The right of peoples to self-determination in the Russian Federation (On the example of the Republic of Karelia)

Author(s):  
V. Kryazhkov
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32

The relevance of the work is determined by the fact that the right to life belongs to the basic constitutional human rights, therefore, its observance and protection is the duty of the state. Despite its undeniable importance, today the right to life anywhere in the world is not really ensured in sufficient quantities. The constitutional consolidation of the right to life raises a number of issues related to the concept, nature, legislative and practical implementation of this right. It should be noted that various aspects of the human right to life were considered in the scientific works of G.B. Romanovsky, O.G. Selikhova, T.M. Fomichenko, A.B. Borisova, V.A. Ershov and other Russian authors. The aim of the study is to study and comparative analysis of the legal content of the constitutional norm that defines the right to life, to comprehend and identify possible problems of the implementation of this right. To achieve this goal, this article discusses relevant issues of ensuring the right to life, proclaimed by Article 20 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and Article 27 of the Constitution of Azerbaijan Republic. The results of a comparative analysis of these constitutional norms and the relevant norms of industry law allow us to determine, that there is no contradiction between Article 20 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the norms of the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation, which imply the death penalty as an exceptional measure of punishment, because a moratorium has been imposed on the death penalty in the Russian Federation since April 16, 1997. However, after the abolition of the death penalty in the criminal legislation of the Republic of Azerbaijan in 1998, there was a discrepancy between parts II and III of Article 27 of the Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the criminal legislation of Azerbaijan Republic that requires the introduction of the necessary changes in the content of the analyzed constitutional norm. The value of the work is determined by the fact that the introduction of appropriate changes will contribute to the further improvement of the Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the effective implementation of the right to life of everyone.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Алмагуль Дюсюпова ◽  
Almagul Dyusyupova

Socio-economic nature and legal content of private ownership of agricultural land in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan have accumulated new features that have not yet received sufficient theoretical understanding, scientific analysis and cross-light. This scientific article deals with the right of private ownership of agricultural land under the laws of Russia and Kazakhstan. The article describes the formation and development of the institution of private ownership of land in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan from the philosophical, historical, legal and economic perspectives. The author determines the legal essence, the characteristics and features of private ownership of agricultural land under the new economic conditions in the competitive environment. The author makes an attempt to understand the formation and development of this institution at the present stage of the development of our society.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr.Sc. Elvina Jusufaj

Crimea’s secession from Ukraine and its annexation to the Russian Federation invoked Kosovo precedent, in its declaration of independence, as an argument for secession. The territorial referendum in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, only five days after the declaration of independence, was an attempt to justify the secession based on the right to selfdetermination of the people of Crimea. It is overwhelmingly considered illegal and its outcome has not been accepted and recognized by states, regional and international organizations. The comparative elements of statehood and secession between Kosovo and Crimea are reflected through analyzing the declarations of independence, international recognition and Russia’s role as a third-state factor in external selfdetermination. Essential distinctions are highlighted. Kosovo is widely acknowledged and accepted a sui generis case. Its declaration of independence came as result of a long monitored comprehensive process; not to legitimize the right for self-determination but as the final option for stability and peace in the region. Crimea seceded in violation of international law through the use of force. While Kosovo is a democratic, multi-ethnic new state and recognized by 107 states, the secession of Crimea and its annexation to the Russian Federation is considered illegal and endangers the existing international order.


REGIONOLOGY ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 290-309
Author(s):  
Anastasia I. Beliaikina

Introduction. Education is of priority interest for the state. The future of Russia, its economic development, and the level of welfare in the society largely depend on its quality. Therefore, identification and study of the peculiarities of the legal regulation of the right to education in the regions of Russia is a relevant topic. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the legislation of the Republic of Mordovia on education, to identify whether consideration is given to socio-economic, national, geographical, ethnocultural, demographic and other features of the region when laws are made. Materials and Methods. The rules of the current legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Mordovia on education were used as the materials for the study. Open data from municipal budgetary educational institutions of the Republic of Mordovia formed the information base of the research. The study employed the method of systemic and structural analysis, that of comparison, as well as the formal logical method. Results. The study has revealed the peculiarities of the region taken into account in the Republic of Mordovia in the process of rule-making in the field of education: the ethnic, economic, geographical, and socio-economic ones. It has been established that in the Republic of Mordovia additional guarantees are provided for the realization of the constitutional right to education: material support is provided to orphans and children left without parental care whose tuition is paid for from the federal or republican budget. Discussion and Conclusion. The research results made it possible to draw the conclusion that consideration of the peculiarities of Mordovia in regional legislation on education is at the appropriate level. Further research may be associated with identifying the regional features and introducing them into the legislation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The data obtained will be useful to regional authorities and administrations of municipal districts when drafting regu­lations and drawing up programs for the development of education in the region.


Author(s):  
Yu. S. Cheremisina ◽  

The article is devoted to a comparative legal study of the consolidation, content and mechanism of the implementation of the right to the administration of justice in the Russian Federation, the Republic of Kazakhstan, and the Republic of Belarus. The article reveals the normative legal foundations of the right to administer justice in the Russian Federation, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Republic of Belarus, securing the place of the right to administer justice in the system of rights, the significance of this right for citizens, the way of securing the right in law. The author analyzes the powers of the right to administer justice from the position of researchers of the theory of subjective law. Attention is paid to the requirements for persons who have expressed a desire to exercise the right to administer justice as a jury, arbitration, and people’s assessors, judges in the legislation of the Russian Federation, the Republic of Kazakhstan, and the Republic of Belarus. The author analyzes the validity of professional and reputation requirements enshrined in legislation. The result of the research in the article was the identification of similarities and differences in the mechanisms for the implementation of the right to the administration of justice in the above legal systems.


Author(s):  
Bakhodurdzhon Ismatulloevich Ismatulloev

This article explores the peculiarities of constitutional-legal regulation of the right to freedom of movement and choice of the place of residence, which is the foundation of migration relations in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Tajikistan. Special attention is given to examination of the provisions of constitutional legislation of Russia and Tajikistan regarding regulation of migration, and modern scientific approaches towards understating the possibilities of exercising the right to freedom of movement and choice of the place of residence reflected in the constitutional law of both countries. The main conclusion of the conducted research consists in the statement that the right to freedom of movement and choice of the place of residence is the basic right in the constitutional legal status of modern migrants, which is specified in constitutional legislation of Russia and Tajikistan. Analysis of the legislation of these countries underlines that a common trend became an amendment to the freedom of movement with responsibility of immigrants to migration registration. This requirement of the legislator is aimed at prevention of illegal migration, which is a negative consequence of exercising the right to freedom of movement and choice of the place of residence.


2018 ◽  
pp. 41-43
Author(s):  
E.V. Ezhova

The article deals with the basic guarantees of protection of attorney-client confidentiality in criminal proceedings. A comparative analysis of the legislative norms of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus regulating the legal regime of attorney-client confidentiality is carried out. The article presents the legal positions of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the issue under consideration, which contributed to the amendments to the criminal procedure law of Russia aimed at providing additional guarantees for the protection of attorney-client confidentiality. The author concludes that the practice of application of the rules containing guarantees of protection of attorney-client confidentiality testifies, on the one hand, to the need to strengthen the protection of citizens' rights to ensure the confidentiality of information provided to the lawyer, and, on the other hand, to the importance of preventing abuse of the right to protection by lawyers and their clients


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (10(79)) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
G. Bubyreva

The existing legislation determines the education as "an integral and focused process of teaching and upbringing, which represents a socially important value and shall be implemented so as to meet the interests of the individual, the family, the society and the state". However, even in this part, the meaning of the notion ‘socially significant benefit is not specified and allows for a wide range of interpretation [2]. Yet the more inconcrete is the answer to the question – "who and how should determine the interests of the individual, the family and even the state?" The national doctrine of education in the Russian Federation, which determined the goals of teaching and upbringing, the ways to attain them by means of the state policy regulating the field of education, the target achievements of the development of the educational system for the period up to 2025, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of October 4, 2000 #751, was abrogated by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 29, 2014 #245 [7]. The new doctrine has not been developed so far. The RAE Academician A.B. Khutorsky believes that the absence of the national doctrine of education presents a threat to national security and a violation of the right of citizens to quality education. Accordingly, the teacher has to solve the problem of achieving the harmony of interests of the individual, the family, the society and the government on their own, which, however, judging by the officially published results, is the task that exceeds the abilities of the participants of the educational process.  The particular concern about the results of the patriotic upbringing served as a basis for the legislative initiative of the RF President V. V. Putin, who introduced the project of an amendment to the Law of RF "About Education of the Russian Federation" to the State Duma in 2020, regarding the quality of patriotic upbringing [3]. Patriotism, considered by the President of RF V. V. Putin as the only possible idea to unite the nation is "THE FEELING OF LOVE OF THE MOTHERLAND" and the readiness for every sacrifice and heroic deed for the sake of the interests of your Motherland. However, the practicing educators experience shortfalls in efficient methodologies of patriotic upbringing, which should let them bring up citizens, loving their Motherland more than themselves. The article is dedicated to solution to this problem based on the Value-sense paradigm of upbringing educational dynasty of the Kurbatovs [15].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document