scholarly journals FOREIGN EXPERIENCE IN IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY OF THE SYSTEM OF STATE REGULATION OF INNOVATION ACTIVITIES

THE BULLETIN ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (388) ◽  
pp. 138-144
Author(s):  
Zhurynov G.M., ◽  
◽  
Isataeva G.B., ◽  
Satybekova E.G., ◽  
Orazova B.B., ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Specific Activity ◽  
Innovation Policy ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Regional Innovation ◽  
Scientific Potential ◽  
Innovation Clusters

Therefore, the transition to an innovative economy requires the development of a network of regional innovation systems. At the same time, the regional innovation policy should be aimed at the formation of regional innovation clusters as the basis of the innovation system of the region, where the best conditions for the innovation process are located. Of particular interest are regions with high scientific potential (as a rule, they include scientific fences and a number of academic towns and other territories with high scientific potential), as they have a significant stock of developments ready for commercialization. It is on the basis of such territories that it is necessary to develop regional innovation clusters. Despite the fact that the problem has been studied and the high level of attention, many of its aspects remain unresolved. Many authors have pointed out the limited possibilities of using classical methods of evaluating investment projects for innovation, and thus the proposed alternatives have not been widely used. The practical and actual significance of the problems of management and evaluation of innovative projects and the use of the most effective methods for this purpose, determined the choice of the dissertation topic, its content, goals and problems. The practical significance of Makala is in the development of management algorithms and evaluation methods for innovative projects. The algorithm includes intra-stage project evaluation and methodological justification of the manager's decision-making in the implementation of the project at each stage and ensuring the need to adjust the strategy. In addition, the analysis of the main barriers to practical implementation was carried out and recommenda-tions were developed to eliminate them. The developed method includes all the prerequisites for successful application in the specific activity of the region.

scholarly journals FEATURES AND WAYS OF DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 762-768
Author(s):  
O.D. Golovina ◽  
O.A. Vorobyeva
Keyword(s):  
Innovation Policy ◽  
Innovation Management ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
Regional Innovation System ◽  
Regional Innovation ◽  
Regional Systems ◽  
Udmurt Republic ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Object Of Study

The article is devoted to the consideration of the functioning of the regional innovation system, which plays an important role in changing the paradigm of economic development from the natural resource to innovative technological. The object of study is the Republic of Udmurtia, which refers to industrial-oriented regions of the Russian Federation. The authors identified the features of the region affecting the development of the innovation sphere, emphasized the importance of regulatory and legal support of innovative processes, and disclosed the content of state regulation of the relationship between the subjects of innovation. In addition, the criteria for assessing the regulatory framework of the Innovation Policy of the region are presented. The results of the expert survey among leading specialists and scientists of Udmurtia on the state of innovative development of the economic and legal system of the region made it possible to draw conclusions about the general state of innovation in the region. Experts highlighted current factors, positively and negatively affecting the development of the innovation sphere in the Udmurt Republic. This made it possible to offer a list of elements of the innovation support system at the regional level. The issues that determine the features and level of development of regional systems in the field of innovation are formulated, the solution of which will have a positive effect on the overall level of innovative regional development and will make it possible to form a viable innovation management system.

scholarly journals Changes in Responsibilities and Tasks of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoltán Birkner ◽  
Tivadar Máhr ◽  
Nora Rodek Berkes
Keyword(s):  
Local Governments ◽  
Geographical Area ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Regional Innovation ◽  
Innovation Ecosystems ◽  
Governmental Organizations ◽  
Non Governmental Organizations ◽  
Innovation Ability

Abstract Innovation process research is changing. In addition to the former territorial approach (examining countries or regions), the description of innovation cooperation in local areas is becoming more and more accepted. Instead of the innovation ability of the traditional large enterprises, research has begun to study the role of small and medium-sized enterprises, non-governmental organizations, local governments, and educational institutions (especially universities), which foreshadows the development of a new innovation system. In 2015, we conducted a study focusing on the civil and corporate relations of a major university. We tried to determine the new directions based on the economic and social cooperation as well as to search for the practical implementation of the theoretical helixes in these interactions. We came to the conclusion that universities not only are determinative according to the triple helix model but also have a prominent role in the creation of new innovation ecosystems, particularly in a well-defined geographical area.

scholarly journals Modern trends in innovative development ofoil and gas producing region

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 57-62
Author(s):  
Tatyana N Bessonova
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
Organizational Form ◽  
Regional Innovation System ◽  
Innovative Development ◽  
Regional Innovation ◽  
Industrial Sectors ◽  
Modern Development

Abstract: When forming the regional innovation system, everyone should take into account specific conditions and the possibility to develop regional economic complexes. Modern development of oil and gas producing region implies an increase in cooperation between all participants of the innovation process. The most promising organizational form of such an association in Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Yugra is Yugra Technopolis. It aims to strengthen the interaction of research and industrial sectors, to improve the commercialization of scientific research results

scholarly journals Regional Innovation Systems in Poland: How to classify them?

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 987-1003
Author(s):  
Dorota Ciołek ◽  
Anna Golejewska ◽  
Adriana Zabłocka-Abi Yaghi
Keyword(s):  
Innovation Policy ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Innovation Systems ◽  
Regional Innovation Systems ◽  
Regional Innovation ◽  
Metropolitan Regions ◽  
Industrial Enterprises ◽  
Innovation Potential ◽  
And Performance

The literature emphasises the role of regional and local innovation environment. Regional Innovation Systems show differences in innovation outputs determined by different inputs. Understanding these relationships can have important implications for regional and innovation policy. The research aims to classify Regional Innovation Systems in Poland according to their innovation capacity and performance. The analysis covers 72 subregions (classified as NUTS 3 in the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) in 2004–2016. Classes of Regional Innovation Systems in Poland were identified based on a combination of linear and functional approaches and data from published and unpublished sources. It was assumed that innovation systems in Poland differ due to their location in metropolitan and non-metropolitan regions, thus, the Eurostat NUTS 3 metro/non-metro typology was applied for this purpose. Panel data regressions as models with individual random effects were estimated separately for metropolitan and non-metropolitan groups of subregions. The study identified common determinants of innovation outputs in both NUTS 3 types: share of innovative industrial enterprises, industry share, unemployment rate, and employment in research and development. Next, NUTS 3 were classified within each of two analysed types in line with output- and input-indices, the latter being calculated as non-weighted average of significant inputs. Last, the subregions were clustered based on individual inputs to enable a more detailed assessment of their innovation potential. The cluster analysis using k-means method with maximum cluster distance was applied. The results showed that the composition of the classes identified within metropolitan and non-metropolitan systems in 2004– 2016 remains unstable, similarly to the composition of clusters identified by inputs. The latter confirms the changes in components of the capacity within both Regional Innovation System types. The observed situation allows us to assume that Regional Innovation Systems in Poland are evolving. In further research, the efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems should be assessed, taking into account the differences between metropolitan and non-metropolitan regions as well as other environmental factors that may determine the efficiency of innovative processes.

Regional Innovation Systems: Finland’s Experience

2012 ◽  
pp. 51-63
Author(s):  
V. Pchelintsev
Keyword(s):  
Systems Approach ◽  
Innovation Policy ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Policy Instruments ◽  
Innovation Systems ◽  
Regional Innovation Systems ◽  
Regional Innovation ◽  
Non Local ◽  
Innovation Policies

The paper examines governmental strategies, main actors and instruments of innovation policies shaping innovation-driven economy in Finland, with particular attention to the regional scale. The analysis focuses on how the regional innovation systems approach became a framework for the design of innovation policies. An innovation system involves cooperation between firms and knowledge creating and diffusing organizations, – such as universities, colleges, training organizations, R&D-institutes, technology transfer agencies. Innovations are considered as interactive learning process. Cooperation and interaction between regional/local and national/international actors is necessary to combine both local and non-local knowledge, skills and competences. The key elements of the policy environment, as well as implementation of the main regional innovation policy instruments – the Centers of Expertise Programme and Regional Centre Programme – are described.

Problems of formation of the regional innovative system of the Donetsk region

2020 ◽  
pp. 46-54
Author(s):  
Serhii Glibko
Keyword(s):  
Innovation Policy ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Regional Innovation System ◽  
Regional Innovation ◽  
State Of The Economy ◽  
Innovative Potential ◽  
Object Of Study ◽  
Economic Formation ◽  
Effective Development

Problem statement. The current state of the economy and the factors that contribute to development, require the search for possible options for building or restoring economic ties at the regional levels, will be the impetus for the economic formation of OTG. But these issues require mandatory reflection in the program documents of the regions and regulations of the state. The purpose of the study. The work is aimed at identifying elements of innovative infrastructure and system, the potential of which can be used to restore the innovative economy of the region and establish areas of economic and legal regulation of the task. Object of study. The scientific study of the structure of the regional innovation system of the Donetsk region was carried out taking into account the principles of transparency, accessibility, completeness, and objectivity of information about the participants of the regional innovation system. Presentation of the main material. The specifics of the regional economy in the Donetsk region require special attention and the use of unconventional methods of detecting them. The study uses some systems analysis approaches related to parts of the system and its purpose. The Law of Ukraine “On Innovative Activity” of 04.07.2002 No. 40-IV does not contain the concept of innovative potential, but defines that one of the basic principles of state innovation policy is the creation of conditions for the preservation, development and use of domestic scientific, technical and innovative potential. Moreover, the very formation of the competitive potential of the Donetsk region is one of the most intense powers, the realisation of this visit is due to the establishment and the disarming of competitive passes, in addition to the basis of the innovative innovation and the unbaked investment of the region of privbliy. It was established that behind the results of the analising of the participants of the regional and innovative systems of the Donetsk region, a table was stored. To report on the illegality of the strategic planning in regulatory legal acts the development of innovative structures, the infrastructure and the reform of the enterprise, which is the competence of the business bodies of ownership in this area. compass the provisions of the development of the innovative and innovative systems in the Donetsk region. Conclusions. Analyzing the above, we can draw the following conclusions: firstly, territorially, the participants are located in the regional centre of Kramatorsk as a whole, as well as in such large industrial cities as Bakhmut, Mariupol, Pokrovsk. The importance of creating and promoting the development of innovative infrastructure by local authorities will contribute to the effective development and productivity of the formation of a regional innovation system in the Donetsk region.

Performing ambiguous policy: How innovation events simultaneously perform change and collaborative order

2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 1403-1419
Author(s):  
Erika Andersson Cederholm ◽  
Patrik Hall
Keyword(s):  
Innovation Policy ◽  
Social Process ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Innovation Systems ◽  
Political Order ◽  
Regional Innovation ◽  
Stability And Change ◽  
The Public ◽  
Social Forms ◽  
Meeting Models

The aim of this article is to analyse how innovation policy is staged and legitimised through the dramatised social process of an event. The context is taken from an annual event, Skåne Innovation Week, which is arranged by the regional innovation system in Skåne, Sweden. Innovation systems often organise similar events internationally, which appear to play a key role in performing inter-organisational collaboration between actors from the public sector, industry and research, as well as manifesting belief in the globalised imaginaries of innovation systems. Through the analytical lens of the event as a social drama, the article examines how the event – and thus, innovation policy – is represented in commemorative films and website documents through which three meeting practices are identified: mingling and hanging out, scripted meeting models and spatial staging. The article argues that these meeting practices and their performed interactive social forms sustain the vagueness and ambiguity inherent in innovation policy, particularly between stability and change. The event can be viewed as a form of performative government that maintains a political order while simultaneously hailing its practices as transformative.

Questioning the implementation of smart specialisation: Regional innovation policy and semi-autonomous regions

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 530-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhiannon Pugh
Keyword(s):  
Innovation Policy ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Regional Innovation ◽  
Diverse Range ◽  
Border Regions ◽  
Regional Innovation Policy ◽  
Smart Specialisation ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
The Uk

This paper considers the recent developments in regional innovation policy pertaining to the smart specialisation agenda from the perspective of a peripheral and semi-autonomous region – Wales in the UK. Through a case study of innovation policy developments in Wales over the past 20 years, and also a consideration of extant literature pertaining to regional innovation policy and smart specialisation, this paper finds a number of issues or shortcomings in the current predominant smart specialisation approach. These are traced back to the strong regional innovation system logic existing in European policy; a number of unresolved theoretical problems that could undermine the efficacy of innovation policy are identified. Both conceptual and rhetorical issues with the concept of the region are highlighted, and questions are asked about the applicability and tenability of smart specialisation approaches in semi-autonomous, cross-border regions, and for policymakers operating in circumstances of multi-level governance. This paper illustrates how such regions provide us with a lens or alternative perspective through which to reconsider our predominant theoretical and practical policy approaches, and highlights a number of potential problems with smart specialisation as it is applied in a diverse range of regional settings.

Application of IC-models in a combined public-private sector setting for regional innovation in Slovakia

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 588-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roswitha Wiedenhofer ◽  
Christian Friedl ◽  
Lubomir Billy ◽  
Daniela Olejarova
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Transfer ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Training System ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Regional Innovation ◽  
Methodological Innovation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
E Learning

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to support the competitiveness and knowledge-based economic growth of the Slovak region of Košice and its stakeholders; suitable intellectual capital (IC) methodologies were selected and applied. This approach responds to a weak innovation performance of Slovakia in general and a weak connection of the Slovak labour market and vocational training system. Design/methodology/approach The methodological “backbone” is given by IC reporting (ICR). The two ICR models – the Austrian University model and the German “Alwert” model – were selected and transferred to higher educational institutions (HEI) and companies in Košice. The knowledge transfer was accomplished by implementation of on-site trainings with different groups of stakeholders, supported by e-learning. Several accompanying in-depth interviews with Austrian stakeholders were conducted to derive recommendations for ICR implementation in the Slovak public sector. Findings Beyond knowledge transfer, a shared understanding of the importance of IC management and common “IC language” between different stakeholders of the regional innovation system could be developed. Further, several recommendations for a sound development of an IC governance tool for HEI were elaborated. Practical implications The knowledge transfer and practical implementation of this Slovak case were successful. Requests for follow-up initiatives, invitations for conferences, development of projects including ICR elements prove this valuation. Originality/value A methodological innovation was accomplished by adapting a set of innovation key drivers as structural base for the development of the regional innovation function and interaction of stakeholders.

MODERN STATE AND PRIORITIES FOR FORMING THE NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM OF GEORGIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-28
Author(s):  
Ramaz Absadze ◽  
Vakhtang Burduli
Keyword(s):  
Innovation Policy ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Innovation Development ◽  
Innovation Infrastructure ◽  
Current State ◽  
Research Sector ◽  
Training Unit ◽  
Unit Unit ◽  
Innovation Clusters

In the article the current state of the Georgian NIS is shown with the identification and characterization of its still few components, then the priorities for its formation are outlined and justified in the context of the following constituent blocks: the blocks for ensuring the state innovation policy, innovation, the scientific-research sector, technology transfer organizations and other elements of innovation infrastructure, the system of cooperation with international innovation environment, innovation financing unit, training unit, unit to support projects implemented by donors, the block to support innovation development of agriculture. Some directions of the formation of innovation clusters in Georgia were briefly discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document