Phase I/II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastasis and its pattern of failure

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric L. Chang ◽  
Almon S. Shiu ◽  
Ehud Mendel ◽  
Leni A. Mathews ◽  
Anita Mahajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Epidural Space ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Spinal Metastasis ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Noncardiac Chest Pain ◽  
Pattern Of Failure ◽  
Grade 3

Object. The authors report data concerning the safety, effectiveness, and patterns of failure obtained in a Phase I/II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal metastatic tumors. Methods. Sixty-three cancer patients underwent near-simultaneous computed tomography–guided SBRT. Spinal magnetic resonance imaging was conducted at baseline and at each follow-up visit. The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 2.0 assessments were used to evaluate toxicity. Results. The median tumor volume of 74 spinal metastatic lesions was 37.4 cm3 (range 1.6–358 cm3). No neuropathy or myelopathy was observed during a median follow-up period of 21.3 months (range 0.9–49.6 months). The actuarial 1-year tumor progression–free incidence was 84% for all tumors. Pattern-of-failure analysis showed two primary mechanisms of failure: 1) recurrence in the bone adjacent to the site of previous treatment, and 2) recurrence in the epidural space adjacent to the spinal cord. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were limited to acute Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea (one case); Grade 3 dysphagia and trismus (one case); and Grade 3 noncardiac chest pain (one case). There was no subacute or late Grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Conclusions. Analysis of the data obtained in the present study supports the safety and effectiveness of SBRT in cases of spinal metastatic cancer. The authors consider it prudent to routinely treat the pedicles and posterior elements using a wide bone margin posterior to the diseased vertebrae because of the possible direct extension into these structures. For patients without a history of radiotherapy, more liberal spinal cord dose constraints than those used in this study could be applied to help reduce failures in the epidural space.

scholarly journals Utilization of laser interstitial thermotherapy guided by real-time thermal MRI as an alternative to separation surgery in the management of spinal metastasis

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 400-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio E. Tatsui ◽  
R. Jason Stafford ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Jonathan N. Sellin ◽  
Behrang Amini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Spinal Cord Compression ◽  
Spinal Metastasis ◽  
Cord Compression ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Interstitial Thermotherapy

OBJECT High-grade malignant spinal cord compression is commonly managed with a combination of surgery aimed at removing the epidural tumor, followed by spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) aimed at local tumor control. The authors here introduce the use of spinal laser interstitial thermotherapy (SLITT) as an alternative to surgery prior to SSRS. METHODS Patients with a high degree of epidural malignant compression due to radioresistant tumors were selected for study. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and quality of life were obtained before and within 30 and 60 days after treatment. A laser probe was percutaneously placed in the epidural space. Real-time thermal MRI was used to monitor tissue damage in the region of interest. All patients received postoperative SSRS. The maximum thickness of the epidural tumor was measured, and the degree of epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) was scored in pre- and postprocedure MRI. RESULTS In the 11 patients eligible for study, the mean VAS score for pain decreased from 6.18 in the preoperative period to 4.27 within 30 days and 2.8 within 60 days after the procedure. A similar VAS interrogating the percentage of quality of life demonstrated improvement from 60% preoperatively to 70% within both 30 and 60 days after treatment. Imaging follow-up 2 months after the procedure demonstrated a significant reduction in the mean thickness of the epidural tumor from 8.82 mm (95% CI 7.38–10.25) before treatment to 6.36 mm (95% CI 4.65–8.07) after SLITT and SSRS (p = 0.0001). The median preoperative ESCC Grade 2 was scored as 4, which was significantly higher than the score of 2 for Grade 1b (p = 0.04) on imaging follow-up 2 months after the procedure. CONCLUTIONS The authors present the first report on an innovative minimally invasive alternative to surgery in the management of spinal metastasis. In their early experience, SLITT has provided local control with low morbidity and improvement in both pain and the quality of life of patients.

Phase I study of temozolomide in children and adolescents with recurrent solid tumors: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 3037-3043 ◽  
Author(s):  
H S Nicholson ◽  
M Krailo ◽  
M M Ames ◽  
N L Seibel ◽  
J M Reid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

PURPOSE The Children's Cancer Group conducted a phase I trial of temozolomide stratified by prior craniospinal irradiation (CSI). PATIENTS AND METHODS Children and adolescents with recurrent or progressive cancer were enrolled. Temozolomide was administered orally daily for 5 days, with subsequent courses administered every 21 to 28 days after full hematologic recovery. Dose levels tested included 100, 150, 180, 215, 245, and 260 mg/m2 daily. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients on the non-CSI stratum were assessable for hematologic toxicity. During the first three dose levels (100, 150, and 180 mg/m2 daily), only grades 1 and 2 hematologic toxicity occurred. One patient at 215 mg/m2 daily had grade 3 hematologic toxicity. Three of eight patients (38%) treated at 245 to 260 mg/m2 daily had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which included both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Twenty-two patients on the CSI stratum were assessable for hematologic toxicity. Hematologic DLT occurred in one of six patients (17%) at 100 mg/m2 daily and in two of four patients (50%) at 215 mg/m2 daily. No nonhematologic DLT occurred; nausea and vomiting occurred in more than half of the patients. After two courses of temozolomide, 10 patients had stable disease (SD), and three patients had a partial response (PR), one of whom subsequently had a complete response (CR) that persists through 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide for children and adolescents without prior CSI is 215 mg/m2 daily and for those with prior CSI is 180 mg/m2 daily for 5 days, with subsequent courses that begin on day 28. Temozolomide is well tolerated and should undergo phase II testing in children and adolescents.

scholarly journals Patient Outcomes after Reirradiation of Small Skull Base Tumors using Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy, or Proton Therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (06) ◽  
pp. 638-644
Author(s):  
Sweet Ping Ng ◽  
He Wang ◽  
Courtney Pollard ◽  
Theresa Nguyen ◽  
Houda Bahig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Skull Base Tumors ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients who received reirradiation for small skull base tumors utilizing either intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and proton radiotherapy (PRT). Methods Patients who received IMRT, SBRT or PRT reirradiation for recurrent or new small skull base tumors (< 60 cc) between April 2000 and July 2016 were identified. Those with < 3 months follow-up were excluded. Clinical outcomes and treatment toxicity were assessed. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the local control (LC), regional control (RC), distant control (DC), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Of the 75 patients eligible, 30 (40%) received SBRT, 30 (40%) received IMRT, and 15 (20%) received PRT. The median retreatment volume was 28 cc. The median reirradiation dose was 66 Gy in 33 fractions for IMRT/PRT, and 45 Gy in 5 fractions for SBRT. The median time to reirradiation was 41 months. With a median follow-up of 24 months, the LC, RC, DC, PFS, and OS rates were 84%, 79%, 82%, 60%, and 87% at 1 year, and 75%, 72%, 80%, 49%, and 74% at 2 years. There was no difference in OS between radiation modalities. The 1- and 2-year late Grade 3 toxicity rates were 3% and 11% respectively.. Conclusions Reirradiation of small skull base tumors utilizing IMRT, PRT, or SBRT provided good local tumor control and low rates of Grade 3 late toxicity. A prospective clinical trial is needed to guide selection of radiation treatment modalities.

Phase I-II Trial of Oral Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone and Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) (CPR) for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1874-1874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Esther Masih-Khan ◽  
Arooj Khan ◽  
Saima Dean ◽  
Peter Anglin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Oral Cyclophosphamide ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1874 Poster Board I-899 Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) and dexamethasone is an effective regimen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts), with an overall response rate of 60.6% and median time to progression (TTP) of 13.4 months (Dimopoulos MA, et al, Leukemia 2009 Jul 23 [Epub ahead of print]). Oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone is an older regimen with excellent patient tolerance, and we sought to enhance the efficacy of lenalidomide by adding oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone in this phase I-II trial. The CPR regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide on days 1, 8 and 15; lenalidomide on days 1–21; and prednisone 100 mg every other day in a 28 day cycle. ASA 81 mg/day was given to all pts as DVT prophylaxis. Three dose levels were evaluated using a 3 by 3 dose escalation design. Between 11/2007–07/2009, 31 pts with relapsed/refractory MM who had not previously received lenalidomide were entered onto study. Median age was 61 (40–78) years and 61% were male. Immunoglobulin subtype was IgG in 19 pts (61%), IgA in 8 pts (26%) and light chain only in 4 pts (13%). Median number of prior regimens was 2 (1–5) and 28 pts had undergone previous ASCT, including double transplants in 6 pts. Prior therapy included thalidomide in 9 (29%) and bortezomib in 15 (48%). FISH cytogenetics were available in 13 pts; one had 13q deletion but none had t(4;14) or p53 deletion. At the time of protocol entry, median β 2-microglobulin level was 246 (92–767) nm/L, albumin 39 (34–48) g/L, creatinine 83 (50–126) μmol/L, platelet count 230 (75–337) × 109/L and ANC 2.5 (1.1–6.1) x 109/L. Protocol treatment is summarized in Table 1. Dose limiting toxicity was not observed during cycle 1 at any dose level. Grade 3–4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia in 5 pts (16%) and neutropenia in 9 pts (29%). These were managed with dose reduction and/or growth factor support. Four episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred. Other grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities included abdominal pain/bacteremia in 1 pt in cohort 1; hypokalemia in 1 pt in cohort 2; and DVT in 2 pts, dizziness in 2 pts and fatigue in 1 pt in cohort 3. Using the International uniform response criteria (Durie BG, et al, Leukemia 2006; 20:1467–1473), the best response was documented at a median of 6 (1–5) cycles and included the following: dose level 1 (1 CR, 2 PR); dose level 2 (1 VGPR, 2 PR); dose level 3 (5 CR, 9 VGPR, 9 PR, 1 MR and 1 stable disease). At a median follow-up (F/U) of 12 (8–21) months, 20 pts remain on study, 2 have withdrawn and 9 pts have progressed at a median of 9 (4–13) months; only 1 one has died (due to MM). We conclude: 1) the combination of full doses of the agents in CPR can be given in a 28 day cycle with minimal toxicity; 2) the overall response rate (CR + VGPR + PR) in 31 pts to date is 93%; 3) at a median F/U of 1 year, only 9 pts (29%) have progressed; 4) longer follow-up is required to assess the TTP and survival of the CPR regimen. Disclosures: Reece: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in combination with drugs other than dexamethasone. Anglin:Celgene: Honoraria. Chen:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Mikhael:Celgene: Honoraria. Trudel:Celgene: Honoraria.

Long-term follow-up results of a phase I/II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for localized nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL): JCOG0211.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8050-8050
Author(s):  
Motoko Yamaguchi ◽  
Kensei Tobinai ◽  
Masahiko Oguchi ◽  
Naoki Ishizuka ◽  
Yukio Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Grade 3

8050 Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has been regarded as one of the standard management for localized nasal NKTCL. However, its long-term efficacy and toxicity is not known. Methods: The JCOG0211 trial is a phase I/II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy consisting of radiotherapy (RT) of 50 Gy and 3 cycles of DeVIC (carboplatin, etoposide, ifosfamide, dexamethasone) for newly diagnosed, localized nasal NKTCL (JCO 2009). Patients (Pts) with newly diagnosed, localized diseases (IE & contiguous IIE with cervical node involvement) who were 20-69 yrs of age with PS 0-2 were eligible. 3-D conformal RT planning with a wide margin (+ 2 cm to the gross tumor, the entire nasal cavity and the nasopharynx) and a 2-step cone down were required. 33 pts were enrolled in the study, 27 of whom were treated with RT and a 2/3-dose of DeVIC, which was selected as the recommended phase II dose in the preceding phase I portion of the trial. All pts completed RT without any protocol violations. Long-term follow-up results on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were evaluated. Results: The median follow-up was 69 months (range, 62-96). The pt (N=33) characteristics were as follows: median age 54 yrs (range, 21-68); stage IIE 33%; B symptom (+) 36%; elevated serum LDH 21%. %5-yr OS and PFS were 73% (95%CI, 54-85%) and 67% (95%CI, 48-80%), respectively. 11 pts (33%) experienced disease recurrence. Two achieved a 2nd CR by salvage chemotherapies followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and the remaining 9 pts died of disease. There was no observed death and disease progression after 34 and 31 months, respectively. One pt experienced Grade 3 irregular menstruation for 3 years. No other Grade 3 or 4 late non-RT-associated adverse events (AEs) were observed. One pt received plastic surgery due to Grade 4 RT dermatitis. No other Grade 3 or greater RT-associated late AEs were encountered. Conclusions: Both survival benefit and disease control from concurrent chemoradiotherapy with RT and DeVIC are maintained during a 5-yr follow-up, indicating the excellent efficacy of this approach as a first-line therapy for localized nasal NKTCL. Long-term toxicity is acceptable.

scholarly journals A Phase I/II Study of Lenalidomide Plus Obinutuzumab in Relapsed Indolent Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 348-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan H Fowler ◽  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
Collin Chin ◽  
Paolo Strati ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Marginal Zone ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Indolent Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Patients with advanced indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) can develop chemoresistance and most relapse following standard therapy. Although multiple treatment options exist, most are associated with short remission or intolerable side effects. Lenalidomide activates NK cells ± T cells and leads to in vivo expansion of immune effector cells in NHL models. The combination of rituximab and lenalidomide (R2) in relapsed iNHL is highly active and was recently approved. Obinutuzumab is a glycosylated type II anti-CD20 molecule with enhanced affinity for the FcγRIIIa receptors leading to improved ADCC. The primary objective of this phase I/II study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of lenalidomide and obinutuzumab in relapsed indolent lymphoma. Methods: Patients with relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), marginal zone, and follicular lymphoma (gr 1-3a) were eligible. Patients enrolled in three predefined dose cohorts of lenalidomide (10mg,15mg, 20mg) given on days 2-22 of a 28 day cycle. Obinutuzumab was given at a fixed dose (1000mg) IV on days 1,8,15 and 22 of cycle 1 and day 1 of subsequent cycles for 6 cycles. The combination was given for up to 12 cycles in responding pts. Antihistamines were given in pts who developed rash. Prophylactic growth factor was not allowed. In the absence of progression or toxicity, single agent obinutuzumab was continued every 2 months for maximum of 30 months on study. Traditional 3+3 dose escalation was used with dose limiting toxicities (DLT) assessed during cycle 1. Once the MTD was established, 60 additional patients were enrolled in the phase II portion of the study. Adverse events were graded using CTCAE version 4.03. Results: 66 pts were enrolled between May 2014 until March 2019, and all are eligible for safety and response assessment. No DLTs were observed in dose escalation, and 60 pts were enrolled in the phase II portion of the study at 20mg of lenalidomide daily. Histologies included follicular lymphoma (FL) n=57, marginal zone n=4, SLL n=5. The median age was 64 (36-81), with 2 (1-5) median prior lines of treatment. For 53% of pts, the combination represented the third or greater line of treatment. The overall response (OR) rate for all pts was 98% with 72% attaining a complete response (CR). Eighteen pts (27%) had a partial response, and stable disease was noted in 1 (2%). At a median follow up of 17 months, 14 pts have progressed, with an estimated 24mo progression-free survival (PFS) of 73% (57-83% 95% CI). The estimated 24 mo PFS for ≥ third line pts was 63%. Twenty five pts (38%) remain on treatment and 95% remain alive at last follow up. The most common grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicities included fatigue (5 pts), rash (4 pts), and cough (3 pts). Grade ≥3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 11 (17%) and 7 (11%) pts respectively. Two pts stopped treatment due to adverse events, including 1 transient bradycardia and 1 grade 3 fatigue. Conclusion: The combination of 20 mg of lenalidomide and 1000mg obinutuzumab is safe and effective in patients with relapsed indolent lymphoma. Adverse events appeared similar to our prior experience with lenalidomide and rituximab and were generally well tolerated. Overall response rates were high, with many pts achieving prolonged remission, including pts who had relapsed after 2 or more lines of prior therapy. Validation studies in the frontline and salvage setting are ongoing. Disclosures Fowler: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ABBVIE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nastoupil:TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Westin:Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; 47 Inc: Research Funding. Neelapu:Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allogene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy.

scholarly journals An Open-Label, Phase Ib Study of Duvelisib (IPI-145) in Combination with Bendamustine, Rituximab or Bendamustine/Rituximab in Select Subjects with Lymphoma or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4422-4422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Flinn ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Michael B Maris ◽  
Jeffrey Matous ◽  
Mohamad Cherry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Delay ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Duvelisib is a potent inhibitor of the δ and γ isoforms of phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) being developed as a potential therapeutic in hematologic malignancies including B and T cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In a phase I study of single agent duvelisib (D), ORR of 52% was seen in pts with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (iNHL) and 47% in CLL. Bendamustine (B), rituximab (R), and their combination have demonstrated proven activity in iNHL and CLL. Combining duvelisib with either bendamustine or rituximab alone or in combination with each other may improve response rates and the durability of remission. The goal of this Phase 1b, open-label, three-arm, non-randomized, dose escalating, safety and tolerability trial is to characterize the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and preliminary efficacy profile of duvelisib given in combination with rituximab (Arm 1-DR), bendamustine plus rituximab (Arm 2-DBR) or bendamustine (Arm 3-DB) in subjects with select relapsed/refractory lymphoma or CLL. Methods: Pts had relapsed CLL or NHL, ECOG performance status (PS) ≤2, and adequate organ function. The subject population during dose escalation was limited to relapsed NHL. During the dose expansion phase, each treatment arm enrolled to population specific cohorts to continue to assess efficacy. Arm 1 (DR) received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 2, 28 day cycles plus duvelisib PO BID up to 12 cycles. Arm 2 (DBR)received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 2, 28 day cycles, bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 2 of the first six cycles plus duvelisib PO BID up to 12 cycles. Arm 3 (DB) received bendamustine 120 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 2 of the first six cycles plus duvelisib PO BID up to 12 cycles. Three different dose levels of duvelisib were explored, 25, 50, and 75 mg PO BID. DLTs were defined as: febrile neutropenia, G4 neutropenia ≥7 days, G4 thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days or G3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, Grade 4 AST/ALT, Grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia ≥7 days, ≥ Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity ≥7 days (excluding alopecia), Treatment delay of ≥7 days due to unresolved toxicity that prevents re-dosing, hepatocellular injury (defined as ALT>2 x ULN and (ALT/ULN)/(ALP/ULN) >5) and bilirubin >2 x ULN or jaundice ± alkaline phosphatase <2 x ULN. Patients were evaluated for response every 3 cycles according to specific criteria for their disease. Results: Between August 2013 and May 2014, 32 pts, median age 66 years (44-78) were enrolled to the study, 12 NHL pts on the dose escalation portion and 20 pts on dose expansion (13 CLL, 7 NHL). Patients had a median of 4 prior therapies (1-11). In arms 1 (DR) and 2 (DBR), no dose limiting toxicities were seen at the highest dose level of duvelisib (75 mg bid). In arm 3 (DB) in which a higher dose of bendamustine is used 1 pt developed a DLT at the 50 mg BID dose level of duvelisib (febrile neutropenia, neutropenia ≥ 7 days, thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days, and liver toxicities which resulted in a treatment delay of ≥ 7 days). Dose escalation continues in this arm as the MTD has not reached. Patients on the dose expansion portion of the study are receiving duvelisib at 25 mg BID due to emerging data of duvelisib monotherapy showing no advantage in doses greater than 25 mg BID in these histologies. The AE profile is consistent with the toxicities of the single agents. The most common AEs > grade 3 were neutropenia (28% overall; [Arm 1 (DR), 27%]; [Arm 2 (DBR), 38%]), and rash (16% overall; [Arm 1, 14%]; [Arm 2, 25%]). Grade 3 or higher AST/ALT increases were seen in 2 out of 12 patients on Arm 1, 2 out of 8 patients on Arm 2 and no patients on Arm 3. There have been 2 deaths (cardiac arrest and pneumonia), both on Arm 1. Twenty one pts were evaluable for response with an ORR of 81% (10% CR, 71% PR, 14% SD and 5% PD). With a median follow up of 4.0 months, time to event analyses are immature. However, Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS at 3 months is 87%. PK analysis is consistent with the monotherapy Phase I trial of duvelisib. Conclusions: Initial early analysis of duvelisib administered in combination with bendamustine and rituximab suggests these combinations to be generally well-tolerated with encouraging. Further follow-up is required to better characterize response rates and durability of remissions. Disclosures Flinn: Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Matous:Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Lenalidomide Maintenance after Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients with High-Risk Relapsed/Refractory Lymphomas Is Feasible and Compares Favorably to Historical Controls: Results of a Phase I/II Trial

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4639-4639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub Svoboda ◽  
Lauren E. Strelec ◽  
Daniel J. Landsburg ◽  
Sunita Dwivedy Nasta ◽  
Anthony R. Mato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Historical Controls

Abstract Background: Lymphoma patients with residual hypermetabolic lesions on FDG-PET imaging after salvage chemotherapy have poor outcomes following autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). We have previously shown progression free survival (PFS) of only 5 months (range: 1-19) in this population with only 7% of patients without progression at 12 months (Svoboda et al, BMT 2006). We hypothesized that these high-risk patients may benefit from continued therapy after ASCT. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent which has been used as maintenance in other hematologic malignancies, but its toxicity and efficacy have not been well described in lymphoma patients following ASCT. Methods: We are conducting a phase I/II prospective, open-label trial of lenalidomide maintenance after ASCT in lymphoma patients at high risk for relapse defined by residual FDG-PET positive lesions (SUV ≥ 2.5) immediately prior to ASCT. The primary objective of phase I was to determine the safety and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of lenalidomide maintenance. A 3+3 de-escalation design was used with a starting dose of lenalidomide at 10 mg on days 1 through 28 of each 28-day cycle. Lenalidomide was initiated 28-100 days post-ASCT and planned for up to 24 cycles. DLT was defined as non-hematologic toxicity ≥ grade 3 or hematologic toxicity ≥ grade 4 during the first 28 days of lenalidomide. The primary objectives of phase II were PFS and overall survival (OS). Survival outcomes were calculated from the date of ASCT. Enrollment began in 5/2012; we report data through 7/2016. Results: Fourteen patients were enrolled and 11 were evaluable (one patient withdrew consent and two progressed prior to initiation of lenalidomide). Eight (73%) evaluable patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): 4 with germinal center (GC) origin and 4 non-GC by Hans algorithm. Three (27%) patients had Hodgkin lymphoma. Median age was 44 years (29-61), ECOG PS 0 (0- 1), prior therapies 2 (2-5). Median follow-up was 24 months (range 8-44), and median time on lenalidomide was 13 cycles (1-24). No DLTs were observed in phase I, and the dose of 10 mg daily was determined to be appropriate for phase II. Six (55%) patients discontinued lenalidomide: 3 due to disease progression, 2 at investigator's discretion (1 subsequently progressed), and 1 due to grade 3 rash possibly related to lenalidomide. Of 3 patients who discontinued lenalidomide due to progression, 1 (non-GC DLBCL) died of disease progression, 1 (GC DLBCL) achieved complete remission (CR) with allotransplant, and 1 (non-GC DLBCL) remains on another active therapy. Overall, 8 (73%) patients remain in CR following ASCT, including 3 patients who discontinued lenalidomide. Of note, 1 patient developed adenocarcinoma of the colon 1 year after completion of lenalidomide, and 1 patient developed therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia at 10 months after discontinuing lenalidomide. At a median follow-up of 24 months, PFS of the complete cohort was 62.3% (95% CI: 0.28-0.84; Figure 1) and median PFS was not reached. OS was 75% (95% CI: 0.30-0.93; Figure 2) and median OS was not reached. When compared to the reported PFS of 7% at 12 months in the historical controls with identical high risk pre-transplant characteristics, the PFS of 62.3% (95% CI: 0.28-0.84) at 12 months was significantly improved (Z-test, p<0.05). Conclusion: We established feasibility of lenalidomide maintenance at 10 mg daily after ASCT in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphomas. Preliminary clinical outcomes observed in this phase I/II trial are very encouraging when compared to historical controls. To better understand the toxicity profile and validate the promising clinical benefit, the strategy of utilizing immunomodulatory agents as post-transplant maintenance should be studied in a larger cohort of high-risk lymphoma patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Svoboda: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Nasta:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Mato:Abbvie: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; ProNAi: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Theradex: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Hwang:Novartis: Research Funding. Schuster:Janssen Research & Development: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Hoffman-LaRoche: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer: Efficacy and quality of life at 4 years.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 88-88
Author(s):  
A. J. Katz ◽  
M. Santoro
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group ◽  
Biochemical Failure ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

88 Background: The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy for organ confined prostate cancer patients. Methods: Fifty T1cN0M0 prostate carcinoma patients (42 low- and 8 intermediate-risk) received 5 fractions of 7 Gy SBRT with Cyberknife to a total dose of 35 Gy delivered over 5 consecutive days. Mean patient age was 69.5 years and mean pre-treatment PSA was 5.7 ng/mL. All patients received 1500 mg of amifostine intrarectally prior to each SBRT fraction. Patients were treated to the 83%-87% contour line with 5-mm margins added to the gross tumor volume at all borders except for the rectum where a 3-mm margin was added. During treatment, 4 gold fiducial seeds were continuously tracked. Toxicity was assessed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity scale; biochemical failure was assessed by the Phoenix criteria, and quality of life was assessed with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Questionnaire (EPIC). Results: At a median follow-up of 48 months (range, 46-53 months) one biochemical failure has occurred. Three patients died of intercurrent disease. The median PSA at 48 months is 0.10 ng/mL (range, 0.01-3.5 ng/mL). At 42 months, 42 of 47 patients had achieved a PSA of 0.5 ng/mL or less. Toxicity has been minimal with no grade 3+ toxicities. Actuarial 48 month rates for grade 2 urinary and rectal toxicity-free survival were 95.5% and 97.8%, respectively. Mean EPIC bowel and urinary quality of life returned to baseline by 18 months and remain at baseline values at 36 months. Of the 36 patients that were potent prior to treatment 29 (80.5%) maintained potency. Conclusions: At 48 months median follow-up the promising biochemical control, minimal toxicity and the promising potency preservation rates are highly encouraging. [Table: see text]

Randomized phase I/II trial of pembrolizumab with and without radiotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9104-9104 ◽  
Author(s):  
James William Welsh ◽  
Hari Menon ◽  
Chad Tang ◽  
Vivek Verma ◽  
Mehmet Altan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Nsclc ◽  
Field Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

9104 Background: We present findings of a randomized phase I/II trial studying PD-1 blockade with and without radiotherapy to lung lesions in patients with metastatic NSCLC. Methods: Patients with metastatic NSCLC were randomized to receive pembrolizumab with or without lung-directed radiotherapy (RT). RT referred to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT, 50 Gy in 4 fractions or 70 Gy in 10 fractions) or traditional fractionation (45 Gy in 15 fractions). Pembrolizumab (200mg IV) was started on day 1 and given every 3 weeks for up to sixteen cycles. The primary endpoint was out-of-field response rate (RR), which refers to complete (CR) or partial response (PR) per irRC criteria. Results: Of 124 enrolled patients, 103 received treatment, 5 withdrew consent, 15 screen failures, and 1 was not financially cleared. Twenty-one patients completed 16 cycles of pembrolizumab; 16 patients received SBRT and 20 received traditional RT. Seven patients received salvage RT after progression on pembrolizumab alone and 15 patients received RT six months before starting the trial. In the combined-modality arm, there were 2 grade 4 toxicities and 9 grade 3 toxicities related to treatment. In the pembrolizumab arm, there were zero grade 4 toxicities and five grade 3 toxicities. At the present time, 72 patients were evaluable for response, 36 in both arms; median follow-up was 15.4 months (range: 1.4-125.2 months). RR for out-of-field lesions was 22% and 25% for the pembrolizumab + RT vs pembrolizumab respectively (p = 1.00); median PFS was 10.9 months (95% CI, 8.1-15.3 months) and 8.4 months (95% CI, 3.9-17.1 months) respectively (p = 0.83). When comparing the SBRT vs traditional fractionation sub-cohorts, non-irradiated RR was 38% and 10% respectively (p = 0.10); median PFS was 21.1 and 6.8 months respectively (p = 0.03). Within the pembrolizumab arm, comparing patients who received prior RT vs those that did not, RR was 33% and 19% respectively (p = 0.26). Conclusions: RT, while safe, did not increase the out-of-field response rate in NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab. Exploratory analysis suggests responses may be enhanced by SBRT, but not traditional fractionation, which warrants further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT02444741.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document