebutuhan keluarga sekaligus sebagai simbol pengusaha local. Aspek partisipasi berhasil mempercepat kelancaran kegiatan atau operasional  pasar. Simpulan penelitian ini adalah Collaborative Governance dari perspektif Civil Society menjadikan kolaborasi pengelolaan pasar klewer pasca kebakaran lebih efektif. 

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 605-607
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Deneen

Whether as a solution to problems of political legitimacy or social mistrust, as a way of involving civil society, or as a method of crafting more effective “third way” policies, collaborative governance has been a topic of renewed interest for political scientists and policy intellectuals. Carmen Sirianni's Investing in Democracy: Engaging Citizens in Collaborative Governance (Brookings, 2009) is an important new book that raises many of these issues. Perspectives on Politics is a forum for raising questions of interest to a broad range of political scientists. In this symposium, we have asked a number of prominent political scientists and policy analysts to assess the book and to address two broader questions: in what ways does the book draw from and add to political science scholarship, and in what ways does political science scholarship help to shed light on the book's core themes?


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Scholtes ◽  
P Schröder-Bäck ◽  
H Brand

Abstract Introduction The complexity of injury and the multi-sectoral nature of its prevention demands a whole-of-society approach. Engaging with civil society in a form of collaborative governance is central to this approach. Civil society, defined as neither state, nor market, nor family, includes organisations such as advocacy groups, charities, professional associations etc. This study looks at the role of civil society organisations in the implementation of child injury prevention interventions in Europe. Methods The method was built upon an existing approach, known as ’organigraphs’. Mintzberg and van der Heyden developed the approach to depict how organisations actually work. We further developed its practical application to explore how interventions in child safety are developed, implemented and monitored across the local, regional, national and EU levels. Professionals working in child safety in 25 European countries were asked to draw organigraphs for an intervention in one of four child injury domains: road, water, home safety or intentional injury prevention. The analysis focused on the action surrounding civil society actors, represented by the connectors leading to and from those actors. Results We received 44 organigraphs in total from 31 participants in 24 countries; nine for intentional injury prevention, nine for water safety, 12 for road safety and 14 for home safety. Civil society actors were present in the majority of Organigraphs and they played multiple and diverse roles including: ’advising’, ’funding’ and ’implementing’ child safety initiatives. Conclusions The role of civil society, described in this data set, appears to be relatively well-developed. Strong, functional and long-standing partnerships between civil society actors across policy sectors and government may lead to greater capacity to address the complexity of child injury. Key messages Effective child injury prevention requires multi-sectoral action to address its complexity. Stakeholders come from the public and private sector and from civil society. Greater engagement with civil society may represent an opportunity for countries and regions to improve their response to the challenges of injury prevention among children.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bok Gyo Jeong ◽  
Sung-Ju Kim

Abstract This study examines, from a collaborative governance perspective, the public policy process of South Korea in responding to the global health pandemic. In many countries, attention has been focused primarily on governmental capacity and political leadership in containing the COVID-19 pandemic. In South Korea, however, the role of civil society as a collaborative partner to government is especially important. To analyze the comprehensive and substantive nature of government-civil society collaboration, this study assesses the response to COVID-19 along two dimensions: the level of civil society involvement in governance, and the stage in public policy development. The study reveals that the South Korean government was a coordinator of multiple actors and multiple sectors of society, including civil society, and that all three facets of civil society as described by Edwards (2004), were involved: associational life, civility, and engagement in the public sphere.


Author(s):  
Valdir Roque Dallabrida ◽  
Daniel Knebel Baggio ◽  
Alexandre Zatera ◽  
Princela Santana Da Cruz

Complex problems such as the public management of a pandemic require coordinated and horizontal action, involving not only public officials and their state agents but also representatives of civil society, their universities, and r esearchers, the technical and the corporate staff in the health field, such as collaborative go vernance practices.How ever, what we observed in Brazil in the Covid-19 first months of the pandemic, was the intensified action in the government sphere, with precarious effectiveness and little coordinative efficiency.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (21) ◽  
pp. 6103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfonso Unceta ◽  
Xabier Barandiaran ◽  
Natalia Restrepo

Public sector innovation labs have gained increasing importance as one of the material expressions of public sector innovation and collaborative governance to address complex societal problems. In the current international context, there are various experiences, interpretations, and applications of this concept with similarities and differences but all of them are based fundamentally on the establishment of new forms of participation and collaboration between governments and civil society. This paper aims to examine, through a case study, how policy innovation labs could play a prominent role in promoting decision-making at the local level in order to create a more sustainable public sector. To do this, this article focuses on an analysis of the “Gipuzkoa Lab”, a public innovation lab developed in the Gipuzkoa region located in the Basque Country, Spain, in order to confront future socio-economic challenges via an open participatory approach. An analysis of a pilot project to address worker participation, developed within this participatory process, indicates that these collaborative spaces have important implications for the formulation of public policies and can change public actions, yielding benefits and engaging citizens, workers, private companies and academics. This paper provides a contemporary approach to understanding good practice in collaborative governance and a novel process for facilitating the balance between the state and civil society, and between public functions and the private sphere, for decision-making. In particular, this case study may be of interest to international practitioners and researchers to introduce the increasingly popular concept of public sector innovation labs into debates of citizen participation and decision-making.


2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 1051-1078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Hermansson

Local and civil society can play decisive roles in disaster response. Yet, the disaster management literature is unclear regarding the conditions that enable cross-sectoral collaboration. Using a collaborative governance framework and 44 semi-structured interviews, this study investigates how trust, pre-existing relations, interdependence, knowledge, and resources affect cross-sectoral collaboration during disaster response in Turkey. The results illustrate how these factors interact with system context factors, such as political compatibility, to facilitate or hinder cross-sectoral collaboration. The study concludes that cross-sectoral collaboration is no panacea for successful disaster response, but empirical examples also suggest that cross-sectoral collaboration can contribute to reducing suboptimal disaster response.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. Layouting
Author(s):  
Agista Siskasari

Kota Layak Anak merupakan kabupaten/kota yang mempunyai sistem pembangunan berbasis hak anak melalui pengintegrasian komitmen dan sumber daya pemerintah, masyarakat, dan dunia usaha, yang terencana secara menyeluruh dan berkelanjutan dalam kebijakan, program dan kegiatan untuk menjamin terpenuhinya hak dan perlindungan anak. untuk mewujdukan Kota Layak Anak diperlukan Collaborative Governance melalui keterlibatan pemerintah, swasta dan civil society untuk bersama-sama mengupayakan pemenuhan hak anak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proses Collaboratuve Governance dalam pelaksanaan program Kampung Ramah Anak (KRA) dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif. Kampung Ramah Anak RW 07 Pakuncen telah melibatkan pemerintah, swasta dan civil society dalam melaksanakan program Kampung Ranah Anak (KRA).


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 601-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romand Coles

Whether as a solution to problems of political legitimacy or social mistrust, as a way of involving civil society, or as a method of crafting more effective “third way” policies, collaborative governance has been a topic of renewed interest for political scientists and policy intellectuals. Carmen Sirianni'sInvesting in Democracy: Engaging Citizens in Collaborative Governance(Brookings, 2009) is an important new book that raises many of these issues.Perspectives on Politicsis a forum for raising questions of interest to a broad range of political scientists. In this symposium, we have asked a number of prominent political scientists and policy analysts to assess the book and to address two broader questions: in what ways does the book draw from and add to political science scholarship, and in what ways does political science scholarship help to shed light on the book's core themes?


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 595-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Weir

Whether as a solution to problems of political legitimacy or social mistrust, as a way of involving civil society, or as a method of crafting more effective “third way” policies, collaborative governance has been a topic of renewed interest for political scientists and policy intellectuals. Carmen Sirianni's Investing in Democracy: Engaging Citizens in Collaborative Governance (Brookings, 2009) is an important new book that raises many of these issues. Perspectives on Politics is a forum for raising questions of interest to a broad range of political scientists. In this symposium, we have asked a number of prominent political scientists and policy analysts to assess the book and to address two broader questions: in what ways does the book draw from and add to political science scholarship, and in what ways does political science scholarship help to shed light on the book's core themes?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document